- Conference Session
- Faculty Unite! Effective Ways for Educators to Collaborate Successfully
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Gouranga Banik, Oklahoma State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
specific problem, such as writing a paper for ajournal with a high rejection rate, approaching a tight proposal deadline, dealing with anunproductive graduate student or a rebellious undergraduate class, find out which colleaguesare likely to be helpful and seek them out.Working without clear goals and plans and accepting too many commitments that don’thelp achieve long-term goals. Faculty need to make commitments wisely and develop cleargoals and specific milestones for reaching them. Periodic feedback from the department headand peers can also be helpful.Others SuggestionsFind one or more research mentors and one or more teaching mentors, and work closely withthem until you become successful. Most faculties have professors who excel at research
- Conference Session
- Faculty Unite! Effective Ways for Educators to Collaborate Successfully
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Christine S. Grant, North Carolina State University; Barbara E Smith, North Carolina State University; Louis A Martin-Vega, North Carolina State University; Olgha Bassam Qaqish, North Carolina State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
Encouraging faculty Engineer-to engineer peer Senior faculty Promotion/Career service at funding mentoring; Non-tenure- development agencies (name of Funding/publications/ service/ track faculty Service positions) teaching Emphasis in Work/life balance Proposal writing for Retention, Promotion, Tenure diversity Team building government (NSF, NIH, Cross disciplinary collaborative (incudes Collaborative & DoD, DOE, AFSOR) research; women and professional and industry funding Building community
- Conference Session
- Listening and Negotiation
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas; Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Continuing Professional Development, Engineering Leadership Development Division, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering
Professor NegotiationsCase 1: Starting offer at a top-ten engineering research programDr. Taylor Smith, having completed a two-year international post-doctoral experience at a majorinternational laboratory – and having proved worth by already having several externally fundedgrants in addition to numerous peer-reviewed papers, applied for two top-ten engineeringprogram assistant professor positions. The candidate was selected for campus interviews at eachplace, and the interview experiences consisted of the typical two full days of interview, includingbreakfasts, lunches and dinners, with various combinations of faculty, graduate students and staff– rigorous interviews designed to vet future colleagues for their ability to take on the research
- Conference Session
- That's a Great Idea! Learning-focused Methods to Revitalize Your Courses
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Vishwas Narayan Bedekar, Middle Tennessee State University; Ahad S. Nasab, Middle Tennessee State University; Walter W. Boles, Middle Tennessee State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
the important homework/practice problems with realworld examples. The summary video helped instructors spend more time on working out theproblems and examples in class. (2) The summary video could also help students who want toreview the material covered in class at home and practice. Moreover, these videos were availablefor students who miss a class to go back and review what was covered in class and be up to speedfor the next lecture. (3) The concept was different from a traditional all-online course whichprovided videos of full lectures online and did not provide opportunities for students to interactwith the instructors and peers in class. In this method, the instructors spent more time on workingproblems and quizzes during normal
- Conference Session
- But I'm a Loner! Expanding capability and creativity by examining effective alliances
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Colin Cerretani, University of California, Berkeley; Marjorie S Went, UC Berkeley
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
withinsubgroups assigned to those tasks, the subgroup should continue to share the responsibility forcompleting the task. For example, if three TAs are responsible for homework solutions for theweek and they divide the task of writing solutions by problem, the entire group should still beheld responsible for the delivery and accuracy of the entire solution set, should be heldaccountable for answering any and all student questions on that problem set and should be ableto defend the grading for that problem set. If TAs share leading sections or supervising labstations, encourage or require them to attend the section that their teammate is directly leading.Maintain consistency. What does the instructor require to be consistent? To what extent dodiscussion
- Conference Session
- Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jenny L Lo, Virginia Tech; Kacie J. Hodges PE, Virginia Tech Dept of Engineering Education; Wm. Michael Butler, Virginia Tech; Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
course sections and the impact of coordination on matriculation . Most relevant to this paper, in 2009, Thompson, et. al, provide details of a model of coordination that worked for their firstyear 3engineering course . This paper adds to the body of knowledge with respect to best practices for course coordination, particularly with respect to information sharing among the instructional team, common test writing, strategies for training and mentorship, and management of supplies, lab access and prototype testing. This paper focuses on recommendations based on personal experiences by four faculty, two of whom have 10
- Conference Session
- That's a Great Idea! Learning-focused Methods to Revitalize Your Courses
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Debarati Basu, Virginia Tech; Walter McDonald, Virginia Tech; Daniel S Brogan, Virginia Tech; Darren K Maczka, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Vinod K. Lohani, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
alumni to date. Dr. Lohani collab-orated with his colleagues to implement a study abroad project (2007-12), funded under the US-BrazilHigher Education Program of the U.S. Department of Education, at VT. He has published over 70 papersin peer-reviewed journals and conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Combined Contribution of 12 REU Students to the Development of the LEWAS LabAbstractThe Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) lab is a high-frequency, real-time environmental monitoring lab located on the campus of Virginia Tech. This lab hasdeveloped over the course of 9 years from a prototype system used in one class to a real-timeenvironmental