, thus far, only three students have transferred into e+ from outside of theengineering college. Prerequisite “gatekeeper” courses most efficiently taken early in the collegeexperience (such as three semesters of calculus and differential equations) could be keepingpotentially interested non-engineering students away. It is hoped that, over time, the curricularflexibility and free electives inherent in the e+ curriculum make the program the engineeringcollege’s most navigable in-migration destination—and thus an increasingly important strategyto broaden participation in engineering by young adults interested in divergent, non-traditionalfutures in non-governmental organizations (NGOs), politics, finances, etc., built upon the solidtechnological
2006, more integrated curricula havebeen developed, which bring technical and process skills together in each semester 13. This issometimes called a project-oriented or project-based curriculum, e.g. 14. Technical / Technology Process / Project Courses Courses Figure 4 - Project-oriented engineering curriculumIn first year at RMIT, students do two project courses, which develop their conceptual designskills and help them understand the engineering design process (above). These projects are anopportunity to improve skills in project management, teamwork, written communication, oralpresentation, debating, research and computing.The later year
years showed many publications whose purpose was to discuss course andcurriculum changes1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Although this search is not comprehensive, we found that noneof these publications about course and curriculum reform specifically described a processthat mimicked an engineering design process.In this paper, we describe how we organized and conducted our curriculum study around anengineering design process, and how doing so not only helped us to approach curricula in the Page 12.1570.2same thorough manner in which engineers approach technical problems but also helped usbuild faculty consensus. The approach could easily be used by other
AC 2007-1016: IMPACT: INNOVATION THROUGH MULTIDISCIPLINARYPROJECTS AND COLLABORATIVE TEAMSKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University KELLY CRITTENDEN is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. He teaches within the Integrated Engineering Curriculum and Multidisciplinary Senior Design series. His interests are in promoting collaboration across discipline and college boundaries in order to stimulate innovation and advancements in engineering education. Dr Crittenden received his B.S. and Ph.D. in BioMedical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University. Page
question,estimating the scope of the project, writing an acceptable statement of work, completing theproject, and delivering results that could be readily disseminated.The undergraduate engineering curriculum at our institution has built-in project-basedcornerstone, sophomore, and senior capstone design courses. The master of engineering is a 30credit course-only program. By leveraging these two curricula, we developed a successfulmultidisciplinary modeling course where key learning outcomes strengthen student readiness toperform research. This paper describes the evolution of our overall strategy to overcomechallenges and put solutions in place. An overview of the course is presented in the context ofhow the pedagogy of student research has
Challenges was one of the first decisionswe made in revising this course. The Grand Challenges Scholars Program at FGCU had beenrecently approved, and an additional opportunity to further integrate the Grand Challenges intothe Engineering curriculum and promote the opportunity to encourage students to participate inthe scholars program was seen to be a positive. Furthermore, the Grand Challenges offered aplatform onto which almost any faculty across the College could integrate their areas of expertiseto the class. However, because we wanted the projects to remain student-driven, we didn’t wantto immediately present the Grand Challenges to the students and force their research into aspecific area. We wanted to regain the active learning component
interconnections of mechatronic engineeringinto consideration. The necessary background to the demands of each semester was not provided,and so there was merely an interdisciplinary bias to the projects developed at this stage.Examples included a mini sailing boat and a lyophilization machine. Despite promotingteamwork, planning and construction, these new projects did not add conceptual componentsrelated to mechatronics.In 2005 the original team resumed the project, seeking to return to the guidelines used at thebeginning of the course, but in a new situation: the curriculum had been changed and a disciplinenamed “interdisciplinary work” had been introduced. This was an attempt to insert the concept ofinterdisciplinarity into a disciplinary model, i.e
. Oliva and W.K. Waldron Jr., “Virtual Design Competitions in a Computer Aided Engineering Course,” Proceedings of 2004 ASEE/NCS Conference, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan (2004).2. W. Waldron, P. Chaphalkar, S. Choudhuri, J. Farris, “Teaching Design and Manufacture of Mechanical Systems,” 2007 ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 24-27, 2007.3. S.J. Noble, “An Approach for Engineering Curriculum Integration for Capstone Design Courses,” Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 14, No. 3, p. 197-203, 1998.4. L.S-B King, T. Lin, “Interdisciplinary Integration of Courses – Automation and Quality Control, International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida, October 16-21, 2004.5
Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1996. [2] A. Birk, “What is robotics? an interdisciplinary field is getting even more diverse,” IEEE robotics & automation magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 94–95, 2011. [3] S. E. Lyshevski, “Mechatronic curriculum–retrospect and prospect,” Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195–205, 2002. [4] D. G. Alciatore and M. B. Histand, “Integrating mechatronics into a mechanical engineering curriculum,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 35–38, 2001. [5] R. Manseur, “Development of an undergraduate robotics course,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, vol. 2. IEEE, 1997, pp. 610–612. [6] T.-R. Hsu
college and includes faculty involved in departmental curriculumcommittees. The charge to the Roundtable has been to “Understand the changing environmentfor higher education and its implications for the College of Engineering and develop an actionplan that includes changes in course curriculum and delivery to meet the new challenges inundergraduate education.” This followed directly from the step 1 implementation from Massy tobuild awareness and commitment and is articulated with similar words in the CCSSI Phase Ireport and other institutional change literature.The Roundtable determined that three elements in addition to disciplinary excellencecharacterize the best undergraduate engineering education: 1) curriculum and course contentrelevancy, 2
learnt thus giving them a potential advantage inthe job market over other entry level competitors without that experience.While maintaining technical execution, students often require the acquisition of complementary technicalexpertise not covered in the official curriculum [18]. This combination of skills remains an area of studywithin engineering education that is still in need of further development and refinement for differentmajors [19]. Engineering collaboration within team settings must “move beyond the divide and conquer”approach (commonly observed) and instead operate in a dynamic and integrative mode that resembles theactual building industry [20]. Multi-disciplinary teams provide an excellent way to promote integrationthat allows for
help solve engineering problems. Applying knowledge from other fields to solve an engineering problem. Understanding how an engineering solution can shape and be shaped by environmental, social, cultural, political, legal, economic, and other considerations. Making explicit connections to knowledge and skills from other fields. Integrating knowledge from engineering and other fields to solve engineering problems. Faculty and Program Chairs – Design Skills (alpha=.85 and alpha=.78, respectively) Faculty: In this course, how much do you emphasizeA: Program Chairs: How much does your program curriculum emphasizeA: Generating and evaluating a variety of ideas about how to solve a
skills.The feedback in the surveys showed that students enjoyed working collaboratively and makingcomplex decisions in which they realized that they needed to consider a range of complexfactors. They also indicated that more time was needed to complete and understand thesimulation procedure. Lastly, when students were asked if this simulation study increased theirinterest in this kind of work, 4 of 9 students answered affirmatively.ConclusionsThe curriculum developed was well received across high school, undergraduate, and graduatestudents studying or interested in transportation engineering. It provided a unique perspective onhow difficult operating an airline can be, and fostered communication about the interactionbetween the transportation
need for, and an ability to engage in life- 93.0% 2.9 long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues 50.7% 3.9 (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern 93.0% 9.1 engineering tools necessary for engineering practiceConclusionThe skills gap both in the technical (“hard”) and professional (“soft”) skills is a reality of themodern science and engineering workforce, but collaboration of employers (industry orgovernmental agencies) with universities can lead to successful partnerships to design anddevelop curriculum that
. It is difficult to have anynanotechnology fabrications without access to expensive fabrication and analytical equipment.Although some institutions have integrated nanotechnology undergraduate education with theirintensive research graduate programs, nevertheless this usually is overlooked by graduatestudents who are busy preparing to defend their thesis or dissertations and present and publishtheir work. Having an exclusive undergraduate laboratory is important because the instructioncan adjusted to their level of understandings without any comparison with their graduatecounterpart. In the year 2000, President Clinton unveiled the creation of the NationalNanotechnology Initiatives with an initial budget of $464 million for Fiscal Year 2001
andvia an external assessor to the overall 14-school program, to determine the progress in meetingthe institutional and consortium educational goals.The Stevens project has involved working with various stakeholders, within and associated withthe Department of Defense, to address a need for an expeditionary housing system for themilitary, with a major focus on integrated alternate energy sources and associated micro-grid.This has application to both forward operational units and for disaster relief missions.This paper reports on the implementation of the project and preliminary findings.Project BackgroundThe project described in this paper provides an opportunity to leverage the significant graduate-level Systems Engineering (SE) education
. This requires an interdisciplinaryapproach to engineering education. Simply adding marketing and business courses to theengineering curriculum often results in compartmentalized knowledge that does not provideexperience and intuition into the complex relationships between the business and engineeringaspects of product development.Currently, the capstone experience in the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering atthe University of Southern California is similar in style and content to most other universities.Using a one semester (15-week) course, students receive loosely-defined design or productobjectives either from faculty or industry sponsors, perform trade-off and other design analysis,complete a prototype, and prepare a written
focuses on theengagement of students in a wide range of activities. Creative Campus is an organization forstudents, faculty and staff to support the arts and creative activity on campus.These activities are similar to other initiatives and ventures that are taking place across thecountry. Several institutions1,2 have investigated formal linkages between an engineering degreeand the liberal arts, developing a Bachelor of Arts in Engineering. Other initiatives providecourse experiences that introduce the field of engineering to non-majors 3,4,5. Still other effortslook at incorporating fundamental issues of other disciplines, such as leadership, into theengineering curriculum 6,7. Finally, several examples exist where interdisciplinary courses
. She has expertise in integer, fixed, and floating-point hardware system design, signal processing, controls, and atmospheric radiative transfer modelling.Dr. Jack Bringardner, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is the Assistant Dean for Academic and Curricular Affairs at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He is also an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineer- ing Department where he teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is the Director of Vertically Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on transportation. His primary focus is developing
courses in Environmental Engineering; and technologycourses in Green Manufacturing. We also offer an interdisciplinary curriculum path, a greenengineering minor degree.2.1 Green Engineering Minor DegreeOver the past decade, several green and sustainable engineering programs have been established Page 14.1277.3in the United States. These include the University of Texas at El Paso4 5, Rowan University6 7,Carnegie Mellon University8, Virginia Tech9, and Rochester Institute of Technology10. In ourcurriculum development at SJSU, we reviewed these programs and adapted portions of them forour own new multidisciplinary green engineering minor program
notions of whether a single PBL model toengineering education produces desirable educational outcomes that meet the needs of theprofession. It suggests that PBL educational approaches cannot be based on definitiveeducational theories, and that there are many multi-variant models that define PBL pedagogy.Implementation of PBL into an engineering curriculum needs to be placed in a context andmust be developed with careful consideration of the social, economic and ethnic diversity ofthe student population and the university academic culture. It is argued that the PBL model inengineering education ought to evolve, with a gradual and well considered introduction.IndexTerms – Problem Based Learning, constructivism, engineering curriculumIntroductionThe
impunity when they get any power at all over others. A clearreference is provided as the reviewer wished34 for that statement.Some MetricsWith the developments that have gone into the EXTROVERT system, some facts can be used togauge effectiveness:1. Usage of Case-based assignments has now become routine in Vehicle Performance classes at both undergraduate and graduate levels.2. The fluid dynamics/ aerodynamics/ gas dynamics curricular stream has become fully integrated, from the Introduction to Aerospace Engineering course all the way to graduate level Advanced Aerodynamics.3. New ways of teaching advanced courses have become possible. For instance, an Advanced Fluid Dynamics course in Fall 2012 took first-semester graduate students to
. Prior to his current position, he served as the CTO and acting CEO of IP SerVoniX, where he consulted for telecommunication firms and venture firms. He has also served as the CTO of Telsima (formerly known as Kinera), where he carried out extensive business development with telecommunications and wireless carriers, both in the US and in India. Before joining Kinera, he was the CTO at Comverse in Wakefield, Massachusetts. Prior to joining Telcordia, he was an associate professor at Clarkson and Wayne State Universities, where he developed the communications curriculum and conducted research in computer networking and source coding algorithms. Dr. Mohan authored/co-authored over 95 publications in the form of books
engineering path selection in colleges and universities wasobtained, and content analysis technology was applied to analyze the data in a bid to verifythe theoretical model extract key factors in the construction of new engineering in collegesand universities eventually.Results Research shows that the path of discipline integration, the path of disciplinederivative, the path of Exogenously industry-led, and the path of Endogenouslydiscipline-driven have become the main paths for the construction of "new engineering" incolleges and universities. Moreover, the path of engineering innovation has also been fullyaffirmed by some universities. The nature of disciplines along with the types andcharacteristics of colleges and universities exerts an influence
multidisciplinary teams during their senior capstone courses. The design module wasintroduced in the fall 2011 semester, and was repeated in fall 2012 and fall 2013. Anassessment, conducted with current and former participants in fall 2013, demonstrates theefficacy of the project.1. INTRODUCTION.The engineering education community has embraced the concept of multidisciplinary designover the past two decades 1-3. This movement reflects a renewed emphasis on design in theengineering curriculum, particularly at the freshman (cornerstone) and senior (capstone) levels 4.The benefit of training engineers to work in multidisciplinary teams is self-evident whenconsidering the integration of mechanical design, electronics, software, human factors andergonomics, and
electrical expertise needed in such settings? We brainstormed a collection oftopics most important for a student to achieve the concentration objective. Thebrainstormed topics were organized using a mind mapping technique that provides ahierarchical structure to the collection. After generating an initial collection, we held a Page 12.590.7group discussion with members of our department's industrial advisory board to findomissions and to refine the emphasis in the topic areas. As the curriculum has beendeveloped, we have also restructured the collection to provide detail and reflect commonelements between topics. The mind map with the current set of topics
amongst them are(i) Assigning “tasks” to team members that tend to be outside their specialty and (ii) Creatingteams in which students of two closely related majors are placed on a capstone design team for ashort duration (typically a semester). These approaches are definitely steps in the right directionbut have limitations.This paper describes an innovative and sustainable framework to provide “multi-disciplinary”experience between the Biomedical Engineering (BE) and Software Engineering (SE) students atMSOE. The approach is neither an “after-thought”, nor an “add-on” to one of the existingcourses. It is a well-thought out plan for vertical and horizontal integration of this experiencewithin the curriculum. This interaction not only provides
student sustainability knowledge. By applying the taxonomy to studentsustainability definitions constructed by a cohort of seniors enrolled in a CEE capstone designcourse at Georgia Tech, the following conclusions were reached.1. A majority of students demonstrated a uni-structural or multi-structural understanding of sustainability, which suggests that additional integration of sustainability into the curriculum may aid students in developing more expert-like knowledge.2. Students in CEE most captured aspects of environmental sustainability and intergenerational equity in their sustainability definitions, which is similar to other engineering and non- engineering students.3. The SOLO taxonomy, when used with an a priori coding scheme, is
, interdisciplinary REUs can help students understand how to transfer thesoft- and hard-skills they learn across other courses and experiences beyond the classroom.Achieving this objective is a matter of configuring REUs to help students see and applyconnections across different learning experiences within the REU context. This paper presents apilot study that assesses how an interdisciplinary summer REU program provided STEMstudents with professional development training. The objective of this experimental programwas to provide educational experiences that allowed participants to integrate soft and technicalskills in an overall biomedical engineering context
as well as quality ofinstruction provided in this program. Each course is established with an acceptable targetachievement.Table 4 shows an example layout of course learning outcomes assessment for SEM 602course. As shown, these individual course learning outcomes are linked to the programlearning outcomes through a curriculum mapping process.SummaryThis program, developed with the help of experienced academics and industrypractitioners, has resulted in a program that integrates fundamentals with relevantapplications, offers significant opportunity to study sustainability, exposes studentsextensively to current issues and practitioners, allows to be readily updated due tomodular structure, and addresses the needs of the marketplace. Finally