engineering courses to an evidence-based specifications grading system,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[24] J. Mendez, “Standards-based specifications grading in thermodynamics,” in 2018 ASEE IL-IN Section Conference, 2018.[25] ——, “Standards-based specifications grading in a hybrid course,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[26] B. P. Helmke, “Specifications grading in an upper-level BME elective course,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[27] H. Evensen, “Specifications grading in general physics and engineering physics courses,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[28] R. Brown and T. Kennedy, “Work in progress: Differentiated learning in a
," Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, United States of America, June 15-19, 2019.[5] O. Oje, O. Adesope, R. M. Wong, B. J. Van Wie, and P. Dutta, "Hands-on in Engineering Classrooms: A Comparison of Online versus Face-to-Face Delivery," Proceedings of American Educational Research Association Conference, Orlando, FL, April 9-12, 2021.[6] C. Watson, J. B. Gartner, B. J. VanWie, Dutta P., O. O. Adesope, and H. Curtis, "The Effects of Prior Knowledge on Learning with Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules," Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26-29, 2022.[7] O. J. Ajeigbe et al., "Gender-Related Effects on Learning with Hands-On Modules in
universities for which he has been associated. Imbrie is nationally recognized for his work in ac- tive/collaborative learning pedagogies, teaming and student success modeling. His engineering education leadership has produced fundamental changes in the way students are educated around the world. Imbrie has been a member of ASEE since 2000 and has been actively involved with the Society in var- ious capacities. He has served in multiple leadership roles in the ERM and FPD divisions, including: ERM board of directors (2002-2004), program chair for ERM (2005 and 2009), ERM program chair for Frontiers in Education (FIE) (2004), FIE Steering Committee ERM representative (2003-2009), as well as program chair (2016) and division
for 11weeks) and their group final presentation and ability to answer questions well (50 points).Table 3 shows the course grading percentages for all components of the course for 2018, 2019,2021, and 2022, both pre-project and post-project, so that a comparison of individual versusgroup work can be made. Table 4 shows the project grade, comprehensive final exam grade (thesame final exam is given each year, with only minor edits), and overall course grades withaverages and standard deviations. For a control, the year 2018 is presented. In 2018, there was noproject. Please note that 2020 is not presented as it was during COVID, and the course wastaught asynchronously and remotely with a different final exam. In 2019, when the project
teams: a systematic review," Team Performance Management, vol. 25 No. 7/8, pp. 369-401, 2019.J. D. Carrico, J. Anjum, and A. Anjum, "An interdisciplinary project-based service learning and action research project with mechanical engineering and speech-language pathology students," in Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 22, 2020 - June 26, 2020.L. Fogg-Rogers, F. Lewis, and J. Edmonds, “Paired peer learning through engineering education outreach,” European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(1), 75–90, 2017.K. Geeraerts, J. Vanhoof, and P. Van den Bossche, “Teachers’ perceptions of intergenerational knowledge flows,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 56, pp. 150-161, 2016.E. Kearney
determine what works and why in virtual/physical teaching spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 903-920. 10. Pazos, P., Magpili, N., Zhou, Z., & Rodriguez, L. J. (2016, June). Developing critical collaboration skills in engineering students: results from an empirical study. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 11. Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Fuster-Guilló, A., Rico-Soliveres, M. L., Azorín-López, J., & Jimeno-Morenilla, A. (2019). Practical method of improving the teamwork of engineering students using team contracts to minimize conflict situations. IEEE Access, 7, 65083-65092. 12. Lattuca, L. R., Knight, D. B., Ro, H. K., & Novoselich, B. J. (2017). Supporting the
conceptualizing their ideas and starting prototyping, students did not create asrobust of learning modules as we had hoped. The students have continued to improve their projectsafter the semester ended, producing three paper drafts that share their classroom activities and havebeen submitted to the ASEE conference [16], [17], [18]. Eight students decided to stay on thisclinic project for the spring semester, demonstrating high engagement with the project overall.Their documentation efforts also forced our students to think deeply about the LOs and how theseactivities can be implemented. We are looking forward to seeing the outcomes of their continuedengagement and the refinement of their educational activities.Survey Outcomes. Seven of the ten students
-Year Course.”[2] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M. R., Shuman, L. J., and Wolfe, H., 2004, “Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., 93(2), pp. 105–115.[3] Rae, D., and Melton, D. E., 2017, “Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in US Engineering Education: An International View of the KEEN Project,” J. Eng. Entrep., 7(3).[4] Farina, J., Dillon, H., Levison, R. D., and Ralston, N., 2020, “Increasing Student Curiosity with Cooling Systems,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education.[5] Bieryla, K., Schulz, N. A., Levison, R. D., and Dillon, H. E., 2020, “Play-Doh and
; Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, June, 2019, p. 33030. doi:10.18260/1-2--33030.[3] J. Erickson, S. Claussen, J. Leydens, K. Johnson, and J. Tsai, “Real-world Examples andSociotechnical Integration: What’s the Connection?,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 35120. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35120.[4] J. Blacklock, K. Johnson, R. Cook, N. Plata, and S. Claussen, “Faculty Interpretations ofSociotechnical Thinking in their Classrooms: Techniques for Integration,” in 2021 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jul. 2021, p. 19.“Understanding theFormation of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Education.” [Online]. Available:https://www.mines.edu
, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24086[5]. LeBlanc, Christopher David, and Donald J. Plante. "An Engineering Technology Course in Additive Manufacturing." In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2018.[6]. Fidan, Ismail, George Chitiyo, Thomas Singer, and Jamshid Moradmand. "Additive manufacturing studios: A new way of teaching ABET student outcomes and continuous improvement." In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, no. 2018. 2018.[7]. Maloney, Patricia A., Weilong Cong, Meng Zhang, and Bingbing Li. "Assessing the Results of an Additive Manufacturing Course at Three Large Universities on Undergraduates and High School Students." In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019.[8]. Prabhu, Rohan, Scarlett R. Miller
, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) andthe American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) have discussed the need for engineersof the future to be “T-shaped” professionals who possess a deep subject knowledge and theability to apply that knowledge broadly [1-4] (the vertical of the T-shape refers to this depth ofknowledge and the horizontal refers to the ability to to transfer this knowledge to variousapplications).A problem exists, however, in that engineering students often face difficulties in transferringknowledge and developing the connections that exist between concepts and courses in theirprogram of study [5-7]. This deficiency is not often addressed by faculty teaching engineeringcourses, which are often taught in silos and
acoustic emissions,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2023 Heat Transfer Summer Conference, 2023, pp. HT2023-106939.[21] C. Dunlap, H. Pandey, E. Weems, and H. Hu, “Nonintrusive Heat Flux Quantification Using Acoustic Emissions During Pool Boiling,” SSRN 4313756, 2022.[22] S. Pierson, J. Goss, and H. Hu, “Enhancing Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Education with CAM and CNC Machining,” in ASEE Midwest Section Conference 2022, 2022.[23] H. Hu, J. A. Weibel, and S. v. Garimella, “A coupled wicking and evaporation model for prediction of pool boiling critical heat flux on structured surfaces,” Int J Heat Mass Transf, vol. 136, pp. 373–382, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.03.005.
, engineering and construction (AEC) women. In February 2019, Andrea received the prestigious National Science Foundation NSF - CAREER award to research professional identity development processes in undergraduate AEC women. She also received an NSF - RAPID award in 2020 to investigate decision making processes in STEM students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Ofori-Boadu has also received grants from East Coast Construction Services, Engineering Information Foundation, National Association of Home Builders, National Housing Endow- ment, University of North Carolina, and the Department of Education. In 2021, Dr. Ofori-Boadu was selected as one of six female faculty to be highlighted in the Center of Product Design and
Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–5.[12] C. Leachman, J. Leachman, and J. Leachman, “If the Engineering Literature Fits, UseIt! Student Application of Grey Literature and Engineering Standards,” 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Jul. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24218.[13] Konstantin Pervushin, M. Fosmire, and P. B. McPherson, “Standards are Everywhere: AFreely Available Introductory Online Educational Program on Standardization for ProductDevelopment,” Standards Engineering, Jan. 2018.[14] P. McPherson, M. Phillips, and K. Reiter, “Integrating Technical Standards into ETCurricula to Meet ABET standards and Industry Needs,” in 2019 CIEC, 2019.[15] P. McPherson and K. Reiter, “Providing Students with Practical Experience in
-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Carol Geary, Virginia Tech Carol Geary is a fourth-year Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her interests include co-curricular support, mentoring, and peer mentoring.Natali C. Huggins, Virginia Tech Natali Huggins is a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Virginia Tech. She holds a master’s in public admin- istration from the National Experimental University of T´achira in Venezuela. In addition, she has several years of experience in higher education administration and internal audit in Venezuela. Her international experience
Laboratory Experiment Paperpresented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.10.18260/p.26679[4] Dickrell, P. L. (2017, June), Five-Minute Demonstrations: Minimal Faculty Investment forMaximum Learning Impact Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28366[5] Funke, L., & Hylton, J. B., & Sawyers, D. (2019, June), Work in Progress: IncorporatingMicroprocessors across the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33630[6] Harib, K. H., & Sivaloganathan, S., & Hamza, R. K. M., & Aziz, M. A. (2020, June),Foundation Mechatronics Laboratory Course for Mechanical
studentperformance and engagement.References[1] Bolton, R. and Zoghi, B., “Enhancing system dynamics instruction for technologists with simulation,”ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[2] Klegka, J.S. and O'Donovan, T.E., “Using Simulink As A Design Tool,” ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings, 2002.[3] Smaili, A. and Zeineddine, F., “SoftLink: A matlab/simulink based code for the analysis, synthesis,optimization and simulation of mechanisms,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[4] KEEN Entrepreneurial Mindset, https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset, accessed 6 February 2022[5] Zhu, H., & Baumann, A., & Lichtenstein, G., “Assessment of Entrepreneurial Mindset Coverage in anOnline First Year Design Course,” 2019 FYEE Conference, Penn State
lessonslearned for developing open educational resources.Project OverviewThis section contains details of the project execution, including descriptions and objectives for thetwo phases: (1) Development of the OER textbook, and (2) Incorporation of student problems.In the first phase, developing the OER textbook, an internal university grant of $1,000 was awardedin April 2020, which allowed for an adaptation of existing material. Rather than create an entirelynew textbook, OER statics and physics textbooks were adapted. A research student was hired inthe fall of 2020 to support the creation of the OER, using the Pressbooks platform. The studentwas recruited based on their performance in the Fall 2019 Statics course with the facultyresearcher, for their
test as a partial fulfilment of graduation requirements. ME andCIVE program students’ performance on their first attempt at the FE exam is providedby NCEES as annual summaries. ME and CIVE programs are also using the provideddata for assessment; significantly the ABET Comparator Average Performance Indexfor individual courses. Both programs are using their respective seniors’ performancein each topic compared to the national average performance andTable 1. Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Civil CBT and Mechanical CBT ExamSpecifications since July 2020. (3, 4)compared to their own historic data for assessment of program. Our historic dataindicated a decrease in our students’ performance in FE questions from 1XX – 2XXlevel courses since 2019
, 10.1002/ase.1573[8] S. Ford and T. Minshall, "Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching education,"Additive Manufacturing, vol. 25, pp. 131-150, Jan. 2019.[9] D.M. Grzybowski, T. Wild, and S.J. Yang, "Board # 90 : Engineering Education for VisuallyImpaired Students," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Jun. 2017, 10.18260/1-2--27952[10] E.C. Pender and J.J. Healy, "Accessible circuit diagrams," 33rd Irish Signals and SystemsConference (ISSC), Jul. 2022.[11] J.U. Davis, T.Y. Wu, B. Shi, H. Lu, A. Panotopoulou, E. Whiting, and X.D. Yang,"TangibleCircuits: an interactive 3D printed circuit education tool for people with visualimpairments," Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in ComputingSystems, Apr. 2020.[12] H. Shen, O
related to the engineering competency model, which may includeinclusion in the Open Skills Network [54]. We are continuing our efforts to promote the use ofthe Pro-ABC materials to industry partners for early-career professional development, to create a“pull” from industry for more professional formation within engineering programs as regionalindustries set clearer professional expectations in their hiring practices.References[1] G. Kremer, “Student perceptions of culture - from a survey of students in ME 4800 / EnE 3810colloquium, December 2019,” Dec. 2019. [Online]. Available:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mcMteeaQFlwOjr15Kp5YNCuyXDW48IW_VRyCMsuQXn0/edit?usp=sharing. [Accessed: Jul. 15, 2022].[2] G. Boyle, Barking to the Choir: The Power
. Litzinger, P.V. Meter, C.M. Firetto, L.J. Passmore, C.B. Masters, S.R. Turns, G.L.Gray, F. Costanzo and S.E. Zappe, "A cognitive study of problem solving in statics," J EngEduc, vol. 99, pp. 337-353, 2010.[15] N. Johnson‐Glauch and G.L. Herman, "Engineering representations guide student problem‐solving in statics," J Eng Educ, vol. 108, pp. 220-247, 2019.[16] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L.W. Singleton, "Feel the force! An inquiry-based approach toteaching free-body diagrams for rigid body analysis," in ASEE annual conference exposition,2020.[17] C.S. Lee, N.J. McNeill, E.P. Douglas, M.E. Koro‐Ljungberg and D.J. Therriault,"Indispensable resource? A phenomenological study of textbook use in engineering problemsolving," J Eng Educ, vol. 102, pp. 269
: 10.1007/s11465-018-0499-5.[8] V. Sima, I. G. Gheorghe, J. Subić, and D. Nancu, “Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 10, Art. no. 10, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12104035.[9] M. Johnson and B. P. Nepal, “Board 76: Bridging the Workforce Skills Gap in High Value Manufacturing through Continuing Education,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-76-bridging-the-workforce-skills-gap-in-high- value-manufacturing-through-continuing-education[10] “Narrowing the Skills Gap to Ensure the Future
Summer Conference, 2022, vol. 2022-May, pp. 441–449. doi: 10.1615/tfec2022.emt.040708.[2] D. Adair and M. Jaeger, “An efficient strategy to deliver understanding of both numerical and practical aspects when using Navier-Stokes equations to solve fluid mechanics problems,” Fluids, vol. 4, no. 4, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/fluids4040178.[3] J. Weber, G. N. Facas, M. Horst, and M. Sharobeam, “Using FLUENT to Supplement Theory in an Introductory Fluid Mechanics Course,” International Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2019, doi: 10.5923/j.ijhe.20190801.03.[4] W. Mokhtar, “Project-Based Learning (PBL) - An effective tool to teach an undergraduate CFD course,” in
Paper ID #41870Ancient Machines: What Engineering Students Can Learn from Them?Dr. Arif Sirinterlikci Ph.D., CMfgE, Robert Morris University Dr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Ph.D., CMfgE is a University Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering in the School of Engineering, Mathematics, and Science (SEMS) at Robert Morris University (RMU). He holds BS/MS degrees (both in Mechanical Engineering) from Istanbul Technical University in Turkey, and his Ph.D. is in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the Ohio State University. He was involved in the ASEE Organization in the years between 2003 to 2011 as a Manufacturing
the global engineering teachingcommunity through our library system.Acknowledgment This work is supported by National Science Foundation Grant EEC-2022275 to createopportunities for revolutionizing the preparation of students. We thank Lani Draper, eSAILInstructional Designer, for her help in developing the module videos.References[1] R. J. Marandi, B. K. Smith, R. F. Burch, and S. C. Vick, “Engineering soft skills vs. engineering entrepreneurial skills,” Int J Eng Educ, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 988-998, 2019.[2] R. Reagans and E. W. Zuckerman, “Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams,” Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 502-517, 2001.[3] P. Pazos et al
students. The course’sprimary objective is to introduce Mechanical Engineering students to programming and toprepare students for subsequent courses including courses in numerical methods,experimentation and instrumentation, and system modeling. This course also serves as one ofthree courses introducing first-year students to Mechanical Engineering. While the course hasexisted for some time, it began a transition to its current form in Fall 2019. The courseintroduces students to C++ programming on the Arduino platform and programming in theMatlab numeric computing platform. The course focuses on fundamental programming conceptssuch as variables, conditional statements, loops, arrays, and functions and on programmingapplications in mechanical
drop inthe number of failing students.Overall, the initial experience using a mastery-based method to teach CAD was successful andwill continue to be used in the future. A few changes will be made to help augment the tutorialsand add extra teaching resources. Also, threads between EM and the mastery-method willcontinue to be developed with the goal of encouraging students to develop a growth mindsetearlier in their engineering education.References: [1] Roszelle, Breigh N. “Full Paper: The development of a first-year design project: focusing on creativity, independence, and design understanding”. 2019 First Year Engineering Experience Conference, University Park, PA, Jul 28th-30th, 2019. [2] Yue, Jianping. "Teaching techniques
then took the paper-based FE exam. Between Spring 2014 and Spring 2018, while using the CE 411 materials for theFE CBT exams we saw a sharp decline in students' performance with the lowest pass rate at65%, which was 13% lower than the national average pass rate 78%. To address this decline, westarted developing and implementing SDLMs in Fall 2018 and modified CE 411 to be ME 416FE Exam Review. Although we didn't anticipate COVID-19 impact in Fall 2019, theimplementation of SDLMs allowed students to continue learning online without meetinginstructors face-to-face. Nonetheless, we still meet students live on ZOOM for the 1st session ofthe course to give an overview of the course and answer questions from students.The objective of this study is
Activity for a First-year Mechanical Engineering Course”, Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Con- ference, doi:10.18260/1-2--29666.[31] Mechanismic Inc., 2022, “MotionGen Pro”, URL http://www.motiongen.io.[32] Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M., 2019, “An introduction to variational autoencoders”, Foun- dations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 12(4), pp. 307–392.[33] Deshpande, S. and Purwar, A., 2020, “An Image-Based Approach to Variational Path Syn- thesis of Linkages”, ASME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 21(2), doi:10.1115/1.4048422, URL https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048422, 021005.[34] Deshpande, S. and Purwar, A., 2019, “Computational Creativity via Assisted Variational