outreach with underrepresented groups in STEM.Dr. Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lauren Cooper earned her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with a research emphasis in Engineering Education from University of Colorado Boulder. She is currently an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Her research interests include project-based learning, student motivation, human-centered design, and the role of empathy in engineering teaching and learning.Dr. Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor and Department Chair of Materials Engineering at
Foundation. The Foundation was established by Stanton andElisabeth Davis after Mr. Davis's retirement as chairman of Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.References[1] S. Pulford, J. Tan, M. Gonzalez, and A. Modell, "Satisfaction: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Engineering Writing Coursework," in 125th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo, 2018.[2] J. D. Ford, "Knowledge transfer across disciplines: Tracking rhetorical strategies from a technical communication classroom to an engineering classroom," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 301-315, 2004.[3] D. A. Winsor, "Engineering writing/writing engineering," College composition and communication, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 58-70, 1990.[4] L. Reave
Paper ID #28945Promoting Materials Science and Engineering Education through 3DPrinting TechnologyDr. Tracy Zhang, MSU Michigan State University (MSU) St. Andrews, Midland, MI. Dr. Tracy Zhang is a faculty member and STEM Outreach Specialist at Michigan State University St. Andrews campus. She earned a doctoral degree in advanced materials from Central Michigan University. Her current role involves promoting STEM education to K-12 students focusing on 3D printing technology area and conducting research in the development of biosourced hyperbranched poly(ester)s for the controlled release of actives across a range of
achievement.AcknowledgementThis work has been supported by the NSF IUSE program under Grant No. 1524527.References1. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 11(23), 8410-8415.2. Hattie, J, Biggs, & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99-136.3. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.4. Schute, V. J., (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.5. Krause, S., Baker, D., Carberry
to assist pulling the fiber at the proper rate to print complex parts. To protect operators,a small chamber is added to the 3D printer just above the syringe which holds a spool of carbonfiber and allows the pressurized air to flow through. This pneumatic-driven 3D printer allows usto manufacture continuous carbon fiber-reinforced composites and the design is shown in Figure2.Figure 2. (a) The pneumatic driven extrusion component designed by the undergraduate students;(b) fully assembled 3D printing system with installed UV curing and extrusion components.Currently, the printer is still in the early stages of determining the best printing parameters. It hasbeen found that a single line of 3k fiber extruded at 15 psi and 1 mm/s provides the
conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities,” Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, 2009.[2] K. P. Cross, “Not can, butwill college teaching be improved?,” New Dir. High. Educ., vol. 1977, no. 17, pp. 1–15, 1977, doi: 10.1002/he.36919771703.[3] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. July, pp. 223–231, 2004, doi: 10.1038/nature02568.[4] C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC, 1991.[5] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410
through learning activities” in International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 13 vol. 3, pp. 249-262. July 2012[6] M. L. Sattler, V. C. P. Chen, B. H. Dennis, S. P. Mattingly, K. Rogers, Y. Pearson Weatherton, M. Rani, and K. Kositkanawuth, “Integrating sustainability across the curriculum: Engineering sustainable engineers” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. June, 2012. Available: https://peer.asee.org/21566[7] M. Ashby, E. Brechbühl, T. Vakhitova, and A. Vallejo, “Social Life-Cycle Assessment and Social Impact Audit Tool: A white paper” in ANSYS Granta Design [Online], Available: https://grantadesign.com/teachingresources
. Haim, “Lab at Home: Hardware Kits for a Digital Design Lab,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 46-51, Feb. 2009.[4] R. V. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191-196, 2007.[5] S. K. Starrett and M. M. Morcos, “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 93-99, Jan. 2001.[6] P. Y. Furlan, “Engaging Students in Early Exploration of Nanoscience Topics Using Hands- On Activities and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 705- 711, Jun. 2009.[7] J. K. Burgher, D. Finkel, O. O. Adesope, and B. J. Van Wie, “Implementation of a Modular Hands-on
Teacher, vol. 30, pp. 141-158, 1992.[2] D. P. Maloney, T. L. O'Kuma, C. J. Hieggelke, and A. Van Heuvelen, "Surveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism," Am. J. Phys., vol. 69, no. S1, pp. S12-S23, 2001, doi: 10.1119/1.1371296.[3] S. Krause, J. C. Decker, and R. Griffin, "Using a materials concept inventory to assess conceptual gain in introductory materials engineering courses," presented at the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 2003.[4] R. Rosenblatt and A. F. Heckler, "The development process for a new materials science conceptual evaluation," presented at the 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Indianapolis, IN, 2017.[5] S
) Books; 1989. 4. Groover, M. P.; Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing (5th Edition); John Wiley (New York); 2013; Chapters 3,10,13,17,18,20,22,23,24,28,38. 5. Kalpakjian, S, and Schmid, S. R.; Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials (5 th Edition); Prentice Hall (New Jersey); 2008; Chapters 2, 5, 6, 8-10, 12, 15.APPENDIX A: Course Syllabus of Manufacturing Processes (INME 4055)Course Title: Manufacturing Processes; number of credits: 3; Contact Period: Three hours oflecture/week.Textbook: Groover, M. P.; Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing Materials, Processes and Systems(5th edition); 2015; Wiley.Course Description: Different manufacturing processes and machine tools; influence of the method offabrication upon the
classrooms,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 687–698, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1080/095006999290516.[2] S. L. Westbrook and E. A. Marek, “A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 649–660, 1991, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280803.[3] E. A. Marek, C. C. Cowan, and A. M. L. Cavallo, “Students’ Misconceptions about Diffusion: How Can They Be Eliminated?,” The American Biology Teacher, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 74–77, 1994, doi: 10.2307/4449757.[4] U. Wilensky and M. Resnick, “Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Mar
) • Choose the appropriate type of graph for the data set. • No Excel titles on graphs. That’s what the caption is for. • Axes usually should not run through the center of a graph. • Each axis needs a label including units • Include legend only when graphing more than one set of data. • Format tables so data can be easily compared. Don’t have tables spread across two or more pages. • Put units in the header of each table column. • Units should be consistent and abbreviated correctly. o mPa and MPa are different o second is s not sec, hour is h not hr, etc. (lists of unit abbrev can be found online)Statistics • For each data point, report the number of measurements made or samples tested (n), even
), by a NSF CAREER Award to C.L. (Grant No.DMR-1554435), by a NSF CAREER Award to A.S. (Grant No. DMR-1555153), a NSF Grant toN.H.P (Grant No. DMR-1945482), and by a NSF Grant to P.B. (Grant No. DMR-1709857). Thismaterial is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate ResearchFellowship under Grant No. 1746047. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] K. Thornton, S. Nola, R. Edwin Garcia, M. Asta, and G.B. Olson. Computational materials science and engineering education: A survey of trends and needs. JOM, 61(10):12–17, 2009. [2] R.A. Enrique, K. Thornton
EducationAbstractHigher education, especially in the engineering milieu, is a complex activity. Many differenttasks need to be performed well to achieve high quality student learning. Significant learningexperiences require specific (and optimal) course design, and inculcation of relevant skills.The more common approach for course design is the ‘content-centered’ one. A list of topicsis decided (using well-established textbook/s), together with time slots and a testing scheme(number of quizzes, tests, etc). Though relatively easy, this methodology pays scant attentionto student learning outside of content knowledge. The more time and effort intensive‘learning-centered’ approach is more systematic and rewarding. Course design is based ondeciding what students can
. Moazed, “Design a New Set of Strength Labs for the Course, Mechanics ofMaterials”, ASEE 2016 Annual Conference, June 26-29, New Orleans, Louisiana.[6] A. Xiao, K. Bryden, D. Brigham, “Virtual Reality Tools for Enhancing Interactive Learning”,ASEE 2004 Annual Conference, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, Utah.[7] A. Sampaio & P. Henriques, “The Use of Virtual Reality Models in Civil Engineering Training”,International Journal of Simulation Modelling, vol. 6, pp. 124-134, June 2007.[8] M. Capra, M. Aquino, A. Dodson, S. Benford, “A Visualisation Tool for Civil EngineeringVirtual Reality”, 1st FIG International Symposium on Engineering Surveys for Construction Worksand Structural Engineering, June 28-July 1, Nottingham, United Kingdom.[9] E. Biglari