Paper ID #21884What Does Hidden Curriculum in Engineering Look Like and How Can ItBe Explored?Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and
in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at
for building the S&E workforce.7-10 Nearly 80% of surveyed underrepresented chemistsand chemical engineers believed that women and underrepresented minorities do not participatein the STEM fields because they are not encouraged to do so at a young age. The problem isexacerbated in college with 60% responding that college is a place of active discouragement. Thestudy found pervasive stereotypes “that STEM isn’t for girls or minorities” as one of the majorcontributors to underrepresentation in the sciences.11 Many researchers working toward the common goal of increasing recruitment,enrollment, and graduation of African Americans in engineering have attributed much of thedisparity between African Americans and White and Asian
for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University and the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project exploring
majors at our university. Studentsparticipated in team-building activities that prompted research into their engineering majors andcareer options. In Week 3, we organized an industry career panel with a diverse mix of recruitersand alumni that currently work as engineers. The students asked questions about the panel’s pastcollege experiences, internships, graduate school, and careers. Students also had the opportunityto practice their “60 second pitches” with the panel members to help prepare for a career fair.Throughout the quarter, we incorporated activities that addressed global perspectives ofengineering, current events, and social justice. In Week 4, we collaborated with an EthnicStudies faculty member and her students from a Gender, Race
University of Cincinnati (UC), and to create the best financial and academic supportenvironment for studying and performing research so that they become well prepared forgraduate education and the rigors of the ever-changing global market.The objectives of the project are: (1) In five years, the recruitment of women (non-ethnic andethnic) engineering students will be increased from 16% to 21% of the freshmen students relativeto the fall 2005 enrollment. (2) In five years, the recruitment of ethnic (women and men)engineering students will be increased from 5% to 10% of the freshmen students relative to thefall 2005 enrollment. (3) In five years, graduate 74% of the students from these targetedpopulations relative to spring 2005. (4) Having the above
communication skills, assessment, and identity construction.Ms. Andrea M. Ogilvie P.E., Virginia Tech Andrea M. Ogilvie, P.E. is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Department of En- gineering Education at Virginia Tech. Andrea’s research mission is to broaden participation in STEM and her current research interests are focused on understanding the relationship between institutional pol- icy and student pathways in engineering (i.e. access, recruitment, persistence, retention, migration, and degree completion). Prior to joining Virginia Tech, Andrea served as the Director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering (EOE) Program at The University of Texas at Austin for 11 years. Andrea joined UT in 2001
2: Concept Generation & SelectionBenchmarking The Phase 1 Problem Definition indicated a [design] opportunity for interventionsfocused on recruitment and retention of women and URGs. With this opportunity in mind, theworking group undertook a comprehensive benchmarking process that involved twocomponents. First, the group conducted an inventory of prior (<20 yrs) interventions within COErelated to undergraduate student recruitment, retention, and diversity. Second, a literature reviewwas also conducted, encompassing national reports of best practices in student recruitment andretention as well as case studies of individual institutions that have made notable progress ingender and/or racial diversity within their own
Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors related to equity and diversity in engineering student
22.814.3on anecdotal evidence from teacher feedback to improve students’ understanding of fundamentalengineering concepts8,9,10. The Integrated Teaching and Learning (ITL) Program at theUniversity of Colorado at Boulder developed a Creative Engineering course for students at anearby high school. This course focused on hands-on design based engineering in conjunctionwith the high school curriculum and demonstrated that students had increased confidence in theuse of engineering methods to solve problems11.Research on learning styles reflects the positive impact of integrating kinesthetic learningenvironments with traditional learning structures. A recent study showed that learning is aconglomeration of a variety of interactions12. The results
Engineering is among the best in the country, offering outstanding degreeprograms and preparing students for exciting and rewarding careers. Our graduates are heavilyrecruited for positions in a variety of settings, including business, construction, transportation,hardware and software development, and design. The College comprises 12 departments offering18 BS, 17 MS, and 14 Ph.D. degree programs and conducts the largest undergraduate andgraduate engineering education and research programs in the State. The College continues torank among the nation's leading colleges in the total number of degrees awarded, the number ofdegrees awarded to women and minorities, the quality of the graduate programs, and researchand extension activities. Our fall 2006
Professor and Chair of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UTPA. His research interests include; Kinematic and dynamic modeling, analysis, design and control of multi-rigid-body linkage systems; Robotics; Biomechanics; and Engineering education. Page 22.1281.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 H. Vasquez*, A. Fuentes, J. Macossay, M. Knecht, R. Freeman * Corresponding Author. Assistant Professor Phone: 956-292-7419, Fax: 956-381-3527; e-mail: vasqu002@panam.edu Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas
AC 2011-666: IF YOU BUILD IT, THEY WILL COME (AND STAY): RE-CRUITING AND RETAINING WOMEN AND UNDERREPRESENTED MI-NORITY STUDENTSHyun Kyoung Ro, Pennsylvania State University Hyun Has been working as a graduate assistant on the Engineer of 2020 research grants that the Center for the Study of Higher Education received from the National Science Foundation at Penn State.Rose M Marra, University of Missouri, Columbia Rose M. Marra, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor at the University of Missouri in the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies. She is Director of Research of the NSF-funded Assessing Women and Men in Engineering (AWE) and Assessing Women in Student Environments (AWISE) projects, and a co
Paper ID #12958Understanding the Mentoring Needs of African-American Female Engineer-ing Students: A Phenomenographic Preliminary AnalysisMs. Courtney S Smith, Virginia Tech Courtney S. Smith is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineering, campus climate and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the STEM classroom.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
that achieving success inincreasing underrepresenting minority participation in engineering study requires a multifacetedstrategy to address the continuum from middle school to workforce entry. The multifacetedXXX strategy integrates our programs designed to increase the number of underrepresentedminorities who earn their baccalaureate degrees in engineering. These initiatives include, Pre-Engineering Programs, Scholarships and University Relations; Research; and Policy.The session will address XXX’s STEM Integration Model with a focus on partnerships, best-practices and data driven strategies with the goal of expanding the engineering pathway. Morespecifically, we will highlight XXX’s college and university partnerships to increase
promote a healthy student community among academia. He have worked as the Program Coordinator of Promoting Academic Success for Boys of Color (PASBOC). This program exam- ined the relationships of college mentors with elementary mentees to better understand their experiences and outcomes. He earned my undergraduate degree in Psychology from USF. His main focuses are to recruit, engage and graduate underrepresented students from college. His research interest include men- toring relationships, multicultural awareness, game making, K-12 outreach, service learning, app building and robotics. Page 26.311.1
interviews. The book, Recoding Gender: Women’s Changing Participation in Computing (MIT Press, 2012) has been published and the transcripts are now available….3 The interviews and the book are focused on some of the same issues raised in the current project discussed in this paper, understanding the pathways and barriers for women pursuing careers in engineering, and serve as complementary material.4In our STEM Oral History Project, the IEEE Historians provide training to the students in oralhistory, a technique to record recollections of interviewees for posterity.6-9 The procedures in thisproject follow the best practices established by the Oral History Association.8 We use themethodology of oral history because oral
demonstrate an explicit connection to graduate education theory and criticalconstructs/concepts for success. Research has shown that addressing the topics in Table 1 cansignificantly impact student retention. These workshops provide students with tools forsuccessful degree navigation as well as a network of support at their institutions, in the broaderRDI cohort, and the larger online network. Underlying every session is the understanding that students are aiming to persist in anenvironment that was not designed for them. Through our sessions, we provided validation thatfeelings of not belonging are real and valid (Gardner & Holley, 2011; Gildersleeve et al., 2011;Wood et al., 2016), but also that they can succeed with supportive tools. To
Business-Higher Education F. Increasing the Number of STEM Graduates: Insights from the U.S. STEM Education & Modeling Project. Business-Higher Education Forum;2010.5 Church, A. STEM Mentoring--Aspiration to Achievement. NCSSSMST Journal. 2010;16(1):13-14.6 Strayhorn, T.L. & Terrell, M.C. The Evolving Challenges of Black College Students: New Insights for Page 26.1146.10 Policy, Practice, and Research. ERIC; 2010.7 Snead-McDaniel, K. Exploration of the Lived Experiences of Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Minority Students, ProQuest LLC; 2010.8 Redmond, S.P
integrated into existingprogrammatic structures for female engineering students, including Living-LearningCommunities and mentoring programs. This preliminary analysis, to set the stage for futureresearch, details the incorporation and impact of coaching in a seminar course while also layinggroundwork for addressing multiple research gaps in these areas: gender and coaching,13application of coaching in higher education,20 development of self-confidence withinprofessional roles and how educational programs can foster this,8 and preparing femaleengineering students for the transition to the workforce/graduate school with the aim ofincreasing their retention in said professions. As a means of identifying future possibleframeworks for further study of
Paper ID #18490Listening and Negotiation IIDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy is Professor and Associate Chair for Global Engineering Leader- ship and Research Development in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech, with responsibilities for managing and expanding the School’s global/leadership education and research programs and impact, and directing the Institute’s Global Engineering Leadership Minor Program. Her research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infrastructure decision making to promote sustainable
impact of advising interventions on the academicsuccess of engineering and applied science pre-majors at a large, multicultural, top-tier researchuniversity. There is a growing body of literature addressing the impact of specific academicinitiatives with respect to how higher education students are taught math, science, andengineering subjects, though there is less focus on the value of intensive psycho-social supporton the retention and advancement of students pursuing the science, technology, engineering andmath (STEM) disciplines. This paper seeks to address that issue and illustrate how earlyadvising interventions can improve retention and graduation rates.Kitzrow notes that colleges and universities in the United States have seen enormous
. Youngman, J.A., and Egelhoff, C.J., “Best practices in Recruiting and Persistence of Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering: A 2002 Snapshot,” Proceedings: Frontiers in Education, 30th Annual Conference, Kansas City, Missouri, October 2000, Session F2D, pp. F2D-11-F2D-16.2. Reyes, M. A., Gotes, M. A., McNeill, B., and Anderson-Rowland, M. R., “MEP Summer Bridge Program: A Model Curriculum Project,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, North Carolina, June 1999, CD Rom, 8 pages.3. McGee, M.M. and Fentiman, A.W., “Components of a Year-Long Bridge Program for Minority Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, June 2002, 5 pages. 4
project. The results of the project: hardware, software and documentationare presented to the faculty in the form of a senior thesis. In completing their senior thesisprojects, the students get to interact with each other, with vendors and manufacturers of softwareand hardware components and spend a great deal of time on the internet searching forinformation on manufacturer specifications and the best components and vendors. For thecapstone project, the computer engineering students use the science, engineering and generaleducation backgrounds acquired over the four year period in the design and implementation. Thisexperience enhances the ability of the students to work on teams. It is hoped that the assessmentdata when collected and analyzed for
school districts, nonprofits, and corporations to expose youngsters toexciting math, science, and engineering design activities led by engineering undergraduates. Italso includes a residential summer engineering program for precollege students and theirundergraduate engineering student mentors. Once admitted to engineering, incoming collegestudents gain access to a system of academic Best Practices that includes first-year commoncohorts for math, science and engineering courses, collaborative learning workshops, academicsuccess tools, personal skills enhancement, formalized peer mentoring, and service learning.Returning and transfer students access supplemental collaborative learning workshops in supportof sophomore- and junior-level engineering
conclusions drawn. First, there is a need for increased efforts to advanceand expand quantitative research related to the role of HBCUs in graduating Black engineersincluding dual engineering programs with PWIs. Secondly, an analysis of research and practice-based funding allocations for engineering at HBCUs should be conducted.ConclusionBy highlighting model programs and processes, thoroughly examining challenges faced by MSIson their path to producing the diverse students needed in the STEM workforce, this reportprovided a thorough and in-depth synthesis of the current state of STEM at MSIs, anexamination that was not previously available. Given the need to invest more in understandingand researching STEM education across the pipeline to increase
departments.Unfortunately, however, the reality of such group experiences often proved demoralizing forwomen. Woodfield (2000), for instance, found that female professionals entering a computingcompany looked forward to working in teams, but found the practical experience of teamworklacking, largely due to conflicts in collaborative styles that led to an under-recognition ofwomen's contributions to the project. Many researchers have reported cases where racism andsexism emerged in team contexts (Hewlett et al., 2008; Ingram and Parker, 2002; Neilsen et al,1998; Tonso, 2007). Perhaps as a consequence, Neilsen and colleagues (1998) found manywomen shunning groups, stating that they preferred to work alone. Female engineering studentsin Natishan, Schmidt and Mead
persistence in the major or their intentions to stay in the profession post-graduation.9,10Much of this research has focused, moreover, on how the culture, climate, and professionalsocialization itself push women out of the field.7,11,12 In this article, we turn this question on itshead and ask: how do women conceptualize their token, or deviant, status as engineeringstudents? In asking this question we contribute a new perspective for understanding how womenconstruct rationales for persistence and exit.Women‟s tokenism in engineering education is structurally and culturally organized.Structurally, women remain a numerically small proportion of their classmates at most majorinstitutions of engineering education. Culturally, engineering education
College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University, eleven years of experience in industry as a software engineer, and three years as a full-time faculty in the department of engineering at a small Midwest engineering university.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson
chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids in coal-bed methane and regular oil and gas wells in Colorado. While in the middle of his master’s degree, he also spent a year as a graduate intern at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory studying renewable energy commercialization in Caribbean countries among other areas. He is currently completing is second master’s in engineering for developing communities in conjunction with his PhD Civil Systems Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. His trans-disciplinary research involves addressing global development issues from an engineering, political, and economic perspective.Dr. Bernard Amadei, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Amadei is Professor of Civil