, 2025Reflective Teaching Practices for Equity-Minded Engineering InstructorsAbstractReflection is often cited as a critical component of effective teaching, but the term itself and itsrelated practices often remain ambiguous. Reflecting on one's teaching is an important exerciseto better understand the approaches to and success towards creating inclusive classrooms.Therefore, engineering educators must become aware of reflective practices to be able to employthem in their work. We explored essential elements of highly effective reflection practices forequity-minded educators in a workshop where faculty participants learned about three reflectivepractices: (i) personal reflection, (ii) reflective engagement with colleagues, and (iii) reflectionwith
Paper ID #45451Construction and Engineering Faculty Internships: A Reflective Case StudyDr. Kenneth Stafford Sands II, Auburn University Kenneth S. Sands II is an Assistant Professor at Auburn University. His research focuses primarily on education and heat safety. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Construction and Engineering Faculty Internships: A Reflective Case StudyAbstractFaculty internships provide construction and engineering educators with a valuable opportunityto engage directly with industry, gaining hands-on experience that enhances their
Paper ID #45182Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students’ Reflections on CombatingSystemic RacismSakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College London and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her current research focuses on
Paper ID #49499Intersection of Design and Society: Student and Faculty Reflection on anInterdisciplinary CourseDr. James K. Nelson Jr. P.E., Texas A&M University System RELLIS Campus Dr. James K. Nelson received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in civil engineering from the University of Houston. During his graduate study, Dr. Nelson specialized in structural engineering. He is a registered professional engineer in three states, a Chartered Engineer in the United Kingdom, and a fellow of the American
certified ABET civil engineering program evaluator and team chair. He is also a sought after national and local media expert on infrastructure resiliency issues. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Session XXXX A Classroom Implementation of Biology and Architectural Lesson Plans - Reflecting Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Decks Using Non-Destructive Evaluation Methods Denise Lopez, M. Ed. Science Department, Carter Riverside HS, Fort Worth ISD
unlike critical pedagogy buton an inward twoness generally and use it to transform their realities. specifically committed to experienced by African Comprised elements are reciprocal collective, not merely individual, Americans. and unidirectional elements of empowerment” (Ladson- reflection and action. Billings, 1995, p. 160). 5Critical Consciousness in Higher EducationThe formal education system reinforces white supremacist
education. Her main goal is to understand how work management and product development practices widely used in industry can be modified and adapted to streamline undergraduate STEM education.Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University Vidya Madana is an undergraduate student in the Department of Computer Science at Purdue University, concentrating on machine intelligence and software engineering. She is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2027. Vidya’s research interests include artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data visualization. In addition to her academic pursuits, she has experience in STEM education, robotics, and journalism, reflecting her broad interests and diverse skill set
education and address NACE career The course focuses on the principles of statics using vectorreadiness competencies. This paper details the classroom setup, calculus, covering key topics such as the resolution andactivity design, and course structure, along with assessment composition of forces, equilibrium of force systems, analysisresults based on semester reflections of forces acting on structures and machines, centroids, dry friction, and moments of inertia. Assessment is based on a Keywords—professionalism; Statics; active learning; teamwork combination of midterm exams, homework assignments, pre
. Notably, a 9% decrease in DFW rates was observed for engineering and science faculty.The faculty program consisted of several hybrid workshops and small-group sessions thatencouraged critical, reflective discussions, development of individual implementation plans, andadministration of a formative feedback survey to undergraduate students three times per semesterto obtain real-time feedback to promote change in the faculty members’ teaching. The facultyand graduate student PD programs were part of a larger institutional initiative to enhance STEMstudent success at the HSI through systemic changes and policies and aimed to improveundergraduate engineering courses with historically high failing and withdrawal rates.Graduate Student PD Program
traditionalengineering curricula, where creative solutions and innovation do not always positively affectacademic performance. Taylor et al. [19] found that while ADHD traits did not predict students’overall GPA, they negatively predicted students’ engineering GPA. Engineering GPA does notreflect creativity, so the strengths students with ADHD have are not reflected in exam scoreseither, further undermining the value ADHDers bring to engineering. The misalignment ofADHD traits and numerical academic assessment in engineering helps illustrate one way thatengineering is less hospitable to ADHDers.Fostering creative problem-solving in engineering curricula remains an important goal.Attracting and retaining neurodiverse engineering students and faculty, including
examines industry alignment, emphasizing how curricula canbe designed to reflect the evolving needs of employers, ensuring graduates are adaptable andcapable of interdisciplinary collaboration. By addressing these focus areas—curriculum design,problem-based learning, assessment methods, and industry alignment—this paper aims to present Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Educationa comprehensive framework for curriculum enhancement. This approach ensures that engineeringstudents not only master technical concepts but also develop the professional
: CRITICAL THINKING, TIME MANAGEMENT, EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION.Skill-Building Workshops: A CloserLook• Icebreaker: Introductions and goal sharing to build community.• Critical Thinking: Activities on questioning assumptions and evaluating evidence.• Time Management: Strategies for prioritization, goal setting, and scheduling.• Effective Communication: Role-playing exercises for clear messaging and active listening.• Reflection: Sharing takeaways and planning for skill application.Fostering a Sense of Belonging• Sharing experiences and challenges in a supportive environment.• "Cultural Exchange" activity
andunderstanding of their own teaching processes [3]. AI, especially in knowledge representation andelicitation, can significantly aid teachers’ metacognitive skills and professional development byenabling detailed, context-specific reflection and adaptive decision-making [3]. Researchers [4]investigate how generative AI, as an advanced innovative tool, can transform engineeringeducation by creating content, enhancing personalized learning, and updating curricula efficiently.Yelamathi et al. (2024) [4] collected data through literature reviews and analysis of AI tools fromengineering fields. They found that generative AI can improve personalized learning andstreamline curriculum updates, enhancing education quality. However, their study [4
Northeastern UniversityAbstract environmental impact and potential for long-term sustainability [10].The "heliostat mindset" emphasizes the harnessing of solar energythrough heliostats—devices designed to track the sun and reflect itslight to specific targets, commonly utilized in concentrated solar Through the heliostat project, students are encouraged topower systems. This mindset is vital for engineering students as it think critically about the intersection of technology and thefosters sustainability awareness
that balances innovation with integrity. This paper encourages faculty toreflect on their responsibilities and the role they play in shaping a future where technologyenhances education without compromising core values. Rethinking the role of AI in highereducation necessitates a reflective and responsible approach to technology use, one that benefitsboth educators and students alike.Contextualizing the Inevitability NarrativeMore often than not, generative AI tools are presented as inevitable technologies. [13] Thisinevitability narrative sometimes sparks resistance or negative categorization. Inevitability doesnot have to be negative, nor does it have to be bifurcated into a binary decision of acceptance orrejection of technology. Neeley and
identity.Dr. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a Professor of STEM education in the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Think-Aloud Insights: Exploring QuantCrit Challenges and Diverse Survey Responses Among Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroductionDiversity in engineering contributes to social and economic advancement in communities byoffering varied perspectives on problems, better reflecting changing demographics, andproviding tangible business advantages. Higher education is vital in
course, ECE students in fall 2023participated in a separate survey in which students were asked to reflect on their writingstrengths and weaknesses, both as individual writers and as collaborative writers working onteam-based Capstone Design assignments. From a population of 69 ECE seniors, 62 responded,and emerging insights are provided in Part II of this paper. The questionnaire used, whichcontained four open-response questions, was not initially conceived to tie back to the researchdescribed in Part I of this paper; however, the data does provide useful context for Part I and thefindings of the original work [1].The goal of this paper is to offer better understanding of how ECE students self-described theirstrengths and weaknesses in solo and
management it is a complete project from concept to • Engagement & Collaboration - Active learning and completion of the planning phase. collaboration are essential components of effective education [8]. Team-based learning by enhancing • Assignment: Reflection recordings – weekly video • What is working well? – that is, achieving learningsubmission 2-3 minutes long submitted before class that objectives as discussed in class?reflects on the lecture topic of the day. • What is not working as well as desired? - not yet achieving learning objectives as discussed in class
programs emphasize distinct areas such as project controls,cost estimation, and construction safety. As a result, CONE graduates face lower pass rates onthe FE Civil Exam compared to their Civil Engineering counterparts.Recognizing the unique competencies required for construction engineers, the NCEESintroduced the Construction Engineering discipline to the Professional Engineer (PE) exams inApril 2008. This change was driven by demand from the construction engineering community tobetter reflect the professional practice and specialized needs of construction engineers. TheConstruction PE Exam emphasizes knowledge areas such as construction management,scheduling, cost estimation, materials, and safety, allowing construction engineers to have amore
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2216561. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.1 Overview of NCWIT’s Philosophy2NCWIT Undergraduate System ModelOrganizational Change Process Communicating for Change Evidence-based tools help establish credibility by explaining a vision ofchange and how it is grounded in theories, best practices, and resources. Creator: https://pixy.org/ | Credit: https://pixy.org/763757/ Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Use Compelling Evidence “[I have met] an incredible
, and working on communication skills [24],[25].As research discussed that undergraduate researchers could engage in their lived experiences formore authentic interpretations of data, we engaged our lived experiences, especially bothundergraduate researchers, through the writing of positionality statements. Positionalitystatements have been a growing phenomenon in engineering education research as part of theefforts to uncover researchers’ preconceived notions that can shape how they conduct theirresearch [26]. By reflecting on their positionalities, Alshanti and Thu as undergraduateresearchers engage their lived experiences as engineering students to interpret instructors’ beliefsand behaviors on test usage. This becomes the foundation of this
Reflection 5 Students present their AI projects and participate in discussions about the ethical implications of their work.The camp was designed to give a diverse group of students a strongfoundation in several topics. The students participated in a workshop onethics and how it can drive decisions and were given resources on how to formdebate positions and how to tell an effective story. The program included acapstone project that was judged by local IT leaders.Day 1 The group was provided an introduction to AI with respected educatorsleaders in the fieldDay 2 The day focused on the creating ethical frameworks. The facilitator leda workshop on ethics and making decisions along ethical lines. The studentsalso learned
year of study (juniors). Specifically, 62.5% of the students wereclassified as juniors, while 25% are sophomores and another 25% are seniors. This distributionsuggests a diverse mix of students at different stages of their undergraduate education, which maycontribute to a broad range of academic perspectives within the program. The program had a higherrepresentation of female participants, with 62.5% identifying as female and 37.5% as male. Thisdistribution indicates successful engagement with female students, potentially reflecting broadertrends in STEM fields and targeted recruitment strategies by the mentors addressing theunderrepresentation of women in these disciplines. Such efforts align with broader initiatives topromote gender
) identified a significant lack of JEDI-relatedcontent in professional engineering societies, underscoring the urgent need to strengtheneducation in these areas to prepare inclusive and socially committed engineers. Armanios et al.(2021) highlighted how a curricular restructuring led to an increase from 17% to 69% in theincorporation of social justice concepts in students' final reflections, demonstrating the ability toinclude the social impact of engineering decisions. Similarly, Hess et al. (2024) emphasized theconnections between ethics and DEI, identifying the need to integrate and unify strategies thatenable engineering students to address both the social and technical aspects of their profession.Finally, Gupta, Talluri and Ghosh (2024
streamline undergraduate STEM education.Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University Vidya Madana is an undergraduate student in the Department of Computer Science at Purdue University, concentrating on machine intelligence and software engineering. She is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2027. Vidya’s research interests include artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data visualization. In addition to her academic pursuits, she has experience in STEM education, robotics, and journalism, reflecting her broad interests and diverse skill set. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Gender Differences in Global Identity Development: Implications for
systems thinking—core componentsof the entrepreneurial mindset. By focusing on these skills, the program aligns with broadereducational goals to prepare students for complex problem-solving in dynamic, real-worldcontexts.Since its inception, the KEEN Fellowship program has grown significantly, drawing participantsfrom various disciplines and institutions nationwide. Fellows undergo professional developmentthrough targeted workshops, such as Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE)and Problem-Solving Studios (PSS), which equip them with pedagogical tools and frameworksthat foster active learning and cross-disciplinary applications. This growth reflects an increasingrecognition of the entrepreneurial mindset as essential for
reinforcement. The flipped model encourages students to take an active role in their learning by requiring them to present a specific topic in the next session. During their presentation, students ex- plain their approach, demonstrate their code, and justify their choices. This role reversal, where students become teachers, is grounded in researches [4–6]suggesting that teaching a concept significantly enhances understanding and motivation. In addition, quizzes are incorporated to maintain a level of productive pressure, ensuring students remain motivated. The combination of flipped learning and quiz practice fosters active participation and reflection, leading to deeper comprehension and long
cultures. Individual feedback sessions on theirdepartment’s Gallup Q12 results provided personalized guidance, promoting reflection onleadership practices.IntroductionA National Science Foundation ADVANCE adaptation award was received by a smallengineering, science, and technology university located in the US Midwest to developprogramming for faculty and research scientists to increase awareness of implicit biases andpromote pathways to faculty success. The university consists of thirteen departments, twelve ofwhich are Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). The university’sadministrative structure does not include Deans, just Department Heads that oversee academicdepartments and report directly to the Provost. As of 2024, there
of the department.Step 2. Forming the Search Committee(s)The Engineering Chair worked to form an appropriate and diverse search committee for eachposition. This diversity is reflected in disciplinary expertise, gender, rank, race, ethnicity, etc.Incredible intentionality was needed in this step with a recognition that inherent and unconsciousbiases may exist with search committees and committee members. If a search committee is allwhite men, the outcome will be the selection of a white man as the top candidate. Research hasshown this time and time again. I ensured that diversity in gender, race, ethnicity, and rankexisted in a search committee. When I was not able to bring enough diversity to the searchcommittee from within the department, I
-MACHINE SYSTEMS COURSE AND ROLE OF AI Along with the assignment write-up, students were asked tooutline the advantages and drawbacks of using AI for such A. HMS Course Profileacademic work. Of the 56 respondents, there were 115 open-ended responses indicating the merits of using Gen AI for this Human-Machine Systems (HMS) is a 5-credit senior-leveltype of project and 121 responses outlining the less effective and engineering course at Northeastern University, with multipleconcerning aspects of its use. The primary categories of positive assignments and laboratory sessions over a 15-week semester.responses reflected how students felt AI benefited them in This course focuses on the science behind safe