characteristics, meaning that the pedagogicalpractices are unique to students’ cultural, religious, demographic, and gender differences. Thesecharacteristics set students apart from one another and their educators. Therefore, when ateacher’s instructions reflect characteristics of only one group of students, the other students aredenied an equal opportunity to learn [16]. Using CRP takes into consideration a student’straditions, linguistics, value and ethical systems. CRP provides teachers with empirical andtheoretical constructs that support their efforts to lower existing barriers and opportunity gaps [17]- [19] for the increasingly diverse public-school student population in all educational platforms.CRP’s objective is to support students in obtaining
the program has been highly effective at increasingpositive attitudes towards STEM careers and towards pursuing research at the upper-division andgraduate level.IntroductionAs part of a U.S. Department of Education Minority Science and Engineering ImprovementProgram (MSEIP) grant, California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB) began a summerresearch experience for lower-division STEM students in 2015. CSUB is a public, regional,comprehensive university that carries designations as both a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI)and a Minority Serving Institution (MSI). Its demographics reflect the demographics of theservice region, which is a majority minority area. The service region for CSUB is also a fast-growing area marked by historic lags in
Page 26.1625.8coders then worked together to negotiate consensus definitions for the groupings such that eachgroup was finally characterized by its differences from other categories as well as the similaritiesamong quotations within the group.ResultsThe preliminary data analysis yielded three major aspects that seemed to dictate the meaning ofmentoring within each relationship: context, formation and tone (Table 1). Context reflects thegeneral scope of the relationship, including both its focus and the dynamic between mentor andmentor. Formation represents the way in which the relationship was initiated, and in someinstances how it was maintained. Finally, tone reflects the general attitude of the mentor thatformed the basis of the student
academic challenges. These programs have significantly reduced the time studentsspend in remedial English and mathematics courses and have increased the first-year retentionrates. Nevertheless, these first-year improvements do not often reflect on the overall retentionand graduation rates. In fact, contrary to what might be assumed, strong first-year supportprograms, which have received the bulk of the attention in the literature, can degrade sophomoreperformance for a variety of reasons1,2. These observations have led to the suggestion thatsophomore-specific programs are necessary to support rising students3. In many cases, thevanishing effect of first-year programs on later years has been attributed to the fact that studentstransition from a
CC-HSIs. KickStarter interacts at three levels within each CC-HSI - individual, team,and organizational. All three levels are key to institutionalizing successful organizationalchange. For example, KickStarter facilitates STEM planning discussions that increase facultyengagement, leadership, and collaboration, with visibility to CC-HSI executives to gainendorsement of a college-wide STEM plan. KickStarter also tailors its technical guidance to theCC-HSI experience level and provides a safe place for learning, resulting in NSF awards forSTEM education innovations. This paper will describe the experience and details for theimplementation and evaluation of the KickStarter program, including reflections, benefits anddrawbacks of the approach
updated annually.The multi-day or two-hour workshop formats included the following information: • Overview of types and lists of graduate funding opportunities • Getting organized to successfully apply for several fellowships simultaneously • Approaching faculty for strong recommendations • Advice on how to reflect on one’s experience to write an award-winning Personal Statement • Examples of how to apply for the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (GRFP), aimed at exposing future scholars to apply for funding from any organization and encouragement to consider NSF funding later in their careers • An introduction to the NSF GRFP application requirements (e.g. the three essays required), broader impacts, and
Page 24.5.3students.(15) Our research focuses on this university’s journey to transform the on-campusprogram to a totally virtual experience. Students who participated in both the online program andon-campus programs were interviewed. The 30 minute interviews were recorded and latertranscribed to evaluate if there are any reoccurring themes between the two groups of students.Students who participated in the online summer bridge program are currently freshman studentsenrolled in STEM fields, while those who participated in the on-campus program are upperclassmen and are reflecting on their freshman experience at the university. Researchers alsocompared the students’ academic achievement in their freshman math and chemistry courses.Finally
Engineering Education, 2014 A Case Study of Success: Mentoring and Supporting Under-Represented Transfer Students in a Mechanical Engineering ProgramAbstractCalifornia State University, Northridge (CSUN), like many large urban institutions, has a verydiverse student body. This diversity is not only reflected in ethnic and racial differences, but alsoin the students’ educational backgrounds. Our institution enrolls a large number of transferstudents, mostly from community colleges in California. These students face a number ofchallenges, including the adjustment to a new learning environment, issues related to transfercredits, and the necessity of taking additional courses to complete lower
College of Engineering andApplied Science enrolls 3,059 undergraduate and 1,162 graduate students. Among engineeringundergraduates, only 8% are underrepresented minorities (URM), 21% are women, and about15% are first-generation college students. Even though 25% of Colorado high school graduateswere underrepresented minorities in 2008, enrollment of such students in our college remainedunchanged for a decade, at 7.6% in 1999 and 7.9% in 2009. Enrollment of femaleundergraduates has also remained flat over this period, at 21%. This enrollment condition isgenerally true nationwide: even as college campuses are becoming more diverse, engineeringcollege demographics have been stubbornly resistant to reflecting the nation’s demographics.Inadequate pre
(thelearning tasks and desired knowledge outcomes are presented – allows for pre-assessment andserves as a benchmark for self-assessment in the Reflect Back step), 1. Presentation of Challenge(the student is provided with information needed to understand the challenge), 2. Generate Ideas(the students work alone and/or in teams to express what concepts or knowledge they think isimportant in solving the challenge – learner and community centered), 3. Multiple Perspectives(thoughts of various experts and/or simulations are presented to the students – community andknowledge centered), 4. Research and Revise (reference materials and formative assessmentarticles are presented to assist the student in exploring the challenge – knowledge and learnercentered
prior to beginning their work at Davis. Three ofthe five undergraduates were given the opportunity to work extensively with the centrifuge testdata and results. Two of the five undergraduates continued to work at the centrifuge facility forover a week after the test was concluded, helping with report preparation and data analyses. Inaddition, for one of the centrifuge tests, we recruited two undergraduates to work together asresearch assistants.AssessmentStudent QualificationsThe data summarized in Table 5 illustrate that the research team was successful in recruitinghighly qualified undergraduate participants, which reflects well on the recruitment programestablished for this project. All of the undergraduates had grade point averages greater
SET, particularly within engineering?1. Miller EJ, Seldin P. Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluation. Academe. 2014;100(3):35.2. Yoder BL. Engineering by the Numbers. ASEE. 2015.3. Beleche T, Fairris D, Marks M. Do course evaluations truly reflect student learning? Evidence from an objectively graded post-test. Econ Educ Rev. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;31(5):709–19.4. Elmore PB, LaPointe KA. Effects of teacher sex and student sex on the evaluation of college instructors. J Educ Psychol. 1974;66(3):386–9.5. Bennett SK. Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. J Educ Psychol
on student attitudes towards careers and research inSTEM and has increased their awareness of the skills needed for success in STEM careers.However, students seem to be less confident in the skills that they need for a career in STEMafter participating in research work. Further investigation is needed to determine the cause of theloss in confidence.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the Department of Education Minority Scienceand Engineering Improvement Program under Grant No. P120A140051. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Education.BibliographyBauer, K., & Bennett, J. (2003
students, offer adviceand encouragement, actively seek to know students on a personal level, and act in ways thatdemonstrate multicultural competence. While Black faculty are underrepresented in theprofessoriate, Griffin (2013) notes that they are often able to relate, and provide academic andsocioemotional support, to Black students in ways that are often unmatched by other faculty.This act of “othermothering” is rewarding to Black professors who report that their support ofBlack students both reflect their commitment to uplifting their communities and provides themwith opportunities to discuss with individuals with whom they have a shared understanding ofacademic life (p.180).For Black students in STEM fields, interactions with faculty can also
diversity); were comfortable voicing opinions about diversity topics; hadwitnessed tensions, stereotyping, or discriminatory acts on the basis of any of these minoritycharacteristics (implying a dominant cultural capital excluding minorities); and whetherminorities felt pressured to act in any particular way inside or outside of the classroom(reflecting both social and cultural capital).1 Climate indices were derived from factor analysesof each of these sets of questions (see the Appendix for index construction). Further, self-confidence as an engineer and in terms of academic suitability to engineering were assessed;indices for these sets of questions were also developed through factor analysis (see theAppendix); as were future plans to be
informeddecisions on their career or post-graduation. The program’s group activities (socials,distinguished speaker lectures, and symposium); mentor pairing with industry, faculty, orentrepreneurship coach; experiential learning opportunities; and academic support services aredesigned to foster a “sense of community and inclusiveness.” In this study, we are interested inunderstanding the role of the cultural self within this community of students in terms ofacademic motivation, social identity, and temporal self-esteem. There are varying definitions anddebates around the concept of cultural identity [11]. For purposes of this study, cultural identityis operationalized as the reflection of identities in relation to gender, ethnic, and first
of the codes to correspond to the coding as being motivational or beingdemotivation.Saldaña48 describes “Analytic Memos” as “a place to ‘dump your brain’ about the participants,phenomenon, or process under investigation by thinking and thus writing and thus thinking evenmore about them” (p. 41). “Analytic Memos” are also can act as a ”prompt or trigger for writtenreflection on the deeper and complex meanings it evokes”48 (p. 42). Examples of “AnalyticMemos” that Saldaña48 provides includes reflections about personal connections to the data, Page 26.94.9study’s research questions, codes, definitions, patterns, categories, themes, concepts
= StronglyAgree, 6 = Not Sure) for participants to rate their perception of experiences in STEM majors atthe HBCU. Survey items were developed to reflect the common reasons for student departure asoutlined in Talking About Leaving and the experiences of senior leaders on the project, each ofwhich having years of experience at HBCUs.7 To ensure the survey focused on the intendedareas and that the researchers engaged in a comprehensive approach, each survey item wasaligned with a research thrust area and compared with the theoretical framework. To account fordifferences in demographic information needed, two parallel surveys were created for eachgroup.Data CollectionData were collected from students (Group 1) and faculty (Group 2) using surveys. The
Sponsorship Brochure (CSB): a chapter fund development template that is consistent with the CMT and NRP Reports for chapters to use to secure funds. Table 6 shows the NRP report requirements for NRP v.3. Unlike its predecessors, the NRPv.3 requirements are minimal recording the most valuable information to ensure full use of thechapters’ ecosystem with SHPE national support as an equal partner. Reducing the NRP v.2requirements to two pages, the chapters provide their accomplishments and supporting quantifiableevidence. Support needed and lessons learned encouraged chapter leaders to reflect on theirperformance based on the results of the previous two pages in the report. Fig. 3 shows thecontinuous cycle guiding chapters on how to reflect on
institution. Both facts reflect the preponderance ofstudents who either attended high school or who have immigrated with their family since highschool to within 45 miles of the two primary sending institutions. Page 13.815.7TT students are a highly urban population with access to numerous institutions that meet variedneeds and schedules attended high schools in urban/suburban communities [7]. Ten of 11 ASAMstudents with TT hours are from urban/suburban communities. Of these10, nine attended highschools located within ten miles of the two primary sending institutions in the metro- area, which in turn are 15-30 miles from our receiving
self-confidence development, desire to study technical education, etc are required. Thispaper shows that by implementing certain pre-conditions, the enrollment of minority AfricanAmerican Women Engineers can be significantly increased which will lead to a balancedworkforce and improve the national economy. Page 12.877.21. BackgroundAlabama Agricultural and Mechanical University (AAMU), a historically black university, wasfounded in 1875. Alabama A&M University reflects the uniqueness of the traditional land-grant institution combining teaching, research, service, liberal arts, and vocational fields. Theuniversity offers baccalaureate, masters
be able to use the study results tolearn “best practices” within the MESA program that might assist with the national agenda ofguiding underrepresented students into STEM programs.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1020019. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors are also grateful for the support of Oscar Porter, Executive Director,and Juanita Muniz-Torrez, Program Operations, of California MESA.References 1. Chubin, D.E., May, G.S., and Babco, E.L. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of
conceptswere correct but incorrect calculations in one step resulted in a failing grade. By breaking aproblem into steps and concepts and rewarding success at each step, students were encouraged tocomplete a problem and ask for help if they did not remember an abstract concept or equation.This paper describes a method for rewarding students for levels of knowledge during the finalexamination of a transportation engineering course.Kolb’s learning style theory 1 identifies four types of learning styles: (1) Concrete Experience(feeling), (2) Active experimentation (doing), (3) Reflective Observation (watching), and (4)Abstract Conceptualization (thinking). While every student has some component of each of thesefour learning styles, there is usually one
workQualitative Interviews Fifteen students at a large, public institution were interviewed in the spring of their senioryear (2007). Interviews were semi-structured and open-ended. Questions were designed to elicitstudents’ reflections on their college experience. Students spoke about their motivation to studyengineering primarily in response to one question: Are there any aspects of engineering that youparticularly like? Follow-up prompts elicited detail about the qualities or specific activities ofengineering that students cited. Students spoke about gender and their experience as engineeringstudents in response to three related questions: (1) How has gender played a role in yourexperience here at the UW? (2) Can you tell me of a particular
course.References1. “The STEM Workforce Challenge and the Role of the U.S. Department of Labor in a National Solution”, http://www.doleta.gov/youth_services/pdf/STEM_Report_4%2007.pdf2. “Science and Engineering Indicators 2012”, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c0/c0i.htm3. Meyers, K., Silliman, S., Gedde, N., Ohland, M., “A Comparison of Engineering Students’ Reflections on Their First Year Experiences”, Journal of Engineering Education, April 2010, Vol. 99 Issue 2, p169-178. Page 23.11.74. Tolley, P., Blat, C., McDaniel, C., Blackmon, D., Royster, D., “Enhancing the Mathematics Skills of Students Enrolled in Introductory Engineering Courses
Librarianship 36:158-165, 2010.7. Meyers, KL, SE Silliman, and NL Gedde, A comparison of engineering students’ reflections on their first-year experiences, Journal of Engineering Education 99:169-178, 2010.8. Angelique, H, K Kyle, and E Taylor, Mentor and muses: new strategies for academic success, Innovative Higher Education 26:195-209, 2002.9. Khazanov, L, Mentoring at-risk students in a remedial mathematics course, Math and Computer Education 45:106-118, 2011.10. Rodger, S, and PF Tremblay, The effects of a peer mentoring program on academic success among first year university students, Canadian Journal of Higher Education 33:1-18, 2003.11. Thorsheim, H, H LaCost, and JL Narum, Peer mentoring of undergraduate research in
Landscape: Summary of a Summit, 57.11. Payton, F. C. (2004). Making STEM Careers More Accessible. Black Issues in Higher Education, 21(2), 90.12. National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.13. Fifolt, M., & Searby, L. (2010). Mentoring in Cooperative Education and Internships: Preparing Proteges for STEM Professions. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(1), 17-26.14. Packard, B. W. L. (2004). Mentoring and retention in college science: Reflections on the sophomore year. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 6(3), 289-300
Research Workforce Working Grouprequired IDPs for their postdoctoral researchers (Austin) [8] and the National ScienceFoundation included the IDP as one of the tools in their career development website [9]. As wecan see, both NSF and NIH, as well as many universities, have embraced the IDP as a keycomponent for enhancing STEM graduate and postdoctoral programs. In fact, in studies ofreflection as pedagogy the IDP is considered a self-reflection tool. Researchers such as McMillanand Hearn have reported that it enhances self-motivation and achievement [10].Taking all these factors into consideration, and the fact that there is not a similar tool as ‘myIDP’for undergraduates, we developed an instrument customized to fit the goals of bachelor's
. A typical I. I NTRODUCTION CTF competition requires at least some basic technical security knowledge and time spent preparing [7]. Unfortunately, CTFT HE United States needs to utilize the available talent to meet the future’s cybersecurity challenges, and underrep-resented minorities are a significant resource pool. There is a contests typically attract fewer underrepresented minorities [8]. The games reflect the designers’ interests, who have usu
success of the LSAMP Program, in 1998 NSFawarded the first eight Minority Graduate Education (MGE) awards (Howard, Georgia Instituteof Technology, The University of Michigan, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, TheUniversity of Missouri-Columbia, The University of Puerto Rico, Rice University, and theUniversity of Florida. The goal of the five year MGE grants was to increase the diversity ofstudents pursuing STEM PhDs and to prepare them with the skills necessary to enter anacademic career. In 1999, the MGE Program was renamed the Alliance for Graduate Educationand the Professoriate (AGEP) program. This reflected a shift from single institution efforts to abroader alliance approach. BEST (Building Engineering & Science Talent), an