(1.95 inNatural Sciences; 2.08 in Engineering, 1.8 in Humanities, and 1.68 in Social Sciences). Womenalso reported higher quality mentoring than men across all the schools.Expansion of MentoringThe Provost has placed faculty mentoring as a high priority at Rice University. As such, thedepartment chairs and deans are developing a plan concordant with their faculty and perceivedneeds to meet this clear mandate for mentoring — and this priority is being reinforced both fromthe highest levels of the institution and from the faculty. In response to the Provost’s request formentoring, the ADVANCE Program developed a Department Grants Program in summer 2009.ADVANCE and the University leveraged resources to fund six grants totaling $23,400.Although the
Page 15.263.11 different disciplines on this project. ≠ For each of the following, describe what you have learned (knowledge and skills) through participating in the CareerWISE project, how you have applied what you have learned in settings outside of CareerWISE, and how you do, or plan to, use this learning in your career o Interdisciplinary teams o Disciplinary cultures o Gender issues in educational and career settings o Creating instructional materials for online ≠ Of the skills and knowledge you have learned, how have you applied them in settings outside of CareerWISE? Please be as specific as possible ≠ One of the objectives of the research held in CareerWISE is to
between the Navajo way of life, which is a holistic cycle of thinking,planning, living, and assuring/testing,119 and an engineering design process (ask, imagine, plan,create, improve120). Thus the structure of the project itself can be described and presented in away that carries cultural meaning for Navajo students.Further, design projects can be structured to blend culture and course material. In engineeringoutreach camps in the Navajo Nation, students were asked to write a story related to their culture(e.g., “Describe a day in the life of a Navajo middle school student”). Students then, learn theengineering design process and build a Rube Goldberg®-style chain reaction machine that tellsthe story they wrote. This not only helps the students
andtechnologists to plan and conduct heavy maintenance and modifications, freighter conversionsand digital equipment modifications. The production of UAS aircraft is expected to increasesubstantially by 2030 [16]. Deloitte [17] expects defense to grow at 2.8%, space launch servicesto grow 15% or higher year over year, and space exploration and space investments to grow in2021 globally. While this is not a complete estimate of forecasted demand, it does show thatdemand is strong in the aerospace industry.Women and BIPOC in Aerospace. Early in developing higher learning institutions, mostprograms that required an interest in technical fields limited enrollment to men [18]. Womenwere not considered "worthy" of this kind of study as they would become
years. It aroused in me a tremendous interest in paleontology and, after theevent, I investigated what I could do to study fossils. I contacted a paleontologist and biologistfrom the Austral University of Chile. She motivated and guided me in all my concerns andquestions, opening the doors to the world of paleontology. So I can say that thanks to thismeeting, I managed to connect with something that I love and plan to study after finishing myfirst university degree."Students agreed that all the event activities, such as talks by outstanding researchers, science andtechnology workshops, and poster sessions on salient women in STEM in history, were excitingand tremendously motivating, considering it necessary to have these in future event
be more open-minded towards females asking for those positions. Theymay not have “enough experience” because they are not offered enough opportunities to gain“enough experience”. Female faculty need to be encouraged to improve their leadership skills byattending training, workshops, conferences, etc.Conclusions and Future WorkAutoethnographic narratives of three female faculty in engineering who have experienced genderbias have enabled this topic to be explored. The findings from this research are consistent with thelarge body of literature on gender bias in academia. The recommendations indicate the need forfurther research, support, and awareness for female faculty who face these biases.The authors plan to continue their work on gender
wouldpatiently wait for them to finish – eager to get past the story they wished to present to the worldand into the complicated histories that have been buried along the way. It got me thinking aboutmy own narrative of how I came to be an engineer, and how tortured I felt to deliver a quick,understandable explanation for why I belonged in engineering. I remember trimming parts of thestory that did not go well in my conversations with others, eliminating the parts that didn’t fitwell, were confusing, or left doubts about my qualifications. I was curious to what extent I mightrecognize these efforts in the narratives of other women.I was also surprised when my opening question did not work as planned, when participants didnot seem to understand it as an
engineering and science departments anduniversities can use climate data to inform strategic plans of action.Campus Climate SurveyEquity in academia involves a variety of factors: in addition to hiring and promotion rates, equityincludes more subtle issues such as access to leadership opportunities and key committeeassignments, allocation of resources, the public valuation of research agendas, recognition andawards, policies and procedures that take into account the needs of the majority as well asunderrepresented groups, and, perhaps most importantly, university, college and departmentalculture that promotes perceptions of fair and equal treatment.8 The current institutional culture atmost colleges and universities values a traditional type of
reviews bydifferent agencies, and to achieve some consistency in the scope of the reviews.13NASA has a key position in the Title IX compliance effort. In 2002, Senator Wyden directlychallenged NASA to develop a plan “to help triple the number of women graduating college withdegrees in science, math and engineering by the year 2012.”14 In 2005 appropriations legislation,Congress explicitly directed NASA to conduct two Title IX compliance reviews per year, andprovided the necessary funding.15 Thus, NASA has taken a leadership role in conducting thesereviews.The situation for the other funding agencies differs somewhat because they have not been toldexplicitly, nor funded, to engage in compliance reviews. The America Competes Act16 does
case story occurred while Kris interviewed for assistant professor positions coming out of atop tier graduate school. Her goal was to interview for all the positions on the market in theUnited States that she was eligible for until she got her first offer and then to be morediscriminate about positions moving forward. Her aim was to join a research-intensive institutionthat also valued teaching, in a region in which she desired to live. As it went, she interviewed attwo very strong universities, and then had a third interview at one of the so-called “top ten”engineering programs, “TTU.” A fourth interview was planned for the following week when herfirst offer came in, from University #1, creating an “auction” environment, where any secondoffer
weekly meeting was a 2-hour block of time in the makerspace classroom,which either involved one large project, or two mid-sized projects to take up the time. Projectswere structured to last approximately 90 minutes, so if some students took a little longer they didnot run out of time to complete their projects. If a student finished early, they were given theoption of leaving early each week, or completing a second version of the project from that weekor one of the earlier weeks if they had a hands-on item they wanted to create again.Projects (and related tools included): wooden coasters (measuring, Dremel tools), string art(pattern planning, pliers, hammers, nails), wooden swiss-cheese (power drill, drill bits, vise),ratcheting wrench mini
number of participants per grade, per ethnicity and in theall-girls after-school STEM program limits generalizations from our data.Although initially planned, a major limitation of the study was that a pre-survey was notconducted limiting the ability to “compare” the influence of the all-girls after-school program.Additionally, the absence of open-ended questions or follow-up interviews with either all-schoolstudents or teachers, limits our insight into student reasoning. For example, do the students knowwhat “engineering” is when asked if girls belong? Interest scores in science were lower than inother areas. The principal indicated hiring good science instructors was a constant struggle andthat the department would be revamped the following
-schwarzman-college-of-computing-1015[Accessed January 31, 2019].[59] UTSA Today. “UTSA expands Downtown Campus with a National Security CollaborationCenter and planned new School of Data Science,” September 6, 2018. https://www.utsa.edu/today/2018/09/story/NSCC_SDS-announcement.html [Accessed January31, 2019].[60] Georgia Institute of Technology. “Core Requirements by Major,”https://admission.gatech.edu/transfer/course-requirements-major [Accessed January 31, 2019][61] USNA News Center. “Naval Academy Cybersecurity Program Receives ABETAccreditation,”September 21, 2018https://www.usna.edu/NewsCenter/2018/09/NAVAL%20ACADEMY%20CYBERSECURITY%20PROGRAM%20RECEIVES%20ABET%20ACCREDITATION.php[Accessed January 31, 2019][62] F. Bruni. “Aristotle’s Wrongful
whether the scale is at a micro-level.These small shifts may later become large cracks or fissures in the dominant frame against whichthese groups are organizing. For example, one activity at an OSH hacker meetup resulted inunplanned discussions about comfort, how to establish physically/mentally safe space, theproblems of masculinist and competition-based cultures in technoscientific work and research,and eventually led to a monumental change in mindset for a few individuals. But it also set thestage for changing dynamics at the host space and the future planning of restorative healingcircles, workshops, and methods in conversation with the participant who was experiencingexclusion, discomfort, and frustrations. Instead of animosity and being
to experience nurturing environments and reported higher levels of self-efficacy, content interest, and support than their peers at PWIs [8], [12]. Institutions with higherrates of persistence and graduation rates with STEM underrepresented minority students, reportincreased student involvement on campus, have welcoming environments, and encouragemeaningful connections with faculty, which are all factors in fostering social-belonging [8].Understanding how high-performing institutions create environments of social belonging and asense of belonging can provide a plan to increase rates of success and degree completion forminority engineering students.Evidence indicates that there is a relationship between campus involvement
support for the belief that high schoolcontext is a crucial factor in determining future plans to pursue STEM.6,9 Currently, only 13% ofhigh school females express interest in STEM,16 and only 1%-4% express interest inengineering,8 but the gender gap can be reduced by 25% or more in schools which support girls’interests in STEM.9 Further, it has been shown that outreach programs targeting certain factorshave been effective for the recruitment of women to STEM.7 In literature, attempts to identify factors influencing recruitment and retention of women inSTEM have converged to several themes. The first major issue is that of actual versus perceivedability in STEM. Although mathematical abilities are now roughly equal for male and femalestudents
conducted by Ms. Irvin.19 Dr. Heidi Ries was born in Marion, OH in 1960. She attended Ohio State University where he she obtained a B.S. and M.S. in Physics in 1982 and 1984, respectively. She later went on to complete a Ph.D. in Applied Physics at Old Dominion University in 1987. Following completion of her M.S., she began teaching at Norfolk State University, where she helped organize school-wide assessment plans, establish the Center for Materials Research, and develop the Graduate science program. Leaving Norfolk State for the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), Ries began her current role as Dean for Research, managing and facilitating faculty work, and
femalegraduate students in STEM in order to help students improve their skills and effectively relaytheir message in such a way as to promote their academic and professional success. The newcurriculum includes written modules that are designed to help students obtain communicationskills that are essential for managing difficult situations, such as, Planning Your Message, ActiveListening, Expressing Yourself, and Receiving and Responding to Feedback.38 This content also includes interactive video simulations that provide training in threecritical interpersonal communication skills of active listening,39 receiving and responding tofeedback,40 and self-expression.41 Each simulation presents a scenario that research has shown tobe problematic for
case studies that depict effective classroom teaching.Session 5: Culturally Responsive Teaching in STEMThis session utilized resources from the Association for Curriculum Development (ASCD), TheNational Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems (NCCREST), the NationalEducation Association (NEA) and the STEM Education Research Institute to encourage futureand new STEM faculty to: be cognizant of the importance of student's socioculture; act asleaders of change and acceptance; and adopt a teaching and learning perspective that embracesthe use of critical thinking and multiple perspectives to approach problem solving. Participantsused the guidelines for developing culturally responsive teaching skills to map a plan to hone
suggest to other faculty mentors. A sampling of faculty responses representing a variety ofexperiences in the program is summarized in Table 1 below. Each row of the table representsresponses from a single faculty mentor. What advice would you give other faculty What did you learn as you mentored the student? mentors?The program is a great medium to connect with students I would strongly encourage participation and plan toin the program at a higher level. It helped the student be participate again if given the opportunity. I would alsoinvolved in department
country twice,following jobs for one spouse and then the other, and recently Manuel accepted a position inindustry that includes a 3 hour commute. With four young children (ages 18 months to 8 years),we plan in advance for meals, transportation and kids’ activities; hire help for household chores;and rely on our broad network of local family and friends for backup care. -Susan and ManuelWe made the choice to maintain separate apartments in separate cities for three years purely forcareer reasons. Overall, the decisions worked out but we would probably not recommend such along length of time if other solutions can be found. That being said, we know several coupleswho spend large amounts of time apart for much longer durations or under harder
Planning, Developing Research Report, and Understanding School Culture. During these years, he has taught construction courses in several technical schools. Mr. Beigpourian currently works in the CATME project, which is NSF funding project, on optimizing team- work skills and assessing the quality of Peer Evaluations.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative
. [8]; Ibarra [9]) and may includework-related and/or social relationships. Informal professional networks are essential for careerdevelopment and job effectiveness (Ibarra [9]). Rankin and Caccamise [10] have presented anintervention model to achieve equity in the STEM fields and have recommended some concreteaction plans to achieve the desired outcome in regard to reducing gender gap. Gallagher, et al. [6]used the intervention model to show that the number of female faculty in Geotechnical Engineeringin the entire United States increased from 8 in 1989 to about 80 in 2017, which is believed to beabout approximately 25% of the total number of Geotechnical Engineering faculty in the nation
teaching and learning”, 2000, pp.171-200.[28] E. Wenger, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge university press; Sep 1999.[29] A. Amin, “Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity”, Environment and planning A, 34(6):959-80, Jun 2002.[30] GA. Fine and LJ. Van den Scott, “Wispy communities: Transient gatherings and imagined micro-communities”, American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10):1319-35, Oct 2011.[31] SB. Merriam, Qualitative Research: a Guide to Design and Implementation, 2009.[32] N. Valanides, “Analysis of interview data using the constant comparative analysis method” In Using analytical frameworks for classroom research, Routledge, pp. 77-89.[33] C. Gilligan, “Strengthening
purpose of this second coding system was todevelop a simpler and more viable option to assess the sole construct of what engineers do. Itallows the participants conceptions of engineers to be coded into the following categories: Designer: Designing or improving objects or processes, usually portrayed by drawing plans or performing specific parts of the engineering design process, an implied client or public use is intended Technician: Computer or electronic technician portrayed by a person fixing something electronic Design/Create single: Hobbies, crafts, and designs for personal use or making one object for a specific person Tradesman: Carpenters, plumbers, welders, etc. where a person is fixing
those who were scheduled to travel but were unable to do so. If requested by thepartner, planned on-campus meetings were shifted to a videoconference format (as were allremaining faculty interviews).B. Tenured/tenure-track faculty demographics in College of Engineering and Applied ScienceDespite multiple programmatic efforts over more than a decade, the demographics of thecollege’s faculty has remained stubbornly unrepresentative of its diversifying student body andthe diversifying pool of individuals who are earning the doctoral degrees in engineering andapplied science typically required for tenure-track faculty positions in the CEAS.1. Gender of facultyAcross all CEAS T/TT ranks, the percentage of women faculty has increased by only 5
considered it. Theproportion of female and male students who had not received encouragement from a facultymember, yet intended to attend graduate school was 26.1% and 20.5%, respectively. Whereas,38.9% and 55.9% of female and male students, respectively, who had been encouraged by one ormore faculty were planning to attend graduate school. These observations indicate a statisticallysignificant increase among male students when encouragement is received (99% confidence), buta statistically significant increase among female students can only be observed with 84%confidence. Figure 4. Graduate school intentions of LCOE students with GPA of 3.0 or above displayed by gender and whether or not faculty encouragement to attend graduate school has been
Paper ID #30117Mentoring Among African American Women in the Engineering AcademyJocelyn LaChelle Jackson, University of Michigan Jocelyn Jackson is a doctoral student in engineering education research at the University of Michigan and national chair of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Her major work includes research in entrepreneurship, organizational leadership and behavior, and strategic planning for NSBE.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State
. She is Chair of the ASEE Long-Range Planning Committee and a member of the Engineering Deans Council as co-chair of the EDC Undergraduate Experience Committee. She is also a member of the Executive Committee for the Global Engineering Deans Council. Carpenter is a past Vice President of Professional Interest Councils for ASEE and past President of WEPAN. Currently she chairs a Pilot Program Ad-Hoc Committee for the Gulf Scholars Program for the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. She is an ASEE PEV for General Engineering, Dr. Carpenter regularly speaks at the national level on issues related to the success of women in engineering and innovative STEM curricula.Dr. Cindy Waters, Naval Surface
know?’ Even though we have accreditation and we have … some discussions about what constitutes a good engineer, 12 it’s very skill-focused. And we haven’t really asked some of the questions that we should be asking. What do engineers need to know now? What do we need to know in order to plan the future? And to recognize that the choices that we are making have an impact on what kinds of technology are going to be available in twenty years.These are radical ideas in engineering education. While it is not typical to challenge the canon,perhaps by injecting new ways of thinking about modes of teaching/learning, creative responseswill arise to meet contemporary