- Conference Session
- NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Heather Maness, University of Florida
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
second language. Accordingly, feel free to ask for repetition or clarification. I will be happy to provide it. Beyond addressing inclusion in the syllabus, I also recorded a welcome message that I expectstudents to watch at the beginning of the semester. In that video, I presented these inclusion ideasagain. In addition, I talk about diversity and students’ need to get prepared for the globalworkforce. Being in this course, I say in the video, “will develop your skills of working withnon-native speakers of English because English is my second language.”In addition to this, the instructional designer tested the slides and online content to make surethat they complied with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 508 of
- Conference Session
- Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jenny L Lo, Virginia Tech; Kacie J. Hodges PE, Virginia Tech Dept of Engineering Education; Wm. Michael Butler, Virginia Tech; Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
Instead of relying on coordinators contracts started a threeday bootcamp. It provided to do all training, departmental week prior to the an overview of policies, the course experts led some sessions. This start of classes, thus project, the learning management reduced monotony for attendees limiting training system, and university online and leveraged expertise of options. recordkeeping systems, as well as colleagues. We found that if prepared instructors to teach the bootcamp is optional, those first two weeks of course content. missing training are behind. Instructors had a Deliberate decisions
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Zhilin Zhang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Chirantan Mahipal, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; David Mussulman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Robert Thomas Baird, University of Illinois Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning; Hongye Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Ruihua Sui, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Maryalice S. Wu; Rob Kooper, NCSA / University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
Paper ID #29904Improving student accessibility, equity, course performance, and labskills: How introduction of ClassTranscribe is changing engineeringeducation at the University of IllinoisProf. Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Lawrence Angrave is an award winning Fellow and Teaching Professor at the department of computer sci- ence at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). His interests include (but are not limited to) joyful teaching, empirically-sound educational research, campus and online courses, computer sci- ence, unlocking the potential of underrepresented minorities
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Tawfik Elshehabi, University of Wyoming
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
evaluation and the online discussionboard, in addition to my classroom observations.Results and DiscussionAfter presenting my visual teaching and assessment philosophy, students were asked to completea three-question survey and engage in an online discussion about teaching philosophy andsyllabus. Overall, the results show my students’ satisfaction with my teaching philosophy. Figure3 depicts that 82.8% of the students strongly agree that the course syllabus, including myteaching and assessment philosophy, is clear, helpful, and matches student expectations. Notably,98.9% of the students agree and strongly agree with this course syllabus statement. Figure 3 The results of the first survey Likert question about the course syllabus and the clear
- Conference Session
- NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Andrew Novocin, University of Delaware; James Atlas, University of Delaware
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
students to not ask questions that are covered on the syllabus?PurposeA syllabus has multiple functions that should be considered while creating the document. (1) Plan the course (for example, lay out the schedule and the assessments) (2) Communicate the objectives of the course (for elective courses, help students decide whether they truly want to take the course or not) (3) Serve as a “contract” or at least a “reference guide” for course policies (how to contact the instructor/s, coursework policies, etc)ContentAt a minimum, your syllabus should include the following information. Beneath each “main item”on this list are questions to consider as you decide what to include and how.• Course number, title, semester, section(s
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 3 - Grading: Grate or Great
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Christina Marie Zambrano-Varghese, Rutgers University-Newark; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Swapnil Moon
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
more severe. Onecurrent type of violation is contract cheating, first coined by Lancaster and Clarke in 2006, whichinvolves paying a third-party to complete an assignment instead of the student enrolled in theclass [4]. Some researchers have even discovered “ghost students,” in which a fee is paid foranother person or company to enroll in an online course for an entire semester on behalf ofsomeone else [5]. Even though contract cheating and ghost-students are extremely severeviolations because of the awareness of the deviousness of the act, the underlying motivations forthese types of violations often reflect the same causes as other forms of academic integrityviolations [4].Students have cited a variety of motivations for engaging in academic
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
simple activity, the IM, to be implemented. Theeducator scaffolded conversation around inclusion in multiple ways. She was also aware of herlimitations, as someone who was interested in promoting inclusion in her course, but did nothave enough previous experience with creating inclusive spaces. From here on, we will refer tothe educator as Dr. YH.Scaffolding a DEI InterventionIn an effort to virtually build a community in Fall of 2020 that addressed issues in diversity,equity and inclusion, the Dr. YH took the following actions in an Engineering Design course: 1. Included a DEI statement in the syllabus. This statement was discussed in the first class session. This action was a part of a new department wide effort to
- Conference Session
- Technology for Faculty Development and Classroom Management
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Rebecca Marie Reck, Kettering University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
boxes g. Electronic course information (e.g. syllabus, handouts) h. Electronic grading/feedback i. Electronic rubrics j. Other k. None of the above 13. What tips or best practices for LMS use would you share with early career faculty members? Open response. 14. What other types of technology do you use in the classroom? Check all that apply. a. Clickers b. PollEverywhere c. Videos d. Presentations via tablet with handwriting input e. Simulations f. Other g. None of the above 15. What tips or best practices for technology in the classroom would you share with early career faculty? Open Response. 16. Do you