Schenectady, NY 12308AbstractFemale representation in mechanical engineering remains a critical challenge for academicinstitutions committed to fostering diversity and inclusivity. At Union College, the genderdisparity is evident, with female enrollment in the Mechanical Engineering departmentdeclining from 22.5% in the freshman cohort to only 13.3% by senior year. To address thisgap, the department has introduced initiatives aimed at supporting and retaining femalestudents through structured mentorship, peer support, and career development programs.Key among these efforts is the Female Student Mentor Project, which pairs senior studentswith underclassmen to foster academic confidence and professional growth. Additionally,regular networking events
Alaskan Native, Asian, black or African American,Hispanic/Latino, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, faces unique challenges that candiscourage them from continuing with a STEM degree including the lack of writing and degreereadiness skills such as mathematical and computational thinking [2]. Minority female studentsare also faced with economic challenges and family commitments which can hinder ordiscourage them from continuing in a degree program [2]. In addition, minority females lackfemale role models in academics and industry. They are influenced by the stereotypical beliefthat white males dominate the computer field and that certain groups do not belong in this field[3]. These prejudices and stereotypes can be reinforced in the home
[9][10]. Strong connections, fostered throughacademic, social, and extracurricular experiences, have been shown to improve both retentionand graduation rates. These activities offer students opportunities to build networks of faculty,peers, and advisors, which are essential to students' persistence and academic success [11][12].For women in STEM, proactive initiatives, programs, seminars, and workshops have been shownto integrate women into their academic departments more effectively [13] and help themnavigate the challenges of higher education. By fostering a sense of belonging and a strong socialnetwork, these experiences not only provide academic benefits but also boost students'confidence and motivation [14][15]. In addition, high-impact
women representing more than half of the US population, they remain underrepresentedin Computing fields. An introductory programming course (CS1) is critical for progression in theComputer Science (CS) degrees. It often presents challenges for retention and graduation,especially among underrepresented students. Previous research has indicated that women may bemore likely to leave or lose interest in computing due to various challenges. The computingclassroom culture needs to improve engagement and create a welcoming environment forwomen. As more schools are using peer instruction, such as LA (Learning Assistant), PLTL(Peer-Led Team Learning), and UTA (Undergraduate Teaching Assistants), some researchindicates that such practice for recitation
breakdown of women and men responses in the above data(in Table 6). Figure 3 shows that despite women feeling very strongly (over 80%) about feelingbonded with classmates and peers, women strongly agree only 52% that they will have betterpeer support in classes upon return. However, the male students had higher percentage (75%) ofstrongly agreeing about expecting better peer support in classes upon return. Overall, 92% ofwomen (strongly agree and agree) left feeling they will have better peer support whereby the87.5% of males (strongly agree and agree). Figure 3: Women vs. Men Responses: bonding with classmates and impact on their networkingThe post-survey prompted students to enter free form response to the questions: “Write asummary of your
majors than peers who identify as men [6], [16]. This sectionhighlights three barriers to sense of belonging: negative faculty interactions, negative peerinteractions, and stereotype threat. Though it has clearly been established that sense of belonging is an important factor inretaining women undergraduate engineering students, there are some potential barriers that havebeen documented to prevent students from experiencing belongingness. Blair et al. found thatfaculty have the ability to positively or negatively impact women STEM majors’ success [17].Upon studying faculty in a variety of STEM programs, researchers identified three-primarypositions related to how faculty members approach the idea of gender equity: gender blindness,gender
femalestudents impact the cultural climate in each engineering discipline?; 2) What is the male students’perception of the cultural climate for women in their engineering discipline?; 3) Is there adisconnect between the cultural climate female students experience and the perception malestudents hold of the cultural climate?; 4) What can be done to create meaningful changes to thecultural climate for women at the university level? To answer these questions, we designed asurvey and semi-structured interview for female and male engineering students across the threechosen engineering disciplines. Our study is consistent with the literature, finding that women arestill experiencing a chilly cultural climate due to peer tensions, gender discrimination, and
outcomes in team settings. Mallette et al. explained that the pressureswomen faced to complete a greater proportion of the writing tasks than their male peers in ayear-long senior capstone materials science and engineering course was due to “the prevailingperception…that women are the strongest writers, so the writing should fall to them,” as well asthe personal desire by female students to produce high-quality project deliverables and theadoption of technical tasks as a way to avoid writing by male students [13]. While these writingcontributions, if visible and rewarded, are not inherently problematic, this task allocation practicemay limit female students’ opportunities to practice and build self-efficacy in technicalcompetencies, and writing
are reported on threefocus groups held with ten women, all students, former students, and teaching professionals froma Construction Engineering degree program at a private Chilean university. This methodologypresents results regarding participant perception of their sense of belonging, their positive andnegative experiences in an environment related to construction, whether in the campus or workcontext, and their proposed solutions for enhancing this sense of belonging within the sector.Despite differences in participants' life stages, they all believe that self-confidence, recognitionfrom peers and leaders, social interactions, and knowledge and skills are critical factors thatimprove their sense of belonging.Keywords: focus groups; sense of
Education initiative and others demonstrates that NTT faculty arepaid 25% less than their TT peers while lacking the protections of tenure [3]. Recommendationsdictate that benefit packages offered to full-time NTT faculty should correspond to thoseavailable to TT faculty [3], [4], but a quick glance through most university websites shows this isoften not the case. Although many features of NTT faculty employment are problematic [5], ourfocus is on disparities around caregiving support - specifically parental leave and workload reliefpolicies.Despite their critical roles in teaching, mentoring, and research, NTT faculty are often excludedfrom benefits offered to TT faculty, including parental leave and workload relief policies. Thelack of equitable
near-peer mentors,engaging in STEM focused events and activities, and connection to university and STEMresources.This practice paper reviews the history and evolution of STEM LLCs for women at RutgersUniversity and catalogs LLC practices, with a particular focus on community engagement. Alongitudinal graduation review of living-learning community participants is also provided,showing that an average of 80% of LLC students graduate in STEM.INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDIn the early 1900’s, the New Jersey State Federation of Women’s Clubs convinced Mabel SmithDouglass to lead the effort of establishing a women’s college as part of Rutgers University. In1918, the New Jersey College for Women, later named Douglass College, opened its doors to
cope with the stresses of life, realize their abilities, learn and workefficiently, and contribute to their community and to socio-economic development” [25]. Inacademia, students and professors alike struggle with their mental health and well-being. Facultyat all levels must balance many roles and responsibilities such as teaching, mentorship, researchand administrative tasks. Similarly, graduate students must complete course and/or laboratorywork, teaching or research assistantships, secure funding to cover costs of tuition, write andpublish papers, attend meetings, and complete administrative tasks. Notably, graduate studentsexperience rates of depression and anxiety at rates six times higher than the general population[26]. Research
graduate students in theCollege of Engineering to gauge need for community and student interest in creating a GraduateWomen in Engineering (GradWIE) group. Results from the survey indicated that students lackedcommunity and had an overwhelming desire to be involved in a graduate women in engineeringgroup. As such, we felt compelled to form an official student organization for the engineeringcommunity, GradWIE. GradWIE welcomes people of all gender identities to support thepersonal and professional well-being of graduate students through peer support, the creation ofsafe spaces, social events, and diverse resources. In its first year, the organization has sponsoredseveral community-building events, reaching over 150 students across all departments
the workforce. An analysis of student reflections from exit interviews of graduatingstudents from 2018 and 2019 cohorts and journal entry data collected from students from therecent 2023 cohort is presented in this work. The themes emerging from this analysis show thatboth graduating students and current students seek to strengthen the RAMP community beyondthe summer program. Their recommendations point to the need for continuing support in bothpersonal achievement and for advocating the needs of their peers. With over a hundred RAMPparticipants now established across the engineering majors and the workforce, theserecommendations will be integrated in the participatory action research framework that anchorsthe design of RAMP. We will address
Research-Course Design,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 4, p. ar37, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-03-0073.[32] A. B. Inoue, Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Compassionate Writing Classroom. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado, 2019. doi: 10.37514/PER-B.2019.0216.0.Appendix[after peer review we plan to include the syllabus developed for the M-CURE course, but it is full ofauthor identity information so has been removed for now]
and research aresupported by award funding from various organizations. They often are directed to womenwithout considering WOC's unique challenges. For example, ADVANCE is a fund that invests infaculty success by exploring and establishing institution-based support programs and strategiesto enhance the climate and institutional context encountered by faculty women in engineering[10]. These initiatives may warrant a different structure at different institutions, such as minority-serving institutions (MSIs), in keeping with institutional missions and demographics. Specific toMSI, Allen et al. [11] proffered that institutional transformation must assist women faculty inSTEM by providing support to develop writing and research skills, networking
to be developed inductively. The final round of coding used axial coding, whichaims to center the coding around the most salient topics [22]. The researcher engaged incontinual peer debriefing and analytical memo writing to engage in reflexivity as they engagedwith the data in more profound ways [21]. The themes for this paper were determined during thefinal cycle of coding and aim to capture the most salient topics described by the participants.Any redactions or author's notes inserted for clarification are noted in italics and brackets. Thethemes are further explored in the findings section below.FindingsThis work-in-progress paper is focused on understanding four women’s motivations for joining aGI ESO and how their membership impacted
opportunities. … But what really pushed me was when I was in high school and I realized that scientists were studying us. And basically … there were a lot of environmental justice activists that were coming out and shouting that we were dying. …. And then the University of [DEID] came to my high school to recruit for a study of the health impacts of these chemicals. …. But they never came back and told us what the results were at all. That fueled me. …. I would one day face those researchers that did that study in my hometown and then they were gonna have to answer [to me]. …when I landed in higher education at the Ivory Tower I wasn't ready …. So I had to work triple, quadruple more than a lot of my peers. …. I realized that my passion
Fellows to asupportive network of peers and professionals through assignment to an i2 mHub. Each i2 mHubwill consist of two to three iREDEFINE Fellows, one to two junior ECE faculty (iREDEFINEalumni), and one to two ECE academic leaders, such as current or former department chairs.Through structured virtual activities, Fellows actively applying for academic positions willreceive guidance from both junior and senior faculty within their Hub. This unique mentoringstructure also fosters a multi-level support system, where senior members provide mentorship tojunior faculty while encouraging peer mentoring among the iREDEFINE Fellows.2 BackgroundAccording to the latest U.S. Census, 50.5% of the U.S. population identifies as female 1
Mathematics (STEM) fields, particularly in engineering. This studyconducted a systematized literature review to identify these challenges, guided by the researchquestion: "What challenges affect Arab women's engagement in STEM fields, particularlyengineering?" A search was conducted using databases such as ERIC, Education Source from theEBSCO platform, and Compendex, Inspec from the Engineering Village platform. After applyinginclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of twelve peer-reviewed articles were selected and analyzedto examine the challenges that Arab women encounter in these fields. The analysis revealed threemain themes: The inherent nature of Arab culture and society and the role of family support in theEngineering field, gender
Figure 1. Graphical model of emerging experience themes identified from the life history interview Theme 1: All of the women participants were aware of gendered ways of being anddoing. For some, their earlier familial/parental influences on non-gender defined ways of beingand doing allowed them to explore what they were interested in and comfortable with who theywere while they were exploring. For others, it was the positive experiences and influences fromother people or peers that helped them to develop a sense of self and ignore or reject theessentialization that gendered roles and expectations typically prompt. However, the mostimportant contributing factor was their own “I want and I can
individualized tutoring tostudents who have trouble in a course. All students take the python programmingcourse and are placed into mathematics, either precalculus or differential calculus,based ontheir performance on a math placement assessment. Students are given the option toaccept or decline the grades for the summer courses. There is no penalty for declininga grade. Ultimately, our goal is to build students’ confidence and facility with thesecourses. 2. Enrichment SeriesThe enrichment series includes training on college readiness (study skills, timemanagement, self-advocacy), professional readiness (resume’ writing, technicalwriting, presentation skills), science identity and community (belonging, Blackfemale role models, peer-mentoring
built around a frameworkdrawn from a recent book [1] that explores the current status of sexual harassment inengineering. Our five panelists are a diverse group of women engineers representing multiplesexual orientations, races, and family backgrounds. Our panelists will present their experienceswith gender harassment, lessons learned, their responses to the harassment, and paths forward.The panel will emphasize approaches and responses to gender harassment that can beimplemented from the bottom up – by individuals or localized peer or work groups – withoutrelying on top leadership in an organization to take the initiative to transform culture or takedefinitive and proportionate action in response to individual harassment cases.Gender
. Belonging encompasses a subjective assessment of astudent's sense of acceptance, value, inclusion, and encouragement from both peers andinstructors within the academic environment. It also entails feeling integral to the class andrecognizing one's importance in the educational community [13]. Studies indicate that studentswho persist in STEM majors tend to experience a heightened sense of belonging compared totheir counterparts who transition out of STEM fields. However, individuals fromunderrepresented groups, including females, are less likely to perceive a strong sense ofbelonging. This disparity is, in part, attributed to the numerical underrepresentation of womenboth in educational settings and within the industrial landscape [13-18]. This
analysis revealed that student leaders used communication, decision-making, vision, andpassion to lead their teams. In particular, there were differences between women and men leaderswhen it came to leading others; while men leaders used a relaxed and fun way to lead, womenadopted a more serious and rigorous approach in their leadership roles. Furthermore, womenleaders found it more difficult to lead their peers and still have a positive relationship with them,and continue their friendship. Overall, women leaders took advantage of their leadership role inincreasing their sense of belonging to engineering, acquiring technical skills, and expanding theirknowledge of what the engineering profession can look like. Women leaders also reportedhaving
rules are listed below: 1. No Squelching – With just one single statement your own creativity or that of another can be destroyed. 2. Take Risks – Give yourself permission to try something new. 3. Write Every Idea Down – Do not self-edit. 4. No Say “no” or “But” – Reframe that with “yes and.” 5. No Analysis – Do not worry about the implementation of ideas. 6. Everyone is an Expert – Everyone gets to speak their mind. 7. Have Fun – Get loud, get animated, move around.The workshop process document helped students understand how negative brainstorming will beaccomplished and how to use the process worksheet. The main premise of negative ideageneration is that it is “both easier and more
mentoring, such as peer mentoring and mentorship between early-career andsenior faculty, considerably influence professional advancement of African-American womenfaculty [6].We anticipate that the establishment of such mentorship opportunities and supportnetworks at a cross-campus level for early-career women engineering faculty will help to retainthese faculty and provide them with opportunities to develop and disseminate research, findcollaborators, and enhance their educational abilities. It is our hypothesis that establishing amentoring program will improve women, particularly URM women, faculty’s career satisfactionand enrich the level of their academic skills and scholarly achievements, and eventually facilitateinstitutional transformations
, yielding findings that suggest thatwomen and non-white students who received the letter-grade C in an introductory STEM courseare less likely to complete a STEM degree than white male counterparts. Despite Black andHispanic students declaring STEM majors at the same rate as their white peers, they are pushedout of STEM at disproportionate rates regardless of academic preparation, intellectual ability, ortheir affinity for STEM [8], [17],[18]. Additionally, they are often depicted as being without ormore so, at a deficit to be academically successful in STEM.Meritocratic ideologies or the belief that individuals are successful because of their own merit asopposed to historical, social and institutional barriers in place underscore STEM culture for
utilize sensors to 'see' their environment and adeptly navigateobstacles. Figure 3: mBot platform used in the workshop activities.The activity was divided into four different tasks to make sure students could independentlyprogress on the different tasks at their own pace. Hands out were provided with clear instructionson the steps and on how to use block coding to perform the required tasks. • Task 1 Start up!: The first activity consisted in connecting the mBot to the laptop via USB and connect it the desktop • Task 2 Obstacle Avoidance: Students started writing the code to enable mBot to move forward, to stop for 2 seconds when an obstacle was at distance less than 20 centimeters and move backwards
aid in the formation of peer-to-peer relationships[3] through a shared identity as a “maker”.Makerspaces are unique learning environments that center around the act of “making,” a broad term thatincludes almost all forms of creative manufacture such as sewing, woodworking, mechatronics, etc.Communities of practice form within these spaces as the collaborative use of machines and technologiespromote the sharing of ideas, knowledge, and experience[4] and a shared identity as a maker. Hilton[5]found that participation in university Makerspaces led to an increase in engineering design self-efficacyamongst undergraduate engineering students. Tomko[2] demonstrated that engagement in Makerspacesincreased engineering students’ motivation and