paper will present an update on the WISE Village, a review of the program’s goals, in termsof assessment results from the first three years, and a discussion of the evolving plans of theVillage, including the implementation of a sophomore track within the program.IntroductionWomen only account for 24% of all science and engineering workers, although they comprise46% of all workers (Graham & Smith, 2005).1 Moreover, women and minorities continue to beunderrepresented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) at both theundergraduate and graduate levels. For example only 20% of engineering baccalaureate degreesare awarded to women (NSF, 2004).2Interest in science and engineering majors by female freshmen has not changed
asked to fill out a brief questionnaire. To recruit freshman and transferwomen to the program, a representative spoke in each of the “Introduction to Engineering”classes for each department in the College of Engineering to inform them about the program andits benefits. An e-mail was also distributed to the women enrolled in these classes where they toowere asked to fill out a questionnaire if they were interested in the program. We are planning tooffer two more mentoring events through fall semester with more events to follow in springsemester. For next year, our goals are to recruit mentors throughout summer, contact incomingwomen in engineering students early by mail and e-mail, pair up students before the school yearstarts and have the first
University), why it is almost absent, as well as the different academic, job-related, and cultural justifications for this phenomenon. It also subjectively compares it with similar models existing in nearby gulf countries, as evidenced by the superior performance of female engineers in recent GCC engineering competitions. This paper finally proposes a plan of action possibly utilizing current education technologies that could be taken to promote engineering education in Saudi Arabia. Key words: Engineering, Education, Saudi Arabia, GCCIntroductionSaudi Arabian higher education currently holds in its 25 public universities1 one of the largestnumber of students in the Middle East, now exceeding an impressive
of women (3.17 GPA) to that of men (3.09 GPA) was statisticallysignificant with a p =.009, with the findings currently under review for use in the College’sdiversity plan metrics. This diversity plan is required by the university and ties to the College’srecruitment plan to increase engineering enrollment of underrepresented students, which includesall women.10, 11 These findings are not unique, since research indicates that women inengineering are well prepared and perform well academically,9, 12-16 but are now documented forfurther study by the College. This continuation study was undertaken, in part, to comparefindings at Texas A&M to recent research on persistence and graduation, particularly for womenand women of color.17, 18
EngineeringThe Engineering Equity Extension Services (EEES) developed a research-based approach toencouraging more gender equity in engineering, specifically in the mechanical and electricalfields, with the ultimate goal of increasing the number of women attaining baccalaureate degreesin these fields. We envisioned a “train-the-trainer” project based on an extension services model,with our Experts providing research-based guidance on practice to Extension Agents whoprovide practical guidance of “gender-friendly” instructional and outreach practices, informed byresearch on engineering education and project management, to teachers, faculty, and outreachvolunteers. Over the 5-year course of the Project, the original plan evolved into one employingExpert
recruitment contacts.Lahoma Jayne Howard, Colorado State University Graduate student, Department of Sociology Page 25.327.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Communications Strategies to Increase Recruitment of Women to EngineeringAbstractIn 2006, the College of Engineering at Colorado State University launched a program to attractwomen to its existing undergraduate engineering programs. The initiative included extensivesurveying, reworking the College’s website, a communications plan that included gender-segmented communications, and a student
(with one being an adjunct instructor when possible) and the director ofcounseling. Other possible members include the learning center director, tutoring center director,curriculum developer, articulation officer, recruitment director, outreach coordinator, publicinformation officer, an equity/women's center coordinator, a school-to-career director, a researchand planning officer, and other key stakeholders.The leadership team model ensures that the entire college will work together to make surewomen are recruited and retained in STEM programs, and that the STEM program will not beexpected to take on functions outside of its normal duties. For example, in many of the collegesthe public information officer has assisted with distributing a press
did not want to get anyone in atizzy unless it was a “sure” thing. However, in academia, where teaching schedules can bedrawn up a year in advance, this did cause some stress as the assignments had to be renegotiatedand rearranged among the faculty.Before arranging a meeting with your supervisor to negotiate the terms of your maternitypackage, develop a plan.7 Research and understand university and federal policies beforeentering into negotiations. Talk with other colleagues in the department, college, and universityto find out what they received and/or negotiated (make sure that they are discreet—you do notwant rumors to circulate before you have had a chance to share the news yourself). You may
the two tables below, we present demographicdata on the students in each engineering major and rates of graduation. All data presented in thefollowing tables can be found on the GT Institutional Research and Planning website,www.irp.gatech.edu. Page 26.860.3 Native American Hawaiian Indian or Black or or Other Two or Alaskan African Hispanic Pacific MoreMajor Gender Native Asian American or Latino
-term goals of organizational strategic plans: This study found that employees who have higher MIL levels (meaning they feel more energy, strength, joy, and power from their working and nonworking lives and environments) might be more open and ready for changes the organization may require of them. Furthermore, employees who feel good and are not burdened down by various concerns at work (job in general, job demands, relationship with boss, workplace social support, job knowledge and skills, and commitment to the organization) and possibly concerns outside of work (family, balancing work and family, physical and mental health) appear to be ready to make necessary individual and organizational
the‘Digital Ladies’ in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. The following sectionswill explain the various operational aspects, impacts and challenges associated with the program.Program StructureStudent board: A WiME board handles the idea-conception, planning and execution of allprofessional development and social activities. The WiME board consists of a group of 4-6women ME students. The chair of the WiME board is usually a senior student, who has severalyears of active participation in planning, organizing and participating in WiME activities. Sheworks closely with the vice-chair, who is a junior student and is the chair-elect for the next year.The WiME board consists of at least one student from each year as well as one graduate
departments to change underlyingassumptions about how institutional processes impacted people differently based on their gender.The team would need to connect with the whole institution.Formation of the Advancement Initiatives CouncilEight months before the proposal was due, to secure early support for institutional change, theProvost announced the creation of the Advancement Initiatives Council (AIC), an internaladvisory board of faculty and high-level administrative staff in the position of implementingchanges in policies and practices. Whether or not the proposal was funded, this body was tocreate an ongoing and sustainable infrastructure for examining institutional policies and practicesand planning strategies to further gender equity based on
Materials Science & Engineering from Boise State in 2014. In the Spring of 2016, Ann was recognized as part of the first cohort of University Innovation Fellows at Boise State, and has worked as a Fellow to collect and incorporate student feedback into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to
recently finished an internship at Walt Disney World. This semester, she is currently doing research on complex signal pro- cessing along with the oral history project. Outside of working on these research projects, she spends her time shadowing different Dental offices, and volunteering at the Animal Humane Society and Hennepin County Medical Center. She is currently preparing to apply to dental school, and plans to become a gen- eral dentist, or specialize to become an orthodontist. After gaining enough experience in the field, she hopes to open her own practice.Dr. Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology Dr. Lanzerotti is an Assistant Professor of Physics at Augsburg College (Minneapolis, MN), an
. As part ofthis group, I regularly train men, both on- and off-campus, to better serve as gender equity allies.I am a member of the Commission on the Status of Women Faculty, a committee that works todevelop and enhance gender-equitable policies at North Dakota State University. I am primaryauthor of a series of broadly distributed advocacy tips, have participated in a national webinar onengaging male faculty as gender equity allies, and have given several conference presentationson the same topics. Additionally, I currently serve on the planning committee for the NSF-funded project Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE), which has thegoal of enhancing women participation and success in engineering programs.Dr. Holmes: I
University. Usingboth internal experts and external consultants, workshops were planned for delivery in half-daysegments throughout each academic year, culminating in a regional one-day-long seminar at theend of the academic year. Additionally, leadership development for department chairs andprograms directors was planned to occur once each semester. Reactions to the workshops weregenerally positive, attendance has increased over the past four years, and sustained support ofthe workshops has been allocated by the administration through a collaboration betweenAcademic Affairs and Human Resources.Each strategy had its own challenges and successes, providing unique insight into the feasibilityof converting a successful technique from a research
of our larger study.2. Prior Literature on Choosing Engineering in the Academy vs. IndustryFor nearly 60 years, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has tracked information about USAPhD recipients, their post-graduate plans, and their employment experiences well beyondgraduation. At least in the USA, most PhDs work in academia, but this number is on the decline[10]. The tracking of this information by the NSF has led some researchers to ask what makesscientists and engineers choose the kinds of jobs they do. Yet, the research on self-selection intoan academic versus industry career in engineering is limited. To begin, almost all of it isquantitative in nature, much of it focuses on STEM PhDs in general, and almost all of it isperformed on
work commitments offering little time to pause and consider how activities todaymay connect with their future plans and how, or if, those future plans align with their purpose inlife. The book offers recommendations and tools for women to make small and large shifts inorder to pursue their broader goals.The book club consisted of four sessions that were 1.5 hours and typically met every other week.All 13 participants received a copy of the book. There was no course credit given forparticipation. Prior to sessions, students read a few chapters to prepare for the discussion.The topics covered over the four sessions aligned with the concepts introduced in the PlayingBig text (12 chapters): • Introduction • The Inner Critic • The Voice of
, Nina Dahlmann focused on the organization and coordination of the involved teams and contributed developing the concept for Genesis and several other projects related to eLTR. She is also involved in the planning and application of future eLTR projects at the Berlin University of Technology. Since 2005 she also works at the IBI (Institut für Bildung in der Informationsgesellschaft), a renowned institute, situated at the Berlin University of Technology, where significant parts of the Genesis concepts are realised. Nina Dahlmann started as an energy and process engineering major at the Berlin University of Technology. In her second year she changed to physics major where she graduated in 2007
; and programs, policies or practices that have equitable results for therecruitment, retention and career development of students and faculty.The second tier of the CBL grantmaking process is the consideration of invited proposals. ACBL Professorship may be proposed only for a new tenure-track faculty position (not an existingvacancy) to be filled by a woman who is beginning her academic career. The intent of thisaward is to identify women scientists and engineers of the highest caliber and to guarantee earlyin their academic career, opportunities commensurate with their considerable talents. Thecandidate must be external to the institution's existing faculty. The proposal must describe howthe institution plans to increase the recipient’s
age of the participating students and to the timeframe available for the activities. 5 Figure 4: Elenco SC-750 Hobby kits [18]Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology ActivitiesLEGO Mindstorms have been used in K-12 settings, and as a tool for teaching computerengineering and programming at the college level [19-23]. These robots are purchased witheducational modules and have plans for different age populations and respective activities, so itis easy to customize the activities based on the time available, the number of students, and theirage group.Robotic Badges Workshop Developed for the Girl ScoutsThe Robotic Badges workshop was held for the
in engineering. She has developed and taught a wide variety of engineering courses in First Year Engineering and Mechanical En- gineering at Ohio State. She has received four teaching awards in the last three years at both the College and the Departmental level at OSU.Suzanne Grassel Shoger, The Ohio State University Suzanne Shoger, M.A., is a Ph.D. student in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University. Her areas of expertise include strategic planning, gender equity and women’s leadership development, and social justice education. Her research focus is centered on gender equity among under- graduate and graduate engineering students, specifically related to ways men as a majority population
planning and a career in engineering or computer science?” This question wasrecently asked of university professors who had just visited a non- metropolitan communitycollege where students grow up and are familiar with only two or three careers available in theirarea. Earlier we had tried to talk to community college students by holding a meeting andinviting the students and their parents to come and hear about “exciting opportunities‟ inengineering and computer science. This did not work well. Very few people came. Weassumed that if students and their parents knew this information was available they would come Page 22.1032.2to receive it. We were
assessments of the targeted course outcomes showed a positive changein the students' knowledge, attitudes and habits, as related to professional development. Some ofthe strongest student-perceived changes over the course duration were focused around graduateprogram planning, the job search process, work-life balance, conflict resolution, and negotiation.Tangible outcomes included curriculum vitae, Gantt chart for progression through the graduateprogram, academic application packet materials, and outreach activities targeted to prospectiveand first-semester graduate students. The course was considered to be a success by the instructorand students, and can be used as a model for the implementation of similar courses withinengineering departments or
student’s time as an undergraduate student. But the cost for a student toattend Tapia is high. In 2020, the student registration fee alone will be $500.Responses to post surveys show that Tapia is at least as effective as GHC in achieving its goalsfor students. Students consistently report being inspired to complete degrees in computing atrates of over 80%, and of having made new connections and learned about new opportunities incomputing at rates of over 90% [24].4 The CDC merged with the CMD-IT in 2016.5 Two cities have hosted Tapia twice—Atlanta (2003, 2017) and Orlando (2007, 2018); Houston, thelocation of Tapia 2001, will host it for the second time in 2020.6 Charts in this figure are from the Tapia 2019 Academic Plan II Benefits Brochure
for Undergraduate Studies and Wayne and Juanita Spinks Professor of Mathematics in the College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech University. She is PI on Tech’s NSF ADVANCE grant, 2014-2015 President of WEPAN, a member of the mathematical and statistical societies Joint Committee on Women, and advises a variety of women and girl-serving STEM projects and organizations. She is a past Vice President of ASEE and current Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Stacy Doore, University of MaineDr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of
attractthe girls, parents, teachers, and counselors to attend the session, and, as is typical in education,marketing and advertising budgets are sparse. Fortunately, the CTC grant has established methods of communication with the middle-schools and high-schools of the region such that announcements for events such as “Girls are IT”can be widely distributed through electronic means, public media means such as newspapers, andthrough written invitations delivered to the educational institutions. Approximately twelveweeks before the event, grant office personnel meet with the Public Relations department atCollin County Community College to develop a marketing plan specifically for this instance of“Girls are IT.” Based on this meeting, a timeline
, suchas proposing alternatives to a product or different assessment plans based on their ownexpertise and experiences. For example: “When we were deciding on the choice of materials in making the intelligent eraser,whether it should be a wet wipe or a dry wipe, I proposed to use the materials in spongemops to prevent dust of chalks, because I used to use the sponge mop to clean theblackboard when I was in high school. Then, we had a try and decided on using thatmaterial to make our product.” ——Lily “I would search online for useful information first about force transducers in themarket. For example, I’d like to know what is this products made of, how big it is
coursework that they may not recall well (e.g., drafting and surveying) in addition torelying on sources of information with which they are not familiar (e.g., building codes,manufacturer’s data sheets, master plans). In short, in our capstone course there are manydeliverables that the students struggle to manage, especially since they may have otherchallenging coursework, and many are holding part-time jobs (e.g., with their co-op employers).Probably the most challenging part of the project is that it is done collaboratively in a team.While we do incorporate teamwork in previous coursework (e.g., lab reports), none of theprevious experiences are as intensive as in the capstone course. Some students struggle with timemanagement and procrastination
satisfaction with one’s position at the university.This paper is the second in a series that examines data from this study. Paper 1 [1] reported onthe distribution of RIT STEM faculty, outcomes of institutional processes of recruitment andadvancement, distribution of STEM faculty in leadership positions, allocation of resources forSTEM faculty, barriers to the recruitment and advancement of women, success of existingstructures at addressing these barriers, accomplishments over the grant period, and plans forinstitutionalizing various initiatives. This paper focuses on distillation of climate survey data toobtain useful and meaningful measures related to work/life balance, climate, value and influence.The paper also explores answers to the following