growth, and build consensus across grade levels and subject areas [15].The two STEM pedagogy courses that anchor this study were designed with these best practicesof professional development in mind. Additionally, they were connected back to our prior studieson engineering education for preservice teachers and implementing STEM professionaldevelopment in vertically aligned PLCs [15], [37]. These elements of the courses offered insightinto STEM teacher self-efficacy in engineering and also revealed opportunities for increasedSTEM teacher agency and growth through hands-on activities.Self-efficacy as a framework for analyzing participants’ experiences and developmentWe selected Bandura’s [14] self-efficacy framework as a lens to examine
principally been in the field of engi- neering. He is interested in ways of characterizing and developing disciplinary practices (e.g., mechanistic reasoning) in K-12 classrooms in order to promote and support disciplined inquiry. He has published his research in the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), Cognition and Instruc- tion, and ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education. In addition, Dr. Weinberg has coauthored a book, The First-Year Urban High School Teacher, focusing on the challenges of support- ing teaching and learning in the nation’s highest poverty schools and districts. He has recently begun a research study that will supports mechanistic reasoning through
, Digital Harbor Foundation Shawn Grimes is the Executive Director at the Digital Harbor Foundation where they use technology and maker skills to develop a blend of creativity and productivity in youth and educators.Dr. Amy Hurst, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Amy Hurst an Associate Professor of Human-Centered Computing in the Information Systems Depart- ment at UMBC and studies accessibility problems and build assistive technologies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Youth Attitudes Towards Assessment Tools in After-school Informal Learning and Employment Training Programs (RTP)1. Introduction“Making” is an umbrella term that refers to a wide range of
design process, helping them solve problems. The studentsexplained how engaging in PjBL activities in the classroom boosted their confidence in using theengineering design process to solve problems they encountered in their homes. Some sampleexcerpts are:“I can solve problems, because I'm actually using it a lot more now since I'm stuck at home. Iuse a new design process, I think almost every day to try and solve a problem.”“I also think I could describe the engineering process to somebody just because we've used it somany times in this class.” “I also think that the engineering design process is more open minded,in a sense. It allows you to be more creative, because with science, there is usually a rightanswer, but with the engineering design
App. The SpatialVis App has shown positive outcomes for undergraduate engineering students and is in use inmultiple engineering courses across the nation [12, 13]. Figure 1. Spatial Vis sketching App1.2 Framework and DefinitionsThe terms spatial reasoning and spatial visualization are often incorrectly used interchangeably.Spatial reasoning involves three properties: 1) an awareness of space, such as distance anddimensions; 2) the representation of spatial information, in the mind or in maps or blueprints;and 3) the reasoning involved in interpreting this information for problem solving [6]. Thus,spatial reasoning comprises a range of spatial skills and includes skills like mental rotation,spatial orientation and
Paper ID #32501Analysis of Online Robotics Challenge Submissions - FundamentalMs. Sara Willner-Giwerc , Tufts University Sara Willner-Giwerc is a Ph.D. candidate in mechanical engineering at Tufts University. She graduated from Tufts University with a B.S. in mechanical engineering and a double minor in engineering education and engineering management in 2018. She is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, which supports her research at the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) on the design of technological tools, learning experiences, and environments for supporting solution diversity
using Labo’s cardboard ones. The effort allowedundergraduate engineering students to develop games, and 3D VR equipment yielding excellentresults where the educational games developed had to work with the VR equipment they alsodesigned and built.Conclusion and Future WorkThe summer workshop engaged the participants effectively in learning game development andVR technology. Three critical observations from the workshop include: 1) a limitation ofimmersion time into the program. Participants observed that the 2-day time frame wasinsufficient for them to learn what was expected. Authors concur and have doubled the workshopto 4 days for similar workshops in the future. 2) inability to ascertain whether the workshopchanged some students minds to
first bend at factor 4 or 5(most often 5) and a second bend at factors 6-8 (most often 7); parallel analysis indicates thecrossing point (maximum possible factors) at 8-10, with 9 as mode and median. Therefore wechose to test models with between 4 and 9 factors, keeping in mind that 8-9 factors seemsunlikely given the tiny eigenvalues, and would be difficult to estimate with our sample size.Table 4. Parallel analysis for engineering log coded items: summary of 20 imputed data sets. Datset #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 # Factors 8 9 10 10 9 8 10 9 9 9 8 10 9 9 9 9 8 8 9 9 Scree bend 1 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
Paper ID #31648CanSat Pico-satellite building workshop as an effective tool for STEAMeducation, a case studyDr. Jorge H Kurita, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion Dr. Jorge Kurita attended Universidad Nacional de Asuncion in Paraguay, where he got his BS in Elec- tromechanical Engineering. After graduation, he spent some time in academia working as faculty. During this tenure he taught courses on heat transfer, fluid mechanics and physics. In 2004 Dr. Kurita was granted the Fulbright scholarship to attend a graduate program on Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Techno- logical University. He has finished his MS and then
Paper ID #25959Design and Development of a Modular K-12 Cybersecurity CurriculumDr. Giti Javidi, University of South Florida Dr. Giti Javidi received her BS from University of Central Oklahoma and MS and PhD from University of South Florida, Tampa. Prior to joining academia as a faculty, she worked for industry for several years including IBM as a software engineer. Dr. Javidi has more than 18 years of experience in teaching, research, industry and consulting services. She Joined USFSM IT program in fall 2016 as a n Associate Professor of Information technology and Cybersecurity, from Virginia State University (VSU
Paper ID #26535Evaluating the use of a Personalized Learning Management System to In-crease Student Enrollment in High School Physics (Evaluation, Diversity)Dr. Meera N.K. Singh, University of Calgary Meera Singh obtained her PhD. from the University of Waterloo, Canada, specializing in fatigue life prediction methods. Following her PhD studies, she joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Manitoba, Canada, where she was a faculty member for 12 years. During that time, she conducted research primarily in the area of the fatigue behaviour of composite materials, regularly taught courses in applied
Protocolfor Engineering Design (COPED) [23], and the Classroom Assessment Scoring System [24],which are science-specific, engineering-specific, engineering design process focused, andcontent agnostic, respectively. Although these instruments provide a variety of different designsto support the development of a new observational instrument, they are ill-suited for use inclassrooms that feature STEM integration, as they do not directly address instruction or learningthat occurs at the intersection of multiple disciplines. Further, these instruments were notdesigned with an integrated STEM education framework in mind, thus missing keycharacteristics of integrated STEM. The desire and need for such as instrument motivated thework reported here, which
. 6“So, I have one student in particular that pops into mind where he eventually wants to go onto afour-year college, but his family is not in a position right now where he can afford it, so he'sdoing the {Regional Pathway} program.” 271T2, suggested that it is important for students to know whether they like engineeringbefore spending large amount of money on an engineering degree, which can influence thestudents’ financial future.“the goal of the class is not to make people engineers. It is to help you find out if you want tobe an engineer and, do you have what it takes to be an engineer? So, at the end of my first levelone class, if a student says, "Wow, I found out I really don't want to go into engineering," wellthat's a win. Here
Paper ID #32392#LaHoraSTEAM (The STEAM Hour) – An Initiative to Promote STEM-STEAMLearning in Quarantine Times (Work in Progress)Mr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the Chicago area, 2) the Junior
manifest in this way leaving opportunities for educators to be mindful inworking toward equal-status in engineering teams. We have highlighted with a few briefexamples what high-status vs. equal-status vs. low-status can look like in a team. We believe it isimportant to be explicit about good teaming behaviors and call out what it can look like whenteammates are not treating each other equally or fairly. For example, in the example wepresented of a high-status member, the actions of Student A could be interpreted as the studentbeing decisive and a leader, behaviors we certainly like to see in students; however, if the studentis not aware of the fact that they are making unilateral decisions, they could begin to alienateother team members. We
that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE and IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee.Mrs. Susan Beth D’Amico, North Carolina State University Susan B. D’Amico Coordinator of Engineering K-12 Outreach Extension The Engineering Place College of Engineering NC State University Susan earned a B.S in Industrial Engineering from NC State and has worked in the Telecom and Contract Manufacturing Industries for over 25 years as an Industrial Engineer, Process Engi- neer, Manufacturing Engineer, Project Manager, Business Cost Manager and Program Manager. Inspired by coursework she developed and presented as an engineer, her professional path made a turn
more confident in it because now I know that if I put my mind to it I can get it done. (YS, 2016)Among all the students, only one reported that the impact of the program was negative because itmade her come to the realization that she didn’t want to pursue an engineering career. This summer experience has opened my eyes to the engineer field. It has helped me make the decision not to become an engineer. (YS, 2018)According to a follow-up email sent in January 2019, among the 39 YSs who graduated highschool so far, 24 YSs are pursuing engineering degrees, 14 are majoring in non-engineeringSTEM disciplines, and one has attended trade school and is now interning at SamsungSemiconductor. These results confirm that the YS program
assess how industrial arts programs have transitioned to current technologyand engineering programs. This study compares its findings with past status studies conducted inOhio and nationally in order to describe the program title, content, and instructional methodsemployed in technology education [36], as well as how programs are aligning to ITEA’s case forproviding technology education for all K-12 students [38], [39]. Most importantly, as a means toinform future research focused on the recruitment and retention of minority students and teachersin technology education, this study describes the inclusion of females, minorities, and studentswith special needs in Ohio technology education classrooms. With these objectives in mind, thefollowing
. Lee, and J. Dantzler, “Mathematical Problem Solving For Engineering Students,” 2005.[18] Unity. Unity Technologies, 2019.[19] “Harris Corporation T7TM Multi-Mission Robot on an EOD Mission.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zX2LwiT0xA (accessed Feb. 01, 2020).[20] “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis - Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E. Shannon, 2005.” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1049732305276687 (accessed Feb. 01, 2020).[21] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1980.Appendix A. Two-Joint Robot Arm Simulation Student HandoutPART 1: POSITIONIn this portion of the activity, you will determine whether your
. Capobianco, B. French, and H. Diefes-Dux, “Engineering identity development among pre-adolescent learners,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698–716, 2012.3. J. R. Wieselmann, E. A. Dare, E. A. Ring-Whalen, and G. H. Roehrig, “‘I just do what the boys tell me’: Exploring small group student interactions in an integrated STEM unit,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 112–144, 2020, doi: 10.1002/tea.21587.4. K. Miel, M. Portsmore, E. Fuller, K. Paul, E. Sung, and A. V. Maltese, “‘Maybe if I put my mind to it’: 5th graders’ receptivity to pursuing engineering careers.” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL. 2019.5. A. Godwin, “The
Paper ID #32896Teachers Navigating Educational Systems: Reflections on the Value ofFunds of Knowledge (Fundamental)Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His research has contributed to the integration of critical theoretical frame- works and Chicano Cultural Studies to investigate and analyze existing deficit models in engineering education. Dr. Mejia’s work also examines how asset-based models impact the validation and recognition of students and communities of color as holders
were recruited from local CBBG educationalpartners, which all serve students from populations traditionally underrepresented in engineering.Two participants teach in a Title 1 school district in Phoenix, one teacher was transitioning backto the classroom from the Arizona Science Center, and two teachers were part of an NSF-fundedproject to develop criteria and associated metrics for K-12 engineering educators with the needsof their students in mind. The teachers themselves also represented diverse backgrounds. Four ofthe participants identified as African American, one also identified as Asian American, andanother teacher identified as Native American. Six of the participants taught at the middle schoollevel and two taught at the high school
computing, and game design. Mr. Minken is also currently pursuing a Doctorate in Educational Leadership at Arcadia University with a research focus in STEM education.Dr. Augusto Z. Macalalag Jr., Arcadia University Dr. Augusto Macalalag, Jr., Associate Professor of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, teaches undergraduate and graduate STEM methods courses for pre-service and in- service teachers. He is the Advisor of Secondary School Teaching Certification Programs (Links to an external site.) that prepare pre-service teachers to teach General Science (Links to an external site.), Biology (Links to an external site.), Chemistry (Links to an external site.), and Mathematics (Links to an
Paper ID #21349Fundamental: Analyzing the Effects of a Robotics Training Workshop on theSelf-efficacy of High School TeachersMr. Abhidipta Mallik, New York University Abhidipta Mallik received his B.Tech. degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from the West Bengal University of Technology, Kolkata, India, and M.Tech. degree in Mechatronics from the Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal, India. He has one year and ten months of research experience at the CSIR-CMERI, India. He is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering
Paper ID #23190Fundamental: Examining the Variations in the TPACK Framework for Teach-ing Robotics-aided STEM Lessons of Varying DifficultyMr. Abhidipta Mallik, New York University Abhidipta Mallik received his B.Tech. degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from the West Bengal University of Technology, Kolkata, India, and M.Tech. degree in Mechatronics from the Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal, India. He has one year and ten months of research experience at the CSIR-CMERI, India. He is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of
Paper ID #22274’Helped Me Feel Relevant Again in the Classroom’: Longitudinal Evaluationof a Research Experience for a Teachers’ Program in Neural Engineering(Evaluation)Ms. Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Engineering Education Research Manager at the Center for Sensorimo- tor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington, where she is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development. Previously, Kristen worked as an ed- ucational consultant offering support in curriculum design and publication. She received her M.Ed. in
-engineering courses. However, teachers who participated in thesummer engineering training program were less likely to have this view. Therefore, professionaldevelopment may influence engineering teaching culture, which in turn affects the inclusion of adiverse group of students in engineering.Research on Engineering Professional DevelopmentPrevious studies underscored the importance of teacher guidance for students in improvingstudents’ views of engineering and choosing STEM fields for their future career path [6], [19].Bearing in mind that teachers lack knowledge about engineering and how to integrate it into theirlessons, several researchers have attempted to develop professional development (PD) programsto improve teachers’ knowledge. For example
Paper ID #27448Design and Implementation of Data Collection in a Large-Scale, Multi-YearPre-College Engineering Study: A RetrospectiveDr. Ibrahim H. Yeter, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ibrahim H. Yeter is a Postdoctoral Researcher in his second year in the INSPIRE-Research Institute for Pre-College Engineering in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He completed his PhD degree majoring in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Engineering Education and minoring in Educational Psychology as well as an MS degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He also obtained an MEd
Paper ID #23248Initial Problem Scoping in K-2 Classrooms (Fundamental)Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emily M. Haluschak is an undergraduate student in Chemical Engineering working within INSPIRE In- stitute at Purdue University. She primarily focuses on data analysis for K-2 STEM integration while also editing STEM curriculum.Ms. Michelle L. Stevens, Lafayette School Corporation Michelle Stevens is a 1st grade teacher at Glen Acres Elementary School in Lafayette, Indiana. She became interested in the implementation of STEM integration in the early grades after teaching the 1st grade STEM
happening in both settings includedAbstraction, Algorithm and Procedure, Debugging/Troubleshooting, Pattern Recognition,and Simulation. We also noticed that given the tasks that children were given, the level ofCT competencies they engaged in was different. BackgroundSTEM IntegrationOver the past fifteen years, engineering knowledge, practices and habits of mind have also begunreceiving greater attention at the elementary school level, as these engineering practices facilitatestudents’ skills in solving complex and real-world problems [1]–[3]. Recent studies suggest thatintegrating STEM provides more meaningful environments for students to foster their interestand connections to the real-world [4], [5]. In