are discussedThe “Science of Team Science (SciTS)” is emerging as a research area to explore how large-scale research (initiated in the medical research context) endeavors can be best accomplishedacross multiple institutions and potentially hundreds of colleagues 1–3. The Science of TeamScience literature has high value in studying collaborations in engineering and particularly theways in which students learn to become collaborative members of their research teams. SciTSfindings have only recently been introduced in an engineering and graduate engineering studenteducational context 3. Most of these studies promote competency- or logistical- bases forsuccess: that by having the right conditions for success, all teams will be able to be
international student with no proficiency in the primary language ofinstruction, and more students from the graduate level. The proportions of female studentsthroughout the three years are about the same.Method Qualitative research seeks to derive meanings and insights from unstructured data.During the process of analysis, researchers examine raw data sentence-by-sentence andassign nodes to each data unit according to the nature of the content. Nodes with similarnatures are subsequently grouped together in order to formulate concepts and then categories,which may serve as the basis of new theory.1 The data for this paper were derived from transcripts of all the collective meetings anddiscussions among the teachers throughout the three years. In
three main themes: local drug delivery, endothelial dysfunction in diabetes, and cooperative DNA diagnostics. Recent awards include the Jeanette Wilkins Award for the best basic science paper at the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Dr. Caplan teaches several classes including Biotransport Phenomena, Biomedical Product Design and Development II (alpha prototyping of a blood glucose meter), and co-teaches Biomedical Capstone De- sign. Dr. Caplan also conducts educational research to assess the effectiveness of interactive learning strategies in large classes (˜150 students). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Promoting career reflection among freshman biomedical engineering
the reasons for their preferences, and 64% (124) of the students whoresponded did so with written comments.Of those who preferred the board format, 70% (57) of commenters indicated that the work at theboard improved collaboration among group members. Most of these simply gave very briefcomments such as “more collaborative” or “easier to work together.” The next common responsewas given by 21% of respondents, who noted that the board work made it easier for all to see thework and follow along. Here are a few of the more articulate responses explaining the boardpreference, which capture sentiments expressed by many students in this group: Working on the board seemed to get everyone more involved as we could all follow along step by
enumerates numerous additional reasons that engineers may not use physicallibraries, ranging from the practical (having to travel some distance compared to the convenienceof remotely accessing online resources) to the psychological (the phenomenon of libraryanxiety).21-27 To overcome this, the scholarly record reflects numerous innovative efforts bySTEM liaison librarians to reach these hermetic students and researchers. Previous initiativesrecorded in the literature include reorganizing staffing at service points to provide subjectspecialists with more time for advanced research questions,28 revamping libraries’ web presenceto make subject specialists more visible,29 launching satellite reference services within academicbuildings,30-32 creating
majors, and the development of spatial reasoning abilities for engineering students. Bell has worked at Michigan State University since 1995. His work focused on the development of K-12 teacher abilities to use technology for teaching and learning. His recent research has focused on distance learning and collaboration through telepresence. One key aspect of this work is the study of embodied content for learning and collaboration. Embodied content includes collaborative textual environments as well as augmented/mixed reality. Other research includes idea-centered teaching and learning.Mr. Timothy J. Hinds, Michigan State University TIMOTHY J. HINDS is the Academic Director of the Michigan State University College of
documentation. In addition, technology can also be a learning tool for team members topractice communication in a “virtual teamwork” context to help better prepare them forengineering practice in industry or research settings (Anagnos, Lyman-Holt & Brophy, 2015). The focus of this study was to explore how teams of engineering students used GoogleDocs to support their collaborative work flow during the initial stages of requirements finding,ideation, research and analysis of potential design options. Students’ familiarity with the tool andGoogle Docs’ built-in affordances for knowledge management made it a practical solution forsupporting complex interaction patterns among team members. Research question that guided theexploration of Google
interactions [9].Research from Handley, Lang and Erdman (2016) investigated the perspectives of on-campusrecruiters who were looking for leadership among engineering students in their final year ofstudies [10]. They found that recruiters were seeking students who had been involved inactivities outside the classroom and had the ability to articulate the learning gained from theseexperiences. The three engineering leadership themes they identified were communication (self-awareness), connection (big picture thinking) and confidence [10]. 2These studies are valuable because they shed light on employer perspectives of desiredleadership qualities and
Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni- versity. Her primary research interests relate to the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, cognitive development of graduate and undergraduate students, and global engineering. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University in 2013.Ms. Tianyi Zheng, Shanghai Jiao Tong University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Exploration of Female Engineering Students’ Functional Roles in the Context of First-year Engineering CoursesAbstract: Engineering profession has been regarded as a male-dominant field becauseof the low representation of females. With an aim to understand female engineeringstudent’s
with thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They
of engineering practice and education, Beddoes and colleagues applied twoof the BNA categories, inclusion and compilation artifacts, to explore cross-disciplinaryteamwork among graduate engineering students, post-docs, and faculty19,27. That studyhighlighted the value of employing BNAs as a theoretical construct for describing how teammembers collaborated and provided a foundation for exploring the creation and evolution ofBNAs and BSOs within engineering practice. Still, additional research is necessary to understandthe extent to which cross-disciplinary teams within engineering utilize artifacts to supportcommunication and how that practice can support the development of engineering students.In particular, studies of artifacts used on
focuses on student problem-solving pro- cesses and use of worked examples, change models and evidence-based teaching practices in engineering curricula, and the role of non-cognitive and affective factors in student academic outcomes and overall success.Mr. Gireesh Guruprasad, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Gireesh Guruprasad is a graduate student at Purdue University. As part of his research, he explores factors that affect the Professional Formation of Engineers, based on students beliefs and preferences and the beliefs of the faculty who teach them. Gireesh obtained his Bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering and is currently pursuing his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics
2014 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin- guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 8 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 59 journal articles, and 133 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 21 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 38 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 400 K-12 teachers and 100 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows
Paper ID #18746Engineering Leadership in a Chinese Industrial Context: An Exploration us-ing the Four Capabilities ModelDr. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni- versity. Her primary research interests relate to the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, cognitive development of graduate and undergraduate students, and global engineering. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University in 2013.Miss Hu Yu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yu Hu is a graduate student at the
Paper ID #18238Making the Invisible Visible: Exploring Cultural Differences of Faculty Work-ing on a Multicultural TeamMs. Sevinj Iskandarova, James Madison University Sevinj Iskandarova is a Ph.D. student at James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA. She re- ceived her MS.Ed. in Adult Education/Human Resource Development from James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA in May 2016. Her main research interests include Human-Computer Interface, Information Technology, International Education, Leadership, Learner-centered Education and Multicul- tural Education. In 2016, she was awarded a prize for Outstanding Thesis
, J.S. (2014) Data First: building scientific reasoning in AP chemistry via the concept development approach, J. Chem Ed., http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed500027gAlice Chow, Rice University Alice Chow is an Associate Director for Research and Grants for the Rice University Office of STEM Engagement. She conducts research in K-12 STEM education on topics such as impact of teacher profes- sional development programs on student achievement and attitudes.Dr. Carrie Obenland, Rice University Dr. Obenland is the Assistant Director for Outreach and Research at the Rice Office of STEM Engage- ment. She as her PhD in Chemistry from Rice University, as well as her Masters. Her graduate work was focused on chemical
thinking, problemsolving, and critical thinking.7MethodsResearch DesignThis study involved twenty-five students from one class, adopting pre-tests, mid-tests andpost-tests in a single-sample experimental design. The research instruments, analyticalmethods and administration times are listed in Table 1. The independent variable wasinstructional strategy with two multidisciplinary PBL projects: an Underpass Flooding project(Project 1; P1) adopting a competitive approach to PBL and a Floating Garden project (Project2; P2) emphasizing interdependence and collaboration. Both projects addressed real-worldand local problems occurring in very close proximity to the living environment of the students.Projects were completed in teams for both PBL approaches
Paper ID #18145Work in Progress: Quantifying the Differences Between Professional ExpertEngineers and Engineering Students Designing: Empirical Foundations forImproved Engineering EducationDr. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University, Center for Engineering Education Research Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design
, he was a graduate student at the University of New Hampshire, where he earned his BS and MS degrees in electrical engineering.Thomas G. Westfall, Virginia Tech I am an environmental engineering graduate student researching water quality issues in urban streams and rivers. I am specifically interested in developing methods using real-time environmental data for stakeholders in the urban community.Mr. James Edward TaylorMs. Serena Lise Emanuel, Virginia Tech Ms. Serena Lise Emanuel is a Biological Systems Engineering student in her third year at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia. Focusing on watershed management and protection, she has explored water resources in Hangzhou, China and Dublin, Ireland through
), suggesting a complex anddynamic interaction between context and learner that shapes the emergence of relevant affective andmotivational processes related to learning and knowledge construction in engineering education. Theunderlying stability of student affect/ motivation and engagement, the environmental factors thatcontribute to its dynamic change over time, and the meaningful levels of analysis and time frames ofstudy are all points of leverage for future research. Evaluation and assessment. The establishment of faculty collaborative networks for research andteaching (Madhavan, et al., 2011) and the diffusion of educational innovations among engineeringeducation faculty (Borrego, et al., 2010) possess underlying network structures that
science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educators in an easily accessible and compelling form:that of an online forum student usage model. Recent work in engineering education providesprecedent for the use of personas to communicate research findings [10-12]. Moreover, incommunicating our findings using personas with contextualized scenarios that describe how thepersonas choose to actively engage (or not engage) with the online forum, we anticipate (a)improved transfer of contextual findings to a broad audience of STEM education stakeholdersand (b) heightened motivation and confidence among STEM educators toward implementingonline forums in order to increase participation of diverse, nontraditional undergraduates.Prior Use of
, Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education.20. Grandy, J. (1994). Gender and ethnic differences among science and engineering majors: Experiences, achievements, and expectations. (RR-94-30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.21. Morozov, A., Kilgore, D., Yasuhara, K., & Atman, C. (2008). Same courses, different outcomes? Variations in confidence, experience, and preparation in engineering design. Paper presented at the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA. https://peer.asee.org/348622. Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_423. Center
graduate students. If we areto preach teamwork to our students, we had better train young faculty in teamwork,and leadership skills necessary for success. Although we would continue to witnessfaculty who can research and publish on their own; but, at the very least the lonewolves will have to learn to travel in more collaborative packs. Having more trainedfaculty in team-based, collaborative research will bolster the pool of potential groupleaders, department heads, and future administrators, when the need arises.Institutional RoleColleges of engineering would excel at teaching and learning when the majority oftheir faculty develop and achieve a reasonable level of pedagogical knowledge, and atthe same time, are able to enrich the learning process
. Sanger, the visiting professor from the Purdue University, USA3,the graduate students proposed a rather surprising idea for their project: To help foreignstudents at the university faster and easier adapt to the new environment. In KNRTU, a specialattention is paid to solving the issues of academic mobility4,5, the number of foreign studentsfrom near and far abroad increases every year (over two thousand people from 63 countriesare studying here), which is another specific feature of the national research university. At thesame time, adaptation to the new socio-cultural environment is one of the main issues thatboth the university and the foreign students themselves face, since this determines the successof their learning activities to a large
students’ behavior and…to draw reasonable inferences about what studentsknow” (p. 833)2. This information consequently informs instructors and other stakeholders ininstructional processes.A key element of these analyses are the underlying patterns or groupings in the data whichresearchers hope are informative. Using methods such as analysis of variance (ANOVA), t tests,or tests of invariance, these groupings are explicated by the researcher and are known a priori.However, cluster analysis, a method for identifying those groupings which are close togethersolely from the data provided, may prove useful in augmenting instructor and stakeholderunderstanding of student characteristics. “Cluster analysis is the organization of a collection ofpatterns
in Engineering Education, August 2017, at Purdue University under the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program. Within his graduate work, Justin plans to explore low socioeconomic high school students’ mathematics experiences and the affect they have on their choice of pursuing post-secondary engineering education.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem
aprevalent source of evidence used to characterize engineering practice, including in studiesfocused on the experiences of early career engineers. Representative examples include: Korte’sstudy of organizational socialization among early career engineers based on interviews withnewly hired engineers and select managers6; research by Brunhaver et al. on gaps betweenengineering education and practice based on interviews with engineering students and newlyhired engineers7; and research by Trevelyan and Tilli that aimed to identify the specific kinds ofwork activities performed by recent engineering graduates in Australia.8Yet commentators have noted some of the limitations associated with interview data. Stevens etal., for instance, point out that
Paper ID #17882Ascertaining the Impact of P:12 Engineering Education Initiatives: StudentImpact through Teacher ImpactDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder Marissa Forbes is a research associate in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the Univer- sity of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach advanced placement and algebra-based physics for the Denver
responsibility to find and arrange work experiencesrests with the student. Acceptable work experiences were described to students and industryemployers as “construction related work experience under a licensed general contractor orsimilarly organized entity.” Detailed criteria on the type of work that would satisfy the 500 hoursexperience requirement had not been widely communicated. Since job functions andresponsibilities assigned to student interns varied greatly among construction employers,program educators found it necessary to evaluate the students’ work experiences for verificationof the graduation requirement and to assess if duties were preparing students for management-related employment.The program recently initiated a more streamlined review
multi-cultural and multi-disciplinary settingthat provides the basis for robust and sustainable solutions. In this proceeding, we present ourobservations, challenges, and learnings garnered over eight years of hosting the summer schooland detail the current program design, which has evolved to reflect lessons learned.1. The ProgramThe US-Denmark research and education program, funded for the first three years by the DanishAgency for Science, Technology and Innovation and the following five years by US-NSF PIRE,is a cooperative and collaborative partnership between two US universities: Universities ofCalifornia, Santa Cruz and Davis (UCSC, UC Davis), and two Danish universities: AalborgUniversity (AAU) and the Technical University of Denmark