Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Indiana-Purdue University; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

processin which proponents of a thesis (T ) seek to specify grounds (Gi ) that respond to refutations ofopponents (Rij ). The inquiry is contingent on a set of shared presumptions (a cognitive status quo)as the foundation, as well as a set of criteria for plausibility and adequacy. The third actor in theprocess is determiner (individual or collective) concerned with termination or adjudication of therational debate.Figure 3 shows possible moves or types of arguments that each party can employ as the dialecticprocess evolves. Disputation begins with proponent claiming one of the fundamental moves. Thiscould be either a categorical assertion (!P ) for “P is the case” or a provisoed assertion (P/Q&!Q)for “P generally (or ordinarily) holds provided

Conference Session

Promoting Technological Literacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; George Roskovich, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

average score was 3.66.While the students displayed their belief in the importance of intuition, they also displayedoverwhelming support for the teaching styles implemented in the course that were designed tocater to visual learning. When asked the importance being able to visualize concepts as theylearn, the total average score was above 3.6. Q: I feel that developing intuition for control is important Figure 3.1: Student Feedback on importance of developing intuition for Controls When asked questions on how the students preferred to be introduced to concepts in ControlSystems, the results were in favor of engaging techniques such as visual, hands-on activities, 3Dpuzzles, and communication-based exercises, as each

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, Poetry road, SC Q. C. Procedural 1C. Lec. 10 - Draw 2C. Lec. 15 - What 3C: Lec. 13 - 4C. - Lec. 9 - How 5C: Lec. 14 - 6C: Lec. 8 - What (specific skills, red cross, absinthe was the main idea Inside Job (half is Haeckel’s Explain how a still alternatives can algorithms, utensil, spiderweb of the talk and why sheet) world map diagram related to works (from patent you propose techniques) is it important? Darwin? drawing) Telkes based on your dis. D. Metacognitive

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tejita Rajbhandari, Gannon University; Mark Blair, Gannon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

incapable of learning or discerningfact from fiction without the assistance of an intellectually superior individual to teach them ordumb-down the material through parables or simplified rules. Patrick Quin describes Aquinas’Super de Trin.2.4 “that theological truth is best transmitted to the faithful in parabolic form… itmight, he thinks, confuse the uneducated who would misunderstand it and be ridiculed byunbelievers who detest it anyway” [10]. Aquinas states: “…it is said in Luke 8:10, ‘To you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God, but to the rest in parables.’ Therefore one ought by obscurity in speech conceal the sacred truths from the multitude” (Pars 1 q. 2 a. 4 s. c. 3). “…the words of a teacher ought

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

their learning. This includes thetime to allow gradual maturing by the students to understand the process of their learning.Finally, based on the reflections provided by the student, there is more evidence of theirawareness and eagerness to realize the value of lifelong learning.In our courses, during each lecture, students engage in activities/problem solving and discusstheir thoughts, ideas and reflections with their teams. Through these reflections, the studentsreview and summarize their learning from previous lectures and at the same time they activelyengage in the process of thinking and deliberation within the classroom.A day in the non-calculus based class Every class, starts with a brief review, open discussions and Q/A of the last

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sara Kaye Jones; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

communicate their status with the instructors.This form of feedback can make the students play a significant role in their classroom educationand enhance the course outcomes.The student’s Autonomy: Student as an agent of changeThe instructor’s goal should be facilitating students’ learning, providing a creative space forencouraging engagement, discussions, and moving towards more in-depth and advanced learning,problem finding, and problem-solving. At the same time, students need to be more than just passiveparticipants, expecting to have a one-directional pathway to knowledge. Students and faculty needto have reflections, discussions, open Q/A, and examination of the expectations several timesduring the process. Students need to be honest

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, University of California, Merced

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Y. Lincoln, Competing paradigms in qualitative research: Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications, 1994.[15] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek, “A pragmatic approach to ethical decision-making in engineering practice: Characteristics, evaluation criteria, and implications for instruction and assessment,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, pp. 663–679, Jun 2017.[16] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014.[17] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson

Conference Session

Developing Technological Literacy in Students

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johanna Kristiina Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT; Hanna Niemelä, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

postmodernperfectionist, the pragmatic hedonist and the materialist maximalist: Understanding highschool students’ profile choices towards or away from mathematics, science and technology(MST) fields in the Netherlands,” Gender Educ., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 831–849, 2017, doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1166185[6] M. Li, W. Fan, F. M. Cheung, and Q. Wang, “Could Meaning in Life Contribute toAdolescents’ Vocational Commitment and Identity? A Longitudinal Analysis in DifferentChinese Cultures,” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, Vol. 12, e36, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi:10.1017/prp.2018.24.[7] Statistics Finland, ”Share of passers of the matriculation examination left outside furtherstudies grew further,” 12 Dec. 2019. [Online]. Available:http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/khak/2018

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet L. Gbur, Case Western Reserve University; Daniela Solomon, Case Western Reserve University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

presentation UL ASTM IEEE AAMI ANSI CSA Q&A Mechanical/Aerospace Biomedical Electrical/Computing Student Perspective Materials Science Library Science (b)Figure 6. Views of online presentation videos broken down by (a) panel type and (b)individual presentationIn addition to

Conference Session

Aspects of Engineering Literacy and Community and Industry Engagement

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lina Trigg, William Mason High School; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. ​International Journal of Production Economics, ​62(1-2): 107-118.Patton, M. Q. (2002). ​Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). ​Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.Reed, S. K. (1992). ​Cognition: Theory and Applications​. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Stevens, R., Johri, A, & Connor, K. (2013). Chapter 7 - Professional Engineering Work.​ ​In A. Jorhi, & B. M. Olds (Eds.) ​Cambridge Book of Engineering Education Research​. (pp.119-138), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Tjahjono, B.,​ Ball​, P., Vitanov, V .I. , Scorzafave, ​C., ​ ​Nogueira​, ​J. ​., Calleja​, J., ​Minguet​, M., Narasimha, L

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, DC, 2018.[3] Q. Bui, “40 Years Of Income Inequality In America, In Graphs,” Planet Money, National Public Radio, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/02/349863761/40-years-of-income- inequality-in-america-in-graphs. [Accessed: 12-Aug-2017].[4] M. S. McPherson and M. O. Schapiro, Keeping College Affordable: Government and Educational Opportunity. The Brookings Institution, 1991.[5] S. Kemp-King, “The Graduate Premium: manna, myth or plain mis-selling?”, Intergenerational Publications, London, 2016.[6] ibid p 11 for a list of digital learning formats and definitions. “Fully online programs conduct all courses-including class lectures and discussion sessions

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

://48ba3m4eh2bf2sksp43rq8kk-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2018/12/UDHR70_AI.pdf [Accessed Jan. 30, 2019][50] H. Sloan, Human Rights and IoT: The Right to Fair and Decent Work. Dec. 13, 2018. Available at: https://medium.com/iotforall/human-rights-and-iot-the-right-to-fair-and-decent-work-23a97bab25d4 [Accessed Jan. 20, 2019][51] R. Rincon, “What’s the gender pay gap in engineering?” All Together - SWE Blog. April 20 2018. https://alltogether.swe.org/2018/04/pay-gap-in-engineering/ [Accessed October 20, 2018].[52] E.A. Cech, “Ideological wage inequalities?: the technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering,” Social Forces, vol. 91 (4), pp. 1147-1182, June 2013.[53] J.R. Mihelcic, C.C. Naughton, M.E. Verbyla, Q

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

these service courses and need to be reminded of their importance to the major. Theexample given in the paper involves liberal arts students required to take a technical course inaeronautics. The reflective essay was proposed as an excellent way to have the students find theintersection of their major with the service course. Page 26.598.11Bibliography1. ABET Criterion 3 a-k, http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3143 accessed on February 1, 2015.2. Nankervis, K., “Service Teaching: Student experiences, issues and future directions at RMIT,” http://emedia.rmit.edu.au/edjournal/?q=node/326, accessed on January

Conference Session

New Approaches and Applications to Enhance Technological Literacy - Part II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Conference Session

Experience in Assessing Technological Literacy

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise M Wilson, University of Washington; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington; Elizabeth Burpee; Mee Joo Kim, University of Washington- Seattle

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering