Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Webster-Giddings, Vanderbilt University; Nancy Dickson, Vanderbilt; Melissa S Martiros, Anna Maria College; Sarah Mullen, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

from Vanderbilt and a Bachelor of Art degree in Elementary Education from Penn State University. Currently, Nancy is pursing a Doctorate of Education at Vanderbilt University’s Peabody College in Higher Education Lead- ership and Policy.Dr. Melissa S Martiros, Anna Maria College Melissa Martiros currently serves as Assistant Professor and Director of Music at Anna Maria College. An active clinician, her recent engagements have included workshops across the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. She is a co-author of Inclusive Piano Teaching, a blog sponsored by the Frances Clark Center for Keyboard Pedagogy, and is co-chair of the committee on special needs for the National Conference on Keyboard Pedagogy

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Zahra Atiq, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Sarah Morton; Nehal I. Abu-lail, Washington State University; Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Julie A. Kmec, Washington State University; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #22417Women’s Motivation to Pursue Engineering Education and Careers: a CaseStudy of MalaysiaMs. S. Zahra Atiq, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Zahra Atiq is a PhD candidate at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is interested in learning about the non-cognitive/affective and individual/demographic factors that impacts students in STEM courses. Specifically, she is interested in understanding the emotions students’ expe- rience while learning computer programming. She is interested to understand women’s participation in computer science and engineering.Sarah

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Saejin Kwak Tanguay, University of Washington; Joyce Yen, University of Washington; Julie Simmons Ivy, North Carolina State University; Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington; Christine S. Grant, North Carolina State University; M. Claire Horner-Devine, University of Washington and Counterspace Consulting

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Engineering and Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change. With ADVANCE, she works on mentoring and leadership development programs for women faculty in STEM. She was awarded a National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, a Sloan Research Fellowship, the 2006 Hewlett-Packard Harriett B. Rigas Award, and the 2018 ECEDHA Diversity Award. She is a Fellow of the IEEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23624Dr. Christine S Grant, North Carolina State University Dr. Christine S. Grant joined the NC State faculty in 1989 after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. (Geor

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vemitra M White, Mississippi State University; Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University; Litany H Lineberry, Mississippi State University; Jessica Ivy, Mississippi State Universitt; C. Danielle Grimes, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Dec. 9, 2017].[11] J. A. Fredricks and S. D. Simpkins, “Promoting positive youth development through organized after-school activities: Taking a closer look at participation of ethnic minority youth,” Child Development Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 280–287, Sep. 2012.[12] B. A. Danielak, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “The marginalized identities of sense-makers: reframing engineering student retention,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S1H–1–S1H–6.[13] R.M. Marra, K.A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self- efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristin E. Sherwood, Stony Brook University; Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

status,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 163-172, 2009.[3] C. Adelman. Women and Men of the Engineering Path: A Model for Analyses of Undergraduate Careers. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1998.[4] S. Bhatia and J. P. Amati, “’If these women can do it, I can do it, too’: Building women engineering leaders through graduate peer mentoring,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 174-184, 2010.[5] C. Poor and S. Brown, “Increasing retention of women in engineering at WSU: A model for a women's mentoring program,” College Student Journal, vol. 3, 421-428, 2013.[6] B. Sattler, A. Carberry, and L. D. Thomas, “Peer mentoring: Linking the value of a

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madison E. Andrews, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

). Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45–76.Case, J. and Jawitz, J. (2004). Using Situated Cognition Theory in Researching Student Experience of the Workplace. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 415–431.Creamer, E. G., Burger, C. J., & Meszaros, P. S. (2007). A Cross-Institutional Comparison of Elements of College Culture That Promote Women’s Interest in Engineering at the Undergraduate Level. In NSF Human Resources Division Annual Meeting, 1.Gunderson, K. E., Bailey, M. B., Raelin, J. A., Ladge, J., & Garrick, R. (2016). The Effect of Cooperative Education on Retention of Engineering Students & the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malle R Schilling, University of Dayton; Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

The STEM Gender Gap: An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Women in Engineering Camps Author Name(s) Malle Schilling and Dr. Margaret Pinnell School of Engineering University of Dayton Dayton, Ohio 45469 Email: schillingm3@udayton.eduAbstractIn the present day, it is not uncommon for there to be a class full of engineering students withvery few women in the room. To combat this lack of gender diversity, colleges and universitieshave employed outreach programs and developed summer engagement opportunities that allowwomen to explore engineering before they graduate high school. As

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AssociatedOutcomes on Student Learning", Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 309-322, 2014.[2] Ma, G., and Ma, L., "Retaining Female Students in a Robotics Program", Proceedings of the 2017 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education conference and exposition, 2017.[3] Crowe, S., "Robotics playing a bigger role in STEM education”, Robotics Business Review, May 27, 2005. URL:https://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/rbr/robotics_playing_bigger_role_in_stem_education, accessed March 13,2018.[4] Zywno, M. S., Gilbride, K. A., and Gudz, N., "Innovative outreach programs to attract and retain women inundergraduate engineering programs", Global Journal of Engineering. Education, 4(3), 293-302, 2000.[5] Doerschuk, P., Liu, J., and Mann, J., "INSPIRED

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, King Saud University; Hamed Dhafi Alsharari, Saudi Elecrtonic University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. [Online]. Available: https://www.asme.org/career-education/articles/undergraduate-students/engineering-still-needs-more-women. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2018].[7] N. A. Fouad, R. Singh, M. E. Fitzpatrick, and J. P. Liu, "STEMming the tide: Why women leave engineering," University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Oct. 2012. [Online]. Available: UC Davis ADVANCE: http://ucd- advance.ucdavis.edu/post/steming-tide-why-women-leave-engineering. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2018].[8] S. Singh, "Self-restrain or discrimination - Participation of women engineers in India," in Fourth International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM 2014), Bali, Indonesia, January 7- 9, 2014. pp.733-9. [Online]. Available: http://iieom.org

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Technical Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jodi F. Prosise, St. Ambrose University; R R Romatoski, Saint Ambrose University; Susa H Stonedahl, St. Ambrose University; Yunye Shi Shi, St. Ambrose University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

S-STEM grant to recruit rural stu- dents from Iowa and Illinois into STEM. Dr. Prosise mentors the collegiate chapter of SWE and organizes many outreach events encourage girls to go into STEM. She leads a study-abroad trip for engineering students to Brazil every-other-year, where students design, build, and implement assistive technologies for people with disabilities. Her research focus is to develop affordable upper limb prosthetics.Dr. R R Romatoski, Saint Ambrose UniversityDr. Susa H Stonedahl, St. Ambrose University Susa Hardwick Stonedahl is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at St. Ambrose University. She received her BA in Mathematics and Physics from Carleton College and her

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A Gatz, Stony Brook University ; Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the academic and socialengagement provided by peer mentoring aspects of the program may be positive predictors ofretention for first year female students in science and engineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.7686640. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. E. Bell, S. J. Spencer, E. Iserman, and C. E. R. Logel, "Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, pp. 307-312, 2003.[2] N. M. Else-Quest, C. C. Mineo, and A. Higgins, "Math

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder; Ray Lynn Littlejohn

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

%) relative tosmaller disciplines that have greater percentages of women graduates (such as environmentalengineering, which only awards 1% of the engineering bachelor’s degrees in the U.S., but half ofthose degrees are earned by women).2Two metrics were used to quantify course choice opportunity for each degree program: 1) thepercentage of total degree credit hours that were free electives (i.e., no restrictions were placedon the course[s] students could choose) and 2) the percentage of total degree credit hours forwhich students were provided any amount of choice in their coursework, including free electives,technical electives, humanities electives, etc., and any opportunities to choose courses frommenus or lists of options. More information is

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Henriette D. Burns, Washington State University, Vancouver; Sean Palmer Marquardt Rice, Washington State University, Vancouver

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

in STEM careers is because the culture ofSTEM, especially engineering and analytical areas, is a limiting culture devoid of what femalesseems to prefer, empathy and social caring [8]-[10].However, measuring constructs such as interest is complex because of the interactive anddynamic nature of constructs with one another, that the constructs are usually self-reported, andthat few standardized measurement terms exist [11]. STEM can be considered as one contentarea or four content areas. We often ask our students to describe STEM. They usually answer bystating the letters S, T, E, and M stand for science, technology, engineering and mathematics, butdo not state any concept of what “STEM” means. The term STEM is thought to originate withthe

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura K Alford, University of Michigan; Valeria Bertacco, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

-efficacy (reflected in themarginal means), and also shows how the increase in Course 1’s women’s self-efficacy comesprimarily from those women who were neutral at the beginning of the course feeling moresuccessful at the end of the class.IntimidationVisually inspecting the survey results for intimidation by programming in Figs. 3, 5b, and 6b, wesee that overall women are more intimidated by programming in both courses, although thisdifference is statistically significant only for Course 2. Therefore, we cannot reject the nullhypothesis for Hypothesis 2. Interestingly, we see that men at the start of Course 2 are, onaverage, about the same as where the left off at the end of Course 1, but women are on averagemore intimidated (not statistically

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Technical Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Technical Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hadil Mustafa, California State University, Chico; Shelby Ann Freese

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

“maybe” want to be engineers, 22% answered "No," while 29%answered "Yes” to the same question. It should be noted that 2016 was the first year an attemptwas made to collect feedback from the participating students. In the 2016’s survey, the question“do you want to be an engineer?” had only two possible answers, “yes or no." We have receivedseveral suggestions to add a third choice of "maybe/I do not know” to the answers. The attendeeswere hesitant to give an explicit answer of "Yes" or "No” to this question. Almost half of thestudents (47%) expressed interest in Engineering compared to 29% in 2017. While this resultdoes not conclude that the students’ interest declined in 2017, it certainly implies that studentspreferred to answer “No” than “Yes

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grace Panther, Oregon State University; Kacey Beddoes, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Cheryl Llewellyn, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Research. Factbook 2014-2015. . Accessed April 2, 2018.[5] K. Beddoes and A.L. Pawley, “Negotiating an Offer: What Graduate Students and Mentors Can Learn from Others’ Experiences,” Society of Women Engineers (SWE) Magazine, vol. 59, no.2, pp. 40-44, 2013.[6] L. Babcock and S. Laschever, Women don’t ask. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.[7] L. Babcock and S. Laschever, Women don't ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.[8] K. H. Eriksson and A. Sandberg, “Gender differences in initiation of negotiation: Does the gender of the negotiation counterpart matter?,” Negotiation Journal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 407-428, 2012.[9] D. A. Small, M

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Technical Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Miller, Campbell University; Saeedeh Ziaeefard, Michigan Technological University; Brian R Page, Michigan Technological University; Lauren Nicole Knop, Michigan Technological University ; Guilherme Aramizo Ribeiro, Michigan Technological University; Mo Rastgaar; Nina Mahmoudian, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

/fa Fu Lo od Go s nd ie Reason for Robotics Interest

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyler Byrne Cole, Northeastern University; Emma Kaeli, Northeastern University; Bradley Joseph Priem, Northeastern University; Caroline Ghio, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. D. MacMillan, “An evaluation of the supplemental instruction programme in a first year calculus course,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 843-855, 2008.[5] C. S. Ticknor, K. A. Shaw, and T. Howard, “Assessing the impact of tutorial services,” Journal of College Reading and Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 52-66, 2014.[6] F. Duah, T. Croft, and M. Inglis, “Can peer assisted learning be effective in undergraduate mathematics?,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 552-565, 2014.[7] R. L. Shapiro, E. O. Wisniewski, E. Kaeli, T. B. Cole, P. A. DiMilla, and R. Reisberg, “Role of gender

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Mayari I. Serrano, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Rachel Ann Baker

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 125(4):470–500, 1999. [8] Antony S.R. Manstead and Sander A.M. van Eekelen. Distinguishing between perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy in the domain of academic achievement intentions and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15):1375–1392, 1998. [9] Carroll Seron, Susan S. Silbey, Erin Cech, and Brian Rubineau. Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43 (2):178–214, 2016.[10] Mary E. Fitzpatrick, Manuela Romero, and Jennifer Sheridan. Changes in undergraduate engineering college climate and predictors of major commitment: Results from climate

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vicki V. May, Dartmouth College; Joseph J. Helble, Dartmouth College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

] Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.[8] Dennehy, Tara C, and Dasgupta, Nilanjana, (2016). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Vol. 114, no. 23.[9] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410.abstract.[10] Prince, M. (2004). Does active

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Technical Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel Alberto Acuna, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Joseph E Michaelis, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Joshua Daniel Roth, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Joseph Towles, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, Plano Clark, VL, Clark, Leslie-Pelecky, D, Lu, Y, Cerda-Lizarraga, P. Examining theCognitive Processes Used by Adolescent Girls and Women Scientists in Identifying Science RoleModels: A Feminist Approach. Science Education, 92 (2008): 688–707. doi:10.1002/sce.20257.Cheryan, S, Siy, JO,, Vichayapai, M, Drury, BJ, Kim, S. Do Female and Male Role Models WhoEmbody STEM Stereotypes Hinder Women’s Anticipated Success in STEM? SocialPsychological and Personality Science, 2 (2011): 656–664. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218.Dasgupta, N, Stout, JG. Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1 (2014): 21–29.doi:10.1177/2372732214549471.Driver R. Children’s Ideas and the Learning of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laine Schrewe, Tolles Career and Technical Center

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

degree in Workforce Development (from the Ohio State University). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 S EM: Customized for Them How to attract students toward education’s latest trendBringing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) into the classroom is thelatest craze in educational strategies. And what is more trendy in education than STEMinitiatives? Well, pretty much the same thing, but with special guest letters like STEAM (+ Art)and STREAM (+ Reading). Acronyms aside, STEM courses are still a tough sell for a lot ofstudents who don’t excel in the traditional math and science courses. Tailoring our curriculumsand course offerings

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chloe Wiggins, Designing Education Lab; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, SKG Analysis; Benedikt von Unold, Stanford University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory; Michael Arruza Cruz

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, practices, and cultures that reflect expandedperspectives on gender, diversity, and intersectional identities. In order to better understand the role(s) of such a course in an engineering student'seducation and how engineering education considers these issues, the instructor team invited twoundergraduate researchers to undertake projects in support of these goals. One of these students(Amber Levine) was tasked with identifying other courses across the U.S. with similar subjectmatter and learning objectives (“EEL Related Courses Study”); she found 13 courses acrosstwelve institutions that connected issues of diversity and culture to engineering and were targetedto engineering students (Levine, 2016). The other student (Chloe Wiggins, who is

Conference Session

History of the Women in Engineering Division: Reflections from Past Chairs of the Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University; Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Noel N. Schulz, Washington State University; Sarah A. Rajala, Iowa State University; Donna Reese, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, 2018 Paper ID #21397 Honorary Society), Tau Beta Pi (Engineering Honor Society), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the Society of Women Engineers and the National Society of Black Engineers.Dr. Sarah A Rajala, Iowa State University Sarah A. Rajala is professor and James L. and Katherine S. Melsa Dean of Engineering at Iowa State University. Previously, she served as professor, dean of engineering and department head at Mississippi State University, and associate dean and professor at North Carolina State University. She received her B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Michigan Technological

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University ; Daniel Collier, Western Michigan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

most currentresearch in a given field of research, or historical reviews that present the development in a givenfield of research over time9. Our review belongs in the historical category as we have includedpapers from 1993.Strategize SearchDatabase We review papers from ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education)’s Journal ofEngineering Education (JEE) (ISSN 2168-9830), a primary publication choice for engineeringeducation researchers, especially in the US10. Pawley et al.11 argue that JEE is the flagship andthe most highly ranked journal of the American engineering education researcher community andchose it for their gender research review that identifies dominant themes and patterns in thestructure of gender research. JEE is

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James A. Coller, University of Michigan; Magel P. Su, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(1):59–77, 2015. [5] John Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. The social psychology of telecommunications. 1976. [6] Yong Zhao. The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4):311–345, 1998. [7] Terry Connolly, Leonard M Jessup, and Joseph S Valacich. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management science, 36(6):689–703, 1990. [8] Robin R Fowler. Talking teams: Increased equity in participation in online compared to face-to-face team discussions. ASEE Computers in Education Journal, 6(1):21–44, 2015. [9] Laura Hirshfield and Milo D Koretsky. Gender and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University; Doreen Aveni, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

students 6follow throughout their four- 4year undergraduate studies. 2 0Both intellectual and Co mp ine g M tric gin ce g he g En Ph s m Ot vil ine El ter cie

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephany Coffman-Wolph, University of Texas, Austin; Kimberlyn Gray, West Virginia University Inst. of Tech.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

disabilities in science and engineering,” NSF 15-311, Arlington, VA, 2015.[2] WVUIT Common Data Set 2017-2018. West Virginia University, 2017 [Online]. Available:https://planning.wvu.edu/files/d/8ed4b6a2-1eed-43c4-8c17-2992915bca00/wvuit-cds_2017-2018.pdf. [Accessed: 16- Mar- 2018][3] “Science and engineering indicators 2004,” National Science Board, May 2004 [Online].Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/, last accessed May 25, 2009.[4] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer and J. Coleman, "Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K–12Students to Engineering Fields," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144-151,Feb. 2010.