data from different industries. Preliminary findings suggested that the content that new engineers learnt includedboth the technical and non-technical aspects. The engineers learned through multiplevenues, including such as learning by themselves and learning from their mentors. Thisstudy will provide practical suggestions for improving engineering education in bothChina and other similar contexts.Introduction Previous studies have indicated that engineering graduates still do not fully reachthe requirement of the industry whether from a global or domestic perspective [1],[2],[3]. Therefore, it has become a challenge for universities to enrich the industrialexperience of engineering students in the process of school education
framework are the blocking factor and the delayfactor. The blocking factor of a course refers to the number of courses inaccessible to a studentwho fails the course in question. The delay factor of a course is the longest prerequisite chainflowing through it. When added together, the two metrics form the course’s cruciality. Ademonstration of the calculation for the blocking factor and delay factor is given in Figure 1. Tocharacterize the overall curriculum's complexity, we can sum the crucialities together to form anaggregate measure called the structural complexity. Previous research has shown that structuralcomplexity correlates well with FTIC student graduation rates [5] but does not for transferstudents [6], suggesting that the current metric
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Reverse Engineering as a Project-Based Learning ToolAbstractAlthough the concept of reverse software engineering is used in many fields, in the context ofsoftware engineering and security, it has come to include fields such as binary code patching,malware analysis, debugging, legacy compatibility, and network protocols analysis, to name afew.[1] Despite its broad use in software engineering, however, there is little work in computerscience education that considers how reverse engineering can be taught effectively.[2] This maybe a result of the compressed timetable of a four-year college education in computer science,where the need for the courses
abilities, interests, and psychological maturity. Male and female stereotypes lead to reverse gender outcomes in STEM fields.IntroductionAlthough women are the minority in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields and degree programs in most countries throughout the world, reversed genderstereotyping is evident in countries such as Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Sweden, and Iran,where women outnumber men in education and STEM fields. In fact, the 2020 report of theNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine states that Kuwaiti femalesexperience no gender-related academic barriers, with females comprising 60%–80% of collegestudents in STEM programs and 81.7% of governmental STEM jobs [1]. Comparatively, 59%of
information for active classroom design.IntroductionActive learning, and spaces purpose-built for active learning pedagogies, are becomingincreasingly prevalent in STEM fields, and engineering in particular. One method to learn moreabout the utilization of active learning pedagogies is to observe teaching and learning in real timeusing a protocol that describes the interaction between pedagogy, space, and technology [1]. Theuse of observation to provide information on teaching practices is a well documented concept[2], [3], [4]. Teaching and Learning Centers have a long history of offering classroomobservations and these are frequently used to provide formative and summative feedback toinstructors, teaching teams, and academic leaders [4]. Classroom
revision of College Algebra topics for Engineering students, but our strategy canbe applied to revise other mathematics topics for any major.Keywords: Online teaching, Phone applications, college algebra, instruction strategies,assessment methodsIntroductionThe unavoidable transition to online education due to COVID-19 pandemic has impactedinstruction at all grades and in all subject areas [1]–[3]. Some of these impacts are expected tofade out when the pandemic is over and normalcy is restored. However, it is also expected thatthere are going to be long term impacts of this online instruction period in higher education.Challenges with this rapid transition to online teaching of mathematics have been discussedextensively worldwide [4]–[8]. Students
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Revolution in CBEE: Connecting the dots between inclusivity and learning1. OverviewSupported by an NSF RED grant, the School of Chemical, Biological, and EnvironmentalEngineering (CBEE) at Oregon State University seeks to create: (1) a culture where everyone inthe CBEE community feels a sense of value and belonging, and (2) a learning environment thatprompts students and faculty to meaningfully relate curricular and co-curricular activities andexperiences to each other and to connect both with professional practice. For brevity, we labelthe first goal “equity and inclusivity” and the second “meaningful
’ effectiveness.IntroductionHaving high-level talent has always played a key role in economic progress. The top performersin the Bloomberg Innovation Index, including Japan, the U.S., and Taiwan [1], have also placedvalue on doctoral education. Japan has revealed its vision to improve career prospects for youngresearchers. The U.S. issued guidelines to support University-Industry Cooperation (UIC). InTaiwan, universities receive funds for research and development (R&D) management.However, cultivation of doctoral-level talents across the country has recently faced severalchallenges, including a downward trend in doctoral student enrollment [2]-[3], a high dropoutrate in doctoral programs [4]-[5], and delayed graduation among the doctoral students [6]-[7].In addition
of bias,increase a sense of agency, and ultimately empower students.1. IntroductionGiven clear evidence of disparities in educational attainment, much importance has been placedon increasing use of inclusive teaching to help close this so-called achievement gap [1]–[4]. Inscience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines, deliberate inclusive practicemay reduce the “leaving” phenomenon where those underrepresented amongst STEM majorssuch as women and minoritized racial groups would otherwise fail to complete their STEMdegree program [5]–[7]. For example, active learning has been shown to improve learning gainsand reduce failure rates especially among underrepresented minority (URM) students [2].Similarly, current recommendations
School – Massachusetts Institute of Technology. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Revolutionizing Transfer: A Novel and Holistic Programmatic Model that Eliminated the Visible and Invisible Barriers to Student SuccessABSTRACTThe Guided Pathways initiative is among many reform efforts that have been implemented byhundreds of community colleges in the country. Four main practice areas are intrinsic of GuidedPathways: 1) mapping pathways to students’ end goals, 2) helping students choose and enter aprogram pathway, 3) keeping students on a path, and 4) ensuring that students are learning.Although this approach is an important step toward successful transfer
that we have a plausiblesolution to the problem and can make evidence-based changes to our curriculum for futureofferings of this course sequence.BackgroundThe Engineering Technologies, Safety, and Construction (ETSC) department at CentralWashington University offers three bachelor’s degree paths for undergraduate students:Electronics Engineering Technology (EET), Industrial Engineering Technology (IET), andMechanical Engineering Technology (MET). These specialized programs provide students witha combination of engineering theory and application-based instruction to prepare graduates forcareers in industry [1]. The department also offers a variety of minors from which students maychoose to enhance their academic careers. After years of
shows that decisions to pursue STEM in later careers are influenced by early exposureduring K-12 education [1]. This early exposure is also useful in understanding connectionsbetween coursework related to mathematics, science, and liberal arts. For example, a pilot studyfound that students who were introduced to neuroscience in the context of health sciencespossessed an increased knowledge and awareness of the growing concerns related to mentalhealth issues [2]. Another study found that students who pursued higher education in STEMreported having an early personal connection to their field through a family member or friendwith a career in STEM [3]. Students who lack such personal connections may also be drawn tothe field by shadowing a
Foundation (NSF), IUCEE Young Leader Award for the year 2015, and IGIP SPEED Young Scientist Award for the year 2014.He previously served as the President of the Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED) and the Vice- President for Student Engagement of the International Federation for Engineering Education Societies (IFEES) where he has led many student-based initiatives to help solve engineering education issues at the local and global level.Prof. Gopalkrishna H. Joshi, KLE Technological University I hold a PhD in Computer Science and Engineering. Areas of research: 1. Data Engineering 2. Engineering Education Research Current position: Professor and Head of Computer Science and Engineering
practice.Background on the ETS-IMPRESS ProgramThe ETS-IMPRESS Program has three major goals to achieve over a five year period. Goal 1:Expand the number and diversity of academically talented and financially disadvantagedindividuals entering the Engineering Technology STEM pipeline; recruit and retain theseindividuals in STEM programs. Goal 2: Add to the body of knowledge regarding best practicesin engineering technology education and promote the employment of engineering technologygraduates. And Goal 3: Contribute to research on self-efficacy and best practices. A first-yearprogress report was previously presented at ASEE [1]. Currently, the project is in the third yearhaving successfully graduated one student who is employed in a STEM field of study
EngineersIntroductionThis paper describes progress to date on a five-year National Science Foundation S-STEMproject entitled "Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers(CREATE)" being conducted at the University of Nevada, Reno, a large western land-grantuniversity. The objectives of CREATE are: (1) To implement a scholarship program built onevidence-based curricular and co-curricular best practices that supports low-income,academically talented students with demonstrated financial need through successful programcompletion; (2) To conduct a mixed-methods research study of the effect of the implementedevidence-based practices on the self-efficacy and engineering identity of the cohorts to contributeto the existing knowledge base on
three-dimensional blocks [6]. The dynamic support provided by the adults were designed to extend thechildren’s ability to assist them in completing the task [1]. As such, the intervention was a methodthat provided a certain level of assistance that helped the children develop the individual problem-solving abilities, knowledge, and skills [7].Though Bruner and his colleagues first coined the term, theoretical foundations of scaffolding canbe found in the seminal work conducted by Lev Vygotsky [5]. Vygotsky posited that learning isprimarily a social endeavor which are influenced by cultural factors and is greatly aided by theassistance of a more knowledgeable other or capable peer [5]. Davis and Miyake reported in 2004that the more knowledgeable
Engineering at Ohio State University, teaching First- Year Engineering for Honors classes in the Department of Engineering Education. Brooke earned her bachelor’s degree and master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at Ohio State. Her interests include implementing and assessing evidence-based practices in the first-year engineering classroom. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Scaffolding Technical Writing within a First-Year Engineering Lab ExperienceIntroductionAlthough the education of engineers has been an ever-changing process that has developed overtime based on the needs of society [1], in more recent years the
a communication skills course specificallyfor engineering students, the course helps satisfy the frequent calls for engineers to obtain morerobust training in communication, a call that is frequently cited in engineering research andrequired by accreditation standards. Many studies have pointed to the importance of communication skill for engineers [1-9],but at the same time, many other studies have pointed to a gap in the preparation of engineers topresent their work. For instance, at Ohio State University, a survey of 2,100 engineering alumni[1] ranked the importance of communicating orally as 4.30 (out of 5) but rated their preparationin the skills as only 3.26. Likewise, respondents in a survey of 243 electrical engineers [3
numbers of designers and engineers. Manufacturingeducation is developing digital solutions to scale and meet the growing need. Massive OpenOnline Courses (MOOCs) on platforms such as edX, Coursera, and Udacity disseminateknowledge at scale to upskill the global lifelong learner, and have reached enrollments of over100 million [1]-[3]. Online programs such as MicroBachelors, MicroMasters, or the onlineMasters lead to academia-recognized credentials. Industry-driven training models are alsogrowing to meet the demand for increasing workforce competency. In addition towell-established industry online learning platforms such as ToolingU or NMTA-U, largemanufacturing technology firms such as Rockwell Automation and FANUC are collaboratingwith community
College Engineering Scholars, Award #1833999) at FresnoCity College (FCC) is inYear 2 of the five-yearproject intended to Key Year 1 Findings from Student Surveysincrease persistence of 100% felt more motivated to complete their degreeengineering students along 89% felt more motivated to transfer to a 4-year institutionpathways to transfer and 89% felt they gained tools to be more successful in their degreegraduation from four-year programsuniversities. The first year 80 – 100% found various seminars on engineering andcoincided with the onset of engineering research to be useful or very usefulthe COVID-19 pandemicwhich brought unexpected 57% found the seminars on college finances and
degree in environmental or civilengineering. The course introduces the three pillars of “science diplomacy” as describedin the New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy report published in 2010 by the Royal Societyand the American Association for the Advancement of Science, including: 1) science-in-diplomacy; 2) diplomacy-for-science; and 3) science-for-diplomacy. During the semester,students conduct policy analyses of case studies including: 1) the Lower Mekong RiverInitiative of the United States; 2) the Antarctic Treaty as described by the RoyalGeographical Society; 3) the Make the Planet Great Again campaign of France; and 4)HIV/AIDS treatment in South Africa as described by Harvard Law School. Each policyanalysis follows Bardach’s eightfold path
addition, she served on National Academy of Sciences Committees on Foundations of Educational and Psychological Assessment and Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress. She earned a PhD in Educational Psychology from UC Santa Barbara. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Self-Reflection of Engineering Majors in General Chemistry IIIntroductionResearch has demonstrated that active and collaborative instruction coupled with various meansto encourage student engagement can lead to better student learning outcomes irrespective of majoror academic discipline [1], [2]. A key strategy for improving student learning is to prompt
. IntroductionHackers use a variety of skills to compromise systems in order to steal money, change data, ordestroy information. Cyberattacks pose serious threats and cause significant damage to privatecompanies and government agencies. For example, Yahoo suffered the biggest data breaches ofthe 21st century, in which one billion users’ accounts were comprised in 2013 and 2014 [1].Another example can be found from the City of Atlanta, Georgia. In March 2018, nearly all oftheir systems in the government of Jackson County, Georgia were locked and hacked by aransomware attack. The hack was the largest successful security breach of a major American cityby ransomware, which affected up to approximately 6 million people [2].Cyberattacks also target academic
specific personality traits toacademic success of students (e.g., [1-6]). Based on a review of the literature, personalityquestions were drawn from components of the Big Five personality inventory [7], which is oneof the most well-regarded instruments for this purpose. An advantage of the Big Five inventorycompared to assessments like the Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator [8], is that the Big Fiveinventory places individuals on a continuum of personality traits rather than in distinctcategories. Personality components included in the Big Five inventory include Extraversion,Agreeableness, Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, and Neuroticism. Of these, thosethat have been most commonly linked to student success (particularly for engineering
engineering degree studies. Extensive surveys ofthe current practices related to senior projects, as well as of engineering teaching through seniorprojects are available in the literature [1, 2]. For their senior projects, students apply thebackground and skills accumulated through coursework in researching a problem, for whichthen a solution is investigated, designed and implemented. A significant part of the knowledgeand skills needed for the projects are straightforward learning from the actual courses taken inthe program, but often new skills are needed, specific to the project topic selected, and studentsneed to apply their learning skills in researching a new subject, or getting familiar with a newpiece of hardware or software platform
shift, many faculty lacked online teachingtraining and experience, and “97 percent of institutions moving classes online had to call onfaculty with no previous online teaching experience” [1]. Prior to COVID-19, only 60% ofuniversity chief online officers said faculty were required to have some formal training prior toteaching online [2]. Faculty teaching in undergraduate engineering programs were tasked withhandling large class sizes, strict pre-requisite requirements, and heavy technical content as theyconverted their courses to online formats. In addition, many engineering programs were alsostruggling with issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly of student populationsunderrepresented in STEM fields, a challenge that would be
bubble saw companies investing heavily in thisnew medium for games. Today, the video gaming industry is worth closer to $150 billion USD ofyearly revenue, with well established practices, trends and new genres [1]. Furthermore, videogames have delivered a wide variety of experiences, from interactive story telling, open worldexploration, social games, puzzle games, virtual reality games, mobile games and so on.The present paper seeks to provide a direct comparison of trends in the video gaming industry, andhow it could be translated to Serious Games in Engineering Education. To this aim, 28 relevantstudies which have reported games for teaching engineering courses within the past decade wereinvestigated. These studies were obtained after
American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Service Learning Through a Course on RoboticsIntroduction Getting young people especially from the under-represented and minority communitiesinterested in science and technology has always been a challenge that educators have faced andresponded through various measures. The need for STEM education initiatives particularly inlow-income and underperforming school districts has been well documented. In 2018-2019,only 52.6% of Bridgeport public schools students met or exceeded the standards set by theState of Connecticut’s Smarter Balanced Assessment [1] in Mathematics, which means that47.4% of students are performing below grade level
well theexisting teaching and learning model applied to the vastly different environment of online versusin-person education. This inspired the faculty to a thorough examination of the living document.During the subsequent fall term, formal faculty discussions about the model were facilitated.Topics from these discussions were grouped as follows: (1) aspects of the model that can beapplied unchanged in the online environment, (2) aspects of the model that are difficult orimpossible to apply in the online environment, and (3) ideas that need to be included in themodel to support the online environment. The discussions included topics unrelated to the onlineenvironment, highlighting important aspects of the model that deserve additional