Asee peer logo
Displaying results 31 - 60 of 180 in total
Conference Session
Materials Experiments, Labs, Demos, and Hands-On Activities
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Spencer Seung-hyun Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Materials
AC 2011-447: DEVELOPMENT OF A LABORATORY MODULE IN HY-BRID BIODEGRADABLE CORNSTARCH MATERIALSSpencer Seung-hyun Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Dr. Spencer Seung-hyun Kim is Associate Professor in Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Tech- nology/Packaging Science (MMETPS) Department at Rochester Institute of Technology. He works as Associate Director in American Packaging Corp. (APC) Center for Packaging Innovation at RIT. Dr. Kim’s research interests are in advanced materials synthesis and characterization. His research area fo- cuses on packaging science and technology. Dr. S. Kim graduated with B.S. in Ceramics Engineering from Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea (1979) and obtained M.S. (1989) and
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University; William Joseph Stuart P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Bethany B. Smith, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
, andsupersaturation is possible. However, in the right graph there is no solid region where oneelement could be soluble in the other in the solid state. With no solid solubility, a supersaturatedsolid solution cannot be created. So the underlying reason(s) for difficulty in understanding thefirst explanation could lie in poor chart reading ability, vocabulary, or in the meaning ofsolubility limit or all. The response addresses all issues with the two graphs, but could have beenimproved with better labeling on the diagrams.Fig. 3. Faculty response on white board to students’ Muddiest Points on age hardening Al alloys. The comments in Muddy Points 2–5 all relate to difficulty in reading the graph, whichplots metal hardness (a measure of strength) as a
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Louis Nadelson, Utah State University; Rick Ubic, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
and technology teacher, as well as several years of electrical and mechanical engineering design experience as a practicing engineer. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from Swarthmore College, his Master’s of Education degree from the University of Massachusetts, and a Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Doctorate in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Louis Nadelson, Utah State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor and director for the Center for the School of the Future in the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education at Utah State University. He has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western
Conference Session
Professional Development in Materials Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Barry Dupen, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne
Tagged Divisions
Materials
choices do not cover all datapatterns, such as the S-curves for impact vs. temperature graphs.Student performance is assessed with a grading rubric which evaluates graphs within laboratoryreports. Low performance on three laboratory reports has led to instructional improvements,including additional focus in the lecture and detailed handouts. Subsequent assessment showscontinued improvement in skill levels from one laboratory report to the next, and from onesemester to the next.IntroductionTAC/ABET requires that engineering technology graduates have an ability to communicateeffectively (Criterion 3, Program Outcome g).1 The MET program at IPFW includes twocommunications courses and three English courses which develop students’ skills in
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Sarah Hoyt, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
achievement.AcknowledgementThis work has been supported by the NSF IUSE program under Grant No. 1524527.References1. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 11(23), 8410-8415.2. Hattie, J, Biggs, & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99-136.3. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.4. Schute, V. J., (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.5. Krause, S., Baker, D., Carberry
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Blake Herren, University of Oklahoma; Ryan Cowdrey; Weston Scott Sleeper; Colin Bray; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Yingtao Liu, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Materials
to assist pulling the fiber at the proper rate to print complex parts. To protect operators,a small chamber is added to the 3D printer just above the syringe which holds a spool of carbonfiber and allows the pressurized air to flow through. This pneumatic-driven 3D printer allows usto manufacture continuous carbon fiber-reinforced composites and the design is shown in Figure2.Figure 2. (a) The pneumatic driven extrusion component designed by the undergraduate students;(b) fully assembled 3D printing system with installed UV curing and extrusion components.Currently, the printer is still in the early stages of determining the best printing parameters. It hasbeen found that a single line of 3k fiber extruded at 15 psi and 1 mm/s provides the
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kaitlin Tyler, ANSYS Inc.; Claes Fredriksson, ANSYS Granta; Hannah Melia, ANSYS Inc.
Tagged Divisions
Materials
conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities,” Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, 2009.[2] K. P. Cross, “Not can, butwill college teaching be improved?,” New Dir. High. Educ., vol. 1977, no. 17, pp. 1–15, 1977, doi: 10.1002/he.36919771703.[3] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. July, pp. 223–231, 2004, doi: 10.1038/nature02568.[4] C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC, 1991.[5] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410
Conference Session
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Teaching and Outreach
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Keith J. Bowman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brenda Capobianco, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
(MSE) Outreach Efforts of Evolving Design Standards for Elementary EducationIntroductionThe recently awarded National Science Foundation project, Science Learning throughEngineering Design (SLED) is one of nineteen targeted Math and Science Partnerships (MSPs)focused on science education and one of four MSPs focused on elementary education1. Severalstates, including Massachusetts2-4, Indiana5 and Minnesota6, have established engineering design-based standards that have potential implications for effectively engaging elementary schoolteachers and students with content related to materials science and engineering. Thirty-ninestates, the District of Columbia and the U. S. Virgin Islands, have also adopted
Conference Session
Innovative Pedagogies for Teaching Introductory Materials
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Elliot Douglas, University of Florida; Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University; Michael Prince, Bucknell University; Trevor Harding, California Polytechnic State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
engineering faculty and gives faculty development workshops on active learning. He is currently continuing the work of Project Catalyst, an NSF-funded initiative to help faculty re-envision their role in the learning process, and researching the use of inductive teaching methods to correct common student misconceptions in engineering. Address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837; telephone: 570-577-1781; e-mail: prince@bucknell.edu.Trevor Harding, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Chair and Professor of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University–San Luis Obispo where he teaches courses in
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Materials
Research Council, Washington, DC, 978-0-309-11999-3, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12199/integrated-computational-materials-engineering-a- transformational-discipline-for-improved-competitiveness[3] R. A. Enrique, M. Asta, and K. Thornton, "Computational Materials Science and Engineering Education: An Updated Survey of Trends and Needs," JOM, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1644-1651, September 01 2018.[4] K. Thornton, S. Nola, R. E. Garcia, M. Asta, and G. B. Olson, "Computational materials science and engineering education: A survey of trends and needs," JOM, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 12-17, October 1 2009.[5] L. Li. (June 2016). Integrating Computational
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lorraine Francis, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Michael Manno, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Tagged Divisions
Materials
project has a common set ofspecifications that all student groups work toward. After brainstorming and selection of aprototype idea, the teams design their part(s) in SW and begin 3D printing, and redesigniterations. In 2013 - 2015, students carried simple analytical calculations of the performance,although some ambitious students did SW simulations. Starting in 2016, SW simulations were arequired part of the design process.  Figure 4​Schematic of semester-long design project in ​Materials Performance.     Table 2​Team design projects titles and specificationsYear Materials Performance (Fall) Materials Processing (Spring)2013/14 Backpack
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aisling Coughlan, University of Toledo; Tanya A. Faltens, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David R. Johnson, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Materials
; Exposition, Louisville, KY. https://peer.asee.org/164322. Krause, S., Decker, J., Niska, J., & Alford, T., & Griffin, R. (2003). Identifying student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN. https://peer.asee.org/125193. Krause, S., Tasooji, A., & Griffin, R. (2004). Origins of misconceptions in a materials concept inventory from student focus groups. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/133274. Krause, S., & Tasooji, A. (2008). An intervention using concept sketching for addressing dislocation-related misconceptions in introductory
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert A Heard, Carnegie Mellon University; Christiaan Job Nieman, Universidad de los Andes
Tagged Divisions
Materials
Based Learning (PBL) with thecaveat that individual students define their own problem and work toward their own goal(s) inthe studio.Studio learning outside of engineering (art/design, architecture, drama, etc.) is often focused onteaching procedural skills (e.g., specific techniques, approaches, tools, and media) usingconcepts and ideas to establish the conditions, examples, and inspirations that spark creativityand exploration. Applying this to engineering subject matter requires a different approach where,in studio learning, Dinham considers a distinction between the educator as “controller-of-information” versus as “orchestrator”[8]. Taking lead from Dinham’s general recommendations,the following guidelines listed by the Eberly Center were
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ajay P. Malshe, University of Arkansas; Salil T Bapat, University of Arkansas
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Materials
Academy of Engineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufactur- ing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories-In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Os- car” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3. the American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME), and 4. the Institute of Physics (IoP), London, England; multiple best paper awards
Conference Session
Building a Community in Materials
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathleen Stair, Northwestern University; Jefferson Z. Liu, Northwestern University; Mark Asta, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
, the compliance constants may be determined usingequations (9) – (11), which follow from inversion of the stiffness matix in equation (1)2. C44 = 1/S44 (9) C11-C12 = (S11 – S12) -1 (10) C11 + 2C12 = (S11 + 2S12) -1 (11)The compliance constants may then be used to determine the anisotropic values for Young’smodulus3: 1 = s11 (12) E[100 ] 1 1 1 = s11 − [( s11 − S12 ) − s 44
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ping Zhao, University of Minnesota Duluth; Hongyan Liu, Colorado School of Mines; PS Dhanasekaran, University of Minnesota Duluth
Tagged Divisions
Materials
ability toapply fundamental principles into the experimental studies, understand the aspects of thematerials, and recognize the applications of the materials in engineering fields. At the end of thesemester of Fall 2017, a questionnaire was handed out in class to assess the learningeffectiveness. Four questions related to the experimental studies are: 1. Do you agree that the lab is a good way to learn and reinforce the fundamental concepts of the materials? a. Strongly agree b. Agree c. Neutral d. Disagree e. Strongly disagree 2. Which of the following has been the best source(s) for you to learn the course materials? a. Lectures b. Homework c. Labs d. Midterm exam e. Examples 3. Which
Conference Session
Computational Tools & Analysis
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jacob Z. Kelter, Northwestern University; Jonathan Daniel Emery, Northwestern University; Uri Wilensky, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe funding organizations.References[1] R. G. Christianson and K. M. Fisher, “Comparison of student learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional classrooms,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 687–698, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1080/095006999290516.[2] E. A. Marek, C. C. Cowan, and A. M. L. Cavallo, “Students’ Misconceptions about Diffusion: How Can They Be Eliminated?,” The American Biology Teacher, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 74–77, 1994, doi: 10.2307/4449757.[3] S. L. Westbrook and E. A. Marek, “A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Rick Ubic, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
).3. Lopatto, D. Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 297–306 (2007).4. Beninson, L. A., Koski, J., Villa, E., Faram, R. & O’Connor, S. E. Evaluation of the research experiences for undergraduates (REU) sites program. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly 32, (2011).5. Follmer, D. J., Zappe, S. E., Gomez, E. W. & Kumar, M. Preliminary evaluation of a research experience for undergraduates (REU) program: A methodology for examining student Outcomes. in 2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14, 2015 - June 17, 2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, (American Society for Engineering Education
Conference Session
Hands-on Materials Science and Engineering
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Griffin, Texas A&M University; Ibrahim Karaman, Texas A&M University; Ji Ma, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey Froyd, Texas A&M University; Jaime Grunlan, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
-1 -1.5 -2 0 5 10 15 Carbon Black wt%Figure 3. Log Resistivity vs. % Carbon Black concentration- emulsion based Polyvinyl Acetatepolymer. Percolation limit appears to occur at 2% Carbon Black concentration1 www.nano.gov2 T. S. Creasy, J. C. Grunlan, and R. B. Griffin, “An Undergraduate Laboratory: the Effect of NanoparticleMicrostructure on the Electrical Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites,” Proceedings of IMECE06, ASME
Conference Session
Introductory Materials Science Course
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Cottrell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Tagged Divisions
Materials
AC 2008-1816: AN INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS COURSE: MAKINGCONCRETE STAND UP TO THE TASKDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has taught courses in statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, graphic communications, engineering economy, and
Conference Session
Materials in Design and Manufacturing
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Somnath Chattopadhyay, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
Toughness Vs Strength Plot from Ashby et al (2007) Page 13.869.8 •REFERENCESAshby, M. F. (2005), Material Selection in Mechanical Design, 3rd Edition, Elsevier ButterworthHeinemann, Burlington, MAAshby, M. F., Shercliff, H., and Cebon, D. (2007) Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing andDesign, 1st Edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington, MAGranta Design (2007) CES EduPack , Cambridge, UK.Irwin, G. R. (1963), “Fracture of Pressure Vessels,” in Materials for Missiles and Spacecraft, McGrawHill, New York, pp. 204-229.Kitagawa , H. and Takahashi, S (1976),” Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or thecracks in the early stage,”. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Mechanical Behavior ofMaterials
Conference Session
Professional Development in Materials Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Griffin, Texas A&M University, Qatar; Reza Rowshan, Texas A&M University, Qatar
Tagged Divisions
Materials
tested a 6061 aluminum alloy link. The students were able to directly see the results of theirdesign and the difficulties in translating an idea to a finished product.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the following students in MEEN 360, fall 2008 at Texas A&MUniversity at Qatar. The students were: OMAR ABDALLAH, SOHA HISHAM AABDELSATTAR, ZUHAIB SYED ABDIN, MOHAMMED A AL-KHORI, OMARMOHAMMAD J M AL-QATAMI, AHMAD MOHAMMED S A ALMANSOOR, COLLIN CDAVIS, ALI MOHAMAD FAYAD, MISAM ALI MEHMOOD JAFFER TIMOTHYRAYMOND, TAYLOR, DANI JAAFAR WANNOUS, and Ric Carusi the machinist. Page 14.882.6Page 14.882.7 Table
Conference Session
Materials Education Perspectives
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aaron Blicblau, Swinburne University of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Materials
Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE, Portland (2005).2. Wilhelm, L., Puckett, K., Beisser, S., Wishart, W., Merideth, E., and Sivakumaran, T., Lessons learned from the implementation of electronic portfolios at three universities, TechTrends 50, 62 (2006).3. Brumm, T. J., Ellertson, A., and Mickelson, S. K., Using ePortfolios to develop and assess ABET-aligned competencies, in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE, Nashville Tennessee, (2003).4. Brodeur.D.R., Using Portfolios for Exit Assessment in Engineering Programs, in 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/FIE, Boston (2002).5. Challis, D., Towards a mature eportfolio: Some implications for higher education, Canadian Journal of
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura Ann Gelles, University of San Diego; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Materials
through learning activities” in International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 13 vol. 3, pp. 249-262. July 2012[6] M. L. Sattler, V. C. P. Chen, B. H. Dennis, S. P. Mattingly, K. Rogers, Y. Pearson Weatherton, M. Rani, and K. Kositkanawuth, “Integrating sustainability across the curriculum: Engineering sustainable engineers” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. June, 2012. Available: https://peer.asee.org/21566[7] M. Ashby, E. Brechbühl, T. Vakhitova, and A. Vallejo, “Social Life-Cycle Assessment and Social Impact Audit Tool: A white paper” in ANSYS Granta Design [Online], Available: https://grantadesign.com/teachingresources
Conference Session
Clearing up Student Misconceptions in Materials
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Sharon Kurpius-Robinson, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
. Page 15.439.11 10Bibliography1. S. Krause, J. Decker, J. Niska, & T. Alford, (2002). A Materials Concept Inventory for introductory materials engineering courses, National Educators Workshop Update 2002, 17, 1-8.2. C. J. Boulter, & B. C. Buckley, (2000). Constructing a typology of models in science education, in Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (Eds.), Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.3. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silverstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 64–66.4. D. Hestenes, M. Wells, & G. Swackhamer (1992). Force concept inventory
Conference Session
A Virtual Community of Practice for Developing and Implementing Evidence-based Pedagogies
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida; Amber L. Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Brittany Nelson-Cheeseman, School of Engineering, University of St. Thomas; Cheryl A Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh; Joseph De-Chung Shih, Stanford University; Daniel Lepek, The Cooper Union; Lindsay Corneal, Grand Valley State University; Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Richard E Eitel, Stevens Institute of Technology (SSE)
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering, Materials
Conference Session
Hybrid and Online Learning
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis; Gianmarco Sahragard-Monfared, University of California, Davis; Edward Thomas Conley, University of California, Davis
Tagged Divisions
Materials
that students canreview these while preparing their laboratory reports. Additionally, the Writing Discussionmodules will be developed into exercises that can be implemented into the course instructionaltime. Although the pandemic caused an upheaval in teaching and learning in 2020, the lessonsabout student learning should be retained for the future.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank KLA Corporation for their support of student learning during the pandemic,particularly creating an introductory webinar targeting students and hosting remotedemonstrations of the equipment.References[1] S. Brown and K. Mangan. (May 28, 2020) What College Students Need Now. Chronicle of Higher Education. Available: https://www.chronicle.com/article/What
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Xinyue (Crystal) Liu, University of Toronto; Simo Pajovic, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cheuk Yin Larry Kei, University of Toronto; Yasaman Delaviz, York University; Scott D. Ramsay, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Materials
. Haim, “Lab at Home: Hardware Kits for a Digital Design Lab,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 46-51, Feb. 2009.[4] R. V. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191-196, 2007.[5] S. K. Starrett and M. M. Morcos, “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 93-99, Jan. 2001.[6] P. Y. Furlan, “Engaging Students in Early Exploration of Nanoscience Topics Using Hands- On Activities and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 705- 711, Jun. 2009.[7] J. K. Burgher, D. Finkel, O. O. Adesope, and B. J. Van Wie, “Implementation of a Modular Hands-on
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kumar Vikram Singh, Miami University; Fazeel Khan, Miami University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
. Kelvin Voigt Creep Simulation Maxwell Loading and Unloading Simulation 2 25 Strain (MPa) vs. Time (s) Stress (MPa) vs. Strain (%) 1.8 1.6 20
Conference Session
Clearing up Student Misconceptions in Materials
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University; Keith Heinert, Arizona State University; Jessica Triplett, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
weremultiple misconceptions for each student's response to each question. After reading through andmaking note of student misconceptions, similar misconceptions were grouped into categories.These categories were developed through emergent themes from student misconceptions asdisplayed on each Topical Module Assessment. For example, many student misconceptions ofcrystal structure included addition or deletion of atoms in the unit cell. Not all misconceptionsinvolved adding or removing the same atom, but because these were similar misconceptions,hinting at an emergent theme, they were grouped into one category referencing extra or missingatom(s). Each student conception was then assigned categories based on these emergent themes.This categorization