Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 59 in total
Conference Session
Future Career and Professional Success for Graduate Students
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Qunqun Liu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). She ob- tained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient
Conference Session
Structural Education Topics in Architectural Engineering
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gouranga Banik, Tennessee State University
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
% in1963 to 54% in 1993, and the percentages of students who engaged in appropriate collaborationwith other students on homework assignments increased from 11% to 49% (Passow et. al.,2006). It can be due to increase of using collaborations in the classes. Several studies haveidentified variations in rates of cheating among students within different majors. With generalagreement among these studies that higher percentages of business and engineering studentsengage in cheating which are 91% and 82% respectively compared to students in the social andnatural sciences which are 73% and 71% respectively (McCabe, 1997, Mattei, 2008). Likewise,past research has identified that variations in rates of cheating among university students fromdifferent
Conference Session
Methodological & Theoretical Contributions to Engineering Education 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scottie-Beth Fleming, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
research: discipline, community, or field? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 39-52.11. Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-400.12. Coso, A., Louis, R., London, J., Ngambeki, I., and Sattler, B. (2012). Exploring the reasons for collaboration and cooperation among graduate student researchers. Paper presented at the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX.13. Olds, B.M. Moskal, B.M. and Miller, R.L. (2005). Assessment in engineering education: Evolution, approaches and future collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 13-25.14. Mckenna, A.F. Yalvac, B. and Light. G.J. (2009). The role of collaborative reflection on shaping engineering faculty
Conference Session
Cooperative & Experiential Education Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Maggie Varga, SOCHE; Sean J. Creighton, SOCHE; Derrick Langley, Air Force Institute of Technology; Diana Lynn Cahill, Air Force Institute of Technology; Richard K. Martin, The Air Force Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative & Experiential Education
Director, Maggie leads the SOCHEIntern Program, which employs nearly 300 students an- nually in cooperation with local government and small businesses, as well as the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) and Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. The program provides high impact experiential learning opportunities for students while generating economic benefit and enhancing community sustainability. Her work improves the efficiency of programs that support member institutions and increase the success of more than 120,000 students in southwest Ohio. Maggie has also provided guidance and leadership in the creation and evolution of regional initiatives such as the Dayton Water
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Khaled Sobhan, Florida Atlantic University; Edgar An, Florida Atlantic University; Ryne A. Sherman; Nancy Romance, Florida Atlantic university ; Nicolas A. Brown, Florida Atlantic University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
Session at the ASEE 2014 Annual Conference, anddescribes a recently funded project (October 2013) under the Research Initiation Grant inEngineering Education (RIGEE) program. It is hypothesized that there is disconnect betweenthe principles outlined in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the actual classroomenvironment, thus creating a barrier to intrinsic motivation needed for student learning. Theproposed work is an empirical investigation to explore this disconnect in the context ofundergraduate engineering education. The primary tasks will be to (i) assess the Facultyknowledge of SDT; (ii) develop a measurement framework to assess the classroom environmentas it relates to SDT; and (iii) determine the association among Faculty knowledge of SDT
Conference Session
Spatial Ability & Visualization Training II
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yingjie Victor Chen, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Zhenyu Cheryl Qian, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
Build/Prototyping Brainstorming Prioritize/Select Items Fig.1. Cyclic Design Model Based on this typical design process model, we want to explore how technology students caneffectively learn from and collaborate with design students. Mattessich and Monsey’s survey incollaboration literature [25] has drawn a clear distinction among cooperation, coordination, andcollaboration. Cooperation is the informal relationship without a clearly defined commonmission, structure, or effort. Coordination shares the understanding of compatible missions, butauthority still rests within the
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Yanhua Cao, Jackson State University; Himangshu Shekhar Das, Jackson State University; Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
Nussbaum et al. show that note starters could encouragestudents to disagree and explore alternative perspectives in comparison to the collaborativelearning without this interface design 21.Weinberger conducted experimental research on effects of both social and epistemic (cognitive)cooperation scripts on cyber-enabled collaborative learning through web-based discussionboard24. Subjects in this research are colleague students of Educational Science. The socialcooperation script adopted in this research specified two roles for each of three students in thecollaborative learning team: (a) analyst, who is responsible for the preliminary and concludinganalysis of one learning case and responding to criticism from the learning partners (Weinberger
Conference Session
Graduate Ethics Education & Professional Codes
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech; William Joseph Rhoads, Virginia Tech; Siddhartha Roy, Virginia Tech; Erin Heaney, Clean Air: Organizing for Health and Justice; Glenn Andrew Ratajczak, Clean Air Coalition of Western New York; Jennifer Holly Ratajczak, Clean Air Coalition of Western New York
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
,discoveries, and products is crucial for ethical practice. It contends that listening canfacilitate transformational engagement between engineers and the public by a)challenging stereotypes on both sides, b) foregrounding the technical and ethicalrelevance of diverse knowledges, c) exposing relationships of structural inequality thatprivilege technical expertise, and d) replacing such relationships with partnerships oftrust that generate meaningful and effective solutions.Transformational listening lies at the heart of a graduate engineering ethics course atVirginia Tech and future online teaching modules, funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF). The goal is for students to experience the cognitive leap thatethnographic research methods can
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott C Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Sydnie Cunningham Cunningham, University of Tulsa; Shaobo Huang, University of Southern California; Svetlana Levonisova, University of Southern California; Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
International
program, funded by the National Science Foundation in order to expand international research opportunities for students in STEM fields. NanoJapan was recognized by the Institute for International Education in 2008 with the prestigious Andrew Heiskell Award for Innovations in Study Abroad. Dr. Matherly is the recipient of two Fulbright grants for international education administrators (Germany and Japan.) She has a BA in English and Political Science from the University of New Mexico, an MS in Education from Indiana University, and an Ed.D. in Education from the University of Houston. She teaches in the graduate program in education at The University of Tulsa.Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr
Conference Session
Engineering Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Janet Callahan Ph.D., Boise State University; Patricia Pyke, Boise State University; Susan Shadle Ph.D., Boise State University; R. Eric Landrum, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
forengineering and computer science graduates, began focusing heavily on student successinitiatives in 2004 with support from the Engineering Schools of the West Initiative, through theWilliam and Flora Hewlett Foundation. This first wave of initiatives was critically assessed, andengineering student success became a focal point for the CoE. Internal research conducted underthis grant exposed numerous roadblocks that impeded students' academic success. In 2010,another large grant, funded through the National Science Foundation Science Talent ExpansionProgram (STEP), was awarded to increase the numbers of students graduating with STEMdegrees. This grant engaged an interdisciplinary, cross-college team of STEM educatorspassionate about continuous
Conference Session
K-12 and Pre-college Engineering: Educational Policy and Research
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
worked in research and develop- ment in artificial intelligence, computer vision, robotics, and sensor fusion. Prof. Nathan also has worked on computer-based tutoring environments for mathematics education that rely heavily on students’ own comprehension processes for self-evaluation and self-directed learning (so-called unintelligent tutoring systems). Prof. Nathan directed the STAAR Project, which studied the transition from arithmetic to al- gebraic reasoning. He served as Co-PI for the NSF-funded AWAKEN Project, which documented how people learn engineering in K-12, college, and the workplace. Dr. Nathan recently served as a member of The National Academy of Engineering (NAE)/National Research Council Committee on
Conference Session
Student Learning, Problem Solving, & Critical Thinking 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan M. Hicks, University of Florida; Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #10737Critical Thinking, Reflective Practice, and Adaptive Expertise in EngineeringNathan Hicks, University of Florida Current graduate student in materials science and engineering at the University of Florida. Spent three years teaching high school math and science before returning to graduate school for an advanced degree.Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of FloridaDr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Associate Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Dean’s Fellow for Engi- neering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the University of Florida. He conducts research
Conference Session
Ocean and Marine Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carlos Efrén Mora, La Laguna University; Jorge Martin-Gutierrez, Universidad de La Laguna; Beatriz Añorbe-Diaz, Universidad de La Laguna; REYES CARRAU MELLADO, Universidad La Laguna; Antonio González Marrero, University of La Laguna
Tagged Divisions
Ocean and Marine
collaborative work both on classroom and online. • In the case of partial experiences, except just one exception, the concept collaborative work and student-centered environments was strange for them, generating rejection among the students, as there was a common trend at the start aiming for individual work, instead of splitting tasks and gather all work afterwards. • The search for creative answers to questions proposed was encouraged by the fact that results and conclusions had to be presented online, avoiding simple plagiarism. • The creation of random working groups generated some conflicts at the start of the experience, caused by the differences of skills and involvement attitudes of the group’s members
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jianyu Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Huiping Guo, California State University, Los Angeles
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
design the project sequence to build up student skills, but leave room for exploration and invention; Don’t underestimate the students’ ability and creativity. • Strategy #4: Focus on Learning Process, not the Results! Do incorporate as many key learning factors in project design; Don’t set the goal to be just completing the project. • Strategy #5: Provide guidelines to foster collaboration Page 24.454.5 Do use team-building activities and provide guidelines; Don’t assume students can work well in teams naturally. • Strategy #6: Build an online community to provide scaffolding Do build a learning community to provide
Conference Session
Teaching Approaches for Ethics
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gregory A. Rulifson, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Whitney Thomas, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Page 24.1291.2include social justice; a consideration of the distribution of advantages and disadvantages insociety.4-6. The extent to which engineering students view the profession of engineering througha lens of SR with consideration of social justice is unclear.The Association of American Colleges & Universities (AAC&U)7 includes SR among theiressential learning outcomes for all college students, noting as sub-elements within this learningoutcome ethical reasoning and action, as well as civic knowledge and engagement. They alsostate: “in a democratic society, the goal must be to extend opportunity and excellence toeveryone, and not just to a fortunate minority.” 8 Toward meeting these aims, the AAC&Usupported the initiative Core
Conference Session
Impact of Community Engagement on Students
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chris Swan, Tufts University; Kurt Paterson P.E., James Madison University; Timothy Henry Hellickson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
hadgraduated and did not provide post-graduation contact information. Finally, the paper providesrecommendations for future longitudinal studies. Page 24.501.32.0 MotivationFor the purposes of this work, community engagement (CE) is taken as an amalgamation ofvarious pedagogical methods, including service learning, community-service, and project-basedlearning, among others. The distinguishing aspect of CE in engineering education is theintentional design of the effort to incorporate service as a means to meet academic learningobjectives. Previous work has shown that CE has the potential for student development on thecognitive 16, 17, 43, 49, social
Conference Session
Methodological & Theoretical Contributions to Engineering Education 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lauren D. Thomas, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, individual ability, and personal responsibilities are also a part ofthe intellectual strand. The institutional strand focuses on identity based on affiliation and rolewithin the university and field. There are also institutional structures, resources, andresponsibilities that have an important influence on the identity of an early academic. Thenetwork strand includes professional relationships, organizations, and collaborations thatcontribute to professional identity. The three strands allow for a rich analysis of the complexnature of identity and how it evolves through time.This framework was used in an engineering education doctoral dissertation9 to explore theexperience of graduate students in optics and photonics. The findings of the study
Collection
2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference
Authors
Beverly Woolf; Enid Sichel; Mark Floryan
systems that reason about domain knowledgeand diagnose student problems, to produce detailed analyses Figure 5. Students collaborate to answer the software questions related to circuit analysis.of student utterances and generate automatic feedback.CycleTalk, built upon the CyclePad simulation environment(above), investigated novel ways of using tutorial dialogue toteach thermodynamics [11]. The system empirically evaluateddialogue that invited students to negotiate problem-solvinggoals. For example, the system asked student to “do you thinkit is a good idea for the . . . temperature to be increased andkept high?” or “What happens to the steam quality if youincrease the maximum temperature?” Empirical resultsprovide strong evidence in favor
Conference Session
Summer and Cohort Programs for Minorities: Student Success
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State University; Kelly A. Rusch P.E., North Dakota State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
Paper ID #9336S-STEM: ENG2 Scholars for Success 2007-2013Ms. Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State University Sarah Cooley Jones is an Associate Director, College of Engineering at Louisiana State University. Ms. Jones develops and manages student programs for undergraduate and graduate engineering students in- cluding programs focused on underrepresented student populations. These programs encompass scholar- ships, fellowships, and seminars/workshops that develop students academically and professionally. She joined LSU in 1992 as a College of Engineering research associate in the area of environmental analyses and worked
Conference Session
Raise the Bar – Visions for the Future, Bodies of Knowledge, and Accreditation Vicissitudes.
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mark William Killgore PE, F.ASCE, D.WRE, American Society of Civil Engineers
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
liberal arts discipline, similar to the natural sciences, socialsciences, and humanities (and the trivium, quadrivium, and natural philosophy of earlier times),by imbedding it in the general education requirements of a college graduate for an increasinglytechnology-driven and -dependent society of the century ahead.5. To achieve far greater diversity among the participants in engineering, the roles and types ofengineers needed by our nation, and the programs engaged in preparing them for professionalpractice.As described on the University website, “the Millennium Project is a research center at theUniversity of Michigan concerned with the impact of technology on our society, ourcommunities, our institutions, and our planet.”The report advocates
Conference Session
K-12 Outreach and Out-of-School Time Engineering Programming and Research
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Benjamin Reed Campbell, Robert Morris University; Sarah Marie Riordan, Robert Morris University; Stephanie Abbott; Sarah Mukui Mutunga, Robert Morris University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
summer program at Carnegie Mellon) and currently sits on the Board of Di- rectors for the PGSS Campaign, a nonprofit that is responsible for raising the funds to finance and sustain the program.Sarah Marie Robb, Robert Morris University Sarah Robb is a graduate student at Robert Morris University in the Engineering Management MS pro- gram. She recently completed a BS in Engineering at Robert Morris with concentrations in mechanical and biomedical engineering. Graduating with honors, she has also successfully passed the Fundamen- tals of Engineering (EIT) exam. She has participated in summer research at Vanderbilt University and Worcester Polytechnic Institute, and most recently worked as a teaching assistant for the
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sabeen A. Altaf, Institute of International Education; Eck Doerry, Northern Arizona University; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Edward Randolph Collins Jr. P.E., Clemson University
Tagged Divisions
International
content, credit transfer, and accreditation concerns are understood by all members, streamlining communication about curricular issues. As members of a strong collaborative community that meets regularly to establish personal ties among members, institutions are more likely to be helpful with special needs, e.g., facilitating access to internships in faculty research laboratories or in local companies.3. Guidance and Support. Exchange of a flexible number of students with a wide range of partner institutions who provide personalized guidance and support to exchange participants. The ability to provide both guidance and support is a necessary member requirement.4. Institutional Visibility. Increased visibility for engineering programs
Conference Session
Gender Perceptions and Girls in K-12 Engineering and Computer Science
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Suzanne L. Berliner -Heyman, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Rosa M. Cano, NJIT; John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Howard S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Linda S. Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
. Correlations among the gender equity items on the attitudes toward STEM survey andgender attribution of engineers in students’ drawing were also examined.IntroductionThe demand for engineers in the United States workforce continues to increase1 but the numberof students studying engineering in college is not increasing enough to meet this demand2-3. Oneof the more significant reasons is the underrepresentation of females in engineering4-5 despite thefact that gender discrimination in engineering wages has been almost eliminated6. To helpencourage female students to study engineering, it is important to eliminate misinformation andnegative impressions about engineers and engineering7-9. Research on engineering recruitmentindicates that many young
Conference Session
Best of NEE
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D, University of Washington; Tamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University; Nanette M. Veilleux, Simmons College; Caitlin Hawkinson Wasilewski, Seattle Pacific University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
whatapproaches have been shown to work well for others; in other words, to consider evidence-basedteaching practices. The engineering education literature has provided such evidence-basedapproaches for introduction to engineering courses1, capstone courses2, and topic-specificcourses.3,4 It has also provided teaching guidelines for approaches ranging from teaching usingactive learning methods5, improving student self efficacy6 and retaining engineering students7. Page 24.977.2This paper summarizes other evidenced-based teaching practices which have recently emerged  from our collaborative research on the role of a student’s connection to community in his
Conference Session
K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design, Part 2 of 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aran W Glancy, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Tamara J Moore, Purdue University; Siddika Selcen Guzey, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Corey A Mathis, Purdue University; Kristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University; Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
engineering or computer science into mathematics and science classes can support and enhance learning within and across the STEM disciplines.Dr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and higher education mathe- matics, science, and engineering classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her research agenda focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. She is creating and testing innovative, interdisciplinary curricular approaches that engage
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ishbah Cox, Purdue University, Band and Orchestra Department; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Assessment (i2e2a). She ob- tained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation Page 24.302.1 of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER
Conference Session
College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Deeksha Seth, Drexel University; John Joseph Carr Jr., New Jersey Academy for Aquatic Sciences; Angela D. Wenger, New Jersey Academy for Aquatic Sciences ; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; James Louis Tangorra, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships
focused on family learning. Ms. Wenger is deeply commitment to diversity issues and broadening access to science for underserved audiences. She is also passionate about professional development of youth and staff working in science centers and museums.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Assistant Department Head of Graduate Programs and co-Director of the VT Engineering Com- munication Center (VTECC). She received her PhD in Linguistics from the University of Chicago and a B.A. in English from the University of Georgia. Her research interests include interdisciplinary collabora- tion, design education
Conference Session
Program and Curriculum Design Initiatives
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victoria Ann Hill, Numeritics
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
Paper ID #10246Lessons in Manufacturing Education for the U.S. from Austria’s Dual-TrackEducation SystemDr. Victoria Ann Hill, Numeritics Dr. Victoria Hill is a Founder and Research Scientist of Numeritics, a research and consulting firm headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA. She was recently a part of a delegation of U.S. experts on Advanced Manufacturing and the STEM Talent Pipeline that traveled to Vienna, Austria as a part of the George C. Marshall Foundation’s efforts to increase cooperation between the U.S. and Austria in the area of Advanced Manufacturing. Dr. Hill has worked on STEM talent issues for many years, and recently
Conference Session
Interactive Panel on Advocacy Tips: an Initiative to Provide Individuals the Tools to Advocate for Women and Underrepresented Minorities
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Kristen P. Constant, Iowa State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sandra D. Eksioglu, Mississippi State University; Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
 and  engineers  are  electing  to  pursue  careers   elsewhere.  The  timing  of  the  tenure  clock  is  especially  difficult  for  young   families  and,  as  research  has  shown,  is  even  more  challenging  for  women   faculty.    The  exclusion  of  potential  faculty  who  place  high  value  work-­‐life   balance  is  not  only  a  loss  to  the  functioning  of  the  academy,  but  also  is   damaging  to  the  students  who  do  not  see  role  models  among  the  faculty  that   they  would  like  to  (or  even  feel  they  can)  emulate.     Panelist  5:  I  think  the  biggest  challenge  that  we  have  in  creating  gender   equity  in  STEM  is  that,  at  every  level
Conference Session
Socio-cultural Elements of Learning through Service
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
requirements (their history, political agendas, desires, forms of knowledge, etc.) is fully understood. (p. 125)18So how do basic and contextual listening relate to each of four design strategies? Listening indesign for technology may be constrained. For instance, in one of our research interviews, aformer graduate student and current faculty member stated that his undergraduate educationand early industry experience taught him that, in design contexts, he needed to “listen to thespec.” By that, he meant that he needed to listen to the specifications that were implicit orexplicit in the client’s explanation of the problem and desired solution. That trained his ear tobe a basic listener and to consciously filter out information that did not