Bootstrapping a New Graduate Curriculum through an Engineering Research CenterAbstract NSF Generation-3 Engineering Research Centers (ERCs) are charged both withadvancing the state-of-the-art in terms of engineering and scientific research as well as training awell-qualified workforce in the domain of expertise. Such an ERC was awarded in 2008 to NorthCarolina A&T State University (NCAT), with the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and theUniversity of Cincinnati (UC) as the core US research partner institutions. The focus of thisERC, the ERC for Revolutionizing Metallic Biomaterials (RMB) is the development of advancedmaterials and processes targeted at the biomedical implant and device industry. NCAT has strongresearch
Paper ID #26601Project-based Learning: An Integration of Real World Project in a 3D DesignClassMr. Kruse Michael Ranly, Ohio Northern University I am a 4th year student at the Ohio Northern University majoring in Manufacturing Technologies. I have been the Teacher’s Assistant for the TECH 2311: Product Design class for the fall 2018-2019 semester. After school I wish to pursue a career in the manufacturing field preferably designing factory layouts to implement robotic lines.Dr. Feng Jao, Ohio Northern University Feng Jao, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Technology at Ohio Northern University. She has been teaching
at minority serving institutions. For example, at the historically Black collegeand universities University of the District of Columbia, an elective biology course forjunior-level biology majors integrates the physiological determinants of health and socialdeterminants of health (SDOH) via seminars with guest speakers who research HD [10].At City College of New York, a Hispanic serving institute, their undergraduatebiomedical engineering program engages students in HD challenges with establishedcurricula on HD modules, undergraduate research initiatives in HD, and design projectsfocused on HD [11], [12]. Often, these two disciplines include students on a premedicaltrack, which has also encouraged exposure to HD and SDOH in medical curriculum
four year grant4 directly supports the development and implementation of new fourthyear curriculum at three of the largest TexPREP sites. The developed curriculum has been madeavailable to all sites and teachers from around the state have been provided training on using thenew curriculum.Challenge Based InstructionThe development of new curriculum for the program offered an opportunity to review thepedagogy and consider new research on effective teaching strategies. The program has had along history of success through integrating projects into the curriculum. In year-end surveys,participants often cite the projects and associated competitions as the highlight of the summer.There are several proven pedagogies that use projects as an integral
computational thinking practices via World MOON (STEM) disciplines as well as computational Project. The World MOON Project is an thinking (CT) practices such as observing and international STEM (i-STEM) collaborative project identifying patterns in aerospace objects (e.g., Integrated Aerospace STEM that thousands of international K-12 students and moon phases). Integrated STEM and CT practices and practices
teaching strategies for K-12 STEM educators integrating engineering design and the development of engineering skills of K-12 learners. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Becoming in Action: An Autoethnography of My Professional Identity Development During the Rising Engineering Education Faculty Experience (Research)AbstractOn the road to obtaining a graduate degree in engineering education, graduate students havelimited opportunities to develop a comprehensive toolbox required for a future career as anengineering education faculty member. The current professional development trajectory focuseson acquiring technical knowledge through required courses and research
beliefs, outcome expectations, personal goals, and interest. Self-efficacy is defined as “people’s judgments of their capabilities to organize and execute courses ofaction required to attain designated types of performances” (Bandura, 1986, p. 391). Thesebeliefs are integrated with contextual factors and behaviors related to job performance or, in thiscase, academic setting, which can be influenced by past experiences, as well as confidence.Individuals also have outcome expectations, or beliefs about what the outcome of an event willbe, within multiple domains, including physical, social, and self-evaluative outcomes (Bandura,1986). Personal goals are aspirations that individuals have in regards to their futures, whileinterest involves the desire
myself as an engineer, researcher, and educator. I have found meaning in mywork through an interdisciplinary understanding2 that serves to integrate my various positions.Mansilla, Miller, and Gardner2 state that individuals show an interdisciplinary understandingwhen “they integrate knowledge and modes of thinking from two or more disciplines in order tocreate products, solve problems, and offer explanations of the world around them” (p. 18).Mansilla, Miller, and Gardner2 explain that “with an interdisciplinary understanding disciplinesare not simply juxtaposed. Rather, they are purposefully intertwined. Concepts and modes ofthinking in one discipline enrich students’ understanding in another discipline” (p. 29). I haveembraced an
in the field of engineering. PBL has long been shown to be an effectivemethod for student learning and understanding, particularly if thoughtfully integrated throughoutthe curriculum [1] and if instructors include key features, such as meaningful inquiries,scaffolded assignments, and consistent feedback [2]. Other studies have shown that PBL is moreeffective in deeper retention of material, satisfaction of both students and professors, anddevelopment of professional skills than traditional lecture methods [3]. However, the overalleffectiveness of PBL, and experiential learning in general, may vary widely depending on thenature and structure of the teamwork [4].This study was conducted at the branch campus of Texas A&M University
AC 2012-5183: EASING INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: AN ORIEN-TATION PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSStephanie Cutler, Virginia TechWalter Curtis Lee Jr., Virginia Tech Walter Lee is a Graduate Assistant and doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His pri- mary research interests focus on diversity and student retention. He earned a B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, communication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
their help with the writing of this paper.References[1] L. Dee Fink, Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses,Jossey-Bass, 2013.[2] G. Wiggins & J. McTighe, Understanding by Design, Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development, 2005.[3] D. R. Krathwohl, A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory Into Practice, Vol.41, No. 4, pp. 212-218, 2002.[4] Saskatoon Public Schools, Instructional Strategies Online. Available:http://schools.spsd.sk.ca/curriculum/instructionalstrategies/.[5] American Psychological Association, Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education, Top20 Principles from Psychology for PreK–12 Teaching and Learning. Available:http://www.apa.org/ed
andexplains to them the role of a faculty mentor. This initial invitation from a senior professor instils a feelingof trustworthiness in the students and ensures that there is someone closer to them with moreprofessional and academic experience, and with whom they can speak freely about their academic as wellas other professional and personal problems.A checklist is maintained in a file called “Student Folder” for each student, and it is continually updatedafter each meeting with the mentor where the mentor makes sure that each student under her/hismentorship progresses smoothly in an ABET accredited curriculum. This activity is further reinforced byadditional record keeping in the office of the Dean of Engineering. According to one of the mentors
Engineering Disciplines into a Common First Year Engineering Program,” in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2003, pp. 1–19.[14] K. Reid and D. Reeping, “A Classification Scheme for ‘Introduction to Engineering’ Courses: Defining First-Year Courses Based on Descriptions, Outcomes and Assessment,” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 1–11.[15] B. M. Olds and R. L. Miller, “The effect of a first‐year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2004.[16] C. Brozina and K. Meyers, “Engineering Major Discernment: A Model for Informing Students and Offering Choice,” in 126th Annual
identity development, and providing mentoring relationships to help foster student growth and success.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of
information registered in a multidimensional code [6, 7].The term episodic reflects its capacity to hold integrated episodes that extend both spatially andtemporally. It is a buffer because it offers a multidimensional code that allows information fromdifferent subsystems to be integrated and linked to LTM. Such a multidimensional capacity tendsto be computationally demanding, hence the buffer's limited capacity [8]. The buffer is assumedto be controlled by the CE, using conscious awareness as an effective retrieval strategy [9-11].The episodic buffer's prominent feature is information chunking. Chunking is where storagecapacity increases by integrating several disparate features into a single whole [12]. The episodicbuffer involves the more complex
Paper ID #31643Gender differences in students’ team expectations and experiences inintroductory team-based coursesMargaret CarrollMr. James A. Coller, University of Michigan James Coller is an engineering PhD Candidate at the University of Michigan focusing on the development of a novel multi-layer network approach to understanding design complexity in unmanned maritime vehi- cles. James also completed his BSE and MSE in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering in 2017 and 2018 respectively and a MS in Robotics in 2019 at Michigan. His research interests include autonomous robotics for both land and marine environments
. The responses were place into six major categories based on Fink’s Taxonomy ofSignificant Learning. The respondents unanimously indicated the course had an impact.Although in both data sets the Fink Categories of fundamental knowledge and applicationreceived the highest percentage of responses; all categories did receive responses. In addition,there was a significant shift from fundamental knowledge to integration between the post-classand alumni response sets. The content and distribution of responses would indicate anunderstanding of a breadth of concepts involved in creating a significant learning experience waspart of the impact of the course. Alumni survey questions focused on specific class objectives. An interesting
context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Ms. Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto Darlee Gerrard is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. from the University of Toronto, B.Ed. from Brock University, and Masters degree from Memorial University. She coordinates leadership and community outreach programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) education, co-curricular and experiential learning, and the equity and accessibility of education.Dr. Deborah Tihanyi, University of Toronto Deborah Tihanyi is an
; the information provided here can serve as a general guideline, but successfulapplicants will carefully review the specific requirements of each program to which they apply.Overview of the “Typical” Application ProcessMost graduate programs in the United States are set up on an academic calendar year, whichtypically begins in late August or early September. Some graduate programs will only admitnew students to start in this “fall” term, while others will admit most students in the fall and asmaller cohort in the January term. The “fall start” is assumed throughout this document, sincethat is the most common timeline; if you are applying to begin graduate school in a differentterm, you will need to adjust the timelines suggested here
technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of ABET and of the AIChE. Page 26.1610.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Two Body Solutions: Strategies for the Dual-Career Job Search AbstractThis paper focuses on the dual-career job search with an eye toward iteratively
Paper ID #30541How to Use Q Methodology in Engineering Education ResearchMs. Renee Desing, The Ohio State University Renee Desing is currently a PhD Candidate at the Ohio State University in the Department of Engineering Education. Ms. Desing holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University. Most recently, Ms. Desing worked as a managing consultant for IBM Public Sector Advanced Analytics.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in the
Polytechnic State University (CPSU). Jointly offered by the Collegesof Liberal Arts and Engineering, LSE is understood as a fourth “computing discipline” by theDepartment of Computer Science (alongside computer engineering, computer science, andsoftware engineering). Admission to the program is by internal transfer only. Accepted studentscomplete rigorous technical education, including 44 units of support courses shared with theCollege of Engineering as well as the CPSU General Education curriculum; 34-35 units ofadditional coursework in an engineering specialization (computer graphics OR electricalengineering (power) OR industrial/manufacturing engineering (systems design) OR anindividualized course of study); 24 units of additional coursework in a
the University of Texas at Austin. Additionally, Dr. Austin Talley holds an undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Mechanical Engineering. His research is in engineering design theory and engineering education. He has published over 25 papers in engineering education journals and conference proceedings. He has worked to implement multiple National Science Foundation (NSF) grants focused on engineering education. He has been an instructor in more than ten week long summer K-12 teach Professional Development Institutes (PDI). He has received multiple teaching awards. He has developed design based curriculum for multiple K-12 teach PDIs and student summer camps. c
activities that simulate the various communication exercises • Can be flexibly implemented to fit the learning – Documented problem solutionsWriting in the Disciplines is an integrated approach that ties writing assignments to that engineers practice in academia and industry. objectives for a coursethe learning outcomes of a technical course and provides relevant opportunities for
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
commandof the material you are teaching and it is matter of setting up an exercise that you can model(and/or students can participate in) where you break down a complex procedure into simple,discrete steps.Repeat Class/Established Relationship with Course Instructor (Level 2):The suggestions with Level 1 are consistent with what most university teaching centers willrecommend for new graduate student graders or teaching assistants. Level 2 introduces novelapproaches that allow GTAs to support curriculum development and establish a deeper sense ofownership in the course.Address Concept Challenges via Curriculum DevelopmentPrior to the start of the semester, summarize and reflect on the main course topics that challengedstudents in the previous course
., capstone design) of an engineering curriculum.10 Due to increasingrecognition of their benefits, professional development opportunities such as internships,undergraduate research, and co-op opportunities are becoming more common amongstengineering students. When compared to other majors, however, engineering students are lesslikely to participate in out-of-class activities.11 Out-of-class activities are defined as any activitythat occurs outside of the formal classroom, including curricular activities, co-curricularactivities, and extracurricular activities. Research in engineering education has shown that out-of-class activities are linked to numerous positive outcomes including students’ professional,intellectual, and leadership development, as
male instructors to useself-disparaging humor (Bryant, Comisky, & Dolf, 1979). Utilizing their categorizations canprovide insight into humor’s use in the STEM classroom and the effects thereof.MethodsThis study utilizes an exploratory mixed methods design that incorporates quantitative analysisof instructor behaviors in the classroom with qualitative excerpts of faculty comments. The datautilized in this paper was collected as part of a larger study examining the use of evidence-basedinstructional practices in foundational STEM courses.ParticipantsParticipants for this study included 48 STEM instructors from a first-year engineering curriculumin a College of Engineering, Physical Sciences, and Mathematics curriculum in a College of Artsand
evaluate a module of asenior design curriculum and give undergraduate Mechanical Engineering students anintroduction to lean manufacturing goals, tools, and best practices. This was accomplishedthrough an in-class lecture, group discussions, along with pre and post surveys.Survey results demonstrated that students were able to develop an effective understanding oflean manufacturing, could successfully identify wastes according to lean principles, and proposeways to implement lean tools and techniques on university-scale design projects. This allowed usto validate that students could apply lean manufacturing principles to a variety of prototypeprojects, giving them hands-on experience with lean practices. From the results of this study, anumber of
Paper ID #6667Am I a Boss or a Coach? Graduate Students Mentoring Undergraduates inResearchMs. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a doctoral student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, whose work examines and develops initiatives to encourage more students, especially women, into the eld of engineering. Currently, Tsai’s research focuses on understanding the dynamics of how status and prestige are constructed among novice engineers.Dr. Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Daria Kotys-Schwartz is the Design Center Colorado Co-Director and an Instructor in the