analytic techniques areexcellent. However, while the analysis is appropriate for undergraduates, many of theapplications are focused on higher-level structural design. There are two, much older, referencesonline that offer a more focused undergraduate presentation, the 1906 “Text Book on GraphicalStatics” 4, a thesis for the “Degree of Civil Engineer” (M.S.) from the University of Illinois, byCharles Wesley Malcom and the “Graphical Analysis, A textbook on Graphic Statics"5, byWilliam S. Wolfe, 1921. Both books look more at forces and equilibrium than design, makingthem more appropriate for topics in Statics for undergraduate mechanical and civil engineeringstudents. Additionally, a detailed explanation and illustrations of force and funicular
presenting the total externalwork and total strain energy equations beginning first with a single load P applied to a planartruss with one load sequence. Then loads P and Q are applied using two load sequences in whichthe load Q is applied at the location and in the direction of the desired displacement. From thisbasis of understanding, an additional load S is included in both load sequences to discuss itsinfluence on the displacement expression. This leads to a general understanding of the influencethat any number of additional loads would have on the displacement expression, and that theeffect of the load Q remains unchanged as these loads are applied. It then becomes evident thatBarry T. Rossonthe desired displacement due to all the applied loads
education," 2008.[2] National Academy of Engineering, "Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century," National Academies Press, 2005.[3] A. M. Ogilvie, D. B. Knight, M. Borrego, A. A. Fuentes, P. A. Nava and V. E. Taylor, "Transfer Student Pathways to Engineering Degrees: A Multi-Institutional Study Based in Texas," in 45th Annual Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, El Paso, TX, 2015.[4] National Research Council, "Enhancing the community college pathway to engineering careers," The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2005.[5] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra and R. Layton, "Persistence, Engagement and Migration in engineering Programs," Journal of
the measured/calculated data alongwith the above mentioned plots (Q2) to report if any differences are observed in the results forthe two different balls that are tested along with a scientific explanation for it. In addition thefollowing discussion questions are asked as well.(Q3) If the ball is projected with a velocity = 2000 ft/s in air how would its flight characteristicsbe affected?(Q4) A ball projected with velocity v at an angle θ breaks apart into two pieces at the highestpoint of its trajectory such that each piece acquires an additional horizontal velocity v opposite indirection to the other piece and perpendicular to the initial horizontal direction. Find the locationof each piece with respect to the launch point when it falls to
@jo&V = s (Eq. 13) r N(.@-(trNq?.@@which is second order. Comparing this result to Equation 2, the identified coefficients agree withthe expected form. The identified parameters correspond to a value of 𝐵 ≈ 0.0688Ns/m, usingthe known values of 𝑀 = 0.57kg and 𝑘 = 15N/m.The identified transfer function for the two-cart system is j(.??(-r w Nq@.(pr s j@?.qqrN-@-q 𝐺-jo&V = x (Eq. 14) r N(.@yqqr w N@(yr s Np.zAprN-@?@which is fourth order, and appears similar to the expected form. The consistency of
Teaching International, 45(4), pp. 375-387.[12] Pierre-Antoine, R., Sheppard, S. D., and Schar, M., 2014, “Utilizing Concept Maps to Improve Engineering Course Curriculum in Teaching Mechanics,” Proceedings of the 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 15-18, 2014.[13] Triplett, J., Kelly, J. E., Krause, S. J., 2011, “Development and Use of Concept Context Maps to Promote Student,” Proceedings of the 2011ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26- 29, 2011.[14] Daugherty, J. L., Custer, R. L., and Dixon, R. A., 2011, “The Use of Concept Mapping to Structure a Conceptual Foundation for Secondary Level Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the
theSolution Grade of a statics or dynamics problem. Fitted Line Plot Solution Grade = 0.1539 + 0.6828 P-Grade S 0.141391 1.0 R-Sq 54.4% R-Sq(adj) 54.4% 0.8 Solution Grade 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0
., & Rogers, C. (2010). The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design. Design Studies, 31(3), 288-309. 3. Steif, P. S., & Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis. Journal Of Engineering Education, 94(4), 363-371. 4. Steif, P. S., & Hansen, M. A. (2006). Comparisons between performances in a statics concept inventory and course examinations. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 22, 1070-1076. 5. Steif, P. S., & Hansen, M. A. (2007). New practices for administering and anlyzing the results of concept inventories. Journal Of Engineering Education, 96(3), 205-212. 6. Dollár, A., & Steif, P. S. (2006). Learning
corresponds to an air velocity of roughly 30 m/s. With the leaky connections, theerrant dynamic pressure and velocity measured about 6 mm of water and 10 m/s, respectively.Thus, their digital measurement device appeared in every way to be working properly, but if thestudents took the effort to convert their pressure measurement to a velocity measurement, theymay realize that the velocity they were measuring was too low, which admittedly may requiresome amount of intuition that the students probably do not yet have.Because the exercise involves questions of accuracy, the students were also asked to assess theuncertainty in their measurements. Because the fluid density is needed to convert the dynamicpressure measurement into a velocity measurement
Higher EducationReport No. 1. Washington D.C.: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development, 1991.[2] Felder, R. and Brent, R. “Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls and Payoffs” ERIC DocumentReproduction Service, ED 377038, 1994.[3] Felder, R. and Brent, R. “Learning by Doing” Chem. Engr. Education 37(4), 282-283, 2003.[4] Prince, M. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research” J. Engr. Education, 93(3) 223-231, 2004[5] Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N. Jordt, H and Wenderroth, M.P. “Active learningincreases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics” PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415, 2014.[6] Culmann. Karl, "Die graphisehe Statik" Zürich
from the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA. 5. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43 (2), 16-23. 6. Turns, J., Sattler, B., Yasuhara, K., Borgford-Parnell, J. L., & Atman, C. J. (2014). Integrating reflection into engineering education. Proceedings from the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 7. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press. 8. Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic
Teaching, 41(1), pp. 30-35.[4] Bland, L. (2006) “Applying flip/inverted classroom model in electrical engineering to establish life-longlearning.” Proc. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.[5] Shibley, I., and Wilson, T. (2012) “The flipped classroom: rethinking the way you teach.” Magna OnlineSeminar presented at Memorial University, St. John’s, NL.[6] Holdhusen, M. (2015) “A ‘flipped’ statics classroom.” Proc. American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference, Seattle, WA.[7] Velegol, S. et al. (2015) “The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations.” ASEEAdvances in Engineering Education, Winter 2015.[8] Swithenback, S., and DeNucci, T. (2014) “Using a “Flipped Classroom
relevance (specific to an engineer’s required understanding of the subject) 4. Evaluate for creativity (is the question contextualised? Authentic? Realistic? Higher order? Is this an excellent way to assess this knowledge/ability? Is the wording ideal?) 5. Solve – what answers might students provide? What is acceptable? What if any partial credit will be awarded? 6. Provide feedback: a. Identify and state the problem/s with the item b. State why it is a problem c. Suggest how the item could be rephrased d. State how the revised suggestion is better than the original 7. Pairs then review and evaluate the items brought to the workshop. Pairs decide whether the item would be suitable as
2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, 2008.[5] B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, K. Jones and Center for Technology in Learning, "Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies," U.S. Department of Education, 2010.[6] D. S. Brewer, The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students, Utah State University, 2009.[7] W. Ziemer, "WeBWorK: An Open-Source Online Homework System," in Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education, NSF DUE in collaboration with EHR and AAAS, 2004, pp. 169-171
Paper ID #16398Analogy Methods to Address Warping and Plasticity in TorsionProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, University at Buffalo, SUNY Dr. Somnath Chattopadhyay teaches mechanics, materials, manufacturing and design at University at Buffalo He has authored a text on Pressure Vessel s and till recently was an Associate Editor of the ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. His research interests are in the areas of fatigue and fracture of metals, carbon nanotubes, multi-scale material modeling and engineering education. He had a very successful industrial career with Westinghouse Electric where he directed and performed
extracted and summarized during coding.The coding table was included in the annex. 1.Looking at the figure in scenario #X, if you pull on the string gently, which way do you predict the spool will move? Right _______ Left ______Won’t Move_______ 2.When pulling, which direction is the friction force? Right _______ Left ______There is no friction force _______ 3.What is the value of the friction force? f k N _____ f s N _____ f s N ______ Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 Figure 3. The four scenarios utilized for the IBLAFindingsThe students
tr e S d o M Preference Figure 3: Distribution of the learning styles for female students in ENGG 349.same as the male students. However, the data suggests that 10% more of the males are active andvisual learners than are the females. In a comparative study of engineering students, a verysimilar trend in the differences in learning styles between male and female
-65 Crocker, S. and King, R.C., (Eds), Piping Handbook, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967
Class period Instructor(s) N* H1 Homework Fall 2013 TR 8:00-10:45am A&B 37 H2 Homework Spring 2014 TR 8:00-10:45am A&C 32 Q1 Quizzes Fall 2014 WMF 8:00-9:50am A&C 35 Q2 Quizzes Fall 2014 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 33 M1 ME/Quizzes Fall 2015 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 34 M2 ME/Quizzes Fall 2015 WMF 8:00-9:50am C 27*N is the number of students included in this study based on exam scores. Students who did nottake either of the exams were excluded from the analysis.As discussed in the
willingparticipation of the student subjects who completed the experiment and provided incrediblyuseful feedback about potential refinements to our methods.References[1] J. Sweller, “The worked example effect and human cognition,” Learn. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 165–169, Apr. 2006.[2] S. Kalyuga, P. Ayres, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller, “The expertise reversal effect,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2003.[3] R. Moreno, M. Reisslein, and G. Ozogul, “Optimizing Worked‐Example Instruction in Electrical Engineering: The Role of Fading and Feedback during Problem‐Solving Practice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2009.[4] J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning,” Cogn. Sci
. 2005.4. Evans DL, Gray GL, Krause S, et al. Progress on Concept Inventory Assessment Tools. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO. 2003.5. Gray GL, Evans D, Cornwell PJ, Costanzo F, Self B. Toward a Nationwide Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN. 2003.6. Smith MK, Wood WB, Knight JK. The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. CBE - Life Sci Educ. 2008. 7(4):422-430.7. Henderson C. Common Concerns about the Force Concept Inventory. Phys Teach. 2002. 40(9):542-547.8. Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE. The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-Yet-Effective Measures of the Big
. Sahin, M. (2010) “The Impact of Problem-Based Learning on Engineering Students' Beliefs About Physics and Conceptual Understanding of Energy and Momentum,” European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 35, No. 5. 7. Albanese, M.A. and Mitchell, S. (1993) “Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues,” Academic Medicine, Vol. 68. 8. Yaeger, P.M., Marra, R.M., Gray, M.G.L., and Costanzo, F. (1999) “Assessing New Ways of Teaching Dynamics: An Ongoing Program to Improve Teaching, Learning, and Assessment,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 9. Woods, D. R. (1996) “Problem-Based Learning for Large Classes in
affected from FC.These numbers are detailed in Table 7. In this study, effect size was calculated using Cohen’s Dgiven in Equation 1, where x is the mean and s is the pooled standard deviation given inEquation 2, where n is the sample size and s1 and s2 are the variances. For Cohen’s d, 0.2signifies small, 0.5 medium, 0.8 large, and 1.3 very large effect sizes, as offered by Cohen. 𝑥1 − 𝑥2 (1) 𝑑= 𝑠 (2
was supported by the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign. This work was also supported by the National Science Foundation undergrants DUE-1347722 and CMMI-1150490. The opinions, findings, and conclusions presented inthis paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the authors’institution.Bibliography [1] M. M. Lombardi. Making the grade: The role of assessment in authentic learning. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, 2008. [2] J. Reeve. Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44:159–175, 2009. [3] F. Marton and S. Booth. Learning and Awareness. New York: Lawrence
prerequisite for ENER 340. ENER 240 covers single-variable calculus and particle dynamics. For example, ENER 240 covers (i) trajectory ofa particle moving in air under gravitational force and (ii) friction force. ENER 240 shouldprovide the students with an opportunity to review applied mechanics course(s) they hadtaken in their two-year diploma programs. Both ENER 240 and 340 are designed with theidea that polytechnic students would be able to learn mathematics better if they are alsolearning simultaneously their applications.ENER 340 is delivered in 6 weeks during the Summer term, and each week has 6 hoursof lectures and 6 hours of tutorials. The course load per week (pacing) is twice as that inregular Fall (September-December) or Winter (January
Education, 1900-1965,” Journal of Engineering Education, Jul, 1999, pp. 285-294.3. Grinter, L.E. (Chair), et al., “Report of the Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education, Apr, 1955, pp. 25-63.4. Fromm, E., “The Changing Engineering Educational Paradigm,” Journal of Engineering Education, Apr, 2003, pp. 113-121.5. Welch, R., and A. Estes, “Teaching Mechanics 101,” Annual Conference of American Society of Engineering Education, 2005.6. Khanna, S. K., and C. H. Jenkins, “Linking Mechanics and Materials in Engineering Design: A New Approach,” Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2001.7. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and L. J. Leifer
solving strategies. Our initial results haveshown that these prompts could direct students’ attention to governing principles instead ofguessing equations. Future research should collect more data to explore how scaffolding throughquestion prompts affects students’ learning. Future work should also investigate the design ofquestion prompts and the effect on learners with different background. As the ultimate goal ofscaffolding is to achieve independent learning, research should be conducted to find out whenscaffolding can be removed.References[1] A. S. Luchins, “Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung.,”Psychological monographs, vol. 54, no. 6, p. i, 1942.[2] K. Miller, “Einstellung rigidity, intelligence and teaching
., 2014, "The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuitsof Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum," Cognition andInstruction, 32(2), 101–158.[17] Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V.N., 2003, "The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-FirstCentury," Science Education, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 28-54.[18] Abdulwahed, M. and Nagy, Z.K., 2009, “Applying Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle for LaboratoryEducation,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 98, No. 3, pp 283-293.[19] Menekse, M., Stump, G.S., Krause, S., and Chi, M.T.H., 2013, “Differentiated Overt Learning Activities forEffective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 102
Inventory Assessment Test. In: Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. ; 2003:8.1202.1- 8.1202.12. https://peer.asee.org/11759.6. Gray GL, Costanzo F, Evans D, Cornwell P, Self B, Lane JL. The Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test : A Progress Report and Some Results Introduction. In: Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. ; 2005:10.1278.1-10.1278.16. https://peer.asee.org/15378.7. Richardson J, Steif PS, Morgan J, Dantzler J. Development of a Concept Inventory for Strength of Materials. In: Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. ; 2003:29-33.8. Sweeney S, Englund R, Edwards R. Direct Assessment of Mechanics of Materials Learning with Concept