Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Devine, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

about the process in the nine classes it has been used although a few students haveasked questions about what will be done with the forms. About two weeks following thedate when grades are due, the SPIE FORM forms are reviewed by the instructor.A protocol was submitted to the Purdue University, Committee on the Use of HumanResearch Subjects prior to first using the SPIE FORM in class. This is done to protect thestudent ’s privacy, safety, welfare, and rights and also to meet government guidelines2 .The protocol was deemed “exempt” because it is “conducted in established or commonlyaccepted educational settings” and it “involves normal educational practices.” Howeverthere is a stipulation for this exemption that the SPIE FORM has to be a part of

Conference Session

Developing New Engineering Educators

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks P.E., University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown; Laura J Dietz, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

experience of new faculty can be leveraged to build a strongerconnection among students, classroom material, and professional skills requirements. A broadnetwork often built with industry experience can assist the new faculty member in supportingstudents in their job search, bringing guest speakers into class, and building student designprojects around real projects from industry partners. Teaching focused institutions in particularwill reap the benefits of hiring faculty with industry experience, and opportunities exist toimprove recruitment and orientation methods to assist new faculty with the transition.ReferencesAdams, Robin S., and Richard M. Felder. 2008. Reframing professional development: A systemsapproach to preparing engineering educators

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

officers—on how to go about seeking research funding. It does notdiscuss individual programs, though it does offer some suggestions for finding them.Rather, it concentrates on finding out about funding opportunities and building a personalnetwork to enable oneself to compete effectively for them.The first step in getting funded is to come up with an idea. The next step is to find anagency that is interested in the area. Then the researcher must make a credible case that(s)he can make a contribution in the area. Sometimes this is through a single-investigatorproposal, but more and more frequently, it is as a member of a team. In the latter case,networking is crucial.2. The ideaA good research topic must have many qualities. It must be inventive. An

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University; Kyle Frederick Larsen P.E., Eastern Washington University; Heechang Bae, Eastern Washington University; N.M. A. Hossain, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Education, 2014, Vol. 42(2) 130-140. [4] T. S. Harding, M. J. Mayhew, C. J. Finelli and D. D. Carpenter, ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates’, Ethics & Behavior, 17(3) (2007), pp. 255–279. [5] Widmann J. and Shollenberger K. “Student use of textbook solution manuals: Student and faculty perspectives in a large mechanical engineering department.” In: Proceedingsof the 2006 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition,Chicago, Illinois, 2006, pp.11.1168.1–11.1168.9. Washington, DC: ASEE.

Conference Session

NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Jensen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign; Karle Flanagan; David Mussulman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Wade Fagen-Ulmschneider, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

identified the following benefits of the Queue system.Save time for both students and instructorsTime is at a premium for students, instructors, and staff. The Queue organizes both students andinstructors to maximize student learning when time is restricted.Group Formation and Peer LearningNumerous studies have shown the benefits of peer learning, but this can be challenging tofacilitate in large courses with several hundreds of students. The Queue allows students toidentify other students or groups who have the same or similar questions. This could be used tohelp students form small groups to discuss their question(s) and then work with an instructor.Similarly, the Queue could also be used to facilitate students answering other students

Conference Session

Women, Minorities and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Annette Mallory Donawa; Clifton Martin, Morgan State University; Carl White, Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

: Foundation in early childhood education. NY: Delmar Learning. 11 Fleming, J., Garcia, N., and Morning, C. 1995. The critical thinking skills of minority engineering students: An exploratory study. The Journal of Negro Education, 64. 4. pp. 437-453. 20 Black, S. 2004. Teaching students to think critically. American School Board Journal, 191; 52-54. 27 Malcom, S.M. (1996). Science and diversity: A compelling national interest. Science, New Series. 271. 5257. pp. 1817-1819. Page 12.1221.14 Page 1328 Atkinson, R.C. (1990). Supply and demand

Conference Session

Survivor: The First Few Years

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Beasley, Texas A&M University; Ana Elisa Goulart, Texas A&M University; Wei Zhan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, and how?” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2007. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/AC%202007Full1771.pdf4. R. Brent, R. Felder, and S. Rajala, “Preparing new faculty members to be successful: A no-brainer and yet a radical concept,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2007. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=101435. R. Rice, M. Sorcenelli, and A. Austin, Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation, Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education, 2000.6. R. Reis, Tomorrow’s professor: preparing for careers in science and engineering, Wiley-IEEE Press, 1997.7. P. Wankat, The effective, efficient professor: Teaching scholarship and service, Allyn & Bacon, 2001

Conference Session

Women & New Faculty Development

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology; Cory Hoffman, Rochester Institute of Technology; Melissa Zaczek, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

City, UT, June 2004.7. Jessop, Julie L.P., “How to Grow your Graduate Students: Mentoring Tips for New Professors”. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, June 2003.8. Hancock, Timothy M. and Norton, John W. Jr., “Experiences of Graduate Student Mentors Mentoring Graduate Student Instructors”. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2004.9. Harding, Trevor S., “Training Graduate Student Instructors Effectively: The University of Michigan Model”, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2004. Page 11.1160.8

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Tenure & Promotion

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Rose, University of Pittsburgh-Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Track.” Proceedings, 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. 2. Bell, J., Ford, A., Goncharoff, V., Montgomery, S., Reed, D., Theys, C., Troy, P., “Lecturer – An Alternative to the Tenure Track,” Proceedings, 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. Page 11.307.73. Fox, P.L., and Hundley, S.P. “Engineering Technology Faculty: Attract, Retain, and Motivate Through Total Compensation and Work Experiences.” Proceedings, 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2002.4. Lipscomb, J.W. “Acquiring Tenure in Engineering Technology.” Proceedings

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Research

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

apprehension in younger students toward understanding technical publications, and aslight increase in productivity towards publication goals within the group. Including this weeklymeeting as an independent study course for credit also encourages all students to read the articlesprior to the meeting and enhances group discussions.References1. Tang, Bor Luen and Yunn Hwen Gan, “Preparing the Senior or Graduating Student for Graduate Research” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 277-280, 2005.2. Compton, W.Dale, “Encouraging Graduate Study in Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, July 1995, 249-255.3. Davidson, C.I. and S. A. Ambrose, “The New Professor’s Handbook,” Chptr 3: Conducting

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Research

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matt Eliot, University of Washington; Roxane Neal, University of Washington; Jennifer Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

2005), Limerick, Ireland.6. Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, (2), pp. 40–57.7. Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., and Wright, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), pp. 27-38. Page 11.533.13

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerry Samples, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Engineering, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.4. Beichner, R. J., Abbott, D. S., Deardorff , D. L., Allain, R. J., and Saul, J. M. (2000), “Introduction to SCALE-UP : Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics”, 2000 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, St. Louis, MO.5. Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, Second Edition, San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.6. McKeachie, W.J. (1999). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers,Tenth Edition, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.7. Martinazzi, R. (1997), “Employing the “Partnering” Concept With Student Teams”, 1997 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Milwaukee, WI.8

Conference Session

Mentoring and Development of New Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay Wierer, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Roger Frankowski, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Cory Prust, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Steven Reyer, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

process.In addition, for new faculty members to communicate with others having just a few years moreexperience than them may help. That group will be able to communicate their experiences andrelate to their concerns. Even faculty members recently evaluated are still mostly pragmaticabout the Process, but their successful navigation of it should provide reassurance to others.Bibliography1. S. Barnicki, C. Barnicki, O. Petersen, “A Non-Tenure Faculty Evaluation System,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI, 1997. Page 15.915.9

Conference Session

Potpourri

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber L. Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

professors on the tenure track, balancing research, teaching and servicecommitments is an ongoing challenge. Organizing and running a program like MaterialsCamp falls in the service category, which is generally considered the least important areafor tenure and promotion decisions. Any camp program requires a significant amount oftime and effort from the organizing faculty member(s), and will inevitably decrease theamount of time available for proposal and paper writing, research activity, and coursepreparation.Feedback from several UAB faculty members in administrative positions with P&Tcommittee experience was collected informally, regarding their impressions of theMaterials Camp program, and its potential impact on the author’s career

Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ajit D. Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State University; James G. Ryan, Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

and graduate programs inengineering, sciences, mathematics, computational science and engineering, and technology byoffering an attractive alternative graduate program for the graduates of those programs in thisexciting and evolving field of the future. As new industries and technologies evolve so are theneeds for new educational programs. Historically, new educational programs have evolved tomeet the related needs and opportunities; for example, computer engineering in 1970’s, computerscience in 1980, bioengineering in 1990s, computational science and engineering in 2000s andthe nanoengineering programs of the 21st century. The committee does not believe the proposedprogram will stretch existing resources. Rather we feel it will further

Conference Session

New Faculty Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahesh Aggarwal, Gannon University; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

institutions recognize onlyScholarship of Discovery, teaching-based institutions have started to recognize the other areas ofscholarship as defined by the Boyer’s Model.Scholarship at Gannon University is broadly recognized by three attributes: professional,communicated and peer-reviewed. Each of these attributes may be found at different levels, suchas University, regional, national or international (recognition, review, publication, etc.).Scholarship activity may be stronger in one of the three attributes; but, the body of a colleague'sscholarship should demonstrate all three to some degree.1. Professional — demonstrably pertinent to the discipline(s) of the individual faculty member.2. Communicated — evidence that the work has been made known

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Walter Schilling, MSOE

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

the 19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (April 19 - 21, 2006). CSEET. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 159-166. 11. Sansgiry SS, Chanda S, Lemke T, Szilagyi J. Effect of incentives on student performance on Milemarker examinations. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;70 (5)Article 103. 12. Schilling, Walter. "Using your Grade Book to Store Course Rubric Information." 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 2009 Page 15.1333.10

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University, Berks

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

engagement, b) includeactive and cooperative learning and c) implement peer instruction. In addition, the fill-insheets have enabled differentiated instruction in the class room, by adding symbolicsolutions to challenge the advanced student, while helping the average and below averagestudent solve the basic problem using numbers. Aside from these an equal number ofproblems are given as homework which have varying degrees of fill-in to inculcate andtrain students in problem solving. Additionally, detailed solutions are made available toimprove problem solving skills, while teaching methodologies. Student surveys indicatethat these fill-in sheets have increased their learning.Bibliography1. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. and, Johnson

Conference Session

INVITED PANEL: Preparing your Teaching Portfolio

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Glen A. Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

expressing the things they believe about teaching,learning, and their role(s) in the teaching/learning processes. For example, “What are yourbeliefs about teaching? What are your aims for students, and why are these aims important toyou? How do your actions as a teacher reflect your beliefs about teaching and learning?”3Portfolio authors could also adapt guidance intended to help students creating learning portfoliosto their situation, and utilize prompts such as “What have I learned? Why did I learn?”4 (aboutteaching); “What difference has the learning made in my intellectual, personal, and ethicaldevelopment?”4 (as a teacher); “How does what I have learned fit into a full, continual plan forlearning?”4 (for teaching, for professional development

Conference Session

Tips of the Trade: Best Practices, Expanded Advice, and Strategies for Implementable Course Improvement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Thomas Quigley, University of Washington; Mania Orand, Human Centered Design and Engineering ; Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

 an array of active learning approaches that pique their interest and spark excitement about the possible outcomes for their students. After initial exposure to new activities, contextual questions naturally arise for educators, and a clear understanding of the essential features for successfully implementing a teaching strategy becomes necessary. Reflection activities represent one approach for active learning that educators reasonably have questions about before adopting the approach.  Reflection is a topic that can have various meanings. For this project, reflection was conceptualized with the following definition: looking back on the past experience(s), to interpret and make meaning of those experiences in order to plan for the future [1

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhiwei Guan, University of Washington; Steve Lappenbusch, University of Washington; Jennifer Turns, University of Washington; Jessica Yellin, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

account for 65% grade. In such cases, students would treatthe portfolio seriously as a class assignment and spend more effort to create it.Comparing the Benefits and Drawbacks of Portfolio AssignmentsWhen students were required to include most of their work into the portfolio, an obvious benefitof creating the portfolios is for students to archive and review their work. This benefit wasmentioned in several studies. For example, students in Upchurch et al.’s study8 thought one ofthe main benefits of creating a portfolio was to archive assignments and to be able to review theirwork. Knott14 reported that students saw being able to keep a record of achievements and jobexperience as one major advantage of creating a portfolio. Heinricher11 reported

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; June Marshall, St. Joseph's College

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. 2005.3. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed in the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 7, 1997 – 1998.4. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’s Press.5. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.6. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.7. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as

Conference Session

Been There, Done That: Advice for NEEs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Philip Gerhart, University of Evansville

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, a mentee, or a formergraduate student, you can use the ideas to save time/effort, become a better educator, and thrivein your career.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all of those individuals that have understood that Phil and Andyuse their relationship for good and not evil and have encouraged them to continue.References1. Brent, R., Felder, R., Rajala, S. 2006. “Preparing New Faculty Members To Be Successful: A No-Brainer And Yet A Radical Concept.” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.2. Boice, R. 2000. Advice for New Faculty Members. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.3. Rice, R.E., Sorcinelli, M.D., and Austin, A. 2000. Heeding New

Conference Session

Getting Started: Objectives, Rubrics, Evaluations, and Assessment

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Ieta, State University of New York, Oswego; Rachid Manseur, State University of New York, Oswego; Thomas Doyle, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

University of Washington, Gillmore [2] supports the viewthat adequate instructor reliability rating is achieved in certain circumstances but is Page 14.516.2limited to similar conditions of measurement. On the other hand, SET scores may not beas reliable as they are thought to be, as some studies show that instructors can increaseSET scores by inflating grades or grade expectations [3-7] (even if some corrections maybe applied in order to rectify the results [8]). The fact that the quality of instruction is notnecessarily correlated to SET scores was strongly opposed particularly in the 1970’s [9].Other general concerns related to how SET ratings are

Conference Session

Faculty Development Toolkit

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allen Estes, U.S. Military Academy; Ronald Welch, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

’s who encourages her Wellesley students to question their traditionalconservative values. While she possesses many of the necessary traits, she may lose your vote inthe scene where she publicly and inappropriately confronts recalcitrant student Betty Warren(Kirsten Dunst) in class. However, she never used that technique with any other student and itwas Betty Warren, who chases Ms. Watson’s departing taxi the longest and touches her handfrom her bicycle. Later Betty writes, “She came to Wellesley to make a difference, but to change for others is to lie to yourself. My teacher Ms. Katherine Watson lived by her own definition and would not compromise it even for Wellesley. I dedicate this, my last editorial, to

Conference Session

Effective & Efficient Teaching Skills

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

June Marshall, St. Joseph's College; John Marshall, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

educators, we need to utilize the above-identified techniques and tips toensure the very best learning experiences for our students.Bibliographic InformationAlbanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomesand Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.Angelo, T.A., (2001). Classroom Assessment: Guidelines for Success. In “Teaching Excellence”. Center forTeaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 12, No 4, 2000-2001.Bennett, J.B., (2001). Teaching With Hospitality. In “Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching,University of Southern Maine. Vol. 12, No 1, 2000-2001.Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University; Jennifer Retherford P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville; David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

., Ambrose, S., and Wheeler, D., 2005. “Becoming a Professional Engineering Educator: A New Role for a New Era.” Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 185-194.9. Felder, R.M., Brent, R., and Prince, M.J., 2011. “Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations.” Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89-122.10. Brent, R. and Felder, R.M., 2003. “A Model for Engineering Faculty Development.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 234-240.11. Estes, A.C., Welch, R.W., Ressler, S.J., Dennis, N., Larson, D., Considine, C., Nilsson, T., O’Neill, R.J., O’Brien, J., and Lenox, T., 2010. “Ten Years of ExCEEd: Making a Difference in the Profession.” International Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi-Min Huang, University of Washington; Matt Eliot, University of Washington; Jennifer Turns, University of Washington; Emma Rose, University of Washington; Jessica Yellin, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

? Paper presented at the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN.6 McCall, R.B. & Appelbaum, M.I. (1991). Some issues of conducting secondary analyses. DevelopmentalPsychology, 27, 911-917.7 Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications.8 Eliot, M., Neal, R., & Turns, J. (2005). Recognizing need: The analysis of qualitative data to inform web sitedesign. Paper presented at the International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC 2005), Limerick,Ireland.9 Turns, J., Eliot, M., Lappenbusch, S., Yellin, J.M.H., Neal, R., Allen, K., et al. (2005). How can user-centereddesign help us think about the challenges of engineering

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators: Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; June Marshall, St. Joseph's College

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

; Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’s Press.5. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.6. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.7. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think? Thought & Action, Vol. 14, Fall 2006. Page 12.867.138. Gibbs, G., (2001). Changing Student Learning Behavior Outside of Class. “Teaching

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Creating successful NEEs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kam Jugdev, Athabasca University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

(1994), no. 5, 485-495.9. M. D. Sorcinelli, Effective approaches to new faculty development, Journal of Counseling and Development 72 (1994), no. 5, 474-479.10. B. I. Dewey, P. B. DeBlois and 2006-EDUCAUSE-Current-Issues-Committee, Top-10 it issues 2006, EDUCAUSE Review 41 (2006), no. 3, 48-79.11. S. M. Bryant, J. B. Kahle and B. A. Schafer, Distance education: A review of the contemporary literature, Issues in Accounting Education 20 (2005), no. 3, 255-272.12. I. J. H. van Emmerik, The more you can get the better: Mentoring constellations and intrinsic career success Career Development International 9 (2004), no. 6/7, 578-594.13. C. Tham, Meng and J. M. Werner, Designing and evaluating e-learning in