Conference Session

Automation Subjects in Manufacturing Education II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lie Tang, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Robert Landers, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

≡ = = = 0.1659 (1) Tl ωm ω$ mwhere Ti is the torque drained from the motor by the leadscrew (N·m), Tl is the torque supplied tothe leadscrew by the motor (N·m), l is the leadscrew angular velocity (rad/s), and m is themotor angular velocity (rad/s). The leadscrew pitch is Ta v v$ m p≡ = = = 2.022 ×10−4 (2) f a ωl ω$ l radwhere Ta is the torque drained from the leadscrew by the linear axis (N·m), fa is the forcesupplied to linear axis by the leadscrew (N

Conference Session

Incorporating Advanced Technologies into Curriculums

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wayne Hung, Texas A&M University; Jorge Leon, Texas A&M University; Luis San Andres, Texas A&M Univeristy

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Foundation was followed with additionalfunding and equipment donation from industry and other organizations.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supplied by the National Science Foundation under grant No.0552885. Additional funding and support were generously contributed by Conacyt,Turbomachinery Research Consortium, Honeywell Turbo Technologies, NASA GRC, TRC,Capstone Turbine Corp, Haas, Unist, MA Ford, Cideteq, Comimsa, and Agilent Technologies.References[1] Chittipolu, S., Micromachining of 316L Stainless Steel, Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2008.[2] Hung N.P., Chittipolu S., Kajaria S., Makarenko M., Purdy A., Bickston L., and Williamson D., “Micromachining of 316L Stainless Steel,” Micro/Nano Manufacturing Conference, SME

Conference Session

Educational Methods and Technologies

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janus Liang, Yung-Ta Institute of Technology and Commerce

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

)instructors and instructional designers should carefully design which course components shouldbe delivered online and in class. Combining classroom and online activities is only a small stepin blended web-based learning. Thus, it is important for instructional designers and instructors tocarefully design web-based learning course to provide learners with meaningful opportunities forcollaboration and social interaction.AcknowledgementsThis research is supported in part by the National Science Council in Taiwan under contractnumber NSC 97-2511-S-132-001-MY2.References[1] L. Bielawski and D. Metcalf, Blended elearning: integrating knowledge, performance, support and online learning (2nd ed.), United States: HRD press, 2005.[2] Market Researcher

Conference Session

Incorporating Advanced Technologies into Curriculums

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Wells, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

has been steadily and rapidly changing for many years. From about the mid-1980’s, concepts of cost control, quality and overall efficiency have become an increasingly sharp focus. In recent years, many companies have tunneled in on lean manufacturing as their savior. It is certainly true that the precepts and procedures of lean, ToC, TQM and other regimens are essential for modern manufacturing competitiveness, and instruction in these matters has become a fundamental component in manufacturing education. With far less visible excitement, however, another ‘revolution’ has entered the scene. The fastest growing sectors of product type are those that require new processing technologies. In 21st century

Conference Session

Past and Future of Manufacturing Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Wells, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

forthe following discussion on the three great challenges of the past thirty years and the responsesobserved thereto.1983: The issue of a distinctive curricular identity for manufacturing engineering was firstopenly and cohesively articulated in the early 1980’s. The founding of the ManufacturingConstituent Committee at the ASEE conference at Southern California in 1981 was one of thecritical milestones. Another occurred at the ASEE conference in Salt Lake City in 1983, whenover coffee during a break in the sessions, the notion of a workshop to explore curricular identitywas first broached. The question formulated at that time was as direct as it was simple: “If youwant to teach someone to be a manufacturing engineer, what do you teach?” The

Conference Session

Program Development and Pipelines for Recruitment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaby Mohammed, The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi; Ramesh Narang, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Jihad Albayyari, Indiana-Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Technology) program atIndiana Purdue Fort Wayne (IPFW) has been in progress for many years. Manufacturing courseshave been offered as part of the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) and IndustrialEngineering Technology (IET) degrees at IPFW since the 1970’s. During the period of late1970’s to the early 1990’s the department of Manufacturing Technology offered a Manufacturingoption as part of the MET program. Because of declining enrollments in the MET programduring the early 1990’s the Manufacturing option was discontinued. However as a part of theMET curriculum many of the manufacturing option courses have been continuously offeredsince that time. With the increased demand for manufacturing specific courses as requested bycurrent students, the

Conference Session

Lean and Six Sigma Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Gadalla, Central Connecticut State University; Mahdy Alam, UTC; Yepery Soro, Central Connecticut State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

workpiece) is put on wheel and travelthrough the factory. AGV‟s assembly is a good example of this category. The unguided caserepresents the case where the machine level case grows.Factory LevelFactory level is where the entire company or part of the company is put on wheels. Factory-in-Box program is a good example of this type of mobility. Various cases and scenarios have beendemonstrated through this project as an example: a cleaning and scrap grinding foundry mobileunit was designed and purchased to be used among several small businesses to offset the highinvestment of the unit.Internal Mobility versus External MobilityMobility can also be defined as internal and external. Internal mobility is where the machine toolis capable of using multiple

Conference Session

Program Development and Pipelines for Recruitment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anoop Desai, Georgia Southern University; Jean-Claude Thomassian, State University of New York, Maritime College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

needs, but is dynamic enough tokeep changing and evolving with the times. This principle has been amply demonstrated in thispaper.References1. Akao, Y(ed), Quality Function Deployment, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press, 1990 Page 15.333.82. Shingo, S, Zero Quality Control: Source Control and the Pokayoke system, Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press,19863. Mizuno, S, Company wide Quality Control, Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 19884. Harry, M.J., and Schroeder, R, Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’sTop Corporations, Doubleday Business, 2006.5. Pyzdek, T, Six Sigma handbook: A

Conference Session

Design Education I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

scheduling of the laboratory facilities andallowing students to customize their products.References 1. D. C. Davis, K. L. Gentili, M. S. Trevisa, and D. E. Calkins: Engineering design assessment, processes and scoring scales for program improvement and accountability, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 91 (No. 2), pp. 211-221, 2002. 2. E. Koehn: Preparing students for engineering design and practice, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88 (No. 2), pp. 163-167, 1999. 3. S. Howe and J. Wilbarger: 2005 National survey of engineering capstone design courses, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2006. 4. Sheppard S. D. (1999): Design as Cornerstone and Capstone, Mechanical Engineering Design

Conference Session

Past and Future of Manufacturing Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

C. Norman, Applied Research Associates, Inc

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

remarkablein any country seeking to industrialize. But in China, it carried special force”. However, when we think of innovation, are we overlooking something, is it justinnovation in the narrow context of new inventions? If we accept the broader definitionof innovation, “…act or process of inventing or introducing something new”, we reallymay be on to something. In other words we don’t have to invent a new widget to beinnovative, we might simply improve (optimize) the widget’s design, performance,durability, and manufacturing process. Many manufacturing processes have changed verylittle since the mid 1900’s. While there have been significant advances in manufacturing,most of the focus has been on process automation, Information Technology (IT

Conference Session

Manufacturing Processes Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joel Dillon, United States Military Academy; Harold Henderson, United States Miliary Academy; Jeffrey Butler, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

:  Final ‘testing’ of bottle openers was  conducted on bottles of sodaBibliography1. Lamancusa, John S., Jorgensen, Jens E, and Zayas-Castro, Jose L.: "The Learning Factory - A New Approachto Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum." Journal of Engineering Education,Vol. 86, No. 2, pg. 103, April 1997.2. Malicky, D., Kohl, J., Huang, M., “Integrating a Machine Shop Class Into the Mechanical EngineeringCurriculum: Experiential and Inductive Learning,” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, Jun 24-27.3. National Association of Manufacturers: 2005 Skills Gap Report- A Survey of the American ManufacturingWorkforce: http://www.nam.org/~/media/Files

Conference Session

Automation Subjects in Manufacturing Education I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

of the Kolb’s cycleimplementation will result in positive changes in students’, and later engineers’, approaches tolearning.Bibliography1. Kolb, D. A., “Management and Learning Processes,” California Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1976, pp. 21-31.2. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.3. McCarthy, B., The 4MAT System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/Left Mode Techniques, EXCEL, Inc., 1987.4. Harb, J. N., Durrant, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering in Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April 1993, pp. 70-77.5. Harb, J. N., Terry, R. E., Hurt, P. K

Conference Session

Automation Subjects in Manufacturing Education II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Eric Carr, Drexel University; Robin Kizirian, Drexel University; Yueh-Ting Yang, Drexel University; Brittany Killen, Drexel University; Yongjin Kwon, Ajou University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Publishing Company, Singapore, 2003.6. Laliberté T., Gosselin C. and Côté G., 2000, "Rapid Prototyping of Lower-Pair, Geared-Pair and CamMechanisms," Proceedings of the ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Baltimore MD,September 10-13, 2000, Paper DETC2000/MECH-14202.7. Won J., DeLaurentis K. and Mavroidis C., “Rapid Prototyping of Robotic Systems,” Proceedings of the2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,8. "Bailey, S. A., Cham J., G., Cutkosky, M. R., Full, R. J., "Biomimetic Robotic Mechanisms via ShapeDeposition Manufacturing," Robotics Research: the Ninth International Symposium, John Hollerbach andDan Koditschek (Eds), Springer-Verlag, London, 2000

Conference Session

Automation Subjects in Manufacturing Education I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jose Gutierrez, Oregon Institute of Technology; John Anderson, Oregon Institute of Technology; David Culler, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

attain several areas in engineering, for this reason is importantfor all the future professionals be familiarize with this kind of technology. Page 15.401.8References[1] M. Chang. J. He, Enrique Castro-Leon, Service-Orientation in the Computing Infrastructure,2nd IEEE International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering, Shanghai, Oct2006, pp 27-33[2] Chen, Y. & Bai, X. (2008), On robotics applications in Service-Oriented Architecture, The28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops proceedings;Beijing, China, 551-556[3] S. Kant Vajpayee (1995), Principles of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Prentice Hall

Conference Session

Incorporating Advanced Technologies into Curriculums

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University; John Mativo, The University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Reverse Engineering – The Stimulu”, 2002 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.7. Robertson, J., Wales, B., Weihmeir, J.,“Reverse Engineering as a Means to Understand Complex Tool Design”, 2004 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT.8. Forsman, D., “Reverse Engineering and Rapid Prototyping: A Senior Level Technical Elective for Mechanical Engineering Students and Much More”, 2004 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT.9. Orta, P., Medoza, R. R., Elizalde, H., Guerra, D., “Engineering Education Through Reverse Engineering”, 2006 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL .10. Shooter, S., “Reverse Engineering to Design Forward: An Introduction to Engineering Experiential Learning

Conference Session

Design Education I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jahangir Ansari, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

functional mini-desktopCNC machine. The assessment of the Capstone design experiment indicated that the six programoutcomes achieved levels of 80 to 93%.References: 1. “ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs”, Effective for Evaluations During the 2007-2008 Accreditation Cycle. WWW.ABET.org 2. J. Ansari, A. Javaheri, S. Tompkins, K. Williamson, “OUTCOME ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN A MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING PROGRAM”, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 3. J. Ansari, A. Javaheri, N. Ghariban, “CIM LAB TO SUPPORT MANUFACTURING DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION”, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition

Conference Session

Automation Subjects in Manufacturing Education I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University; Albert Sun, St. Mary's University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. Page 15.291.10AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by a National Science Foundation grant no. 0935211. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Rampersad, H.K., Integrated and simultaneous design for robotic assembly, Chichester, England: Wiley, 1994.2. Hsieh, S. (2005). "Automated Manufacturing System Integration Education: Current Status and Future Directions," Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. Page 15.291.11

Conference Session

Industrial Interactions and Educational Resources

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Nutter, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

project is designated and arrangements made for a plantvisit. Typically, a 1-2 hour meeting with the company includes an explanation of their business, ageneral description of the operation(s) to be simulated, and a tour of the plant and specificoperation(s). Data is provided then and upon request, including pictures and videos if available.The team observes the plant operations, discuss the issues and company expectations, gatherrelevant data and information, and begin creation of the simulation. Additional plant visits andcompany communications are the responsibility of the students. A Gantt chart from MicrosoftProject is submitted weekly, and the professor monitors project progress. During the tenth weekof the quarter, the team presents the

Conference Session

Past and Future of Manufacturing Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, 2008, Farmindale State Colle - SUNY, Farm-ingdale, NY, http://www.merconline.net/wiki/index.php?title=Farmingdale_Forum_Program.3. Jack, H., (editor) Manufacturing Education Transformation Summit Proceedings, Austin, TX,June 2009, http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/ocs/index.php/smetexas2009/METS2009/sched-Conf/presentations.4. Jack, H., “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Education”, An SME Technical Paper,November 20055. Danielson, S, Georgeou, T, “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Technology Education”

Conference Session

Educational Methods and Technologies

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; William Marshall, Alief Independent School District

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Page 15.695.1112, 2000.5. Felder, R., Active Learning with Dr. Richard Felder, downloaded on March 17, 2010 fromwww.youtube.com/watch?v=1J1URbdisYE.6. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeedin the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9,No 7, 1997 – 1998.7. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.8. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.9. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American

Conference Session

Program Development and Pipelines for Recruitment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandy Feola, Sinclair Community College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

knowwhat school has a manufacturing program, they don’t know where to start – schoolprograms can have different names, but offer the same variety of courses.Schools that are added into the careerME.org database can have multiple linksspecifically entered to take the student directly to their educational programs. When thestudent enters a school name or search term(s), the results list will present the link thatgoes directly to the school’s education programs – no need to navigate within a school’swebsite hierarchy to figure out how to get there. When school programs are added to thedatabase, professors are encouraged to contribute to the data, having the ability torecommend content beyond what they are able to add to their own school’s

Conference Session

Lean and Six Sigma Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Leduc, Ball State University; Gary Hadley, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Mark Ratzlaff, 3M

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

have most or all of the following characteristics:4 ≠ Carry academic credit ≠ Engage participants in an active learning process that is student-driven, but guided by a Page 15.665.4 faculty mentor ≠ Produce a tangible outcome or product, such as a business plan, policy recommendation, book, play, or DVD ≠ Involve a team of students, often working on a project that is interdisciplinary in nature ≠ Include a community partner(s) and create an impact on the larger community as well as on the student participants ≠ Focus on student learning outcomes ≠ Help students define a career path or make