enter college intending to major in a STEM fieldcomplete a STEM degree.” In order to remain globally competitive, the U.S. must increase thequantity, quality, and diversity of the STEM workforce.Studies have shown that students who participate in STEM programs before college increasetheir chances to succeed5-13. These programs provide them with important knowledge and skillsto gain a better understanding of science and engineering careers. This paper describes a STEMSummer Enrichment Program (STEM-SEP) designed for high school students. STEM-SEP’sgoal is to improve the recruitment and preparation of students, particularly those fromunderrepresented groups, through participation in a two-week summer enrichment workshop thatincreases students
Paper ID #25515Design and Delivery of an Electro-Optics Summer Camp for Secondary Stu-dents (P12 Resource/Curriculum Exchange)Dr. Benjamin R. Campbell, Robert Morris University Ben Campbell holds a BS in physics and MS in electrical engineering from Penn State and a PhD in engineering from Robert Morris University. For the first decade of his career, he worked as a laser engineer at the Penn State Electro-Optics Center. In 2011 he joined Robert Morris University and currently holds the rank of Associate Professor of Engineering. He has been supporting RMU’s mechatronics minor and also teaching dynamics and electronics
transportation to middle and high school students" and "exposes students tothe transportation and encourages them to pursue transportation-related courses of study at thecollege and university level" [7]. The NSTI program presented in this paper is hosted by CentralConnecticut State University (CCSU). It recruits high school students with diverse demographicand academic background, and focuses on raising participants’ awareness in STEM educationaland career opportunities. Program evaluation results demonstrate how high school students'interests in STEM can translate into engineering pipeline growth. Program participants'perceptions and preferences shed lights on effective course delivery in engineering education.Program Overview The NSTI at CCSU
students were very interested in the activities and that the unit increasedtheir students’ awareness of neural engineering. Results from surveys of students in 2017 (N =212) indicate that they self-reported on a 5-point Likert scale statistically significant (p < .001)differences before and after enactment of the units in their knowledge of concepts in neuralengineering, engineering, neuroscience, and neuroethics, as well as careers in neural engineering. 1414 North East 42nd Street, Suite 204, Seattle, WA 98105-6271 Telephone: (206) 685-8915 URL: http://www.csne-erc.orgFeatured Unit: Modeling & Designing a Sensory Substitution DeviceTime: 4-5 weeks Lessons: 10 Grades: 6-8 Focus: STEAM
Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Associate Professor of Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college- level engineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school ex- perience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellDr. Tejaswini S Dalvi, Univeristy of Massachusetts, Boston c American Society for
-Ordóñez, Graduate student; Dr. Morgan Hynes, Supervisor. Link to full curriculum and support resources: Please, follow the QR code This curriculum was based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under RET grant no. EEC 1454152—CAREER: Broadening Contexts to Motivate Participation in Engineering through the Purdue University-CISLUNAR Initiative
, 2021 Preparing the Next Generation Advanced Manufacturing Workforce using Collaborative Robots and Experiential Learning (Work in Progress)AbstractThe widening skills gap and shrinking workforce in advanced manufacturing is a critical national problem.One solution is to open the minds of schoolchildren to the joy of robotics in manufacturing to stir theirenthusiasm, with a larger goal of generating future career interest. This paper describes the application andassessment of a 7-week long after-school experiential learning program using collaborative robots thatintroduced 16 middle school students from underrepresented and underserved groups to robotics andadvanced manufacturing. Through pre- and post-surveys, students reported
. Undergraduatestudents volunteered their time to serve as Challenge team mentors who led the small groupsessions as high school student teams worked to solve the problem. Engineering Deans hosted acasual panel discussion full of good-natured banter and details about how they came to choose anengineering career.2. Building a virtual design competitionThe TriU Challenge Committee developed the theme for this challenge around a topic relevant tohigh school students - social distancing in schools during a pandemic. The first step was todetermine student outcomes. The Committee agreed the teams should deliver a final project thatrequired participants to demonstrate the engineering design thinking process [5, 6]. 1. Define the problem in their own words
1981-1989 Associate Director for Finance and Administration, Center for Electromagnetics Research (CER), Northeastern University. Pub- lications/Papers: Reenergizing and Reengaging Students Interest through CAPSULE; A Novel and Evolu- tionary Method on Educating Teachers to Promote STEM Careers Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (IEEE ISEC 2011); and ”Implementing the Capstone Experience Concept for Teacher Professional Development” Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (ASEE 2011). Rel- evant Presentations: ”K-12 Partnerships” (Department of Homeland Security/Centers of Excellence An- nual Meeting 2009); ”Building and Sustaining K-12 Educational Partnerships” (NSF ERC 2007 - 2010
science aims to more deeply connect engineering design and practice with science conceptsusing inquiry-based methods. The framework relates science to students’ everyday lives, ensuresstudents learn about being careful consumers of scientific and technological information, andprepares them with the skills to enter careers in science, engineering, andtechnology. Curriculum must harmoniously integrate the three dimensions of science learninghighlighted by NGSS: core ideas, science and engineering practices, and cross-cutting concepts.While the core ideas are similar to past standards, the emphasis on students’ understanding of theapproach and methods employed by engineers and scientists, and the demand that engineeringand technology be integrated
the NGSS is to empower all students to participate inpublic science discourse, be critical consumers of scientific information, and have the skills topursue careers in the 21st century, particularly those in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) [2]. As an increasing number of states adopt the NGSS, there is mountingpressure to prepare science educators for the impending changes in expectations, curriculum, andassessment.There are significant challenges as states transition their science standards to align with NGSS,such as insufficient professional development and support for teachers, inconsistency ofimplementation, and inadequate time and curricular resources [3]. In this recent reform effort,science teachers are likely
Knowledge Dimension: What all High School Students Should Know to be Engineering Literate. (Fundamental)Rationale and Background The importance of engineering for P-12 learners continues to increase1-6. This growinginterest can be attributed to the idea that engineering education can contribute to the generaleducation of all students as well as inspire a more diverse, and workforce ready, populace tomeet the needs of high-demand careers of the 21st century2. Engineering education is uniquelypositioned to support interdisciplinary learning experiences to foster rich connections and furtherknowledge and skills of academic disciplines. The inclusion of engineering into P-12 educationis now seen as an approach to address challenges facing
Engineering Integration Prior to NGSSIn order to understand how NGSS has shifted the landscape of K-12 engineering standards, wemust first look at the state of engineering standards integration prior to the NGSS. In a 2012publication, Carr, Bennett, and Strobel asked the question “To what extent is engineering presentin current STEM standards in the 50 states in the USA?” To answer this question, the authorsanalyzed science, math, technology, vocational, career and engineering content standards from2011. They found that 11 states had explicit engineering standards, and another 19 referencedexplicit engineering content from either Project Lead the Way, or the International Technologyand Engineering Educators Association. Of the remaining states, 11
may not have a lot of discretionary time to devoteto formal out-of-school STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) programs,which foster the subsequent pursuit of STEM careers.1 Moreover, working youth may not haveextra disposable income to devote to many STEM activities such as attendance at sciencemuseums or the purchase of STEM magazines and materials, which also foster the pursuit ofSTEM careers.2, 3 High school students’ workplaces may thus be promising sites for fosteringequitable STEM learning because they are sites inhabited by many youth who do not have thesame access to formal STEM learning opportunities as youth from more affluent families.The purpose of this study was to identify the types of engineering-related
engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Equity in Collaboration: My Ideas Matter, Too! K-12 Students’ Negotiation of Social Status in Collaborative Engineering Team (Fundamental Research)AbstractWithin pre-college (K-12) engineering education, the curriculum design integrates studentsworking with partners or teams on projects as standard practice in the curriculum design.However, with a need to increase participation in engineering and other STEM career pathways,introducing engineering in pre-college settings has become a central avenue for access to STEMcareer pathways for many students. Pre-college learning experiences are opportunities to developstudents’ interests further and
curriculum included (a) STEM hands-on activities focused on mathematicsand engineering (including mathematical visualization, engineering design process throughtowers and chain reaction machines, explorations with arduinos and circuits, and mathematicalthinking through folding), and (b) World of Work activities that centered on self- and career-exploration experiences (including career cards, games, virtual reality experiences, conversationswith and presentations from STEM professionals). The first week of the summer program thestudents focused on introductory STEM activities and explorations and alignment of their currentinterests and abilities to career pathways leading to STEM. In the second week, these activitieslaid the foundation for students
recently taught in the classroom. Therefore solvers are notrequired to demonstrate the metacognitive processes involved in recognizing, recalling, andselecting discipline-specific content knowledge related to the problem. Within Tech-EDclassrooms, students are assessed using competencies defined in the Career and TechnicalEducation curriculum framework which typically do not focus on assessing students in solvingauthentic problems.In this paper, the design, methods, analysis of data, and results of a research study to evaluate theperformance of high school pre-engineering students (completing their fourth and final year inthe program) in solving an authentic engineering design-based problem outside the context of aclassroom are described
Course on Undergraduate Students (RTP)AbstractExposure to pre-college Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) activitiesand undergraduate service learning have been linked to increased interest and participation inSTEM careers. However, few studies have linked these two activities to increased interest andparticipation in teaching careers related to STEM. Due to changing national standards anddemographics, the next generation of K-12 teachers will be required to integrate STEM into theirclassrooms while dealing with students of diverse backgrounds that may differ significantly fromtheir own. Of concern are the elementary or K-6 teachers who will be expected to include STEMin their lessons but do not
school students maintained by the MassachusettsInstitute of Technology (MIT) Office of Engineering Outreach Programs includes 14 free or low-cost science and engineering summer programs, 15 programs with tuition/fees under $1,000, and11 more-extensive programs with tuition/fees greater than $1,000 [2]. Common goals for manyof these camps include: introducing students to engineering as a possible career path; engagingstudents in collaborative, problem-based learning assignments that integrate mathematics,science, and engineering; and providing examples of how engineers engage in engineeringdesign to solve problems [3]–[6]. Some programs choose to specifically target women as anunderrepresented minority in engineering, such as the New Jersey
persistent concern forsupporting in-service K-12 teachers to develop and embed rigorous engineering instruction intotheir practice [9]-[12]. Furthermore, there is a critical need for more role models for all students,especially underrepresented minorities (URM) and those in high-need school districts, in STEMeducation and career fields [13]. While teachers can help fulfill these roles for students in STEM,more attention is needed on professional development supports for teachers and leaders in STEMeducation and teacher education [13].To address these needs and the increased focus on engineering integration, this research studyexamines the supports provided by one professional development program that served K-12teachers in their development as STEM
, presentation, and business skills; and inspire their students, through examples of real-world applications, to pursue careers in STEM and create technology ventures.3. Assess program activities and disseminate outcomes.As elaborated below, PBL, engineering research, and entrepreneurship and industry experiencesare purposefully integrated in this PD program so that educators can link classroom teaching andlearning in STEM disciplines with real-world STEM practices.To develop a technically literate workforce, educators must not only teach STEM knowledge butalso address students’ question: “Why do I need to know this?” Engagement of industry in PD canallow teachers to inform students about job opportunities based on their own experiences. Such
programs, including: a STEM career program (SISTEM) and the Summer Research Experience (REX) program for novice researchers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessing Secondary Science Teachers’ Nature of Engineering (NOE) perceptions with an open-ended NOE instrumentThe recent adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) by some states providesan opportunity to integrate engineering education in the K-12 science curricula. Whileengineering education research in K-12 is emerging, there is an expanding literature that focuseson the epistemology, philosophy and history of engineering education, specifically the Nature ofEngineering (NOE). Although NOE aspects are not
programs, especially through interactive lab activities [4].Another program geared towards electrical engineering found an increase in both studentknowledge on the subject matter and interest in future studies in engineering and science fields[5]. Engineering career aspirations were also shown to increase in a Texas A&M summerprogram [6]. Another program found students showed great interest in studying engineering andengineering-related fields after their summer program [7]. Numerous additional studies echo thefindings of this limited selection of studies [8-11]. Together, these studies show the potential ofcollege-level courses for high school students to grow student knowledge, subject matter interest,career aspirations, and future college
Experience-based Summer Bridge Program to Improve the Success of Incoming Engineering Freshmen Students. (Work in Progress)AbstractCollege of Engineering, Architecture, and Technology (CEAT) at the Oklahoma State University(OSU) annually offers a 3-week high school-to-college transitional program called SummerBridge for incoming engineering freshmen. The summer bridge program is a hands-on,experience-based learning program that gives engineering freshmen a good head-start to theircollege careers and greatly increases their likelihood of success. Various engineeringdepartments actively participate in this program by offering a discipline-specific hands-onexperimental or simulation-based design modules to
high and middle school students as problem-solvers and spark interest in STEM careers. Recently, the Cisco corporate advised fund at theSilicon Valley Community Foundation, granted Arizona State University funds to expand EPICSHigh to underrepresented students and study the student outcomes from participation in thisinnovative program. In this exploratory study we combined qualitative methods—in personobservations and informal interviews—along with pre and post surveys with high schoolstudents, to answer the questions: What skills do students gain and how does their mindset aboutengineering entrepreneurship develop through participation in EPICS High? Research took place in Title I schools (meaning they have a high number of
onlinemath software and go over some important concepts that they may have forgotten since highschool. Other sessions include learning about all the engineering majors offered at LSU andways to enhance their college career (such as study abroad, internships, and minors), lunch withfaculty and staff, a presentation on how to design a research poster, a student organizationshowcase, and culminating in a luncheon with industry representatives.The students spend most of the remaining time on engineering design projects. Teams get tochoose from eight different projects that are inspired by different engineering disciplines, but aretied to a common theme. Last year’s theme was an amusement park renovation, and exampleprojects included designing a safe
Presidential Early Career Award for Sci- entists and Engineers (2010), and a National Science Foundation CAREER Award (2009). Her Auburn University awards include the Excellence in Faculty Outreach (2015), an Auburn University Alumni Pro- fessorship (2014), the Auburn Engineering Alumni Council Awards for Senior (2013) and Junior (2009) Faculty Research, the Faculty Women of Distinction Award (2012), and the Mark A. Spencer Creative Mentorship Award (2011). Dr. Davis is the past chair of Auburn’s Women in Science and Engineering Steering Committee (WISE) and the faculty liaison to the College of Engineering’s 100 Women Strong Alumnae organization which is focused on recruiting, retaining and rewarding women in engineering
encourage them to pursue STEAM careers. One particularly effective approach isthrough hands-on learning and “making,” since children often have a natural affinity fortinkering and learn well through active involvement in meaningful activities [1]. Hands-on,project-based learning has been shown to get more students engaged with STEAM and help themlearn key skills for the future [2]. However, most STEAM education programs target students inupper-middle or high school [3]. Bustamante et. al write, “Since engineering education hastraditionally not been part of the general K–12 education experience (i.e., the beginning ofprimary school (age 5) through the end of secondary school (age 18)), early childhood educatorshave minimal background in engineering
experienced in their career. The overall goal is to have teachers and their perceptions as a starting point in anunder-researched phenomenon, and to determine a basis for both, in depth and extensive,research on “troublemakers” including student and/ or parent views on “troublemaking”behavior. Literature ReviewFactors Causing Student Misbehaviors Previous researchers have studied what factors may or lead to students’ troublemakingbehaviors at school or in the classroom. A large-sample study indicated that sex, race, age,peer bonding, students’ trust in school rules, school involvement, and school effort had asignificant impact on student misconduct (Welsh et al., 1999). More specifically, Lee andSondra
students’ perceptions of robotics in terms oftheir interest in future scientific or engineering related majors in college or careers, and have foundthat students have a positive attitude towards robotics [5], [6]. In this paper, we aim to develop amore nuanced understanding of student attitudes towards robotics-based lessons in terms of moreimmediate effects such as whether the students would like to have more robotics-enhanced coursesin their school curricula. Researchers have also previously suggested that robotics-based lessonsmust be developed so that the students can easily see a connection between the robotics activityand learning goals [3].In this work, we do not prescribe any specific pedagogical methodology, however all