; Lauenroth, W. K. (eds) (2003). Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 476pp.Clark, S. K., Sibley, D. F., Libarkin, J. C., & Heidemann, M. (2009). A novel approach to teaching and understanding transformations of matter in dynamic earth systems. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 233-241.Croneis, C., and Krumbein, W.C. (1936). Down to Earth: An Introduction to Geology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 501 p.Haas, C. N., Rose, J. B., & Gerba, C. P. (1999). Quantitative microbial risk assessment. John Wiley & Sons.McNeal, K. S., Libarkin, J. C., Ledley, T. S., Bardar, E., Haddad, N., Ellins, K., & Dutta, S. (2014). The role of research in
: http://dschool.stanford.edu/our-point-of-view/#design-thinking. (Accessed: 30th December 2016)7. Altman, A. & Krauss, G. G. The key ideas of MDW IX: A summary. International Journal of Engineering Education 32, 1331–1335 (2016).8. Siniawski, M. T., Luca, S. G., Saez, J. A. & Pal, J. S. Design Thinking and Service-Learning for First-Year Engineering Students *. 32, 1508–1513 (2016).9. Rossmann, J. S. Engineering design as a liberal art: A first-semester introduction to design thinking. International Journal of Engineering Education 32, 1502–1507 (2016).10. Strobel, J., Hess, J., Pan, R. & Morris, C. A. W. Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty
be continuing to develop new ways to fund these experiences and working withother collaborators to continue to add value to the exhibits.ReferencesChua, K. (2014). A comparative study on first-time and experienced project-based learning students in an engineering design module. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39, 556-572.Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research and Development, (1), 65-85.Fitzgerald, H., Bruns, K., Sonka, S., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2015). The centrality of engagement in higher education. APLU Council on Engagement and Outreach. Retrieved from http
student will work with the faculty mentor and graduate student to formulate their own research question(s). Develop a computer study and/or experimental measurement plan. • Weeks 2-9 - Research: Students actively participate in research projects. Here, the students will: o Conduct the research according to plans developed in week 1. o Meet once a week with the full group to review progress with peers and meet twice per week within subgroups to provide peer critique at subgroup and full group meetings and respond to feedback from full group during the following week. o Document changes in research plans as needed. o
] Kumar, S. & Hsiao, J. K. (2007). Engineers learn “soft skills the hard way”: Planting a seed of leadership inengineering classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 7 (1), 18-23.[2] Lesgold, A., Feuer, M.J. and Black, A.M. (1997). Transitions in work and learning: Implications for assessment.Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.[3] Hesketh, A. (2000). Recruiting an elite? Employers’ perceptions of graduate employment and training. Journalof Education and Work, 13, 245-271.[4] Koring, H., & Campbell, S. (2005). Peer-advising: Intentional connections to support student Learning.(NACADA Monograph No. 13). Manhattan, KS: National Academic Advising Association.[5] Schwitzer, A., & Thomas, C. (1998). Implementation, utilization
stories which they later implem ment as a viddeo game proototype usinggcomputerr programmiing. This interdisciplinarry approach seems to bee effective inn teachingcomputattional thinking concepts and skills to o non-compuuter majors. Moreover, sstudents are ableto make interdisciplinary connections between creative writing and computational thinking.There is an intriguing relationship between video game playing and interdisciplinary awareness.References1. Barnett, S. & Ceci, S (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637.2. Benander, R., & Lightner, R. (2005). Promoting transfer of learning: Connecting general education courses. The Journal of
focus and ability to get advanced technical jobs.AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful for funding support from the National Science Foundation under awardEEC-1446001. The authors would like to thank Drs. Cathleen Barczys Simons and GaryLichtenstein for their design of the final survey. The authors acknowledge the contribution ofMs. Steffi Renninger in administering the survey.References[1] S. LeBlanc, S. Renninger, and E. Shittu, “Nanotechnology Fellows Program : Preparing Undergraduate Students for Careers in Nanotechnology,” in Proceedings of ASEE Conference & Exposition, 2016, pp. 1–8.[2] S. LeBlanc, V. Sorger, and E. Shittu, “Nanotechnology Fellows Program: An Interdisciplinary Practicum for Nanotechnology
creators of The Science Of . . . a web-based video magazine. In addition to her role as Associate Provost Dr. Cements is also the director of Experiential Learning and a tenured Professor of Biology and Marine Science at Jacksonville University.Cindy LeongMisha M ChalkleyMr. Crandall Maines, Jacksonville University Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Experiences of NSF- supported ScholarsAbstractThe Mathematics, Engineering, and Physics (MEP) scholar program at our university supportedby NSF S-STEM scholarship program is preparing individuals for the STEM workforce byproviding an educational experience
concept and getting itapproved by faculty advisors is one of the greatest challenges you will ever face as a collegestudent.In the final analysis, this research project was an unqualified success, despite the disappointmentof not having enough time to adequately test the final design.References[1] J. Gowda, "Design and Fabrication of Drone Based Pesticide Sprayer," VTU Belgaum, Karnataka, India, 2018.[2] N. Yogianandh, R. Stopforth and G. Bright, "Development of an UAV for Search & Rescue Applications," in IEEE, Livingstone, Zambia, 2011.[3] H. Vardhan, D. S, S. Arul and P. Aditya, "Development of Automated Aerial Pesticide Sprayers," International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 856 - 861
Education 2005, 21, (1), 139-150.2. Benedict, B.; Napper, S. A.; Guice, L. K., Restructuring for Strategic Outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education 2000, 89, (2), 237-246.3. Guice, L. K.; Napper, S. A.; Nelson, J. D., Interdisciplinary Administration Supports Interdisciplinary Education and Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education 2003, 2003-216.4. Nelson, J. D.; Napper, S. A.; Elmore, B.; Carpenter, J.; Deese, B., An Integrated Freshman Engineering Curriculum. Frontiers in Education Conference 1998.5. Nelson, J. D.; Napper, S. A., Ramping Up an Integrated Engineering Curriculum to Full Implementation. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 1999.6
Authentic, Student-Centered Engineering Project on Student Motivation. 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2000.6. Rosentrater, K.A. Integrating Ethics, Design, and Service Learning in the Engineering Classroom, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE IL/IN Sectional Conference, Peoria , Illinois, 2004.7. Madler, L., Genesis of an undergraduate research experience, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998.8. Gunn, Alastair S. and P. Aarne Vesilind. Hold Paramount: The Engineer's Responsibility to Society. Pacific Grove, CA : Thomson-Brooks/Cole, 2003. Page 15.1379.109. Betz, N.E. (1992). The
are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 22.241.8References[1] ABET (2005). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs effective for the evaluations during the2006-2007 accreditation cycle. The Engineering Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.http://www.abet.org/eac/eac/htm.[2] National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting EngineeringEducation to the New Century, Washington D.C.:National Academy Press.[3] Schaffer, S., Chen, X., Oakes, W. (2010). Measuring cross-disciplinary team learning inundergraduate project design
completing the course, student will be able todemonstrate their factual and conceptual knowledge about the data visualization process: 1. The basic stages for visualizing data. 2. What happens in each stage of the visualization process. 3. What stages are likely to initiate the iterative nature of the process. 4. Different techniques used to better understand data.After completing the course, students will be able to demonstrate the following proceduralknowledge: 1. Demonstrate actions to acquire data. 2. Demonstrate the ability to change raw data into a useful format for further processing. 3. Implement procedure(s) to extract data of interest from a larger dataset. 4. Choose the appropriate visualization chart for
describe a perceived causal link between variables in aparticular context, individual theories of action describe a perceived relationship between actionsand anticipated results in a unique setting. All theories of action have the same form: “Insituation S, if you want to achieve consequence C, do action A”8. Consider the theory of actionthat is present in a hypothetical example where Joe, a member of a team, struggles withproviding honest feedback: “My group really didn’t pull their own weight on this last report andI need to let them know that! Mid-semester Team Evaluations are coming up next week; thatwill be the perfect opportunity to show them the effects of not working as hard as me. I’ll rankthem low so they start helping out on this
Testing of Hypothesis step.References1. Carper, K. L. (Ed.). (2000). Forensic engineering. CRC Press.2. Delatte, N. J., & Rens, K. L. (2002). Forensics and case studies in civil engineering education: State of the art. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 16(3), 98-109.3. Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2007). The CSI effect: Popular fiction about forensic science affects the public's expectations about real forensic science.Jurimetrics, 357-364.4. Chen, S. E., & Janardhanam, R. (2013). Forensic engineering education reform. Proceedings of the ICE- Forensic Engineering, 166(1), 9-16.5. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2004, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin
. 107th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, St. Louis, Missouri.14. System Dynamics Society (2015) www.systemdynamics.org15. Forrester, J.W. (1961) Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Reprinted by Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA.16. Forrester, J.W. (1969) Urban Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Reprinted by Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA.17. Aström, K.J., and Murray, R.M. (2008) Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press.18. Palm, W. J. (2014) System dynamics. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Science.19. Zelinka, I., Vaclav, S. and Ajith, A. (2013) Handbook of Optimization: From Classical to Modern Approach. Berlin: Springer
. Page 26.1404.125. References[1] Assessment and Institutional Research. (2010). CUNY Student Experience Survey. New York City College of Technology, CUNY.[2] Barnett, S. & Ceci, S (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637.[3] Bateman, C. (Ed.). (2007). Game writing: Narrative skills for videogames. Boston: Charles River Media.[4] Benander, R., & Lightner, R. (2005). Promoting transfer of learning: Connecting general education courses. The Journal of General Education, 54 (3), 199-208.[5] Brooks, R. E. (1977). Towards a theory of the cognitive processes in computer programming. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 9, 737-751.[6] Cabo, C
MEDIAN MODE AVG. TOTAL xx STUDENTS # A B C D E F G H I J K . . . . X Y Z RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION (1: Strongly Disagree; 5: Strongly Agree)1 Visual 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 2 4 2 2
(Seppet al. 2015; Kim, Campbell, et al., 2019) due in part to the efforts of the Consortium to PromoteReflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, see www.cpree.uw.edu). In the context ofreflecting on experiences broadly, reflection has been defined as “an intentional and dialecticalthinking process where an individual revisits features of an experience with which he/she isaware and uses one or more lenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that can guidefuture action (and thus future experience)” (Turns et al. 2014). This definition is consistent withour conception of skills and habits needed by reflective engineers, though we think it importantto emphasize extending the temporal view to include not only the past, but also the
Tennessee Board of Regents for supporting the summerprogram.References[1] Miao, L. and Li, C. “Engaging Minority and Underrepresented Engineering Students to Fight“Sophomore Slump” through a Summer Research and Enrichment Program (Research)”, 2021ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Conference, July 2021[2] Wood, B., and A. Ganago. "Using Arduino in Engineering Education: Motivating Students toGrow from a Hobbyist to a Professional." ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt LakeCity, Utah. 2018.[3] Hopkins, M. A., and Kibbe, A. M., 2014, "Open-source hardware in controls education,"ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.[4] Parker, J. M., and Canfield, S. L., 2013, "Work-in-progress: using hardware-basedprogramming experiences to
Laboratories Duringthe COVID-19 Pandemic’, J. Chem. Educ., vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 1887–1894, Jul. 2020, doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00483. Accessed: March 8, 2021. [Online]. Available :https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00483.[4] M. Fenichel, “The Integral Role of Laboratory Investigations in Science Instruction”,National Science Teachers Association, 2007. Accessed: March 8, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/integral-role-laboratory-investigations-science-instruction.[5] M. V. Mawn, P. Carrico, K. Charuk, K. S. Stote, and B. Lawrence, ‘Hands‐on and online:scientific explorations through distance learning’, Open Learning: The Journal of Open,Distance and e-Learning, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 135–146, Jun. 2011
● ● Tour and social event(s) ● ● * Unfilled circles indicate activities that were not required at all locations.Evaluation of the REU program was performed using a web-based survey. Additionalinformation was collected from focus groups consisting of the REU participants from oneUniversity. These focus groups were held at the end of the REU program. The evaluatorreported that she had a difficult time extracting information the REU participants from Year 1,but that after the formal professional development program was introduced, the students hadplenty to say.Laboratory SafetyLaboratory safety training has always been a formal 1 to 2 hour session presented byrepresentatives from each
, Bi-Huang Hu, Bruce P. Lee et al., "Mussel adhesive protein mimic polymers for the preparation of nonfouling surfaces," Journal of the American Chemical Society 125, 4253-4258 (2003).4 S Vogel, Cats' Paws and Catapults. (W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1998).5 Steve Weiner, Lia Addadi, and H. Daniel Wagner, "Materials design in biology," Materials Science and Engineering C 11, 1-8 (2000).6 J Benyus, Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. (HarperCollins, New York, 1997).7 S Vattam, M Helms, and A Goel, Technical Report, 2007.8 Jon A Leydens, Barbara M Moskal, and Michael J Pavelich, "Qualitative methods used in the assessment of engineering education," Journal of Engineering Education 93
, Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering.[13]. Grinter, S. (1955), (chair), “Final Report of the Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, 46 p.25-60.[14]. Ashby, E.[1966], Technology and the Academics- An essay on Universities and the Scientific Revolution, London: Macmillan.[15]. Guthrie, B.(1994), The Higher Education Experience Survey : An Examination of the Higher Education Experience of 1982, 1987 and 1992, Canberra: Graduate Careers Council of Australia.[16]. Yorke, M. (1999). “ The skills of graduates: a small enterprise perspective” . in O’Reilly, D., Cunningham, L., & Lester, S. (eds). Developing the Capable Practitioner, pp.174-183, London: Kogan Page..[17]. Harvey
3.00 L E A D E R S Average Normalized Ind Avg Wk 1 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.14 0.90 Tm Avg Wk 1 4.62 4.62 4.56 4.62 4.62 4.56 4.56 4.60 1.00 Ind Avg Wk 5 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 1.10 Tm Avg Wk 5 4.53 4.67 4.60 4.53 4.47 4.53 4.53 4.55 1.00 Ind Avg Wk 1 Tm Avg Wk 1 Ind Avg Wk 5 Tm Avg Wk 5 Figure 2: Student ‘D’ Leadership AssessmentThis positive improvement in
Paper ID #19391Cross College Faculty Collaboration for the development of a new major inDesign and Construction IntegrationLuciana de Cresce El Debs, Purdue University Programs Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real
. 14Dr. AC. Megri 2020 ASEE Annual Conference Figure 14: Outcome 3 from ABET 15Dr. AC. Megri 2020 ASEE Annual ConferenceReferences:[1] Abou Hashem, Y., Dayal, M., Savanah, S., & Strkalj, G. (2015). The application of 3D printing inanatomy education. Med Educ Online, 20, 29847.[2] Berry, R. Q., III, Bull, G., Browning, C., Thomas, C. D., Starkweather, K., & Aylor, J. H. (2010).Preliminary considerations regarding use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering designprinciples in elementary mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and TeacherEducation, 10(2), 167-172.[3
. ReferencesAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs (2020). Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/E001-19-20-EAC-Criteria-11-24-18.pdfAmerican Management Association. (2012). AMA 2012 Critical Skills Survey. Retrieved from https://www.amanet.org/assets/1/6/2012-critical-skills-survey.pdf.Barker, R. T., Gilbreath, G. H., & Stone, W. S. (1998). The interdisciplinary needs of organizations. Journal of Management Development, 17(3), 219-232.Bers, M. U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 59
responded and commented on thesereports. Butcher claims the reports call for, ―ingenious leaders — ingenious engineers‖ and callsthese engineers, ―well-rounded Renaissance Engineer[s]‖5. Turns, Atman, et al.,6 use thesereports as a gage of what an engineer needs to know. Dym, et al. present how engineeringeducation is being challenged to require students to consider additional design constraintsrequired as part of a ―new fundamentals‖7. In response to this challenge, the CoE hopes toestablish its leadership in reshaping the undergraduate experience to prepare the engineer of2020: making the educational experience more meaningful to the student and the student moredesirable to local and national industries. As such, the CoE proposes that to fulfill