Paper ID #16862Leading Team Learning: Reflections of a Teaching AssistantMr. Brian E Faulkner, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Brian Faulkner is a graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. His interests include teaching of modeling, engineering mathematics, textbook design, and engineering epistemology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Leading team learning: Reflections of a Teaching Assistant Abstract Active learning models have been propagating through engineering education. As this process occurs, many graduate students must lead new forms
Paper ID #17149Assessing Student Understanding of Reflection in Engineering EducationDr. Kristine R. Csavina, Arizona State University Dr. Kristine Csavina is Clinical Assistant Professor in the The Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University, where she is the Associate Director for Engineering Program Innovation. Currently she is the instructor for the senior capstone design experience and active in program improvement for the engineering programs. She is Co-PI on on the CPREE grant; both PIs are active in expanding the practice of reflection in classrooms across the
opportunities for undergraduates to engage in K-12 education and outreach. At both Duke University and the University of Washington, Dr. Hendricks has developed and taught summer camp curricula for middle school and high school students.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT) Ken Yasuhara is a research scientist at the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a campus lead for the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), and an instructional consultant in the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching & Learning (ET&L) at the Uni- versity of Washington. He completed an A.B. in computer science at Dartmouth College and a Ph.D. in computer
Paper ID #16795Mirror Mirror: Reflection and the Building of MindsetsProf. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Dr. Joseph (Joe) Tranquillo is an Associate Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Biomed- ical Engineering, He is also co-director of the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management, co-director of the KEEN Winter Interdisciplinary Design Program, and chair of the Biomedical Engineer- ing Division of ASEE. Tranquillo has published three undergraduate textbooks and numerous engineering education publications, and has presented internationally on engineering and education. His work has
Paper ID #17468Developing Engineering Leaders Using a Reflective Autobiographical Exer-cise ˜ Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. David Nino, David Ni˜no, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer in the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, where he has a strong commitment to the development of leadership among undergraduates and graduate students across MIT and among engineers, more broadly. In addition to MIT teaching, he is active in an international consortium of engineering leadership centers and a founding officer of the Engineering Leadership Development Division of the American Society of
RAT.While students generally understand the need for RAT activities and overwhelmingly recognizetheir helpfulness, administering RATs is not without challenges. The most common challengesinclude underlying student resentment, student test anxiety, and the inconvenience of dealingwith student absence or sickness.6 In addition to these evident challenges of RATs, they alsolimit creative ways to retain learning. Methods to hold student’s accountable for their learningreadiness should more fully embrace the diverse ways in which students begin to construct theirunderstanding of course content.This paper presents on an integrated system of readiness assessment, whereby student-generatedpre-lecture Concept Reflections (CRs) are paired with traditional
Paper ID #15487The Charles Sturt University Model - Reflections on Fast-track Implementa-tionProf. Euan Lindsay, Charles Sturt University Professor Euan Lindsay is a Mechatronic engineer, a discipline that integrates computers, electronics and physical hardware. Prof Lindsay’s PhD investigated whether remote and simulated access alternatives to the traditional in-person laboratory experience could provide the same learning outcomes for students. Prof Lindsay’s work in Remote and Virtual laboratory classes has shown that there are significant differ- ences not only in students’ learning outcomes but also in their
Paper ID #16857Work in Progress: Promoting Career Reflection Among Freshman BME Stu-dentsDr. Emma Frow, Arizona State University Emma Frow is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University; she joined ASU in February 2015 with a joint appointment in the School of Biological & Health Systems Engineering and the School for the Future of Innovation in Society. She has graduate training in both the natural and social sciences, with a PhD in biochemistry and an MSc in science & technology studies. Emma is interested in the engineering imagination, particularly in the emerging field of synthetic biology. Over the
Paper ID #17117Tips & Tricks for Successful Implementation of Reflection Activities in Engi-neering EducationDr. Lauren D Thomas, University of WashingtonMania Orand, Human Centered Design and Engineering Mania Orand is a researcher in the field of Human Computer Interaction at the University of Washington. Her research interests are on using reflection in designing web and mobile technologies, user experience, and digital media.Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of WashingtonDr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the
Paper ID #17414Assessing a Scaffolded, Interactive, and Reflective Analysis Framework forDeveloping Ethical Reasoning in Engineering StudentsDr. Lorraine G. Kisselburgh, Purdue University, West Lafayette Lorraine Kisselburgh (Ph.D., Purdue University) examines organizing and communicative practices in sociotechnical contexts, particularly collaboration in engineering design teams, spatial and material in- fluences on organizing, and gendered practices in technological settings. She has backgrounds in com- munication, human performance, and computer science, and over twenty years experience designing and supporting
Paper ID #16805Personal Learning Environments: Analysis of Learning Processes, Reflection,and Identity in an Academic ContextMiss Judith Virginia Gutierrez, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) PhD. Science, Engineering and Technology Education. Postdoctoral Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.Dr. Frida Diaz Barriga, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) The Mexican researcher and teacher Frida D´ıaz Barriga Arceo serves at the Faculty of Psychology of the National Autonomous University of Mexico. Her academic career includes a degree in Psychology, Mas- ter’s degree in Educational
ofinspections in software industry (i.e. to save rework cost, effort, and time), academia should alsoprioritize training students with early quality assurance skills (i.e. inspections) during SDLC.Therefore, this research reports the results from a practical training experience to help studentsimprove their understanding of inspection which in turn, would improve their inspectionperformance. This paper presents results of an academic study on the effect of reflection(training) technique on thirteen graduate and twenty-six undergraduate students on theirinspection performance. The participants individually inspected two different requirementdocuments using fault-checklist method and recorded faults pre and post reflection. We analyzedthe impact of
Paper ID #16801Impromptu Reflection as a Means for Self-Assessment of Design ThinkingSkillsMiss Avneet Hira, Purdue University, West Lafayette Avneet is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests include K-12 education and first year engineering in the light of the engineering design process, and inclusion of digital fabrication labs into classrooms. Her current work at the FACE lab is on the use of classroom Makerspaces for an interest-based framework of engineering design. She is also inter- ested in cross-cultural work in engineering education to promote
Paper ID #15129Prediction and Reflection Activities in a Chemical Engineering Course: Fun-damentals of Heat and Mass TransferDr. Heather C. S. Chenette, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Heather Chenette is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. Her professional interests include enhancing student learning in the classroom and creating op- portunities for students to learn about membrane materials and bioseparation processes through research experiences.Dr. Tony Ribera, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #15817Changing Student Behavior through the Use of Reflective Teaching Practicesin an Introduction to Engineering Course at a Two-Year CollegeMr. Richard Brown Bankhead III, Highline College Richard B Bankhead III is the engineering department coordinator at Highline College. At Highline Colleg,e Richard is committed to developing the behaviors of successful engineering students in transfer students as well as preparing them academically for the challenges of junior level engineering courses. Richard has taught at Highline since 2004 and was awarded the Faculty of the Year Award at Highline Col- lege for the 2009
Paper ID #17376Experience and Reflection on an Industry-College Partnership to Develop aNew Instrumentation and Measurement Laboratory CourseDr. Bob Brennan, University of Calgary Robert W. Brennan has been actively involved in a wide range of national and international design ed- ucation initiatives over the past 12 years. He has served on the Canadian Design Engineering Network (CDEN) steering committee, chaired the organizing committee for the second CDEN conference (2004), chaired the Schulich School of Engineering’s first Engineering Education Summit (2007), served as an or- ganizing committee member for the CIRP
, then talking “engineering education” with faculty developers: A collaborative reflection on working across communities Abstract Over the last several years , the engineering education research community has aimed to disseminate and implement its work in engineering classrooms. Several investigations have explored reasons for and barriers to the adoption of evidencebased practices. Many of these investigations have been housed within STEM Education communities. External avenues, such as the Professional and Organizational Development (POD) network community of faculty developers, represent untapped resources that could enhance these dissemination efforts. Over
, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C. Lucena, will culminate in Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2017).Dr. Barbara M. Moskal, Colorado School of Mines Barbara Moskal is a professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics and the Director of the Trefny Institute for Educational Innovation at the Colorado School of Mines. She is also a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Reflections on the Integration of Social Justice Concepts into an Introductory Control Systems Course (Work in
Paper ID #15016Elementary Teachers’ Reflections on Design Failures and Use of Fail Wordsafter Teaching Engineering for Two Years (Fundamental)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Associate Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple informal settings. As a pre-service teacher educator, she includes
Paper ID #14864Utility of Post-Hoc Audio Reflection to Expose Metacognition and StrategyUse by First-Year Engineering Students for Different Problem TypesMs. Heidi Cian, Clemson University Heidi Cian is a PhD student enrolled in Clemson University’s Curriculum and Instruction program with a concentration in science education. Heidi is a former high school biology and anatomy teacher.Dr. Michelle Cook, Clemson University Michelle Cook is an Associate Professor of Science Education in the Eugene T. Moore School of Educa- tion at Clemson University.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of
education community that is developinglessons and activities specifically designed for K-12 educators [3]. Nanoscale science has beenrecognized as truly interdisciplinary and oftentimes reflects modern science better than thetraditional science disciplines [4]. Previous reports demonstrate that introducing NSE modules ina high school engineering classroom can leave students with positive perceptions aboutnanotechnology [5] and allows students to delve into science content across multiple size scales[6] . Furthermore, just having a firm understanding of what objects look like at the nanoscale canhelp students gain a better understanding of concepts in related scientific fields [7].On the other hand there are challenges in implementing NSE lessons
way to let students knowabout upcoming activities and offer a way to get in touch with us, the mentors. This site is knownas the BSC CyberCenter, and has been entirely designed and developed by the mentors.At this point, the site has grown to include all of these functionalities and more. We continuallyupdate the site to reflect the activities that are coming up soon, and we also use the site as a wayfor students to register for our events. The CyberCenter includes registration/accountfunctionality, so that students who register for the site can receive regular email updates aboutupcoming events and activities. Additionally, members of the site are allowed to register for allof our events before the general registration is opened.In addition
the uncertainty of divergent problems byconstructing multiple problem spaces and then engaging in reflective practice or reflectiveconversation as they interpret and evaluate alternatives. These metacognitive strategies enableengineers to deal with uncertainty by continuously engaging in acts of self-evaluation, self-monitoring and reflection as they work through the engineering design process.10, 13 The use of acollaborative environment has been found to help engineers reduce and manage uncertainty.10, 14Shin and his colleagues14 explain that working in teams allows engineers to reduce ambiguity bydistributing the knowledge and skills and collectively making decisions. The ability to logicallyand persuasively argue for or against a decision
a responsive teaching approach looks like in engineering and how teachers might enter intothis approach. Our study is also intended to highlight some of the challenges that teachers face inresponsive teaching in engineering.In this research study we analyze interviews with six elementary teachers who had at least twoyears of experience with Novel Engineering, an approach to teaching engineering designdeveloped at Tufts University that uses narrative texts as the basis for design problems.14 In thesesemi-structured interviews we discussed the implementation of Novel Engineering in theirclassroom and showed them a short video of some of their students working on the project. Weasked teachers to reflect on these students’ work, drawing on the
theoryduring the special session to support their reflection of their experience towards earning a PhD. Identity-trajectory was also used to help frame the analogy for the special session to support the analysis of theparticipant maps as well. Academic identity-trajectory consists of three major strands: intellectual,network, and institutional3,4. The intellectual strand refers to how a student becomes part of andcontributes to their overall academic field3. In this study, the intellectual element explores the role of theoverall disciplinary field with respect to the PhD process. The institutional strand refers to the morespecific elements of the student’s department or university3. In this study, the institutional elements willbe represented by
reflect the recommended timeframefor curriculum delivery.Data screening was conducted based on recommendations from Tabachnick and Fidell45 formultivariate statistics including: inspecting univariate descriptive statistics, evaluating anddealing with missing data, considering linearity and homoscedasticity, identifying and dealingwith multivariate outliers, and evaluating for multicollinearity. In dealing with missing data,cases were retained for listwise completion at the subscale level because each survey waspresented as its own page. This led to a greater number of students having completed theEngineering Design Self-Efficacy instrument (see Table 1) and a varying number of studentsbeing included in each statistical test. (We have taken care
productively withengineering design practices while using a CAD software in a group setting in a classroomenvironment. Existing research has classified students as mostly beginning designers or informeddesigners. The data collected are reflections written by 10 students in an introductory designcourse, one reflection after working individually in a design of an energy efficient house andanother after working as part of a team on the same problem. The data were analyzed using asconceptual framework the informed design teaching and learning matrix developed by Crismondand Adams. Findings suggest the presence of a continuum consisting of four levels and highlightthe shift in students’ design practices towards higher expertise levels after using the
currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Philosophical Perspective on ABET's Proposed Changes to Criterion 3 and Criterion 5This paper critiques the proposed changes to the ABET criteria through the lens of thephilosophical system outlined in 20th Century Scottish philosopher John Macmurray’s GiffordLectures. Changes to ABET criteria reflect beliefs about the purpose of education, andphilosophy enables a dialog about underlying beliefs and assumptions; thus this analysis isintended to provoke discussion of alternate forms and processes of
hubless bicycleFastCompany.com core77.comASEE - EDI March 30, 2016 What is Innovation? John Morrell Exhibit 2: The Money Maker Pump kickstart.orgASEE - EDI March 30, 2016 What is Innovation? John Morrell Exhibit 3: Segway HTASEE - EDI March 30, 2016 What is Innovation? John Morrell Engineering Innovation DesignASEE - EDI March 30, 2016 What is Innovation? John Morrell Decision Making Reflection Iteration