Paper ID #24562Connecting with first-year engineering students’ interest in social responsi-bility issues through ethics lessonsMs. Kathryn Waugaman, University of Colorado Boulder Katie is an undergraduate student researcher at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She is interested in why students choose to study engineering and what retention methods are successful for universities, particularly in underrepresented communities. She is a Senior in Mechanical Engineering and plans to work in renewable energy when she graduates in December.Dr. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher
Praxis Award in Professional Ethics from Villanova University in 2010, and the IEEE Barus Award for Defending the Public Interest in 2012. His paper on lead poisoning of children in Washington D.C., due to elevated lead in drinking water, was judged the outstanding science paper in Environmental Science and Technology in 2010. Since 1995, undergraduate and graduate students advised by Dr. Ed- wards have won 23 nationally recognized awards for their research work on corrosion and water treatment. Dr. Edwards is currently the Charles Lunsford professor of Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech, where he teaches courses in environmental engineering ethics and applied aquatic chemistry. American
Social Class Include ethics, policy, and social justice [2,8] Give assignments and hold in-class discussions on ethical issues [8]same social class. Critical Theory: Feminist Critical Race Queer Theory
are four main attributeswithin this dimension: 1) The epistemological openness attribute captures the inclination of anengineer to “recognize and value the subjective experiences and perspectives of others as validand important source of knowledge” [1, p. 135]. Epistemological openness allows a researcher tocapture the thought process behind the various actions of an engineer. 2) The second attribute isthe micro to macro focus which informs the need for an engineer to consider the systems-levelimplications of their action along with the individual level implications. 3) The reflective valueawareness attribute covers the need for ethical and professional impact of an engineer’s action.The ability to reflect on their own values and improve
students 1–3. These courses address importanttopics for young researchers, such as a re-introduction of the scientific method, scientific writing © American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferenceof proposals and papers, and ethical considerations. For departments with such structuredcourses, new graduate students develop their research skills together, which saves the students’advisors time in teaching them basics individually. Such a system also avoids frustration due tolost productivity in the early stages of their studies.Many of these ideas are independent of the field of study, hence they can be taught by anythoughtful instructor who has
strong analytical skills, communication,practical ingenuity, leadership, professionalism, ethics, and lifelong learning.Methods, Techniques, or Modes of InquiryQualitative methods were used to conduct the current study, which is one part of an exploratorystudy about engineering Ph.D.s14. To define the attributes of engineering Ph.D.s and to identify Page 22.267.4strategies to help engineering Ph.D.s to acquire expected skills, researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with industry and academic professionals in engineering fields. Resultswere analyzed from four questions (two about attributes and two about strategies). The researchteam
data and reality • Communicative Validity – ensures that the experiences of the participants are accurately portrayed to and understood by the researcher and that the data is handled in a way that best communicates the reality of participant experiences to a relevant audience • Pragmatic Validity – considers whether the theories, frameworks, and ideas the researcher brings to the study fit with the social reality and considers the applicability of the results to the social context • Ethical Validity* - focuses on aspects of integrity and responsibility during the research process (*not included in the 2013 publication, but presented at Q3 workshops, conferences, and in subsequent
within the Biology Curriculum. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33 (7): 34-37. 3f an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility Student Formative Etkina Exam, Gantt Chart, Summative Saterbak College Learning Assessment Formative, Frank 15. Lave, J. (1988) Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press
in engineering practice, is selected as amentor and is given three (3) credit hours of release time per semester for helping the students intechnical as well as ethical issues related to engineering profession. More senior professors areencouraged to lead this role. The ME department at the University of Florida (UF) in Gainesville iscomparable in size with that of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM) in the sense of boththe undergraduate student population as well as the faculty strength. Hence, some similarities can beobserved and inferred. Qualitative results of educational research in both the institutions suggestsatisfactory implementation of mentoring by the dedicated senior faculty members [5]. Also, in both theME
) underlying students’ reasoning in physics. Lately, he has been interested in engineering design thinking, how engineering students come to understand and practice design, and how engineering students think about ethics and social responsibility.Dr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland Chandra Turpen is a Research Assistant Professor at the University of Maryland, College Park with the Physics Education Research Group. She completed her PhD in Physics at the University of Colorado at Boulder specializing in Physics Education Research. Chandra’s work involves designing and researching contexts for learning within higher education. In her research, Chandra draws from the perspectives of anthropology, cultural
excellence in aprofessional setting? What projects did you work on? What training did you complete? Whatwere the outcomes of your work? For instance: I interned with the product development team during summer 2016. I was asked to update the testing manual for the new product line, to be released in early 2018, and generated over 5,000 test cases during the three month summer internship. I completed eight hours of training in professional ethics and standards as part of the internship program, and participated in a day-long seminar on advanced manufacturing techniques.Research Experience: consider both paid and volunteer experiences, as well as substantialresearch projects completed as part of your technical
out undesired experiences in eachdepartment based on social consensus.MethodsBefore conducting this study, an ethics protocol was submitted and accepted by the research ethicsboard of the institution (ID: 36998). An online survey was distributed to engineering doctoralcandidates across engineering departments at [name withheld] in early 2019. The survey questionswere intended to collect information about the demographics of candidates (i.e., home department,year taken, type of exam, etc.) as well as their perceived experiences and thoughts on the purposeand utility of the CQ exam. The survey was pilot tested by 3 external reviewers, points ofclarification were noted, and survey questions were adjusted accordingly and finalized once theauthors
following section, we will first describe epistemic cognition andmetacognition separately. Next, we will discuss the construct of epistemic metacognition thatlooks at epistemic cognition and metacognition in combination. This discussion is followed by asection that discusses the value of studying epistemic metacognition in the context ofengineering.Epistemic cognitionEpistemic cognition concerns how people acquire, understand, justify, change, and useknowledge. It is distinct from cognition because the focus of epistemic cognition is on theconstruction and justification of knowledge, understanding, and/or true beliefs. The study ofepistemic cognition emerged with Perry’s [10] study into the cognitive and ethical developmentof male student at
otherindividuals might mine existing qualitative data does not exist. In this paper, we present such anoverview. We provide the example of how one existing qualitative data set was used for threedissertation studies. We show how each study had its own considerations for the use of that dataset, and how those considerations could help others identify whether a data set is useful for themwhile they are mining qualitative data.There are two main reasons that researchers should consider qualitative data mining. Seale[3]notes that secondary analyses like those that are performed through qualitative data mining arebeneficial to both the researcher and the research community in general, stating that, “It is botheconomical and ethical to analyze existing data
addition to the extracurricular activities, there are work-study and co-opprograms that provide students with real-world experiences. Inside the classroom, studentsacquire the knowledge necessary to ultimately graduate with a Bachelor’s degree in their chosenmajor. All these experiences help transform the student from a dualistic to a relativistic point ofview. According to Dr. William Perry, author of Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Developmentin the College Years, there are nine positions of intellectual development that can be divided into Page 23.571.2two broad categories with position 5 as the pivotal point (see Appendix for Dr
Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), particularly the Body of Knowledge report15, andarticles from the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. Fromthis literature I identified three central themes of uncertainty in measurement, economicalimpact, and ethical decision-making as critical issues that are underrepresented in CivilEngineering, and particularly in Geotechnical Engineering curricula. In summary, I used theevidence shown in Figure 2 to select and justify the content for the new FSFME course. Figure 2. Evidence used to select and justify content for FSMFE courseOverall, I organized the enduring understanding into four primary learning objectives; studentswere expected to: describe how issues
quantitative thinking [22; 23; 24]. In light of the persistence of this issue, we argue that the engineering education community is 2 uncertain “about what matters”, both in the sense of why this problem matters (e.g. is diversity a question of equity and ethics? Or putting together a more diverse and thus competitive American workforce?) and how to address the problem (see discussion of polarization below).Polarization “[that which
employed for the design and verification of the EP.This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Board at the University of Toronto.Participants have reviewed and signed consent form which outlined the procedure, conditions,and confidentiality of the study. All participation is voluntary, and participants could withdrawfrom the experiment at any point. First, participants were asked to follow typed instructions to set up the headset bythemselves, without any prior exposure. Their set-up time was recorded, and their comfort levelwas measured using a Likert scale from 1 to 10, where 1 was defined as “absolutely unbearable,I cannot wear the headset for any longer” and 10 was defined as “I could wear this all day
Organization’s Lisa Tabor Award for Community Service. Using deep insights from a fourteen-year industry career and her strengths as a systems thinker, she is now developing and disseminating empirically-grounded models and strategies for improved human competence, motivation, and learning as it relates to the civil engineering profession and the construction industry. She is a discipline-based education researcher who passionately pursues research to develop an agile, ethical, diverse construction workforce enabled to lead, design, and build sustainable, intelligent infrastructure. Her mission is to transform the construction workforce and sustain change. To this end, she undertakes research that enables her to influence
and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: College Students with ADHD: A Framework for Studying the Role of the College Experience on Academic SuccessAbstract Students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) represent a growingfraction of the college population. We plan to study the experiences of college students withADHD majoring in science, engineering, and mathematics
process to solve an unfamiliar problem.4 I am capable of becoming an engineer. Understanding of Engineering5 The role of engineers is limited to technical problem solving.6 Ethical problem solving is an important part of engineering design.7 Engineering decisions are influenced by the societal context in which they take place.8 I understand the relationship between engineering and the society in which it is practiced.9 Engineers are responsible for solving technical problems with little to no collaboration with other professionals.10 I understand how engineers work with other professionals and technicians to solve problems. Satisfaction with Engineering/Sense
, and different workshops are offered to students on research ethics, the job market,fellowship programs at Cornell, and applying to graduate school. Students also attend a TED talksession where faculty talk about their current research interests.1.1. Choosing the Project:Based on the background and interest of the students our team looked for different projects and wecame across the project designed by Andy Grove on instructables.com. It is an open-source projectcalled “Ultrasonic Pi Piano with Gesture Controls!” [1] We treated this opportunity as a tinkeringchallenge. Grove’s project is a gesture-controlled piano that uses ultrasonic sensors to determinethe distance and to generate corresponding notes to each length. The goal was to have a
6 Engineering Ethics 7 10 5 Graduate Studies Civil Engineering Community Engagement in Engineering Education 8 8 4 Multidisciplinary Engineering Two Year College Computers in Education 9 6 3 New Engineering Educators Environmental Engineering Mechanics Aerospace Mechanical Engineering 10 Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
department initiated an independent research propositioncourse for all first year PhD candidates. Student performance in this spring semesterthree unit course was treated as a graduate qualifier exam, and both students and facultyhave been supportive of this requirement, as summarized earlier1. Over the last decade, our first year approach to research education hasbroadened. Peter Kilpatrick added a one unit fall course, Introduction to Research, aprofessional development course including research ethics, presentations, andpublications. While these two courses were satisfying as stand-alone efforts, recentfaculty and graduate student sentiment pushed for an earlier engagement of student withresearch advisor, PhD committee, and research itself
because it allowed me to see others work ethic and allowed me to gain knowledge about a field I was not very familiar with. I was able to see how the alignment of lesson plans and activities can be very time consuming and the use of frameworks allow for the writer to systematically formulate a creative, and well put together lesson.” (Participant 9)The Trainees came to several conclusions about strategies to best manage group work in aprofessional setting in order to meet timeline deliverables and expectations. First, they noted theimportance of responsive communication in whatever medium the team decides works best.Second, the Trainees realized that differing perspectives, even if they require discussion, oftenlead to achieving
thinker, she is now developing and disseminating empirically-grounded models and strategies for improved human competence, motivation, and learning as it relates to the civil engineering profession and the construction industry. She is a discipline-based education researcher who passionately pursues research to develop an agile, ethical, diverse construction workforce enabled to lead, design, and build sustainable, intelligent infrastructure. Her mission is to transform the construction workforce and sustain change. To this end, she undertakes research that enables her to influence postsecondary education and workplace learning pathways; instructional, diversity, recruitment, and retention strategies; and federal
a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Texas at Dallas within the Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science where she is studying retention of undergraduate engineering students. She has extensive experience using qualitative and mixed-methods research in Engineering Education. Before joining UTD in September 2020, Laura worked at the University of San Diego on their RED grant to study institutional change efforts and redefine the engineering canon as sociotechnical. She has a background in environmental engineering and received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University with a research focus on the ethical and career aspects of mentoring of science and engineering
of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Out-of-Class Impacts of Flexible ClassroomsAbstractThis student-led research project analyzes the impact that the conversion of a computer lab to aflexible classroom space had on informal use of the space outside of class time. Studies havebeen conducted on the benefits of informal learning settings, but there are few studies on how thephysical space itself can support the informal learning process. Research surrounding learningspaces in libraries has emphasized use of collaboration and flexible spaces, but these studieshave been conducted to inform space design decisions
confidence in their skills. Overall, positive feedback was gathered both before and after theretreat. Our chapter plans on rerunning this program with some changes to the skills that will bediscussed. We will also change the scheduling of the event so that it takes place one day perweek for three weeks, as opposed to three consecutive days, in an effort to boost attendance.IntroductionSoft skills are an important aspect of engineering education. The Accredation Board forEngineering and Technology lists several soft, or professional, skills that should be covered inthe engineering curriculum: communication, teamwork, ethical responsibility, and lifelonglearning [1]. While students are expected to have these skills, there is evidence of a
scavenger hunt. We also provided lunch andgave freebies to students. The BSC mentors gave a presentation as the initial event for the first day of the orientation. Itwas designed to help incoming students succeed at our university. Throughout the presentation,the BSC mentors discussed different personal techniques used to succeed at UHCL, gainedthrough practical and personal experience. Apart from the main ethical and professional points ofavoiding cheating, laziness, and procrastination, we shared very specific tips for various courses.We believe that with this presentation, we were able to give the students an insight as to what lifeas a university student is like. They learned about their professors before meeting them, aboutwhat courses to take