groups to uncover their own thought and biases before discussing difficult orcontroversial topics surrounding engineering innovation with the class as a whole. While thecourse is taught specifically with engineering design in mind, the course has attracted studentsfrom varying majors which has fostered collaboration and creativity in idea generation. Thecombination of critical thinking methodology with innovation concepts has led students to notonly expand their knowledge of potential applications of engineering, but has lead severalstudents to initiate communication with faculty members regarding their ideas for researchopportunities, innovation competitions, and initiated their own projects via applying forUniversity Innovation Fellows
Paper ID #22908Curious About Student Curiosity: Implications of Pedagogical Approach forStudents’ MindsetDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based
Paper ID #22015Investigating the Effects of Mechanical Vibrations on Oryza Sativa: An In-terdisciplinary Summer Undergraduate Research ExperienceDr. Dennis O’Connor, California State University, Chico Dennis M. O’Connor California State University, Chico Chico, CA 95929-0789 dmoconnor@csuchico.edu Professional Preparation B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Au- gust 2004 M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, May 2007 Ph.D. Engineering Science, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, May 2014 Academic Appointments Lab Manager, Southern Illinois University
about the problem and thus may not fulfill others’ need to a satisfactory level.The importance of incorporating customers in students’ training has been mentioned by a fewauthors [3-5].Fig. 1 The KEEN pyramid depicting the attributes of an entrepreneurially-minded engineer [1]In addition to an entrepreneurial mindset, engineers have increased need for interculturalcommunication competence. Both academic programs and professional environments areglobalized spaces [6] where intercultural communication competence is a necessary skill foradvancement. Effective intercultural communication requires an understanding of culture thatmoves beyond mere translation of language and into understandings of the cultural backgroundsof potential customers [7
) not persist throughand research studies (Cunningham & Kelly, 2017) as an In order to develop an understanding for participants’ failure?essential skill, or habit of mind, that successful engineers experiences in high school engineering and how theypossess. However, when looking at societal views and the actively make meaning of what it is to experience designgeneralized school view of the word “failure,” there tends to failure, I will be using a multiple case study design (Yin,be negative connotations and teachers typically associate 2012) that utilizes participant observations, open-endedfailure with academic expectations or abilities (Lottero- interviews and student
public I should always keep an open mind and consider different groups. A sentence from the lecture that resonated with me and I wrote down was ‘If we don’t design for everyone - not everyone benefits from engineering.’” “These lectures and quiz sections have been my favorite so far in this class. Learning about how extreme the lack of diversity in the STEM field is was stunning to me… I had never considered that social biases could be reflected in science, a topic which I took for cold hard facts.” Comments on weaknesses and areas for improvement: Feeling that [university] generally is very biased in one direction can be intimidating. I don’t disagree with a more liberal perspective, but it makes it hard to even discuss other
Paper ID #22107Peer Mentoring of Undergraduate Women in Engineering as a Mechanismfor Leadership DevelopmentMs. Kristin E. Sherwood, Stony Brook University Kristin E. Sherwood is a doctoral student in Science Education at the Stony Brook University. She is focusing her research on the representation of women in engineering and other STEM related fields.Dr. Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of Physics and the Associate Director of the Science Education Program at Stony Brook University, New York. She attended La Salle University, Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania, where she
Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. His current research interests are engineering edu- cation, software engineering, and developing innovative entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. He was chosen as one of the five outstanding engineering educators by
correlated to Innovation Self Efficacy andEntrepreneurial Learning Experiences. Finally, we draw practical implications of these relationshipsfor Entrepreneurship and Engineering Education, while at the same time keeping in mind that youcannot just “make” someone an Entrepreneur or change his or her personality. This paper is anexplorative starting point that results in various findings that suggest future research. We recommendfocusing on the three personality traits that showed significant results. 1. IntroductionSome of the biggest economic success stories were written by people who had an idea andfounded their own company. An example would be Sergey Brin and Larry Page who foundedGoogle in 1998. Today, the company employs over 72,000 people
lunch recipients from diverse ethnic backgrounds (51% Hispanic, 17%Black, 13% White, 4% Native American, and 16% Multi-racial) that were transported by busfrom their respective schools daily. The student-mentors, likewise, reflected the demographics ofthe students with 40% Hispanic, 44% Black, 13% White, and 6% Asian. And while the campersconsisted of only males, there were three female student mentors. The student-mentors receiveda two-day training prior to the beginning of the camp in order to familiarize them with thecurriculum. The curriculum consisted of engineering habits of mind, design thinking, 3-D designand printing, and foundations in computing. The student-mentors themselves majored in variousengineering fields, computer science
Paper ID #21942A Mixed-methods Study of Non-text Social Media Content as a Window intoAfrican-American Youth STEM IdentitiesDonna Auguste, University of Colorado, Boulder Donna Auguste is a Ph.D candidate in the interdisciplinary ATLAS Institute, College of Engineering and Applied Science. Her research engages intergenerational learners of color with STEM through sensor- based experiences that are personally meaningful, providing an opportunity to assess impact of such ex- periences on STEM identities. She examines modern expressions of STEM identities in social media. She earned a M.S. in Information Technology
andreally just enjoy the process”“Working with a group of women who all had different levels of experience with each build fromweek to week was the most impacting for me. Every week, we would all combine our individualknowledge and experience to work together and complete the build as a team, which was themost rewarding to me.”“The aspect of flexibility made the biggest impact on me because it allowed the group membersto realize how we can do anything that we set our mind to. If we wanted to do a side project, andthe resources were there, we would just go for it.”“Seeing successful women in engineering. From the third and fourth year engineering students,to Dr. Dickrell herself, everyone in the group was someone I felt comfortable asking for help
Paper ID #22229Community: Voices from a Small CohortMiss Monica Lauren Singer, AmeriCorps VISTA Monica Singer is an AmeriCorps VISTA (Volunteer in Service to America) supporting diversity and inclu- sion initiatives within engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. There she received her Bachelor’s degree in Psychology with minors in Gender, Race, Culture, Science & Technol- ogy and Child Development. She is currently a research assistant in the Advancing Cultural Change lab on campus studying students’ experiences of bias in STEM. Her research interests include masculinity, STEM
Paper ID #21515Student-created Canvases as a Way to Inform Decision-making in a CapstoneDesign SequenceProf. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Dr. Joseph (Joe) Tranquillo is an Associate Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Biomed- ical Engineering, He is also co-director of the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management, co-director of the KEEN Winter Interdisciplinary Design Program, and chair of the Biomedical Engineer- ing Division of ASEE. Tranquillo has published three undergraduate textbooks and numerous engineering education publications, and has presented internationally on
Paper ID #21305Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical WritingDr. Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University PhD. in Mechanical Engineering, Wash- ington State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018“Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing”. Hani S Saad Associate Professor of ME/MET Eastern Washington UniversityAbstractTeaching technical writing to engineering students is a challenging task
Paper ID #21252’Is Someone in Your Family an Entrepreneur?’: Examining the Influence ofFamily Role Models on Students’ Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy and its Varia-tion Across GenderDr. Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan Prateek Shekhar is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Michigan. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research into practice and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of
Paper ID #24273Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset on Funding Opportunities forFundamental ResearchSamarth Gupta, Purdue UniversityDr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. ©American Society for Engineering
students inSTEM fields, including those who changed majors within the STEM fields or out of the STEMfields, using anonymous surveys with a focus on gaining insight into why some female studentsleave STEM fields (particularly engineering). Data will be analyzed for recurring themes amongthe students in their experiences both positive and negative (e.g., moments they thought theywanted to quit, experiences that caused them to feel they could or could not achieve a STEMdegree, what changed their mind about staying, or what event caused them to switch to adifferent field). Though this research the authors’ hope to gain insight into why some femalestudents leave STEM fields and others stay. The goal of this paper is to correlate experiences ofthe
engineeringeducation. It is a theory of learning founded on the premise that the reflection of our experienceswill construct our own understanding of future knowledge, much like the purposeful, deliberate,and systematic nature of engineering, which requires reflection on past knowledge to constructfuture creations. There are several guiding principles of constructivism30,41,47,63,74:1. Understanding comes from interactions with the environment. A learner’s knowledge comes from his/her pre-existing knowledge and experience, and new knowledge is formed when connecting previous experience to the new content and environment.2. Conflict in the mind or puzzlement is the stimulus for learning and determines the organization and
’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 233–243, 2005.[8] M. N. A. Bousaba and N. Carolina, “Promoting Entrepreneurial Skills through Senior Design Projects Promoting Entrepreneurial Skills through Senior Design Projects at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte,” 2014.[9] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E. Brawner, and T. K. I. Miller, “The effect of an entrepreneurship program on GPA and retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2004.[10] S. Fredholm et al., “Designing an Engineering Entrepreneurship Curriculum for Olin College,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2002.[11] L. Hirshfield, A. Huang-Saad, and J. Libarkin, “Mapping Engineering
Paper ID #21627Analyzing Popularity of Software Testing Careers in CanadaDr. Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University Dr Pradeep Waychal is a visiting professor at the CRICPE of Western Michigan University, a founder trustee of Guruji Education Foundation that provides holistic support to the higher education of under- privileged students, and an academic adviser to many Indian educational institutes. Earlier, Dr Waychal has worked at Patni Computer Systems for 20 years in various positions including the head of innovations, NMIMS as the director Shirpur campus, and at College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the
Education atPurdue University, and Director of CATME. His day-long workshop was a demonstration of theCATME tools and an introduction to some newly deployed tools.The spring 2018 seminars will revisit Entrepreneurially-Minded Learning (EML), and willinclude: • What is the Entrepreneurial Mindset and Why is it so Important for Engineers? o Defining the Entrepreneurial Mindset o Why is the Entrepreneurial Mindset Important to Future Engineers? • Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into Existing Engineering Curriculum o Being intentional about incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into curriculum o ABET Student Outcomes and the Entrepreneurial Mindset • Where Do We Go from Here? o
and develop an entrepreneurial mindset. The streamlined/simpler version at lower cost. The disruptiveauthor’s previous works [4-8] describe the details about the technologies may address their needs. The not-servedFreshman Engineering Discovery courses that have been customers currently are not using the products/services, andrunning for more than ten years at Marquette University – they could become part of market if product/service wereOpus College of Engineering. In those courses, the substantially changed. The disruptive technologies mayentrepreneurially minded learning (EML) pedagogical address their needs.approach has been explicitly adapted and used to foster
Paper ID #22035Visual Literacy in Mechanical Engineering Design: A Practical Approach toAssessment and Methods to Enhance InstructionMs. Caitlin A Keller, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Caitlin Keller is the Instructional Designer for Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Her primary role involves partnering with teaching faculty to create and develop courses in the online, blended, and face-to-face environments. Caitlin serves as the designer, facilitator, and instructional design consultant for the Faculty Institute for Online Teaching program. Caitlin holds a Master of Science degree in Learning Technologies and
for end-users [5]. Understanding end-users in engineering maycontribute to market success, as a majority of innovative breakthrough products involve noveluser interfaces [6]. Further, the established design process guides published by Stanford d.school[7] and IDEO [8] place empathy among the first steps to take when aiming for innovation. As forself-efficacy, it is currently hypothesized that it influences an engineer’s interest and ability tocarry out tasks associated with innovativeness [9], such as open-minded design exploration [10].However, despite educators attempting to teach empathy [11], [12] and innovation self-efficacyto engineering students, there is little understanding as to whether students develop either ofthese mindsets. Thus
statistically significantlyhigher proportion (based on a one-tailed z-test with a p value of 0.025) of students who feltchemistry to be important at the start of the semester used SI during the semester than studentswho did not feel chemistry to be important. Furthermore, as shown in Table 3, among those whoreported chemistry as important at the beginning of the semester, a larger proportion of thosewho used SI reported chemistry remained important at the end of the semester than those whodid not use SI (i.e., students who used SI were less likely to change their minds about thecourse’s importance than those who did not use SI). Together, these findings suggest that theperceived importance of learning a gateway science subject by an engineering student
provided by participation in the program. As one mechanical engineering studentstated, “I am satisfied with my participation in WISE. I have support and friendship of womenwho are both in my major and going through similar situations…it is sometimes hard to be awoman and stand up for things in male dominated classes.” This camaraderie from peers andadvice from upperclassman seemed to help the first-year female students in science andengineering cope with the academic and social stressors within their majors, as reported by ageneral engineering student: I like how the other students in the program are like-minded as me, and understand the struggles/challenges I face not only as a woman in STEM, but simply as a college student. Not
clearly shows that students and teachers havedifferent perceptions; such discrepancy shall be kept in mind when designing STEM-learning projects; and communication towards mutual understanding among students andteachers are often needed for ensuring effective teaching and learning. In general, STEM-Inc students had higher interest and confidence towards engineering thanentrepreneurship, which is understandable since STEM-Inc essentially is a project for STEMlearning; and entrepreneurship has been used as a tool to engage students in STEM learning.However, it is worthwhile noting that activities incorporating both engineering andentrepreneurship (such as the field trip to a fast pitch competition where students presentbusiness ideas with
thinkdifferently about given tasks (Haynie, Shepherd, Mosakowski, & Earley, 2010), and thecognitive strategies which provide them with the ability to rapidly sense, act, and mobilize, evenunder uncertain conditions” (Ireland, Hitt, & Sirmon, 2003) (Wheadon & Duval-Couetil, 2016).Integrating entrepreneurship education into engineering education is therefore is not solelyfocused on the outcome of students’ entrepreneurial endeavors and development of specificbusiness skills and knowledge, but also on developing entrepreneurially minded engineers thatare prepared to identify and solve problems in innovative ways. These students can then utilizetheir entrepreneurial mindset to eventually become an entrepreneur or in other ways such asbecoming an
Paper ID #23135Critical Incidents in Engineering Students’ Development of More Compre-hensive Ways of Experiencing InnovationDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Industrial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, design thinking, and instructional design