University ofTexas study, the improvements in student grades based on recitation may be statisticallyinsignificant because of a larger influence from student participation and attendance [7]. In thespring of 2021 at Penn State Behrend, one recitation section was offered and had 7 participants.More sections will need to be opened to increase availability to students with conflictingschedules because students cite scheduling conflicts as the main factor for skipping or notregistering for recitation courses [13], [14]. It is hoped that with proper tracking of the success ofthe recitation, the data can be used to convince future students to participate in the recitationcourse.References[1] S. Hoover, “Pennsylvania colleges face steep enrollment declines
there was an increased level of awareness of the students’learning, and that awareness will be used in other courses.6. Bibliography1. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and McGoury, J., “The ABET “Professional Skills”- Can They Be Taught?Can They Be Assessed?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, January 2005, pp. 41-55.2. Roselli, R. J. and Brophy S. P., “Effectiveness of Challenge-Based Instruction in Biomechanics,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 95, No. 4, October 2006, pp. 311-324.3. Wankat, P., “A Push for Participation,” PRISM, Vol. 15, No. 5, January 2006, pp. 39.4. Jawaharlal, Mariappan, Fan, Uei-Jiun and Monemi, Saeed, “Implementing Service-Learning in EngineeringCurriculum,” Presented at the 2006 ASEE Annual
instructors’ own notes to deliver advanced topics. The instructors of Courses 1, 6 and 12 use the books they authored as the textbooks, but they also provide other references. Among all the courses listed in Table 1, one textbook (first and later editions) received the greatest popularity, being chosen as the textbook by at least three instructors. This textbook is: Spong, M.W. and M. Vidyasagar, Robot Dynamics and Control. 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its latest version: Spong, M.W., Hutchinson, S., and M. Vidyasagar, Robot Modeling and Control. 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This textbook sufficiently discusses the fundamentals of rigid body coordinates transformations, formulation of kinematics, dynamics and
through the curriculumat varying speeds, and not all of the students in the post requisite course had the sameprerequisite experience, so their value as a timely assessment of a given course was diluted.Finally, the WebCT interface is not optimal for department assessment due to ongoing designand administrative issues. On-line administration also necessitates an open-book format, againimpeding faculty buy-in.BackgroundForce Concept Inventory (FCI)During the mid-1980’s it was recognized by the physics community that students were leavingNewtonian physics courses with the ability to solve quantitative exercises, but often not theability to answer a simple qualitative question regarding the underlying concept. This suggestedthat students were
vertical position, will be implemented using a finite state machine. Note: you are not required to design the feedback controller or state machine. Select appropriate sensors and actuators to implement the proposed system. These may include position/velocity/acceleration sensors, temperature sensors, motors, linear actuators, and many others. Note: accuracy, speed, and cost all matter! Select an appropriate microcontroller(s) to implement the proposed SLS system. If necessary, design appropriate interfaces between sensors and actuators and the microcontroller(s). Note: while useful in class, the Arduino Uno is likely not sufficiently
biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, increasing student engagement with hands- on activities, and more recently, creativity & design. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Foundational Engineering Science Course and Its Impact on Those Who Teach ItCurricular innovations are difficult to implement and sustain. Many innovations were developedthrough the NSF-funded Engineering Education Coalitions in the early 1990’s
Paper ID #15214Experiential Learning in the Thermal Sciences: Introducing and ReinforcingFundamental Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer Principles to K-12 andEngineering Undergraduate StudentsDr. Arden Moore, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Moore graduated with his B. S. in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in 2001, followed by his Master’s and Ph. D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2007 and 2010, respectively. During his time in graduate school he worked in the fields of thermoelectric nanostructures, nanoscale energy transport physics, and advanced thermal
downside to active learning using clickers in large classes.Institutions may need to reconsider large class sizes with clickers to take advantage ofimprovements in exam performance and benefits in terms of cognitive and non-cognitiveoutcomes.References [1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012) Fact Sheet: Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.[2] U.S. Department of Education: National Center of Education Statistics (2013) Digest of Education Statistics[3] Freeman, S., S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, M.P. Wenderoth (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science
the faculty member(s) promptand guide smaller student groups in learning and applying just taught concepts while theycomplete a problem in class. The goal is to attain the benefits of group work while providingjust in time coaching to address any conceptual issues as they occur. Although group orteam-based learning has its advantages, it still has well-known disadvantages. The maindrawback being the student who is not participating may have less effective learning expe-riences as compared to the more gregarious and/or confident students who actually solvethe problem. The purpose of this paper is to discuss this technique in the context of teach-ing undergraduate dynamics, although we believe it can be applied in other undergraduatescience
-class activities such as video lectures, text-based materials, and online exercises and quizzes, in-class activities including methods such astraditional lectures, reviews of pre-class assignments, and active learning exercises, and post-classactivities such as quizzes or other homework exercises [4]. According to a meta-study performed byKarabulut-Ilgu interest in the technique was first observed the early 2000’s and, beginning around 2011,academic interest has grown rapidly, evidenced in both conference proceedings and journal publications[5]. Several substantial meta-studies have been published in the past few years attempting to distill theresults of this near decade of study [4-6]. While a distillation of relevant aspects of these studies
inaugural Faculty Associate for Mobile Learning. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wyoming (Laramie, Wyoming). He has approximately 25 publications/presentations. He is a member of the American Society for Engineer- ing Education (ASEE). He is the recipient of David S. Taylor Service to Students Award and Golden Apple Award from Boise State University. He is also the recipient of ASEE Pacific Northwest Section (PNW) Outstanding Teaching Award, ASEE Mechanical Engineering division’s Outstanding New Edu- cator Award and several course design awards. He serves as the campus representative (ASEE) for Boise State University and as the Chair-Elect for the ASEE PNW Section. His academic research
, its relevance in engineering and engineeringeducation cannot be underestimated, especially when having today´s energy andenvironmental concerns in mind.Despite the importance of the subject, it has been considered as “dry and abstract” bystudents 1. One reason might be that the subject has become more and more difficult to relateto its applications –the fundamentals principles are the same as for 150 years ago, but theapplications become more and more refined due to technological developments andinnovations. If so, it is altogether not surprising that students find engineeringthermodynamics abstract, being separated from its applications – this might be devastating forthe students’ interest and possibility to learn.An increase in student
tothe CLOs and the Program Outcomes (POs). For this course, the CLOs and their mapping to thePOs has already been identified. Overall, the course syllabus and the course objectives are met toa great extent. As mentioned before, several assessment tools have been identified such as classwork/homework, quizzes/exams and projects. Sincere attempt is made to refer to the CLOs whiledesigning the contents of the assessment tools used. For example, many class work andhomework problems, and each exam question clearly stated the concept being tested in thatquestion, and to what extent that question addresses the CLO(s) and how it maps the PO(s).Students were informed where this information will be used. The stated CLO(s) is/are assumedto be satisfied
the introduction of personal computers (PCs) in the early 1980’s, complex computer Page 14.17.2codes were needed for numerical solution of heat transfer problems. Access to mainframecomputers and proficiency in such programming languages as FORTRAN and PASCAL werenecessary for solving complex heat transfer problems. As the personal computers became moreavailable and affordable, and as the operating systems became more user friendly, theirapplications were gradually integrated into introductory heat transfer courses. Simpleprogramming languages such as BASIC were used for solving simple heat transfer problems inlate 1980s or early 1990s. During
learning process to the student, but to intentionally add adegree of freedom and flexibility often missing from academic coursework. Allowing studentssome ability to shape their learning experience enables them to advance their personal skill setand interests in new and constructive ways. Pedagogically, the mini-projects aim to movestudents from a simple to a complex level of understanding; for example, moving beyond simplygrasping how a tool is employed to understanding its purpose, the need(s) it addresses, and theexpectations surrounding its use. In short, students learn how to think about tools and operationsthat are viable, feasible, and desirable. Adding opportunities for flexibility in pursuing some oftheir own interests can further
realobject. Based on free responses it can be said that some students appreciated the link betweentheory and practice. The activity has gained interest at the author’s institution where two additional instructorshave adopted it. It is anticipated that it will evolve as a result of broader deployment.Acknowledgements The author acknowledges the James Madison University Quality Collaborative project,funded by Lumina Foundation.References[1] S. D. Sheppard and B. H. Tongue, Statics Analysis and Design of Systems in Equilibrium (revisd edition), Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007.[2] F. P. Beer, E. R. Johnston, Jr., D. F. Mazurek, P. J. Cornwell and B. P. Self, Vector Mechanics for Engineers (11th edition), New York, NY: McGraw
course for undergraduate mechanical students. The main focus presented in this paper willbe for teaching fundamental concepts of FEM theory utilized in the first 3 weeks of the semester.At the end of the course in 2018 spring semester, students participated in a class survey and tookthe CSWA-S certification exam (Certified SOLIDWORKS Associate – Simulation). Analysis ofthe collected data indicated that teaching the fundamental concepts of FEA theory significantlyhelped students to have a better understanding of FEA and facilitated them to use FEAcommercial software.2. TEACHING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS 22.1 THE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MECH4200-SIMULATION-BASED
Exposition, 2004.[2] Hertzberg, J., “Seeing Fluid Physics: Outcomes From a Course on Flow Visualization,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Paper # QE3, 55 (16), 2010.[3] Poon, M., Todd, J., Neilson, R., Grace, D., Hertzberg, J., “Saffman-Taylor Instability in a Hele-Shaw Cell,” Physics of Fluids, 16 (9), p. S9, 2004.[4] Settles, G. S., “On the Fluid Dynamicist as Artist,” Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Gottingen, Germany, 2006.[5] Kleine, H., Settles, G. S., “The Art of Shock Waves and Their Flow Fields,” Shock Waves, 17, pp. 291-307, 2008.[6] Samuel, M., Henley, J., and Shakerin, S., “Development of a Wet Wall: An Undergraduate Research Project,” Paper #37677
deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in thedeployment of 84 TACMAV systems in 2005. Around that time he volunteered as a science advisor andworked at the Rapid Equipping Force during the summer of 2005 where he was exposed to a number ofunmanned systems technologies. His initial group composed of about 6 S&T grew to nearly 30 between2003 and 2010 as he transitioned from a Branch head to an acting Division Chief. In 2010-2012 he againwas selected to teach Mathematics at the United States Military Academy West Point. Upon returningto ARL’s Vehicle Technology Directorate from West Point he has continued his research on unmannedsystems under ARL’s Campaign for Maneuver as the Associate Director of Special
. J., 2005, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journalof Engineering Education, 94, p. 121-130.11. Steif, P., & Dollar, A. 2004, Reinventing The Teaching Of Statics, ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City,Utah12. Kaul, S., & Sitaram, P. 2013, Curriculum Design of Statics and Dynamics: An Integrated Scaffolding andHands-on Approach ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.13. Ramming, C. H., & Phillips, J. J., 2014, June, Improving Retention of Student Understanding by Use of Hands-on Experiments in Statics ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana.14. Hennessey, M., 2008, Statics and Dynamics Projects Emphasizing Introductory Design and Manufacturing, inProc. ASEE Annual Conf. & Expo
class or not.The majority of students are sympathetic to a student who may arrive late to class, and considerthis a “minor thing” as highlighted in the following comment: Professor absolutely disliked students walking in late in class and would ask them to leave if they walked a minute past the class start time. I think this was not only unwelcoming and embarrassing for the student(s) arriving late, but being forced to miss the lecture, despite paying for college tuition was unfair. This act of negative reinforcement also caused the student(s) to be behind and had to catch up on the material on their own time. While I understand that walking late into class can be distracting for the students and the
feltnegatively towards the assignment initially. Pre/post analysis revealed no significant change inthe freshman‟s negative attitudes. Initially, the juniors expressed positive feelings. However,after designing and performing the experiment, the juniors liked the assignment less. Theirpositive attitudes decreased to match the freshmen. The junior and senior attitudes were similarbefore designing the experiment. However, unlike the juniors, the seniors became more positiveafter the assignment was complete.The unexpected effects of the experimental design experience that occurred with the juniorstudents are of interest. The juniors initially felt they understood how to design an experimentbut after performing it, they did not. On the pre-survey, 95% felt
least 2 research projects. The application form required student contactinformation, college/university, academic major(s)/minor(s), and GPA.The PIs selected participants from the applicant pool based on qualifications, interest in research,and preferred research topics. Minimum eligibility requirements for the program weresophomore standing or higher, 3.0 GPA, and a major in engineering or engineering science.Closely related majors in the sciences, such as materials science, physics, and chemistry werealso considered if the major closely matched a project in which the applicant was interested.Matching of selected participants with faculty mentors was performed by the principalinvestigators (PIs), sometimes in consultation with potential
designs andbuilds custom apparatuses, such as a rig for 2 DOF torsional system developed by Souza et al.4Also, with a custom apparatus, custom instrumentation and transducers are required – which mayor may not be research caliber instruments. One unique apparatus that the author experienced asa graduate student at The Pennsylvania State University in the 1990’s used an air-hockey liketrack to connect mass elements with springs and measured using accelerometers and a 2-channelHP analyzer. It worked well, but a leaf-blower like device was required to produce enough airflow, which was noisy and sometimes would break down. When parts break down on customapparatuses, repair or replacement is usually more difficult than a commercially
3 πD Where K s is the stress concentration factor of the profile key seat under torsion; τ max is themaximum shear stress occurring at the middle of the longitudinal fillet surface on the bottom ofthe profile key seat; τ nom is the nominal maximum shear stress for a round shaft under torsion; Dis the normal diameter of the shaft and T is the torsion.Figure 1: Meshing information for a profile Figure 2: The Von Mises distribution of a key seat on a shaft with diameter 1 1/16” profile key seat under torsion Figure 3: The shear stress distributions on Figure 4: a) the first Principal stress and b
“Professional Skills”- Can They BeTaught? Can They Be Assessed?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, January 2005, pp.41-55.[4] Azapagic, A., Perdan, S. and Shallcross, D., “How Much Do Engineering Students Know aboutSustainable Development? The Finding of an International Survey and Possible Implications for theEngineering Curriculum,” European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 30, Issue 1, March 2005, pp.1-19.[5] Cengel, Y. A. and Boles, M. A., “Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach,” 5th Ed., McRaw-Hill,NY, 2006, pp. 86-91. Page 11.178.5Appendix: Sample Paper The Effect of Energy Conversion on the Levels of Ozone and
the study reported inthis paper. In the future, we will use factor scores derived from factor analysis to evaluate themediation relationships between the variables in our study, and we will employ learning andmotivation theories to further explore these relationships.References[1] L. Tian, T. Yu, and E. S. Huebner, "Achievement goal orientations and adolescents’ subjective well-being in school: the mediating roles of academic social comparison directions," Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking., vol. 8, p. 37, 2017.[2] M. V. Covington, "Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review," Annual review of psychology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 171-200
the course and six (6) have taught the lab portion. Continued feedback betweenthe instructors has strengthened this new lab offering.References1. Peters, D.L., Stanley, R., Hoff, C. & Casci, J. (2015) Redesign of Lab Experiences for a Senior Level Course in Dynamic Systems with Controls. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA2. Reckinger, S. M. & Reckinger, S. J. (2014) An Interactive Programming Course Model for Mechanical Engineering Students. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.3. Bedillion, M. D., Raisanen, R. J., & Nizar, M. H. M. (2014) Improving Transitions Between Sophomore Dynamics and Junior DynamicSystems Courses. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual
judgment on question #9. Here are two sets of answers from the eight students: Question #9 Student 1: “(Elastic potential energy) depends on our datum, and if you are pushing or pulling the spring.” Student 2: “(Elastic potential energy) depends on if spring is compressed or stretched. ” Question #10 1 Student 1: “It is the same PE, 𝑉𝑒 = 2 𝑘𝑠 2 ” Student 2: “the |change in position| (absolute value) is s in both cases.”Linear impulse and momentumFour questions with a focus on the conservation of linear momentum of a system ofparticles were involved for this section in the pilot study (Table 1). The two questions(#11-#12) were involved in this