U.S. Science and Engineering 2020,” Natl. Sci. Board Sci. Eng. Indic., 2020.[2] M. Ong, N. Jaumot-Pascual, and L. T. Ko, “Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581–615, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20345.[3] K. Hamrick, “National Science Foundation Statistics on Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science & Engineering,” Natl. Sci. Found., 2019.[4] M. Jarvie-Eggart, A. Singer, and J. Mathews, “Parent and Family Influence on First-year Engineering Major Choice,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annu. Conf. Content Access Proc., 2020.[5] J. Roy, “Engineering by the numbers,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2020.[6
contributing to this lucrative profession [1],[3], [12]. There is limited research to indicate how CSE affects female students and theirdecision to major in engineering, and how CSE predicts the retention of women engineeringstudents in the major. This study sought to further investigate CSE of undergraduate womenengineering students, and how their beliefs about creativity and their lived experiencesinfluenced them to choose and succeed in engineering as a major. Industry Needs The need for architecture and engineering occupations is expected to increase 3% overthe ten-year span from 2019-2029, during which approximately 74,800 new jobs are projected tobe added, predominantly in engineering [13]. Notably
://profiles.asee.org/ • Campbell University is not in ASEE. Their engineering population is found on: https://engineering.campbell.edu/our-purpose/accreditation/ Each of the panel organizers crafted several questions. Then, they deliberated carefully and jointly to modify, tweak, combine, delete, and re-write those questions. This process produced afinal set of 5 questions which are shown in Exhibit 3. This list was shared with the Panel early inDecember 2019, with instructions to respond by December 20, 2019. An extension was grantedto one individual and all responses were collected by the first week in January 2020.This paper summarizes responses from the Panelists, and interjects information and insight froma few relevant articles on the subject
, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)fields despite an increase in the number of women in graduate and professional schools and theundergraduate women population exceeding 50% [15, 47]. For electrical engineering (EE)degree attainment, the numbers are more dismal. In 2017-2018, 14.2% of all bachelor’s degrees;23.5% of master’s degrees; and 17.3% of doctoral degrees were awarded to women in electricalengineering [36]. Percentages for women faculty members in tenure positions parallelpercentages for degree recipients. In a report for the American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE), Yoder (2017) found the mean percentage of women tenured/tenure-trackfaculty in all engineering disciplines was 16.9%. That same year, only 14.2% of women facultymembers
Summers is a doctoral student in the College of Education at the University of Washington, Seat- tle. Her research interests focus on the potential roles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, and other political identifiers in determining undergraduate engagement across a variety of majors, including engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration Among Women and Men Faculty in Engineering: A Self-Determination PerspectiveAbstractThe workplace experiences of faculty in engineering, physics, and computer science wereevaluated through the lens of self-determination theory (SDT), which posits three universalhuman needs
a more technical or managerial role. Finally, at theconclusion of the interview, participants were offered the opportunity to share any additionalinformation or thoughts that had not been covered in the interview.Data CollectionData were collected in the fall 2019 semester under approval of the institution IRB. Participantswere recruited by email from advisors of the Electrical Engineering, Bioengineering, andComputer Science majors. Participants were eligible if they identified as female, were in theirsecond year of undergraduate education, and were currently enrolled in one of the three focalmajors. Participants were informed in the recruitment email that they would receive $20 for theirparticipation. All interviews were held face-to-face
Engineering Education from the perspective of outreach to mi- norities with focus on women recruitment, retention and progression. Other research activities include: systems and product design, decision analysis, manufacturing, process automation and real-time process control. Dr. Medina is currently appointed as President (2019-2021) of the Manufacturing and Design Division for the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). Dr. Medina has received multiple recognitions for her work that include the IISE M&D Outstanding Service Award (2016), UPRM Recog- nition on the 4th Research Academy for Faculty & Postdoctoral Fellowships Symposium (2015-2016), CIAPR Emergent Leader (2015) and UPRM Industrial
issues in counseling. Meghan earned her master’s degree in Clinical Mental Health Counseling at Xavier University of Louisiana. There, she gained experience working on an in- terdisciplinary research project within education, specifically exploring how stereotype vulnerability and sense of belonging impacts African American engineering students. In the clinical setting, she focuses on culturally relevant therapeutic interventions with various client populations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Intersectional Perspective to Studying Microaggressions: An Overview of the Current Scholarship Dr. Cristina Poleacovschi, Assistant Professor
Engineering at Cornell UniversityDr. Stacey E. Kulesza, Kansas State University Dr. Stacey Kulesza is an assistant professor in the civil engineering department at Kansas State University. Dr. Kulesza teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in geotechnical engineering and is a licensed engineer in the state of Kansas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 We are thriving! Undergraduate women in engineering student project teamsAbstractFor more than two decades, female participation in undergraduate engineering programs hasremained stuck at 20%. The research focus has been on women who either choose not to enrollor withdraw. We propose a change in
policyrecommendations, outlined below.The first recommendation from the task force was to offer a tenure clock or contract clockextension for all full-time faculty. Given the known impacts of the pandemic on research,teaching, and service obligations, the option to allow faculty an additional year was quickly metwith unanimous support from the task force. However, the details of how to best implement thepolicy took careful consideration. The first choice was to intentionally make the policyapplicable to all full-time faculty. UD faculty includes both tenure-track and tenured faculty(T/TT), as well as non-tenure track (NTT) faculty. These NTT faculty have full-time, renewable,non-tenure track positions, which ASEE has referred to as “professional track.” Many
desde la perspectiva del estudiante. (Assessment of online courses from a student's perspective)," Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23-38, Jan. 2016. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412016000100002[2] S. Sundararajan and T. Heindel and B. Ganapathysubramanian and S. Subramaniam, “Women in Mechanical Engineering: A Departmental Effort to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Engagement of Women Students,” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22240, 2012, pp. 25.1483.1 - 25.1483.15. https://www.jee.org/22240[3] E. P. Deess and K. Joshi and V. Briller and R. Calluori, Predicting Engineering
and Outcomes for Connectivity Series Evaluation Plan Objective Short-Term Intermediate Long-Term Evaluation Outcomes Outcomes Outcomes Data Source (s) / Each AY AY 2017 AY 2019 Cycle Strengthen Continual Assess Inform NSF Connectivity faculty core review of Connectivity ADVANCE Series competenci Series Series impact on national Evaluations es and build satisfaction participating community with (individual faculty
Linguistics in 2005. April worked at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in residence life for two years and as an Instructor for two years. She also worked at Texas A&M University in College Station, TX for 7 years as a student affairs professional in residence life. Currently, April is a program coordinator for the THRIVE Technical Assistance Program with College & Community Fellowship. Her position includes research and training for agencies looking to strengthen their service delivery to citizens with criminal justice involvement as well as increasing agencies knowl- edge regarding an underutilized labor force. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Systematized Review: Gender and Race in Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms AbstractTeamwork is an essential skill for undergraduate engineering students, and