7 Page 12.187.8TOTAL (%) 100 100 100Table 4c Results for ME215 Strength of Materials Laboratory (Fall 2006), 12 students enrolledObjectives ⇒ a b c d e f g h i j k l m nStrongly Agree 25 33 8 17Agree 67 25 42 50Neutral 17 42 25Disagree
AC 2008-533: A TEACHING TOOL FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF CAM ANDFOLLOWER MECHANISMSMina Hoorfar, University of British Columbia Okanagan Mina Hoorfar received her Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto in 2005. In the course of her graduate studies at the Laboratory for Applied Surface Thermodynamics, University of Toronto, Dr. Hoorfar worked in the area of surface and interfacial engineering. Her research mainly focused on the development of methodologies for accurate measurement of interfacial tensions, contact angles, and line tension. After completing her Ph.D. research, Dr. Hoorfar joined the Case Advance Power Institute at the
AC 2008-778: DIRECT MEASURES FOR COURSE OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTFOR ABET ACCREDITATIONHakan Gurocak, Washington State University-Vancouver Hakan Gurocak is Director of School of Engineering and Computer Science and Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Washington State University Vancouver. His research interests are haptic interfaces, robotics, automation, fuzzy logic and technology assisted distance delivery of laboratory courses. Page 13.439.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Direct Measures for Course Outcomes Assessment for ABET AccreditationAbstract - Direct measures provide
AC 2007-2879: USING THE SAE COLLEGIATE DESIGN SERIES TO PROVIDERESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES FOR UNDERGRADUATESGregory Davis, Kettering University DR. GREGORY W. DAVIS is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, formerly known as GMI Engineering & Management Institute. Acting in this capacity, he teaches courses in the Automotive and Thermal Science disciplines. He also serves a Director of the Advanced Engine Research Laboratory, where he conducts research in alternative fuels and engines. Currently, Greg serves as co-faculty advisor for the world's largest Student Chapter of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and the Clean Snowmobile Challenge Project. Greg is
institutions feel thattheir programs might be misrepresented. Substantial judgment and interpretation had to beapplied in determining how to best allocate course work into the defined categories.As much as possible core technical curriculum requirements were included in the break out ofsubject areas to minimize course work placed in the electives category. Some mechanicalengineering programs are introducing mechatronics into their curriculum. When thesemechatronics courses were part of the mechanical engineering core degree requirements, theywere placed in the vibrations, system dynamics, and controls category. Otherwise, they wereincluded as electives.A few programs listed instrumentation, experimentation, measurement, and laboratories asseparate
by Product Dissection”, Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC., 1996.11. Lamancusa, J., Jorgensen, J., and Zayas-Castro, J., “The Learning Factory – A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 103-112, April 1997.12. Fincher, C., “Trends and Issues in Curricular Development in Higher Education”, Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 2, 1986, Ed. J. Smart.13. Nicolai, L.M., “Designing a Better Engineer”, Aerospace America, pp. 30, April 1992.14. Beaudoin, D.L. and Ollis, D.F., “A Product and Process Engineering Laboratory for Freshmen”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 279-285, July 1995.15. Felder, R
Technology. He received a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His primary research interests are spacecraft control, sway reduction in cranes, control of flexible structures, and active seat technology. Page 11.230.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 ARLISS: A Multidisciplinary Extracurricular Design Project for UndergraduatesAbstractDesign projects that require students to build working prototypes are an invaluable sup-plement to traditional lectures and laboratory exercises. Additionally, allowing students toparticipate in challenging design projects outside of any
the end of the semester, a general courseevaluation was given. This survey included the open ended question: Do you think that you learned engineering design in this course? If yes, HOW (through what classroom readings, activities, discussions, etc.?)Without prompting 35% of students mentioned the impromptu design projects. This may notseem like a huge percentage, but in a class where there are numerous ways to learn the designprocess (hands-on laboratories, homework, Beetlebot competition discussed above, impromptudesign, other in class projects, etc.), a 35% share of responses is actually quite significant. Thisshows that students were indeed interested in the projects, but also that they perceive them asbeing a good education
mechanically inclined tend to score betteron the MAT.The dataset also gave us the opportunity to identify prior experiences that might lead to morepositive attitudes about engineering. The list of activities with statistically significant correlationwas dominated by hands-on and design activities. This type of information may be relevant forattracting more young people to the engineering field.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EEC-0835987.References1. ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2006-2007 Accreditation Cycle,” ABET, Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2006.2. Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in
-Director of the Experimental and Computational Mechanics Laboratory at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSM&T). Before joining SDSM&T, he was an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University in 1992. His main interest areas include Computational Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, and Product Design and Development. He has taught several different courses at the undergraduate and graduate level, has over 50 publications, is co-author of one book, and has done consulting for industry in Mexico and the US. He can be reached at Karim.Muci@sdsmt.edu
Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado alsoprovide different insights and recent developments in the field. Engineering thermodynamics isa prerequisite, fluid mechanics is a co-requisite, and while an introduction to the basic modes ofheat transfer are covered in the engineering thermodynamics course, it is recommended thatenrolled students have satisfactorily completed a dedicated heat transfer course.While the course covers a variety of topics (solar, wind, ocean, hydro, geothermal, combinedheat and power, biomass, nuclear, etc.), a substantial portion of the course is devoted to solarenergy (active, passive, and photovoltaic), and would benefit greatly from the incorporation of a
United States and Europe. Teresa earned her doctorate at the MIT Media Laboratory with Tod Machover and Rosalind Picard. Her doctoral project, the Conductor’s Jacket, was selected by MIT alumni for inclusion in the exhibition celebrating 150 years of the institute’s founding.Andrea Salgian, The College of New JerseyMeredith K. Stone, Independent Evaluator Page 22.1484.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Course Involving Engineering, Science and ArtsAbstractAn interdisciplinary undergraduate course that
. Asenrollment in engineering programs has increased, some institutions believe they need to limitenrollment so that the existing infrastructure, especially laboratory classes, are not overwhelmed.Many programs have a minimal GPA requirement in key foundational courses to limit Page 22.1198.2continuation into a major program of study. If students fail to achieve a sufficient GPA,although they have passed all of the prerequisite classes, they can’t continue in the engineeringprogram. Overall, GPA is a very important measure of a student’s academic progress and moreattention should be given to ensure that it is a robust metric with which to compare
at the Jet Propul- sion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., and an Invited Professor at INRIA Rhone-Alpes, Monbonnot, France. Research interests include computer vision, mobile robotics, intelligent vehicles, entrepreneurship, and education.Dr. James P. Schmiedeler, University of Notre DameDr. Michael Milo Stanisic, University of Notre Dame Page 25.1135.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Robotic Football: An Inter-university Design Competition Experiment1. IntroductionRobotics competitions have grown significantly over the past decade. The FIRST competitionhas inspired many K
. 103. Feisel, L.D. and Rosa, A.J., (2005) The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education, J. Engineering Ed., 94(1), pp. 121-130.4. Kline, R., (1994) World War II: A Watershed in Electrical Engineering Education, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, pp. 17-23.5. Dutson, A.J., Todd, R.H., Magleby, S.P. and Sorensen, C.D., (1997) A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (1), 1997, pp. 17-28.6. Sheppard, S.D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A. and Sullivan, W.M. (2008) Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.7. NAE, (2004) The
Paper ID #10089Thermodynamics in the ArtsDr. Heather E Dillon, University of Portland Dr. Heather Dillon is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Portland. Her teaching focuses on thermodynamics, heat transfer, renewable energy, and optimization of energy systems. She currently leads a research team working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fundamental heat transfer. Before joining the university, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer. Dr. Dillon’s research at PNNL supported the US Department of Energy and
field.Dr. LeAnn E Faidley, Wartburg College LeAnn Faidley is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science at Wartburg College in Waverly, IA. She teaches the freshman engineering sequence, the mechanics sequence, the design sequence, and materials. She is interested in a number of pedagogical research questions including how students can be helped to better formulate questions, the development of scenario based laboratories, and the use of service based learning in the engineering classroom. Page 23.984.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Problem Framing
. Four of the six give direct measures based on student work (SW, CP,SD, FE) and two are indirect measures based on surveys (SS and AS).The courses are reviewed to ensure coverage of all of the Student Outcomes which each graduateof the program is expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation. These skills,knowledge and behaviors are acquired as they progress through the program and differentcourses emphasize different outcomes. For example, the laboratory courses emphasize (b)experimental skills and the numerical methods class emphasize (k) computer skills. Syllabi arereviewed by the Assessment Committee which provides feedback to the instructor. Each syllabiis consistent with the overall expectations of SOs for the program
classroom or laboratory – but with an unfamiliarlevel of control over their decision-making, operational, creative, and communication processes.Douglas et al. describe how the formation of a self-directed work team “alters the structure ofrelationships by redefining the traditional roles of both managers and employees”19.Accordingly, faculty must adjust to the situation as well, relinquishing certain powers for thesake of student empowerment.In terms of team communication, members in a SDWT undergo an experience of rhetoricaldiscovery, a generative process of determining how to communicate effectively within or in frontof an unfamiliar audience in a new context and genre. A member may seek to figure out how sheherself should communicate and perform
reading, assigned homework problems, interactive exercises, andpower-point presentations. Students are responsible for learning basic course material outside ofclass time. Unlike an online class, an IC includes face-to-face time with the instructor inclassroom or laboratory setting where the material learned outside of class is discussed andapplied. The IC allows an educator to present course material in several different formats, and soengages the different learning styles and preferences of students. The IC format encouragesstudents to become self-learners and help prepare them for how they will need to learn aspracticing engineers. Our experience shows that the IC format can free class time for learner-centered activities without sacrificing
clear and concisely and students incorrectly answering questions likelyhave conceptual misunderstandings.Specific Comments from Advisory WorkshopThe preliminary concept inventory for the second law of thermodynamics was presented to anadvisory council composed of thermodynamic experts from industry, academia, andgovernmental laboratories during a one day workshop evaluating the redesign of the FTC effort15 . The advisory council members were enthusiastic about the inventory, and in general felt thatthis preliminary version captured the basic concepts that they felt were important. Several of themembers had specific comments about the wording of certain questions, and a valuable dialogwas conducted that should help improve future versions of
Guide to Criterion-referenced Test Development, Page 15.1110.16 Validation, and Test Score Usage, Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Research Report No. 70, School of Education, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1978, pp. 61-66.13. Osterlind, S.J., Constructing Test Items: Multiple Choice, Constructed Response, Performance, and Other Formats, Second Edition, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA, 1998, pp. 59-66, 83-88, 107-159, 163-202.14. McDonald, M.E., Systematic Assessment of Learning Outcomes: Developing Multiple-Choice Exams, Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, 2002, pp. 83-116, 119.15. Miller, P.W
Lots Substantial 1 2 3 4 5The average response with standard deviation is given in Figure 14. As seen by the response toquestion one, the students overwhelmingly lacked experience with technical writing. This wassomewhat surprising given that laboratory courses such as with physics and material sciencetypically require typed reports for experiements. The second question targeted the pace andexecution of said writing assignments. From their response and general classroom discussion,due dates were extended and more specific feedback was provided to help improve subsequentassignments. Always looking for enhanced learning benefit, the fourth question sought toappreciate added
literaturethat provide mechanical engineering students with the opportunities to perform hands-on designin their sophomore or junior years. For example, Mascaro et al. at University of Utahimplemented new laboratories which involve hands-on design in the first and second years of themechanical engineering program [12]; Al Hamidi, et al., discussed similar efforts in theMechanical Measurements course at Texas A&M University at Qatar [13]; Hodges and Sullivanimplemented several projects in the Design of Mechanical Systems course, which involvedfabrication of students’ designs in the machine shop [14]. However, these efforts do not involvethe development of an entrepreneurial mindset.The author has tried to implement a group-based hands-on design
team.Dr. Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and a fellow of the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, director of the Interdisciplinary Design and Entrepreneurial Applications curriculum , a KEEN Leader, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids and Aerodynamics Laboratories, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops
between the traditionally taught course andthe course taught with the active incorporation of concepts. A laboratory portion of the coursepreviously contributed to the course grade, but a curriculum change moved the laboratorycomponent into a separate course during the year concept maps were incorporated. Differenttypes of assessments were used at the two institutions in this study. No final exam was given inthe course at IUPUC. Instead, a standards-based approach to grading was used, with quizzes overspecific topics. Quizzes were graded “Pass” or “No Pass” based on specifications determined bythe instructor [19]. Students could re-attempt quizzes. The traditional course offering had 15students enrolled in the previous academic year. Both courses
Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with both the Birck Nanotechnology Center and Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same insti- tution. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, each in mechanical engineering, from Michigan State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research interests include the predictive design, analysis, and implementation of resonant micro/nanoelectromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS) for use in chemical and biological sensing, electromechanical signal processing, and computing; the dynamics of parametrically-excited systems and coupled oscillators; the thermomechanics of energetic materials; additive manufacturing; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads
is chair and professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Detroit Mercy where is specializes in materials, mechanics of materials, machine design and reliability/probability. He has been involved in pedagogy in higher education for the past 15 years and test engineering and R&D activities for the past 25 years. His post PhD positions include 12 years at University of Washington in Seattle, 5 years at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and 1 year as a postdoctoral invited researcher at the University of Tokyo. Prior to his PhD he worked at PACCAR Technical Center for 2.5 years. He has authored or co-authored over 75 archival publications, over 100 proceedings publications, and
order to assess this Page 12.1314.7in a quantitative fashion, the instructor developed a laboratory assignment that targeted thedesign process. The grade on this assignment paired with the grade on the design processsection of the final design report, comprise the quantitative assessment of student progress inthe outcome identified above. This process has proved to be valuable as it requires instructorsto insure that they have not only defined their course outcomes, but are also measuring themin some quantitative fashion. After collecting the data for all students in each course, thecourse outcomes are mapped to the ABET outcomes and a
? Page 12.881.13Appendix 5MECH 4835 THERMAL FLUID APPLICATIONS FALL 2006 FINAL ASSESSMENT SURVEY FOR COURSE ASSESSMENTIn the course syllabus, several learning goals/anticipated outcomes were specified so that each student, upon completionof the course, demonstrates the desired level of comprehension and achievement. Since this marks the end of the courseand the associated laboratory, it seems an appropriate time to investigate whether those outcomes have been achieved toeach student’s satisfaction.A short survey form is developed to gather your opinion on these courses in an attempt to improve the quality of theteaching and learning process. Please answer