the key to successfully cultivatingOutstanding Engineers, and puts forward the implementation principles of being under theguidance of industry, strengthening school-enterprise cooperation, considering the differentclassifications of colleges and universities, and promoting with various models, whichrequires colleges and universities to integrate the school-enterprise relationship, and shiftfrom the paradigm of “on-campus cultivating” to the paradigm of “open school-enterprisecooperation training”.Therefore, an in-depth study of school-enterprise joint training of the Outstanding EngineersPlan will broaden the depth and breadth of the Outstanding Engineers Plan educationresearch at the theoretical level, improve the quality of the Outstanding
a mechatronics project. This paper shares the development of an introductorylaboratory curriculum that teaches mechanical engineering students to gain fluency in electronicsand software with system-level demonstration to be a valuable employer of mechatronics. Whenwe talk about systems, we use the NASA Systems Engineering handbook definition as “aconstruct or collection of different elements that together produce results not obtainable by theelements alone.” This is the mindset we want students to carry throughout the mechatronicscurriculum. To focus on the practical applications of mechatronics, we developed a labcurriculum that cultivates system-level thinking around the build and integration of ahypothetical NASA Mars rover project
industry drives an increasingly diverse populationin terms of majors, interests, and experiences towards introductory and advanced courses (Foster, et al., 2018;Erdil, et al., 2019). A thoughtfully-designed survey course can balance the needs of various subgroups andrealize the potential to influence students’ attitudes and beliefs, develop career intentions, and teach coreconcepts.A first-year integrated college curriculum has been a common practice across many engineering and sciencedisciplines for years (Cordes, et al., 1997; Bazylak & Wild, 2007). In these approaches for common curriculumdesign, all those first-year students admitted to programs of study in engineering, technology, applied sciencesand other related fields are offered
, Montana State University Dr. Nicholas Lux has is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education. His teaching and research interests are in the area of educational technology. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for 18 years, and currently teaches in the Montana State University Teacher Education Program. He has experience in educational technology theory and practice in K-12 contexts and teacher education, with a focus on STEM teaching and learning, technology integration, online course design and delivery, program evaluation, and assessment. Dr. Lux’s current research agenda is STEM teaching and learning in K-12 contexts, technology integration in teacher
curriculum and inadequatetraining of teachers.” A faculty member wrote, “We have a hard-enough time to teachfundamentals in our disciplines. I am concerned we may not have enough time to incorporate AIappropriately.” How to integrate AI into school settings and the curriculum is a concern. Onefaculty stated that it is “haphazard at the high school level, while overly focused on machinelearning in our universities.” Another offered more specifics by sharing “there is not enoughfocus on problem formation and epistemology.” Student preparedness for AI is an ongoingdilemma and is due to issues such as the “lack of sufficient mathematical education (foundation)to understand AI algorithms.” For faculty, there is some concern about “attempts to
to train an artificial intelligence (AI)model, replacing human observers to allow real-time measurement of many to all studentssimultaneously.An automated system was developed by [22] utilizing eye-gaze tracking collected on eachstudent from which attention and engagement are inferred, which relied on expert humanobservers for validation. The EMS proposed in this paper collects and integrates many morepieces of information to infer emotional, behavioral, and cognitive engagements and reportsthese in both a summarized instructor dashboard and more detailed analysis archived foroffline use.2.1 Previous Work on Classifying Emotion from Facial Expres- sionPrevious work supports the ability to select facial features from an image of the
Paper ID #30727¿Por qu´e no los dos? The Importance of Translanguaging in BridgingLanguage, Literacy, and EngineeringDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His research has contributed to the integration of critical theoretical frame- works and Chicano Cultural Studies to investigate and analyze existing deficit models in engineering education. Dr. Mejia’s work also examines how asset-based models impact the validation and recognition of students and communities of color as
outreach camps for elementary school students and teachers Large Group drove conversations with the participants about notions - Outreach opportunities for teachers to earn micro credentials Collaboration introduced by the class-wide conversations (5-10 students). - 1-2 day professional developments to help elementary school teachers meet engineering education standards • Class-wide conversations were driven by volunteers with - Week-long professional developments to help K-8 teachers integrate computer science lessons in their curriculum
physics and a PhD in science education. Her research interests include physics/astronomy education, citizen science, and the integration of technology in teaching and learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Mitigating the Fear of Failure in a STEM + Computational Thinking Program for Minority Girls (Work-in-Progress-Diversity)IntroductionThis is a work-in-progress study. The purpose of the paper is to present research on anintervention informed by the first year of the study. We are conducting an after-school program,studying an integrated STEM +Computational Thinking curriculum, in an urban, low-incomeneighborhood. Our program’s broader intention is to influence how
of the importance of engineeringdesign’s integration with society, in our critical review we found it was mostly grand statementsbeing made in the introduction and conclusion, without much real substance in the meat of thepaper. This was most prominent in A4’s paper. The second paragraph mentions the importanceof covering “social issues like the environment” (A4, p.83), and in the conclusion they concludethe students “have shown significant progress in […] developing an appreciation of theengineering involved in creating wealth for society” (A4, p.90). Whereas, during the textualanalysis of the remainder of the paper, there were almost no other codes for society.This is again evident in A1, where the second sentence of the paper states
northeast area of the USA, has been a resident of Fargo, ND since 1996.Dr. Austin James Allard, Turtle Mountain Community College Austin Allard is a Pre-Engineering Instructor at Turtle Mountain Community College. He earned a doc- torate degree in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University. His work deals with using manufactured drones to map ecological areas. He is dedicated to using engineering solutions to investigate environmen- tal issues close to home.Teri Ann AlleryAnn Vallie, Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish CollegeDr. Bradley Bowen, Virginia Tech Bradley Bowen is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the School of Education’s Integrative STEM Education program. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia
NRP guidelines, detailing the requirements, were streamlined to be less than twelve pagescompared to the 20+ page documents of their predecessors.10 For student chapters, an advisor is either a faculty member or university administrator.11 The NAC provides up to 31 different awards to chapters based on their NRP performance across the student andprofessional chapters annually.12 Up to three different chapter awards for NRP v.3. 11 Figure 1. NRP v.3’s chapter activity in the SHPE annual cycle.2.3.2 Chapter v.3 Ecosystem Integration In addition to chapter ecosystem integration within the NRP v.3 report
curriculum.IntroductionSince 2006 the popularity of computational thinking (CT) - skills for solving problems byadopting the theoretical concepts of computer science - has been increasing substantially,leading to an increase in the amount of research and experiments on the CT method. Yet,there are limited numbers of inquiry investigate approaches to incorporated CT into acurriculum. Betül Czerkawski researched ways to integrate CT across all curriculum, throughsurveying instructional CT designers. She constructed the survey using the ADDIEinstructional design model. One of her findings showed that the Mind Map(s) (MM) strategycan establish a better connection between CT and instructional design [1]; however, verylittle research existed to investigate the correlation
experience in the industryenvironment. Successful integration of workplace and education is expected to result inincreased focus, interest, and success for all our students [7]. These experiences are alsoexpected to positively affect course curriculum and teaching effectiveness through increasedfeedback by students and industry [7].The MET and SM curricula are rigorous, as both programs are math and physics intensive andare considered STEM programs. Both of them require courses such as (but not limited to)algebra, calculus, chemistry, physics, probability and statistics, industrial hygiene, human factorsand ergonomics, fire protection systems, system safety analysis, hazardous materialmanagement, introduction to solid modeling, applies statics
, e.g., capstone projects.However, students would benefit from, and are interested in, integrating holistic educationthroughout the curriculum. Moreover, university engineering programs that are accredited byABET are required to meet these objectives. In their recent redevelopment of the student outcomescriteria, ABET [1], [2] identified seven primary outcomes for students. Of these, items two andfour focus on holistic engineering, emphasizing global cultural, social, environmental, andeconomic factors.To address all of the critical aspects of engineering projects, students must successfully analyze therequirements, synthesize information, and evaluate several design options for a given problem.These cognitive skills match well with Bloom’s
reluctant to respond to questions asked in class and itis hard to tell whether it was due to fear of failure or some other force.Key Words:Classroom Response Technology, Top Hat, measuring effectiveness, assessment, andevaluation of learning.1. Background There has been research related to integrating technology into the pedagogy ofdifficult subjects like Integral Calculus [1]. Other research gathered student’s opinionsabout the implementation of Classroom Response Systems in university lectures [2]. Thefindings of the Procedia research showed that students gave an overall positiveevaluation of the Classroom Response System (CRS). It also identified CRS’s asenhancers of attention, participation, classroom dynamics, and learning. In 2016
growing importance of ROS in research and commercial robotics, engineeringeducators are introducing ROS into the engineering curriculum [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. As canbe noted from the literature, ROS is powerful technology but has a steep learning curve, whichmakes the interface with MATLAB an attractive alternative for educators. Several educatorshave reported results integrating MATLAB Robotics Toolkit with ROS middleware for mobilerobotics [8], [9]. to improve student accessibility. One researcher has surveyed 75 roboticseducational programs (undergraduate and graduate) and indicated MATLAB is the mostcommonly used software language in robotics programs [10]. It was also reported in the samestudy that there was a general need for a low
Paper ID #28644Assessing an Assessment: A Case Study of the NSSE ’Experiences withInformation Literacy’ ModuleMs. Debbie Morrow, Grand Valley State University Debbie Morrow currently serves as Liaison Librarian to the School of Engineering and the other units within the Padnos College of Engineering & Computing at Grand Valley State University, to the Math- ematics, Statistics, and Physics departments, and to the Honors College at GVSU. In that position her primary role is to support students in courses in her liaison areas both in and outside of their classrooms. Helping students make connections between information
transportation.Dr. Salman Ahsan, San Jose State University Currently Salman Ahsan is an educator and mentor to young people he teaches part-time at San Jose State and Seattle University. He is also working on a services company that specializes in the artificial intelli- gence and machine learning space. In the past he worked in the semiconductor industry, in companies like Linear Technology (now Analog Devices Inc) and Maxim Integrated. Salman studied at the University of Pennsylvania (B.S.E), Princeton University (Ph.D) and University of California at Berkeley (M.B.A).Mr. Eric Wertz, self/EduShields Eric Wertz is a software engineer most recently involved in embedded systems and education. He has been a volunteer educator
research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014 and the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effec- tiveness and Educational
offerings, 7 years, 4 instructors, and about 1,500students, we have had no significant issues with the chat.5.5 LabsLabs are run by the TA similarly to lecture for the first 20-30 minutes. Then students can workon their weekly programming assignments and use the chat to ask the TA or classmatesquestions.Both lecture and lab sessions are recorded, such that students who miss a session can see whatwas missed, and students can also go back and review.5.6 IntegrationIn 2014, we switched from the previous commercial homework system to a new systemintegrated in the interactive learning content created by zyBooks. Furthermore, in 2016, weswitched from our homegrown program auto-grader to an auto-grader integrated into thatinteractive learning content
, Gainesville. She did post-doctoral work with the USDA in Peoria, IL as a biochemist in soy- bean oligosaccharides before joining Central State University in 1989. Dr. Lowell maintains a research program in directed energy to kill weeds as an integrated pest management strategy. She mentors un- dergraduate students in funded research projects who have gone on to present at local, state and national conferences.Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Central State University Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Professor of Geography, GIS, and Remote Sensing at the Department of Water Re- sources Management (WRM) at Central State University. Dr. Wei received her bachelor degree from Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping and her doctoral degree from
College of Engineering (CoE) graduation rates for 2015 at our Hispanic ServingInstitution revealed to be 73% for students from households with income above $50,000/year, and54% from households with income below $7,500/year. Similar trends were also noticed in retentionand persistence rates indicating higher attrition among students from lower income families. Thisprogram aims to increase these statistics among LIATS by integrating elements from Lent’s et al.Social Cognitive Career Theory [1] [2] and Tinto’s Departure Model [3][4] in conjunction with ascholarship program. The final objective is to establish an intervention model to be furtherinstitutionalized in the CoE, if proven to be effective [5][6]. In this program we have includedtools to
Paper ID #29152Year 3 of an S-STEM Summer Scholarship for a Sophomore Bridge ProgramDr. Katie Evans, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Katie Evans is the Associate Dean of Strategic Initiatives in the College of Engineering and Science, Academic Director of Mathematics and Statistics and Online Programs, the Entergy LP and L/NOPSI #3 and #4 Professor of Mathematics, the Director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center, and the Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering and Louisiana Tech University. Dr. Evans also serves as the Chair of the National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges Scholars Pro
programs becomeeligible for graduate assistantship funding as soon as their graduate career level is activated.Since research is a major component in R1 institution’s mission, such early career opportunitiesare vital to student’s success as this fosters the exposure to research at an early stage, whichfurther hones and develops students’ professional and technical skills. The 4+1 program couldfoster an effective educational paradigm by integrating undergraduates to collaborate and workwith graduate students to enhance their technical and professional skills [7].Background and MotivationSTEM Education in the U.S. has undergone drastic changes over the past years due to concernsrelating to the quality of education being offered to prepare the next
the rolesthey play within engineering as a discipline, with their peers, and within engineering classrooms[13]. Women must author their individual engineering identities that will relate to the groupidentity of an engineer [13]. Educational experiences within the classroom have the potential tofoster agency through participation in engineering and directly influence a woman’s pursuit ofengineering both at secondary and post-secondary levels [8]. Development of this identity willrequire active participation in engineering curriculum and social integration into engineeringacademic communities [13].Social Cognitive Career Theory Social cognitive career theory (SCCT) was developed originally to connect anindividual’s career development
and adapted by other instructors, and integrated intotheir own courses and/or GCSP, to reach an even broader audience.The on-ground version of this course uses a lot of active learning techniques and is discussion-based, incorporating activities such as mind mapping, debates, role-play-based simulation,design challenges, and case studies, to help students explore and understand the interdisciplinarynature of the complex global challenges. Additional detail on the on-ground version of the coursecan be found in [2]. This high level of in-person, active learning posed the biggest challenge totranslate to the MOOC. Therefore, in addition to reaping the benefit of modularization forportability, there was also a strong focus and intent on making
young children computational thinking by modeling playground environments. She seeks to expand her experience by volunteering and helping to facilitate STEM workshops.Mr. Salah Alfailakawi, Kansas State University Salah Alfailakawi is a PhD student in Educational Technology (ET) Graduate Programs at Kansas State University’s College of Education. His areas of interest include social/cultural issues in ET, the impact of ET on learners and teachers, as well as practice and change management. He earned his master’s degree in practice and theory in interdisciplinary studies from Montana State University Billings. He has been an a teacher of English as a foreign language since 2006 and a head teacher since 2012 (6th-9th
(Burke & Stets, 2009). Identity theorists advocate that an understanding of PIDprocesses lead to targeted policies and programs that improve students’ persistence into variousprofessions. PID is the process by which students come to think, act, and feel like professionals(Cruess et al., 2015). It is the successful integration of personal attributes and professionaltraining in the context of a professional community. It is an ongoing process of interpretation andre-interpretation of experiences which allow the strengthening and maturing of an individualthrough a series of processes of professional education and experiences (Beijaard, 2004; Kerby,1991; Kogan, 2000). Multiple factors within and outside the educational and
content.Unlike the majority of the engineering curriculum, professional ethics is neither calculation- nordesign-intensive. Covering this content through traditional lecturing and text-based readingassignments often fails to fully motivate this generation of tech-savvy students to learn to theirfull potential. Improvements to course design and content delivery can improve studentengagement [5-9]. These strategies include developing interactive course activities [6],incorporating multimedia resources [7-9], and integrating practical experiences into the deliveryof the course content [9]. Specifically, recent papers have suggested incorporating a multi-modalapproach to teach ethics using popular media [10].Bearing this in mind, a short ethics module was