built environment.Prof. Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor and one of the founding faculty members of integrated engineering at the University of San Diego. He is passionate about creating engaging experiences for his students. His work is primarily focused on two ar ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Whiteness in STEM/Engineering: The Problematic Nature of Meritocracy and Colorblindness Abstract Research in engineering education has taken a deficit-oriented perspective by focusing onthe dearth of People of Color (POC) in engineering as a supply issue, also more commonlyreferred to as a
engineering,and environmental engineers. This article includes details of the module. In particular, studentsare invited to answer an open ended questions, “how much would you pay to watch a perfectsunset?”, and the results of student responses are used as part of teaching. The results of studentresponse before and after a lecture module show a clear trend away from extreme answers of“everything” (i.e., a sunset is priceless) and “nothing” (i.e., a sunset is free), and towards a betterunderstanding of public value and an answer that reflects “some dollar amount,” which is createdfrom the sum of the values expressed by each individual. A subsequent lecture module introducesstudents to the concept of full-cost accounting as a way to integrate
Paper ID #41210Data-Science Perceptions: A Textual Analysis of Reddit Posts from Non-ComputingEngineersMr. Nicolas Leger, Florida International University Nicolas L´eger is currently an engineering and computing education Ph.D. student in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University. He earned a B.S. in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from the University of Maryland at College Park in May 2021 and began his Ph.D. studies the following fall semester. His research interests center on numerical and computational methods in STEM education and in
career mentoring is the key to setting students up for a smoothtransfer experience. The APEX faculty in the School of Engineering have implemented aproactive faculty mentoring initiative aimed at supporting students who may transfer from anumber of our local 2-year colleges. APEX Faculty members visit classes at nearby communitycolleges to connect directly with students. Over the past two years - these visits have taken theform of both on-campus as well as virtual visits via Zoom/Teams. The APEX faculty mentorsprovide an overview of the undergraduate engineering programs, the various student focusedsupport structures, the transfer process, financial aid and scholarships. More importantly, facultyhighlight the benefits of expressing an interest
StructureUpon completion of this course, students will be able to: ● Explain the role of engineering in society, articulating the importance of a mindset that values diverse perspectives and experiences, and ensures equitable access and participation in all aspects of engineering education, design and practice. ● Apply design thinking principles and decision-making skills to evaluate personal, academic, and professional interests; make decisions; and create a planned academic path in the College of Engineering. ● Describe different career opportunities associated with a variety of the engineering disciplines offered within the College of Engineering. ● Begin to develop an engineering identity by identifying personal
, but certain aspects have been built and implemented. Allengineering students are automatically added to the platform; whether they actively participate ornot is up to the individual. Students who choose to participate log in with their universitycredentials and answer a survey that helps personalize tips, email messages, etc. They are thenprovided with the list of competencies and asked to list their top three to these three questions: ● What areas are most exciting to you personally? ● What areas might be most important for your career? ● What are your most important areas for growth?After those questions, students select up to three competencies to focus on (they can changethese at any time if they wish). By selecting three
theincreased financial stability allowed students to explore their academic and career interests, studymore individually and in study-groups, and devote themselves to their engineering education byregularly meeting with faculty and staff outside the classroom.Scholarships offset rising gas prices for commuters and allow other students to live close tocampus. Students worked fewer hours (often 10 to 20 hours a week) compared to working full-time in community college. Students spent this additional time on campus and pursuedinternships and career opportunities in their field of study. In effect, S-STEM scholarshipsenabled students to treat their engineering education as a job, rather than having to work outsideof school to pay for their education.Our
program’s location began with an existing collaboration at thefaculty member’s previous home institution, and it made sense to retain this location not onlybecause the faculty member is now exceedingly familiar with the city and has plenty of helpfulcontacts there but also because the larger Munich area has a robust bioengineering industry andacademic presence (e.g., Biogen GmbH, the Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering), whichproves useful for participating students’ degree work and future career plans. Morefundamentally, the addition of an international experience to a communication culture centeredon the idea of professional personae also made sense since expanding students’ culturalawareness (especially as this relates to engineering work
a betterunderstanding of engineering research (Figure 3).Figure 3. FCC Scholar Ratings of the Personal/Academic Outcomes of Faculty Mentoring (n = 6)As part of the ESP, scholars had the opportunity to mentor students in subsequent cohorts. CohortA served as peer mentors for Cohort B in year 2, while Cohort B students provided peer mentorsupport to Cohort C in year 3, and during the fourth year students in Cohort C provided mentoringto students in Cohort D. An Engineering Scholar faculty team member provided peer mentors withtraining, during which they learned about effective mentoring, received guidelines on their role,and received resources to support them as peer mentors. The faculty team supported mentorsthroughout the academic year
) review.Data CollectionData collection went through three key phases. First, 26 copies of FYS instructor syllabi werecollected and coded for basic information and key components (see details in Instruments sectionbelow); at the same time, orienting conversations were carried out with both COE FYS facultyand faculty undergraduate program coordinators. Second, integrating insights of the preliminaryresults from these data and previous survey results, an updated survey was developed anddistributed to faculty, students, and administrative policymakers. Third, further follow-up focusgroups and individual interviews were conducted to explore participants’ feelings, both about thepresent FYS model and potential alternative FYS models that the COE at Penn
linearproblems. “So, what we have here is a two-dimensional integer program, [it is] two dimensional because we have X one and X two, two decision variables, and an integer because of this constraint that we have here…in fact, we also have that they are positive integers. And so, what we did here is we said, “Ok, so it’s a maximization problem, so we’re going to try and solve it using the techniques that we know how to use, and the problems that we know how to solve are linear problems.” (Optimization and Data Analytics subfield, IE faculty)A final example of how “Foundational Technical Knowledge” appeared across all required IEcourses was observed in a course taken by IE students nearing graduation. In this
on global experiences for undergraduate students has increased.Institutions and educators have worked to create more opportunities for international collaborationfor students. One is Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL), a pedagogical methodthat allows for a deepened global engagement for students without international travel. The COILmethod connects students and faculty from different countries to explore a subject, theme, issue,or idea through a project-based learning (PBL) experience. COIL presents many opportunities forvirtual engagement to solve the lack of student mobility, as emphasized throughout the pandemic.Our university has expanded on COIL by offering full-semester COIL courses with an optionalpost-course short
institutions towards anincreased diversity of environments and ideas. The UVA course was directed to graduate levelstudents in engineering, and the HU course was for undergraduate engineering students. Initially,4 seminars were shared between the two courses covering Professional Engineering Code ofEthics, Corporate Ethics, Quality and Compliance, Intellectual Property, and Climate Ethics 9. Inthe subsequent year, the collaboration expanded with the goal to further relationships betweenfaculty and students that could lead to other forms of collaboration, including joint researchprojects, opportunities for graduate study and other mutual benefits. The current collaborationresulted in an internal grant from UVA to support one-day in-person student
students to iden7fy and pursue individualized design learning, structured via an itera7ve prototyping and tes7ng process; an IDS serving DE students only. 4. Design for a Globalized World: A systems thinking and design course exploring global interdependencies surrounding social and environmental systems as they intersect with engineered solu7ons; an IDS serving DE students only. 5. Design and Modeling of Integrated Systems: A systems modeling course that enables students to characterize and formalize component rela7onships to inform design in response to complex sociotechnical systems; an IDS serving DE students only. 6. Design Engineering Applica7ons: A career-focused dis7lla7on of DE-student
Paper ID #43909Methodologies for Evaluating the Impact of STEM Outreach on HistoricallyMarginalized Groups in Engineering: a Systematic Literature Review (Other,Diversity)Jessica Nhu Tran, University of British Columbia Jessica Tran is an oncoming graduate student pursing a master’s degree in engineering education at the University of British Columbia (UBC). They are interested in exploring justice-oriented pedagogies and praxis, decolonization, and EDI (equity, diversity, and inclusion) within engineering education spaces, particularly within K-12 STEM outreach.Jessica Wolf, University of British Columbia Jessica Wolf is a
. In order to break down thefaculty/staff/student barrier, each student finds professors and staff members whose interests alignwith their passions. Experienced entrepreneurs, serving as “Entrepreneurs or Innovators InResidence” to the college play a key role, enabling fellows to see the links between their academicpursuits and their entrepreneurial passions. This personal coaching has been extremely effectiveover the first three years of the fellowship program, kick-starting students into high levels ofengagement and ownership in charting their path. Students also meet with entrepreneurial peerleaders (typically junior or senior level undergraduate fellows) regularly to help navigate collegelife.During the winter interim, fellows start an
, Godfrey [9] cites many studies andpapers that describe and examine how engineering education culture contributes to resistance tochange in engineering programs with respect to: ● the participation of women (Dryburgh, 1999; Hacker, 1983; Lewis et al., 1998; Tonso, 1996b) ● culture as gendered (Cronin and Roger, 1999; Lewis et al., 1998; Tonso, 1996b) ● culture as an agent in student attrition (Courter, Millar and Lyons, 1998) ● student engagement and enculturation (Ambrose, 1998; Lattuca, Terenzini &Volkwein, 2006) ● the development of engineering identity (Dryburgh, 1999; Stevens et al., 2008; Tonso, 2006) ● faculty cultures (McKenna, Hutchinson, and Trautvetter, 2008) ● campus cultures (Tonso, 2006
) and Centers(offering co- or extra-curricular activities) [6]–[8]. Particularly noteworthy is the growth overthe last 20 years in the number of programs and centers and the growth in faculty support andinvolvement in such Programs and Centers [9].Efforts to integrate entrepreneurial skills into existing engineering courses have been notable.For instance, Schar et al. [10] introduced a series of case studies in an introductory mechanicscourse, under the label of Scenario Based Learning. These case studies challenged students toapply their mechanics-based analysis skills to support product decisions involving businesselements. Woodcock et al. [11] explored how an engineering capstone design course couldhelp students learn entrepreneurial skills
1. Briefly, the centerpiece of the program is our quarterly Success inSTEM seminar, which students take every quarter for their first two years at University ofWashington Tacoma. Through these weekly sessions, students connect with each other and withtheir faculty cohort mentor, learning to support each other through challenging times,developing a growth mindset towards their academic journey, understanding barriers that leadto equity gaps in STEM such as stereotype threat and imposter syndrome, and building a senseof belonging and self-efficacy. The seminar allows participants to explore co-curricularopportunities (e.g., student clubs), campus resources such as disability services and financial aidoffices, and career preparation, while
engineering students’ competencies for responding to ethical predicaments.SEAF draws on both conflict resolution process design methods and on elements of layeringderived from the Empowered Self Defense pedagogy. It introduces additional scenario-buildingand response-planning strategies that can enhance the stepwise rehearsal experience of thelearner, and therefore their sense of self-efficacy in applying the GVV framework. The proposedinnovation incorporates two additional elements: concentric circles of engagement and stepwiserehearsal of interactions. Concentric circles of engagement involve different centers of focus anddegrees of involvement of others in the learner’s process of ethical decision-making and action,which expand from an internal
timeline that reflects theresearcher’s tenure at the university. At this level, faculty members can tailor meaningful projectsfor researchers over a set period. The last and broadest level of participation is short-termengagement through undergraduate and graduate courses. For short-term engagement, studentsparticipate in community-based class projects for one semester or can take elective courses thatoffer community-based research. With short-term engagement, students apply concepts ofcommunity-based research. This participatory approach serves as an opportunity for students toconduct research and advance into mid-term engagement opportunities (Figure 1). These levels ofengagement provide a more diverse audience that is engaged in community-based
aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor and a B.S.E. in civil engineering from Case Western Reserve University, both in the areas of structural engineering and solid mechanics.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom
Science, New York University) Elizabeth Hervias (Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology) Maryom Rahman (Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology) Amina Anowara (Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Princeton University)B. Mentor PoolThe research projects performed by the undergraduate students during the summer REU will be within theareas of diagnosis, therapy, and mechanistic modeling of cancer systems. To further this intellectualcuriosity and the innovation spirit, the chosen faculty members are renowned, including multiple NSFawardees (2 NSF Career Award winners). The faculty members have a diverse intellectual focus in cancer,from diagnostic devices, machine learning, and mechanism to therapeutic
Paper ID #42146A Game-Based Learning Method to Promote Soft Skills in Construction EducationRaissa Seichi Marchiori, The University of Alabama Raissa Seichi Marchiori is currently a Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) and a Ph.D. student in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Raissa obtained her bachelor’s degree and an MBA in Civil Engineering in Brazil. Her research topic is in the construction engineering area. Her research interests include implementing Building Information Modeling on construction sites, safety training, workforce development, and
Educational and Career Decision Making.” ACT Research Report Series, 2015 (3). ACT, Inc., 2014[3] A. Sithole, E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D.M. Mupinga, B.K. . Bucklein, and J. Kibirige. “ Student Attraction, Persistence and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges”. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), pp.46-59, 2017[4] E. R. Kurban, and A. F. Cabrera. “Building readiness and intention towards STEM fields of study: using HSLS: 09 and SEM to examine this complex process among high school students”. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(4), pp.620, 2020.[5] K.G. Ricks, J.A. Richardson, H.P. Stern, R. P. Taylor, and R. A. Taylor. “ An Engineering Learning Community to Promote Retention and
factor. This framework has been usedacross STEM education to describe what it means to take on the role of being a particular type ofperson and has been linked to several important outcomes including continuation in engineeringpathways [5], [41], [46], academic performance [47], [48], and choosing engineering careers [49],[50], [51]. Recognition is an important aspect of engineering role identity [42], [43]. Recognitionincludes both a self-recognition and other-recognition aspect of being the kind of person who cando engineering work. These beliefs shape the internal dialogue that students have about themselvesin the role of an engineer. Students’ recognition beliefs do not develop from interactions withinsignificant contacts but are
Dr. Vongkulluksn is an Assistant Professor in the Educational Psychology program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. Her research examines student engagement as situated in specific learning contexts. She specializes in cognitive engagement in STEM learning, particularly in technology-integrated learning environments and for traditionally underserved students.Mei Yang, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dr. Mei Yang is a full professor and the graduate coordinator at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Her research interests include computer
Emily Macdonald-Roach is an MASc student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering identity formation, engineering culture, and equity, diversity, and inclusion in engineering career paths.Ms. Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto Saskia van Beers (she/her) is a MASc. student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She holds a BASc in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on understanding how Canadian engineers reflect on the impact that their social location has had on their career.Sasha-Ann Eleanor Nixon, University of Toronto ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Why would
focused on creating stronger partnerships between faculty and staff at a 2 yearand 4 year institution supporting engineering transfer students found that faculty and mentors played amajor influence on students’ decision to choose an engineering major [25]. Students also reported on thechallenges that they faced finding detailed and locally relevant information on engineering careerpathways outside the classroom environment and several of them were struggling with issues related toengineering identity development and sense of belonging. Furthermore, students articulated that whatdrew them to engineering was their desire to develop their quantitative and critical thinking skills, andtheir love of innovation and design, all of which are closely
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Sustainability in Higher Education: Curricular Review and Opportunities for Future DevelopmentAbstractRose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT) is renowned for its commitment to providing thefinest undergraduate education in science, engineering, and mathematics. With a missiondedicated to support students in an individualized learning experience, RHIT strives to be aglobal leader of engineering and science education. In line with its vision, the institution aims toproduce graduates who are not only inspired and prepared for success but also equipped toaddress the complex challenges facing our global society. We have comprehensively exploredRHIT's sustainability