engineering curriculum: They exist side-by-side, institutionally parallel as opposed to convergent. Therefore, an element of bait-and-switchremains, but the outlet of creative, synthetic, hands-on design in an intimate, supportive learningenvironment is both present and institutionally legitimated as part of students’ formalizededucational experience. This arrangement challenges the logic of exclusion prevalent within theengineering-only programming by overlaying a logic of engagement on top of the standardfundamentals-first engineering curriculum. Page 26.616.13Since PDI operates outside of Rensselaer’s core engineering curricula, it provides only a
facilitators of a student-led learning process [12]. Engineering educators have adapted similar PBL approaches such as capstone designprojects and engineering student design teams to complement the more traditional, basic-sciencebased engineering curriculum. Project-based learning (noted as PBL*) team opportunities arequalitatively different than traditional PBL efforts in one demonstrable way. Engineering projectteams tend to engage more complex design challenges over a longer period of time compared toin class PBL investigations commonly used in medicine[2]. This qualitative difference createstwo organizational challenges unique to engineering project-based learning teams. Student PBL* teams must sustain team motivation throughout a
knowledge and hone theircommunication, teamwork, and problem-solving skills. Given the nature of senior designcourses, they offer an opportunity for engineering programs to integrate the outcomes of ABETcriteria [1]. In contrast to much of the undergraduate curriculum, the problems that students workon in senior design tend to be more ambiguous, require the consideration of multiple tradeoffs,and have no ‘right’ answer. As such, engineering design problems require individuals to makedecisions about what counts as knowledge by assessing various sources of information,balancing constraints, and evaluating alternative solutions. These acts can be grouped together asepistemic cognitive processes and require individuals to reason “about specific
isapproximately $114.In addition to the kit, each laboratory group will need a computer with MATLAB/Simulink and anetwork connection to the Raspberry Pi. The license for MATLAB and Simulink have not beenincluded in the cost of either lab setup because it is assumed that a school with an existingcontrols curriculum will already have a site license.A kit has been developed that will replace the technical functionality of four out of the six labsfor GE320. It is currently about $30 over the target, however with bulk ordering and diligentprice comparisons the kit cost could be reduced even further. GE320 Lab 2 could not bereplicated with this kit, at this time it is not clear if the educational objectives it to be included inthe curriculum. This lab could be
graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Diana Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. Additionally, her scholarship includes topics such as curriculum development, contextualization of fundamental engi- neering sciences and integrating social justice into engineering education. She earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College
ranked journals (e.g. Journal of College Science Teaching), reviewed conference proposals (e.g ASEE).Miss Ezgi Yesilyurt, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Ezgi Yesilyurt is a PhD student in curriculum and instruction/science education at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a graduate assistant in an NSF funded grant project in which she assumed major responsibilities such as data collection, data analysis, design and delivery of teacher professional development workshops in the grant project. Also, she is currently teaching science methods courses. She received her MS degree and BS degree in elementary science education. She participated European Union Projects in which she conducted series of
research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills to integrate science, language arts, and engineering education within the context of Next Generation Science Standards.Miss Ezgi Yesilyurt, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Ezgi Yesilyurt is a PhD student in curriculum and instruction/science education at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a graduate assistant and teaching science methods courses. She received her MS degree and BS degree in elementary science education. She participated European Union Projects in which
, published in ranked journals (e.g. Journal of College Science Teaching), reviewed conference proposals (e.g ASEE).Dr. Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada Las Vegas Hasan Deniz is an Associate Professor of Science Education at University of Nevada Las Vegas. He teaches undergraduate, masters, and doctoral level courses in science education program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. His research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills to integrate science, language arts, and engineering education within the context of Next Generation
withcustom PCB work, the EE team integrated commercial off the shelf (COTS) components into theoverall electrical architecture shown on Figure 6, primarily the CPU’s, motherboard, andArduinos, components that were used after students made an informed decision that someexisting circuit boards would meet all requirements and promote system simplicity andreadiness.The computer science (CS) team were uniquely challenged by the hands-on experience gainedthrough Robosub. CS students, in general, rarely have the opportunity to work on a hands-onproject throughout their curriculum. The CS team was responsible for the AUV’s computervision system and the integration of the EE team’s navigation algorithms into a largernavigation/overall vehicle communication
, onlineeducation tool for control systems that integrates the traditional curriculum with interactivecomponents to create a more comprehensive learning experience. The technical products used todevelop the learning tool project were often free and opensource-- indication of the increasedaccessibility of developing virtual education tools. The project was evaluated with user feedbacksurveys and common user metric research methods with a sample of students that have recentlytaken the control systems course at The University of Texas at Dallas. The results ultimatelyunderlined the appeal of immersive, gamified learning experiences to students and highlights theopportunity the education field has in developing more multimedia, engaging learning materials
individual’s scheduledid not impede the critical path.One challenge of the working group approach is that an “Integrations” team needs to be assignedearly. Integrating each of the subteam pieces proved to be one of the most time consuming andchallenging portions of this engineering challenge. In addition, individuals on the integrationsteam must have a deep understanding that constantly updates as each working group iteratesthrough their design. Tools such as GitHub and Google Drive assisted with this aspect of theengineering design as version control and up to date documentation was critical to systemfunctionality.Approach Taken: Systems EngineeringSystems engineering, in practice, is the succession of several structured design phases plannedwith a
(CAED) Student Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (SDEI)committee at the authors’ institution developed online summer workshops focused on topics ofanti-racism titled the Unlearning Series. This series began with the mission of questioningpractices and education in the built environment that are integrated in formal instruction. Thegoal is to utilize an alternative method of education where participants (students, faculty, staff,and administrators) recognize how their discipline shapes and supports systems of oppression,while giving them tools to combat it.Before each session, videos and readings were provided to participants to establish anunderstanding of the new topic. The online workshop started with a brief lecture from an SDEIcommittee
pedagogicaltheories into practice through the development of a new online engineering course. As a second-semester student in an engineering education doctoral program I was given the opportunity todevelop a new graduate-level course for an online Master of Civil Engineering (MCE) program.Concurrently, I was enrolled in an Engineering Education course, Content, Assessment, andPedagogy: An Integrated Engineering Design Approach (CAP) and a Curriculum and Instructioncourse, Advanced Issues in Distance Education (AIDE). This combination of coursework andemployment provided an ideal opportunity to immediately apply course concepts to a real-worldproblem.The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the process of translating theoretical course concepts toa new
leadership in their professional guideline series [3]. In AIChE’s body ofknowledge, it lists necessary psychomotor skills of listening and interpreting, speaking andpresenting, communication, leadership, presentation, and teamwork [4]. In general, everyengineering disciple these professional skills for a successful engineer.Despite the standards set by these societies, usually in an engineering curriculum there is noformal course on professional skills. Typically, during the capstone senior design courseundergraduate engineering students are exposed to some of these skills such as presentation andteam work. Occasionally the center of career development at an institution will offer sessions onprofessional skills usually focusing on interviews and
impacted their motivation,learning, and sense of community. This research specifically examines mechanical engineeringstudents’ experiences at a large public university in California. At the end of this university’sWinter Quarter, faculty were given two weeks of training and preparation during an extendedSpring Break to develop their online curriculum for the upcoming quarter. Courses were offeredin synchronous and asynchronous formats. Students were also given the choice to take anunlimited amount of class units with a “credit/no credit” grading system. For this new quarter,most course webpages were moved to Canvas, a course learning management system new to ourinstitution.Literature ReviewOver the course of the past few decades, some
Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the Col- orado State University. She received her B.S.E. (2011) and M.S.E. (2014) in Structural Engineering from the Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Evaluating the effectiveness of implementing active learning opportunities for first year engineering students who are taking math, physics, and chemistryIntroductionUndergraduate engineering students are typically required to take introductory math,chemistry, and physics concurrently with their first-year engineering curriculum.According to previous studies, success in these core courses is an integral part of asuccessful engineer's training
- cludes enhancing student skill sets through highlighting community resources, integrating micro-video content into engineering core curriculum as a supplement educational resource for undergraduate stu- dents. Ryan is also the recipient of the Syracuse University Graduate Fellowship and the NSF EAPSI Fellowship.Mr. Alexander Johnson, Syracuse UniversityKaty Pieri, Syracuse University Katy is a second year PhD student in the bioengineering program at Syracuse University.Mr. Alex Vincent Jannini, Syracuse University Alex Jannini is a third-year PhD student at Syracuse University in the Biomedical and Chemical Engineer- ing Department. His current research consists of developing tough and elastic double network hydrogels
significant, dissatisfaction with the rate atwhich research drives action, as well as the belief that research can be more effectively leveragedto support action, has motivated increased activity around this topic. For example, the funding oflarge-scale centers on “translational science” and conference themes such as “knowing is notenough” are powerful indicators of the significance of the issue. Understanding and being able toengage in translational work is thus an important issue for emerging scholars.Consider, as a public manifestation of translational work, formal research publications. Journalarticles and conference papers often contain statements identifying implications for action. Whilethere exists a large body of literature that focuses on
employment in the roleof faculty members, they are well prepared in science, math, and engineering content andpractice, however, they generally lack training in student learning and instruction. A pragmaticapproach guided the investigation lead by three research sub-questions related to: a) practicealignment with the United States Next Generation Science Standards; b) knowledge of reform-based teaching practices; c) how fellows implement biomedical engineering research intosecondary science classes. Surveys, interviews, and lesson plan documents were utilized toanalyze the phenomenon from three perspectives in the form of an instrumental collective casestudy. The National Science Foundation GK-12 program, the context of the study, operated as
students technical material3,14; and the abilityto generate new knowledge in order to advance the technical field 2,3,15.Additionally, the 1995 National Academy of Science's report, “Reshaping the GraduateEducation of Scientists and Engineers” recognized the failure of current graduate education inthe sciences to educate doctoral students to be trained in interdisciplinary settings16. This lack ofinterdisciplinary collaboration and a push for more diverse curriculum has been the focus ofmany critiques and conversations surrounding graduate education 17–20. In response to thesecommon findings, the National Science Foundation developed the Integrative GraduateEducation and Research Traineeship (IGERT) program. To date, 278 IGERT grants at over
principles.Keywords: Backward Design Process, Course Design, Outcome Based Learning, Statics.I. INTRODUCTIONA. Setting for the Curriculum ProjectThe specific setting for this curriculum project is outlined as follow:1. Salient characteristics of the institution or sponsoring organizationAs described by Anand (2005), " Engineering Mechanics - Statics is a core course in most of theengineering disciplines, and is generally taught by a civil and/or a mechanical engineeringfaculty at the nations' ABET accredited colleges and universities" (p.1). The institutional settingfor this course is also considered an ABET accredited engineering college that offersundergraduate degree programs for civil engineering and/or mechanical engineering students.This course is not
engineering at the pre-college level. He is a founding member and vice president of UA chapter of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and is the curriculum writer and project coordinator for ENGR101 Middle School.Mr. Alexander M Alvarez, University of Arizona Department of Biomedical Engineering Alex Alvarez is an MD/PhD student at the University of Arizona. His primary research area for the PhD in Biomedical Engineering is in ultrasound characterization of electrical signals in the heart. A secondary focus is on promoting and advocating for inclusion of all people of diverse backgrounds in engineering, science, and medicine - especially in educational spaces for these fields.Mr. Byron Hempel, University of
the classroom. Previously, Dr. Cutler worked as the research specialist with the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE - W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.Dr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate students.Dr. Matthew A. Verleger
Paper ID #25452Board 130: Engineering Education Collaborations: Exploring ”Ways of Think-ing” Using a Mixed Methods ApproachDr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Medha Dalal has a Ph.D. in Learning, Literacies and Technologies from the Arizona State University with a focus on engineering education. She has a master’s degree in Computer Science and a bachelor’s in Electrical Engineering. Medha has many years of experience teaching and developing curricula in computer science, engineering, and education technology programs. She has worked as an instructional designer at the Engineering Research Center for Bio-mediated and
connect withone another and reflect on the information they have been exposed to throughout the day.As shown in fig. 6, the majority of teachers have already used, or are intending to use the activitykit provided. Some have even mentioned using activities from the website that were not part of thetrack they attended at the workshop but fit their classroom curriculum. There was a wide breadthin the ways teachers implemented their classroom kits. Some teachers mentioned they use theactivity as an introduction to a new concept, while others used them as hands on reinforcement ofa concept they had already taught in a traditional fashion. Teachers who used the kits mentionedthat they encouraged them to try new teaching strategies in their classrooms
Paper ID #25288Experimental Evidence Regarding Gendered Task Allocation on TeamsMs. Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan Elizabeth is an undergraduate student at the University of Michigan studying Biomedical Engineering and Applied Mathematics. She has worked as a research assistant for Dr. Robin Fowler in the Technical Communication Department of the College of Engineering for several years focusing on team dynamics for first-year students and also works as a research assistant in the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group working on design science based research in senior-level engineering design
integrating collaborative educational technologies likeMicrosoft Teams, Slack, and Discord into the class to promote group work outside of class.Students are using these features anyway and they can be a great way to increase peer-to-peercommunication in the class. Professors should go above and beyond to establish and encouragepersonal communications between students and teachers, whether via email, message board, orother channels. Facilitating group work during class meetings is vital to information retentionand helps to foster relationships between students and the professor, even though the class isonline. Professors should also make an effort to be reliable and consistent throughout the class;they should post information in a timely manner, keep
engineering. Her research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her specialty is in how people learn problem solving skills.Hannah Christine Zierden, The Ohio State UniversityMr. Kevin Robert Wegman Kevin is a first year graduate student studying Nuclear Engineering. He graduated last fall with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering. Kevin has taught with the EEIC for the past three years, twice as a UTA and once as a GTA.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering at The Ohio State Univer- sity. She earned her B.S. and M.S
her marketability to engineering firms. Unlike Jimmy, Kimmy suggests that herparticipation in extracurricular activities is integral in her development and future marketabilityas an engineer; she does not mention having interest in these activities to help her advance herengineering learning, but sees them instead as a way to network with fellow engineeringstudents. However like Jimmy, Kimmy’s response to this question seems to also fit with herearlier assertion that communication is an important engineering skill; it could be for this reasonthat Kimmy seeks to involve herself in socially oriented extracurricular activities.Through Jimmy’s and Kimmy’s responses, we can begin to see how a student’s expectationsmight play an important role in
AC 2011-658: DOCTORAL STUDENTS AS COURSE INSTRUCTORS: THREEENGINEERING TEACHING ASSISTANTS’ SOCIALIZATION EXPERI-ENCESIrene B. Mena, Purdue University, West Lafayette Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her research interests include K-12 engineering education, first-year engineering, and graduate student professional development.Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological