Paper ID #23688Exploring the Interplay of Diversity and Ethics in an Introductory Bioengi-neering Course (Work In Progress)Dr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne G. Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Wash- ington, where she leads the Bioengineering Outreach Initiative, Bioengineering Honors Program, and the Bioengineering Summer Camp in Global Health. She holds a PhD in Genetics from Duke University, and BS in Molecular Biology and BA in Psychology from the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Hen- dricks’ teaching activities at the University of
Engineering Education, 2011 Views of Diverse Groups of International and American Students Concerning Business, Cultural, and Ethical IssuesAbstractUniversity programs have a growing number of students from all around the world, making itimportant to consider the perspectives of these students to maximize their learning experiences.As manufacturing and business activities and operations become increasingly global, theopportunity for interaction with these students gives all of our students, including traditionalNorth American students, the opportunity to learn about other cultures and their impact onbusiness and business ethics. It is far too easy to assume mistakenly that all students view class topics from the traditionalCanadian
ateam of agents and processes, acting upon the students’ life at decidedly different time intervalsand all with a different focus. The first challenge is that of foundational mathematics and scienceand the critical time frame for the first challenge is that of between 4th and 6th grades. Thesecond challenge is that of instilling a self motivated work ethic towards learning and the criticaltime frame is ideally 9th grade but no later than the beginning of the 11th grade. The thirdchallenge is that of financial accountability and the critical time frame is from freshman throughsophomore years at the undergraduate level. This paper peers into these real challenges ofattracting minority students to engineering careers and offers the seeds for
components. The WIMS LSAMP REU Program is a 10.5-weekresidential program for LSAMP students located at at the University of Michigan. Table 1 – WIMS LSAMP REU Components Primary Component Research Projects, with mentoring Secondary Components Communication Skills Professional Ethics LSAMP Awareness Graduate Study Workshops Ancillary Components WIMS Seminars and Discussions
Paper ID #26126Work in Progress: Science and Engineering for Social Justice: CurriculumDevelopment and Student ImpactCamille Birch, University of Washington Camille Birch is a graduate of the Bioengineering and Computer Science departments at the University of Washington. She developed curriculum concerning the interplay of diversity and ethics for undergrad- uate engineering students at UW and is interested in the power of education to enact change in future generations of engineers. She currently works for Microsoft in the Bay Area.Celina Gunnarsson, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks
-intercept & their standard deviations), which will also be covered during the prepcourse. Collectively, these activities will not only enhance students‟ understanding of theconcepts and improve their problem solving skills in chemistry, but it will also teach studentshow best to study the sciences, integrate concepts, and learn scientific thinking.Genetics and ethics are both logic-based disciplines uniquely integrated in the day-to-day workof genetic researchers. Given the history of the eugenics movement, it is imperative that ethics isintegrated into introductory genetics courses as a core part of a whole rather than an afterthoughtor add on. It is critical that high school students‟ initial genetic research experience involve thedevelopment
face the challenges of the future. The ten traits include 1) analyticalskills, 2) practical ingenuity, 3) creativity, 4) communication skills, 5) business &management skills, 6) high ethical standards, 7) professionalism, 8) leadership, 9)dynamism/agility/resilience/flexibility, 10) desire to be a lifelong learner.Research ApproachThe study takes a quantitative approach to analyzing an on-line survey conducted with anational sample of 289 African American student and alumni members participating in up tothree types of non-curricular activities: BGOs, MEPs, NSBE. “Students” in this study aredefined as current undergraduate members of an organization and “alumni” are members whoare no longer enrolled as undergraduate students (i.e., graduate
’ matriculation byfocusing on African Americans at PWIs, to a great extent, education and psychological researchexcludes the experiences of African American male students persisting at HBCUs.Although the significant and positive impact of attending HBCUs is well established16, this paperargues that racially homogenous education settings such as HBCUs are not devoid of deficitintellectual stereotyping of African American male students. Further, the nature and function ofwithin-race and gender based ideas about students’ work ethic and skills may operate uniquely inracially homogeneous settings. Therefore, the purposes of the paper are to 1) elucidate thepresence of within-race stereotypes of Black engineering students (African American andinternational
identify problems, finding solutions Creativity Creativity, invention, innovation, thinking outside the box, art Communication Communication skills, oral narrative skills Business and Management Decision making, prioritizing, managing people and projects, troubleshooting Leadership Service, leadership High Ethical Standards Ethical standards, religion (faith), values, belief system, morals Professionalism Professionalism, ethics, judgement, care, subject expertise
for sophomore, junior and senior high schoolstudents. The two-week program highlighted key areas of study necessary for academicsuccess in the areas of Electrical and Computer Engineering, including math, physics,and English. The program also included opportunities for the development of pre- Page 13.1028.2professional skills with the incorporation of LEGO laboratory exercises, company visits,engineering ethics and history sessions.The ExCEL Program recruited most of the participating high school students from schooldistricts within the state of Texas. Efforts were made to expand the recruitment to anational level; however, the results of the
substantially successful. Since its inception, more than 300 minority studentshave received PhD degrees in science or engineering at {institution withheld}, ten percent ofwhich entered academia as direct beneficiaries of FACES, and ten of which received meritoriousyoung investigator awards.11A key aspect of the FACES program is the extensive use of mentoring and enrichment activities.Monthly enrichment seminars expose FACES fellows to training in traditionally pivotal topicssuch as grant writing, interviewing skills, and research ethics; as well as more recentlyhighlighted social sensitivities such as work-family balance and effective networking within
perspective on how individual professions studytheir engineering education profession as it relates to diversity and inclusiveness. Each year, thenominations resulted in five or six finalists arising from different divisions which included the K-12 and Pre-College Engineering, First Year Programs, Liberal Education/Engineering andSociety, Mechanical Engineering, Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation, andMultidisciplinary Engineering Divisions in 2015, the Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering,Educational Research and Methods, Engineering Ethics, Women in Engineering Division and thePacific Southwest Section in 2016, and the Aerospace Division, Diversity Committee, LiberalEducation/Engineering & Society Division, Mathematics Division, and
Texas, El Paso. She is currently serving at Galveston College. Her research interests include biomedical robotics, biomed- ical ethics, sustainability engineering, and green ethics. Page 25.1123.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Research and Leadership Experiences for Undergraduates (RLEU) in Optimization with Engineering ApplicationsAbstractTraditional Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU’s) typically pair anundergraduate student with a researcher for several weeks. The student’s efforts usuallyresult in a poster, a presentation, or even a paper. While
Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Intersectional Complexities of Race/Ethnicity and Gender in Engineering Students’ Professional Social Responsibility AttitudesAbstractThis research examined the professional social responsibility attitudes among engineeringstudents from different demographic groups based on intersectional categories
Studies in an Introduction to Engineering CourseThis section discusses the results of implementation using case studies in the freshmen courseEGR-101 Introduction to Engineering, which is required in the engineering and in the 5-yearMBA program. The learning objectives for the course are that students should demonstrate theability to define the engineering profession; to cite reasons why they have decided to becomeengineers; to identify and formulate problems with an engineering approach; to apply variousmathematical methods for the solution of engineering problems; to write engineering reports onprojects; to make an oral presentation on an engineering project; and to use ethics, societal,environmental and safety considerations to make
Science Foundation S-STEM (Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) grants on undergraduate minorityengineering transfer student retention and development during the period 2007-13 in the Collegeof Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The programs were designed toovercome known barriers to persistence of transfer students from community college, includinglack of engagement on campus, underdeveloped professional work ethic and goals, deficientstudy habits, fewer opportunities to gain practical competence/reflection on learning, andworking for pay. The elements of the programs included cohorting, team-building, mentoring,tutoring, and advising, as well as monetary support in the form of scholarships
notexplicitly reflected in the rubric’s criteria. Specifically within the chemical engineering literature,many key themes were already reflected in the rubric, with the exception of uncertainty. Fromthe electrical and mechanical engineering literature, themes such as industrial ecology,technological adaptability, e-waste, and user experience were missing from the rubric. Inaddition, design for “X” (DfX) approaches, such as design for disassembly, were commonlydiscussed in the electrical and mechanical literature.3 Affordability and Ethics Innovation Equity (Across Disciplines
interested in transferring to a bachelor’s program in engineering.The purpose of the course is to introduce potential Grove students to the practice of engineering Page 23.249.4research in the engineering disciplines the school offers. The course consists of a group researchassignment, lab and library visits, guest lectures on engineering ethics and statistics, groupreports and presentations, math tutoring, and writing exercises analyzing a research article andexploring a research problem. A program description is provided in appendix 2. The studentswere recruited by Grove’s office of student programs using its contacts in many communitycolleges and
actively engages with powersystems and dialogue, honoring lived experiences and committing to an ethic of care andaccountability. This provocation provides a sample case for understanding accomplicerelationships and suggests heuristic for potential accomplices to use in establishing enduringcoalitions between Black and white women.IntroductionIn 1979, Audre Lorde [1] published a letter she’d written to Mary Daly, author of Gyn/Ecology.In it, Lorde, a Black queer woman poet and theorist, praised Daly for her work and yet shared thereality facing Lorde as she read it: To imply, however, that all women suffer the same oppression simply because we are women is to lose sight of the many varied tools of the patriarchy. It is to ignore
, and MATLAB) and be able to explain your rationale for your choice; 5. Synthesize your knowledge of effective and ethical membership on a technical team (i.e., teaming skills) to refine your conduct as a member of the team. 6. Exhibit a work ethic appropriate for the engineering profession.B. ProceduresPre- and post-engineering enculturation surveys were developed to see how studentsexhibit characteristics of the engineering enculturation outcomes through the engineeringprogram on their way to becoming professional engineers. The students were surveyedwith open-ended questions and their responses were dissected for dominant viewpoints.First, the entire FYE foundation course of over 3,600 students was invited through anemail to
, he stated, “I feel like I’m more comfortable with [becoming anengineer] than I may have been before. I thought, ‘All right math, physics - that doesn’t alwaysequal engineering. Maybe that equals a physicist or something like that.’” STEP helped himrealize that his interests did in fact equal engineering.Charles also realized that he needed an improved work ethic - he described himself as “verylazy” and knew it was something that he needed to overcome. During STEP, Charles realizedthat some assignments could take more time than he was willing to commit. He stated, “I coulddo [the work]… I just don’t love wasting that kind of time. Even though it’s not wasting becauseit’s learning and stuff.” While Charles did not perform well academically
results stronglysuggest that the issue of having the FE Exam in the English language is not as critical asoriginally hypothesized. However, additional research, needs to be performed before reachingany solid conclusions; for example, are these results repeatable? Also, will the results hold inother areas of the FE Exam, for example, problems in ethics or engineering economics, in whichthe vocabulary may be more difficult to comprehend and problem statements are usually longerin length? Still, students committed orthographic errors in the translated text; however, these did notalter the meaning of the problem. The author was able to conclude that the students clearlyunderstood the problem and had identified the problem to be solved (find
themselves in their roles as engineers, theirdefinitions of an engineer started to change. As they discussed their journey throughundergraduate school and their career their description of what it meant to be an engineer nolonger reflected the stereotypes that they described initially. They started to personalize theirdefinitions to now embody personal traits, and they started to describe engineering as part oftheir individual and collective identities. Andy described engineers as individuals with a “strongwork ethic… and high integrity,” “being comfortable around technical information,” and“definitely takes a different kind of thinker to be an engineer.” She also described it as “fun,”likening engineering to being “[…] a private detective.” Others
A Qualitative Look at African American Students’ Perceptions of Developing Engineer of 2020 Traits Through Non-curricular ActivitiesIntroduction and MotivationThe National Academy of Engineering’s publication The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofEngineering in the New Century identifies 10 attributes necessary for engineering graduates: (1)strong analytical skills; (2) practical ingenuity (skill in planning, combining, and adapting); (3)creativity; (4) communication skills; (5) principles of business and management; (6) principles ofleadership; (7) high ethical standards; (8) professionalism; (9) dynamism, agility, resilience,flexibility (the ability to learn new things quickly and apply knowledge to new
, and early warnings.2) ME Faculty will mentor students in areas and activities such as professional opportunities for students (internships, professional societies, co-ops, undergraduate student research and industry projects, design competitions, professional meetings, etc.),answer questions about career choices, encourage good habits (study habits, ethical behavior, healthy life, stress management techniques, search for any required professional help, etc), motivation (rewards of hard work, celebrate success, learn from failure, etc.), building a relationship (personal accountability, showing that we care, etc.), financial aid/scholarships, and selection of technical electives appropriate to student interest and career goals3
10% intended to begin their academic careers at the local juniorcollege. Since the Engineering 11 students were pre-selected from students with highschool GPAs above 3.0, the predominance of more renowned institutions in the list ofUniversities to which the students intended to apply testifies to the students’ motivationfor attending university and strong self-concepts. The college-going ethic appeared to bewell established in the population. While there is no formal tracking mechanism of students once they complete thecourse, 33 students who completed Engineering 11 were contacted by e-mail after thecourse. Nine responded. All but one of those who responded were still interested inengineering. Six of the respondents have been
selections based on a Likert scale of well, very well, exceptionally well, or not applicablebased on the degree to which he/she believed their mentor(s) performed various mentoringpractices.ResultsThe responses provided by the participants to the qualitative open-ended questions on the surveyrevealed several common emerging themes. For example, when asked to describe what factors wereused to select a mentor student participant responses were as follows: 1) professionalism of the mentor,2) previous advising experience with mentor, 3) person demonstrated consideration for the student ingiven situations, 4) person was eager to share information to assist with pursuing degree, 5) commonresearch interests with the mentor, and 6) work ethics of the mentor
over the years as a natural evolution...Diversity 1.0 was about compliance and abiding by government regulations. Diverity 2.0 revolved around ethics, morality and social responsibility. Today, Diversity 3.0 is about business integration and globalization...and, ultimately, producing increased employee productivity and new revenue streams. 27Whether competitive anxiety is the basis of diversity reform efforts, or invoked by diversityadvocates because they believe it to be so for corporate leaders and economic policy makers, it isnonetheless a priority which subordinates inclusion to performance and productivity. Sufficientindustrial productivity, or profits, are of course culturally determined and have not
are reinforced by mass media9 and by curricula and in class activities that may notinclude girls’ preferred learning styles,3 which centre around collaboration and relationships3.Students hold views that scientists are men,7 that males are better at STEM fields8 and havenegative notions of females in these fields.1As students view STEM fields to not encompass collaboration, connection, and care,2 asignificant number of girls choose not to go into them for careers.5 However, these conceptionsare questionable as the STEM careers, for example the field of engineering, in fact requirecollaborative work, which is embedded in an ethic of care. The researchers conceptualize care ascollaborating with others in the development of solutions to societal
topics and do long problems on the board and no one ever stopped to ask questions because he would make no effort to help us understand the topics.”These comments demonstrate the crucial role of professors as ambassadors of the profession instudents’ early careers. Engagement with the professors/T.A.s Lectures and activities in class Doing homework & assignments Helpful textbook, handouts, and other resources Collaboration with fellow classmates; study groups Internship experiences My own technical skills and work ethic 0