Search Terms n HR in Title, n Years Web of Science “human rights education” + 64 42 2004-2019 university Web of Science “human rights” + engineering 357 46 1972-2019 Web of Science “human rights” + engineering 41 4 1974-2018 + education EJEE - European Journal of “human rights” 23 0 1985-2019 Engineering Education JEE - Journal of Engineering “human rights” 2 0 1996-1998 Education ASEE PEER “human rights” 119
University of Science and Technology, and a B.S. from the City College of New York. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 “Should we consider transforming the definition of technological and engineering literacy…”AbstractDuring the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, several session papers, panels, andspecial presentations put forward that there are other components to technological andengineering literacy / philosophy of engineering. These suggest a broader understanding (andperhaps definition) of this literacy and philosophy than previously thought; that perhapshistorical industrial, cultural, educational, and political perspectives have constrained
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018[14]. D, G. Dimitriu, K. Bartels, and D. Dixon, “Reflections on Eight Years of Undergraduate Research Program at Our Community College”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Tamps, FL, 2019[15]. Hispanic Outlook on Education < https://www.hispanicoutlook.com/articles/top-10-schools-major-2019 >[16]. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) < https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/ >[17]. D. G. Dimitriu and M. Shadaram, “The Making of a Technology Literacy Course”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education
to examine the The GregorcStyle Delineators in greater detail as it can be related to engineering education. The followingrepresents a brief description of each of the four learning styles. The author has utilized this setpreviously and has presented at other ASEE and ASME conferences (Narayanan, 2007, 2009 &2019). The author has reproduced Gregorc Style Delineators here for sake of clarification andcompleteness (Gregorc, 1984).Gregorc Style Delineators Anthony Gregorc obtained a B.S. degree from Miami University and an M.S. degree anda Ph.D. degree from Kent State University. The Gregorc Style Delineator Guide is supposed toincrease style awareness in one's Self and also in others. It includes the research-based GregorcStyle
techniques,” wired.com, Dec. 2018.[Online]. Available: https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-alexa-2018-machine-learning/[Accessed: January 3, 2020].[9] J. Msv, “Managing machine learning models the Uber way,” forbes.com, Jun. 2019. [Online].Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2019/06/26/managing-machine-learning-models-the-uber-way/#534b72624ae4 [Accessed: January 3, 2020].[10] K. Rowe, “How search engines use machine learning: 9 things we know for sure,”searchenginejournal.com, Feb. 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-search-engines-use-machine-learning/224451/[Accessed: January 3, 2020].[11] Z. Ruan and K. Siau, “Digital marketing in the artificial intelligence and machine learningage,” in Proc. of the
from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, and a B.S. from the City College of New York. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 “Where do we go from here?” A Discussion Regarding Technological Literacy / Philosophy of EngineeringThis discussion has its origin in “Finding the Sweet Spot Between Engineering Faculty’sWillingness to Teach and Non-majors’ Willingness to Learn” (ASEE 2017 Session M349) paneldiscussion with Sheila Tobias, author of “They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different” and “Breakingthe Science Barrier”; Dr. Maria Garlock, Princeton University; Dr. Agnes d’Entremont,University of British Columbia; Dr. Gary
and her Ph.D. from Brown University.Dr. Steven Nozaki, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Ph.D. Engineering Education - The Ohio State UniversityMr. Fredrick A. Nitterright, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Mr. Fred Nitterright is a lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Technology at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He received the A. A. S. in Mechanical Drafting and Design in 1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, the B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 1991 from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, and the M. S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Mr. Nitterright is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education ASEE . Fred
, she was one of the recipients of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Curriculum Innovation Award. She is a former board member of ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Small Teaching via Bloom’sAbstractEngineering 481 is a typical Technology and Society course that most engineering programsoffer that covers, as listed on abet.org: “the impact of engineering technology solutions in asocietal and global context.” It is a course all students take and can therefore have large classes:180 students in Fall and 240 in Winter in our case. The course has a large end of term deliverablebut in order to maintain attendance in class
Paper ID #27089Application of a Computerized Method for Evaluating Systems-Level Think-ingDr. John Krupczak Jr., Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, Na- tional Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education 2013-2016.Dr. Ali Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University A. Mehran Shahhosseini is an Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Engineering and Tech- nology
Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching engineering in particular Electromagnetism and other classes that are mathematically driven. His research and activities also include on avenues to connect Product Design and Engineering Education in a synergetic way. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing a Multi-Cycle
+ education 493 2,270 11,536 + kindness -- 777 493 (title) 1,069 6,264 14,419 ASEE PEER (title) 0 1 32 JEE search 5 17 60 IJEE advanced search 3 21 143 29 Kindness papers Total counts of term 1341 1054 819 No. papers with term 29 21 21Within engineering
Paper ID #28823The transition from STEM to STEAMDr. Jayanta K. Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Jayanta Banerjee is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez campus. Dr. Banerjee received Ph.D. from the University of Waterloo and M.Ed. from Queen’s University, both in Canada. He has worked in industries and taught at the universities in Germany, Canada, USA and Latin America. He has over hundred publications in refereed journals and conference proceedings and a few books to his credit. Jayanta is a member of ASEE, ASME and VDI (Germany
psychology article “(Un)hiddenfigures: a synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of Black women and girls in STEMeducation” [69], and Guzman’s [24] 2019 “Beyond Hidden Figures: shining a spotlight on constructed hierarchies ofgender, age, and elementary mathematics”. Often my search for literature produced images and links to websites thatwere related to STEM education and diversity. These include NASA, a Wikipedia page, the Hidden Figures Twitteraccount (inactive since 2017), and the online encyclopedia site “Alternatives to slavery”. Katherine Johnson, one ofthe main characters in the film, died in 2020, so I found many obituary tributes that included images of her beingawarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom from the
engineering literacy is needed – Prof. Carl O. HilgarthAs this paper was in preparation, the author offered us the opportunity for a codicil to givesome added perspectives on “Cui bono,” i.e.: to whose benefit is engineering andtechnological literacy? The process leading to this appendix began in 2017 at the ASEEAnnual Meeting and Exposition with intense discussion that continued through continuedthrough the 2019 ASEE Annual Meeting and Exposition on clarifying and amplifying thedefinition of engineering and technological literacy and how it can be extended to thecommon good.From the many papers published in ASEE conference proceedings the expressed need hasbeen to
the problem. This focus is appropriate for the specific material ofthe course, but it misses how and why one gets to the point where the course material is needed.It also misses more general aspects of engineering and technology. Courses with project workmove beyond this to some degree, but are unlikely to succeed in covering some facets oftechnological and engineering literacy (TEL).Many approaches have been documented for teaching technological and engineering literacy [4,5]. A search for technological and engineering literacy in the ASEE PEER database in February,2019, resulted in a list of 60 papers from technical sessions of the Technological and EngineeringLiteracy/Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhE) Division alone; 163 are listed for
interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Prof. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of Learning in Engineering Education; The Human Side of Engineering, and Empowering Professional Teaching in Engineering
Paper ID #33135The Concept of Technological Literacy Examined through the Lens of aCase Study Concerning the Boeing 737 Max AccidentsDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. He is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society, and the work of ASEE’s TELPhE division from whom he has received a best paper and meritorious service awards. He has also received awards from
Paper ID #33033Computerized Algorithmic Approaches for Evaluating Systems Thinking ofBoth Engineers and Non-EngineersDr. John Krupczak Jr, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, Na- tional Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education 2013-2016.Dr. A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University A. Mehran Shahhosseini is a Professor in the Department of Applied Engineering and Technology Man
education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Hidden Curriculum Perspective on the Importance of Ethics and Societal Impacts in Engineering EducationAbstractLearning in higher education occurs in many forms; through the official written lessons in thecurriculum, the informal conversations and interactions in academic settings, and the tacitmessages and attitudes of the organization and culture. The last
standards-based grading in engineering courses.”,Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016.[4]. L. M. Fritschner, “Inside the Undergraduate College Classroom,” The Journal of HigherEducation, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 342–362, 2000.[5]. L. R. Murillo-Zamorano, J. Á. L. Sánchez, and A. L. Godoy-Caballero, “How the flippedclassroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students'satisfaction,” Computers & Education, vol. 141, p. 103608, 2019.[6]. R. Ptucha and A. Savakis, “How connections matter: factors affecting student performancein stem disciplines,” IEEE 2nd Integrated STEM Education Conference, 2012.[7]. R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and M. J. Prince, “Engineering instructional development
innovation, makerspaces and technology-assisted learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Beyond the Maker Movement: A Preliminary Partial Literature Review on the Role of Makerspaces in Engineering EducationabstractMakerspaces have grown over the last few years as public awareness of the maker movement hasincreased. Makerspaces are open to the public as community design studios that cultivatecreative and technology-based projects alike. Fabrication labs and makerspaces serve ascollective organizations that help facilitate design and prototyping for individuals that may nothave access to that equipment or material outside of that physical location. In engineeringeducation, there is a vast
. A. Cheville and J. Heywood, “Tensions Between Industry and Academia: Policy Making and Curriculum Development,” in The Engineering-Business Nexus: Symbiosis, Tension, and Co- Evolution, S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, C. Didier, M. Meganck, and M. Murphey, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 475–498.[25] M. Gauci, A. Perz, S. Purzer, J. Kirkpatrick, and S. McComb, “A Comparison of Nursing and Engineering Undergraduate Education,” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2012.[26] T. Adams and P. H. Sawchuk, “Professional-Organizational Contradictions and Hybridization of Knowledge: Insights from the Study of Engineering and Nursing in Canada,” Vocat. Learn., 2020
is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Prof. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of Learning in Engineering Education; The Human Side of Engineering, and Empowering Professional Teaching in Engineering. Together
Professional teaching in Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Cui Bono. Engineering and Technological Literacy and Higher EducationAbstractDuring the last five years the TELPhE Division of ASEE been engaging in constructivedialogue with its members about its purposes and intents. In 2016 the author presented apaper at ASEE’s annual conference that raised questions about the intent of technologicalliteracy in society at the present time. To further encourage dialog the Division invited itsmembership to submit short responses to the issues raised in the paper with a view topublishing them in one of the Divisions handbooks. These were published in 2017. Thepublication of the responses serves
Technology Education in a So- cietal and Student Oriented Context, www.cetuss.se) and the IEEE Education Society Nordic Chapter. He as a reviewer for a number of major journals and conferences, including the Computer Science Education Journal (Taylor and Francis), the ACM SIGCSE and ITiCSE and Koli Calling International Computer Science Education conferences.Dr. Niall Seery, Athlone Institute of Technology Dr. Niall Seery is also the Director of the Technology Education Research Group (TERG) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Theorising the Role of Engineering Education for Society: Technological Activity in Context?AbstractThis paper establishes a