collaborators attracted close to $1M research grants to study writing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For the technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for automotive, marine, and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with the focus of fatigue strength im- provement of aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 200 peer-reviewed papers in these areas.Dr. Ken Lulay, University of Portland BSME, University of Portland, 1984 MSME, University of Portland, 1987 PhD
, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for marine and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with a focus on fatigue strength improvement of aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 200 peer-reviewed papers in these areas. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work-in-progress: An Investigation of Engineering Undergraduates’ Writing Transfer from Two First-Year Writing-Intensive Sites to Introductory Engineering LabsAbstractTransfer of learning theory explains how learners can apply their previously acquired knowledgeand skills in a new situation or
activity coding shows that participants were getting adviceon their writing (e.g., grammar and style issues), an opportunity to judge the effectiveness oftheir writing through clarification requests from the colleagues, information necessary toimprove the documents through the genre negotiations and audience discussions, and evensupport for gaining confidence in their writing through the affective interactions. Theclarification codes indicate that participants were encouraged to articulate and explain theirportfolio elements—their peers challenged their conceptions of teaching, wished for evidence toback up the claims in their statements, or were unclear about the terminology used in theirstatements. By doing so, participants would have the
incorporating communication into technical coursesmay be mitigated by the use of peer review; by setting students up in peer review sessions, they canread and comment on the work of others as a means to improving their own communication skills.Many of us who have employed peer review have seen the benefits firsthand.1-5 The process of readingand reviewing the written documents of other students—submitting their own documents to beassessed by other students, reviewing documents that try to fulfill the same assignment they havewritten—has a measurable impact on the student’s own writing. Studies of peer reviewing strategiesconfirm what many of us have seen in our own classrooms. The process for peer review, with fewexceptions, remains the same. Students
ability of scholarship, writing their career goals, and aligning their actions with their goals [12].Similarly, another facilitated peer-mentoring program with women faculty members yielded positiveimpact on academic skills and manuscript writing [14]. Another research involving junior doctors foundthat peer mentoring promotes psychosocial well-being by helping build support structures, building asense of community, and allowing the new interns navigate their professional environment.Related to peer mentoring is the use of accountability partners as a way of generating motivation towardsgoal achievement [17, 18, 19]. Accountability partners are based on the idea that having a peer partnercan influence one’s commitment towards a personal goal
Paper ID #40935Ethics Case Study Project: Broadening STEM Participation by NormalizingImmersion of Diverse Groups in Peer to Near Peer CollaborationsDr. Brian Aufderheide, Hampton University Dr. Brian Aufderheide is Associate Professor in Chemical Engineering at Hampton University. He com- pleted his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His areas of expertise are in advanced control, design, and modeling of biomedical, chemical and biological processes.LaNika M. Barnes, Albemarle County Public Schools (Charlottesville, Virginia) LaNika Barnes, a certified High School Science and Equity Resource
Session 1625 A Peer-to-Peer and Instructor-to-Students Interactive Learning Process in Engineering Design Courses Enhanced by an e-Learning System Masakatsu Matsuishi, Dr. of Engineering Matsuishi@neptune.kanazawa-it.ac.jp Kazuya Takemata, Dr. of Engineering Takemata@ neptune.kanazawa-it.ac.jp Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Ph.D. caitosh@ neptune.kanazawa-it.ac.jp Division of Engineering Design
Practice shaking hands and audience analysis for and audience analysis making a presentation 2 / Oral presentation, visual Practice one minute impromptu presentation; assign aids, assessment criteria topics for the two minute presentation 3 / Two minute presentation Peer assessment (presentation) without visual aids 4 / Two minute presentation Peer assessment (presentation); assign reading without visual aids materials for teaching note writing 5 / Effective reading, Practice writing a summary for teaching notes; peer summarizing, teaching notes assessment (teaching notes); assign students to find writing guidelines reading
christel.heylen@mirw.kuleuven.be 2 Jos Vander Sloten, Faculty of Engineering, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Belgium Technical communication and technical writing are important skills for the daily work- life of every engineer. In the first year engineering program at KU Leuven, a technical writing program is implemented within the project based course ‘Problem Solving and Engineering Design’. The program consists of subsequent cycles of instructions, learning by doing and reflection on received feedback. In addition a peer review assignment, together with an interactive lecture using clicking devices, are incorporated within the assignments of the
) What does writing look like in engineering? • Increase peer and instructor dialogue in feedback [Chong 2012] Theory of situated cognition:* Written, oral, and visual communication exercises: 2) Which skills do engineering students
lack the structured guidanceand technical proficiency necessary for success. While they are often required to write, theirpreparation may be insufficient, hindering their competence and readiness for workforcedevelopment. This pilot study introduces a 9-week intensive course designed to address this gapby providing comprehensive instruction across a range of essential topics. These include goalsetting, topic selection, the research life cycle, ethics and misconduct, AI usage (such asChatGPT), and various writing skills such as illustration, data analysis, citation, and references.A key feature of the course is the opportunity for students to write a state-of-the-art reviewpaper, guiding them through the entire process—from drafting to peer
Neurophysiology from the Aerospace Medical Research Unit (AMRU) at McGill University and is part of the research support staff in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Centre for Intelligent Machines (CIM) at McGill ´Mr. F´elix Langevin Harnois, Ecole de Technologie Sup´erieure ´ Librarian at Ecole de technologie sup´erieure, an engineering school in Montreal, he works on developing information literacy skills for undergraduate and graduate doctoral students. He also works, in collabo- ration with 3 professors and a researcher, on the SARA service which uses peer-support to help graduate students who have to write a thesis, a journal article or who want to develop their scientific
technical writing skills in STEMdisciplines is well documented. Solutions have been proposed, implemented, and inconsistently sustained.One approach to improving disciplinary technical writing is through Writing Assignment Tutor Trainingin STEM (WATTS). WATTS is an interdisciplinary, collaborative approach in which STEM faculty workwith writing centers and generalist peer tutors to provide just-in-time assignment-specific feedback tostudents. WATTS research was funded by an NSF IUSE collaborative grant (award #s 2013467,2013496, & 2013541). In WATTS, the STEM instructor collaborates with the writing center supervisorand prepares materials for the tutor-training including assignment examples, a glossary of terms, areas ofconcern, and the
technical writing program aregraduating, which suggests it is time to formally evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Thispaper focuses on the assessment tools built into the program to provide immediate feedback tostudents. A follow-up paper will capture the longitudinal study that measures writingimprovement in ME students.ResearchProcess approach to writing – In response to feedback from employers and alumni themselves,many technical and business writing programs have adopted a process approach to writingbelieving incremental drafting is best suited to produce high-quality, usable documents for theworkplace. A typical approach might include drafting, peer reviews, instructor feedback via aconference, a visit to the college writing center
enroll in the same required Physiology course, which includeslabs with multiple full scientific writing deliverables, in the Fall 2023 (FA23) semester. NorthCarolina State University’s Institutional Review Board has reviewed and approved theprocedures of this study.The technical writing modules focus on one report section at a time, allowing students to usefeedback to rewrite that section multiple times. For example, when learning about each section ofa scientific report (e.g., Methods), students were provided a handout describing conventions ofthe genre and appropriate writing style. With this information, they wrote an initial draft that wasanonymously reviewed by two peers. After using this feedback to make improvements, studentssubmitted a
gradually increased incomplexity, with students receiving feedback on report structure, grammar/spelling, conciseness,figures/tables, and overall argument through drafting, classroom presentations, peer review, andone-on-one group meetings.In 2016 and 2017, students were given examples of “real world” technical reports and articles asexamples of technical writing, and in 2018 students were only given other students reports (withexamples of A, C, and F work) and encouraged to search articles and reports for additionalexamples.2.3 Study Outline2.3.1 DataThree major data sources were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. 1) Anonymous course evaluation survey data. Course evaluations were conducted every year of the
knowledge of sound conventions[5]. Furthermore, student-centered approaches have been observed to be more successful whenthe student understands the genre conventions [5]. Three student-centered approaches forimproving writing include peer-to-peer, collaborative, and scaffolded.Peer-to-Peer ApproachesOne facet of peer-to-peer writing interventions is considering students’ academic level and thefeedback they can offer their peers. An approach to improving scientific writing sought todetermine if student academic year impacted the ability to provide effective peer-to-peer tutoring[6]. Peer-to-peer tutoring did show an improvement in student writing outcomes, regardless ofthe academic year of the peer. Conversely, researchers analyzing the writing
dynamics. When writing their abstracts, students are expected to demonstrateknowledge of their topic and explain their research objective, methodology, results andconclusions in a clear and concise manner. The abstract is written as a wiki to share thisinformation for peer learning and to gain feedback on the clarity and quality of their technicalwriting. Assessment and evaluation of the impact of this effort includes peer review andfeedback from the instructor directly using the wikis. Comments to the wiki are made alongsidethe abstract as to not completely change the original composition but rather to enhance it forinclusion in their final paper. Results include student perceptions about their writing experiencewith the wikis compared to a more
effectively is presented. Several strategies were used like faculty instruction,using rubrics as a guide for assessment, peer reviewing and engaging a student writing fellow toassist students in this process. The effectiveness of these strategies was verified using multiplestatistical assessment methods and the students’ performance before and after the interventionwas compared with emphasis on the writing-to-learn process. Qualitative data is also presentedto assess the benefit of the intervention for students learning the course content.IntroductionIn general, students’ performance increases with their engagement in the learning process1. Aspart of the engineering curriculum, the engineering students start building their analytical andproblem
] Build – according to plan, sometimes 5] Drafts- usually iterative Iterative6] Test – does dog want to live in it? 6] Peer evaluations, Writing Center, other interventions7] Communicate – Put name on it! 7] Turn into professor, send to publisher, “Fido” receive money from clientA few comments expand each of the steps mentioned above;Under step 1), one should ask questions like, What kind of dog house? For a small or large dog?Square or round? For areas with lots of snow or rain? Clarity on what is expected is essential toinitiating a good design. Paper ideas usually come from the instructor of a course
] Build – according to plan, sometimes 5] Drafts- usually iterative Iterative6] Test – does dog want to live in it? 6] Peer evaluations, Writing Center, other interventions7] Communicate – Put name on it! 7] Turn into professor, send to publisher, “Fido” receive money from clientA few comments expand each of the steps mentioned above;Under step 1), one should ask questions like, What kind of dog house? For a small or large dog?Square or round? For areas with lots of snow or rain? Clarity on what is expected is essential toinitiating a good design. Paper ideas usually come from the instructor of a course
communicatetheir ideas. In this approach, students are encouraged to formulate their thoughts in writing andthen engage in oral interaction with a peer. VNPS on the other hand is a teaching technique thatinvolves students leaving their seats and participating in a group setting while standing at a verticalnon-permanent surface like a whiteboard to accomplish a task. An added advantage of the VNPSapproach is that it provides students the opportunity of seeing the work done by other groups,thereby gaining insights into ideas they may decide to adopt. It has been suggested that the use ofvertical non-permanent surfaces for group tasks promotes greater thinking, classroomparticipation, discussion, persistence, and knowledge mobility [12].The overarching
runs on LaTeX, in orderto work collaboratively on projects with instructors, co-authors, researchers, and peers [4].The audience will have takeaways that include a technical document, a mock conference paperon Overleaf, a set of supplementary materials on typesetting, editing, and publishing technicaland scientific documents using LaTeX.Unlike other editing tools, LaTeX has a learning curve. This workshop will provide thatopportunity for participants to get introduced to the software and to overcome the learning curvein order to begin using and guiding our first-year engineering students to write technicaldocuments on LaTeX. The presenter has experience teaching LaTeX to engineering students andguiding them on research writing.Results and
AC 2012-4824: INTRODUCING MEMO WRITING AND A DESIGN PRO-CESS: A FIVE-WEEK SIMULATOR PROJECTDr. S. Scott Moor, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Scott Moor is an Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of First-year Engineering at Indi- ana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne. He received a B.S. and M.S. in chemical engineering from MIT. After more than a decade in industry, he returned to academia at the University of California, Berkeley, where he received a Ph.D. in chemical engineering and an M.A. in statistics. He is a registered Professional Chemical Engineer in California. His research interests include engineering education with an emphasis on developing and testing educational
Figure 2. Pre-and Post- Interview Responses to “Expected Types of Page 4.218.4 Professional Technical Writing Tasks”Hearing first hand from their interviewees and then from their peers leaves the students with apowerful impression of just how necessary effective communication skills will be in theirprofessional careers. Based on the interview assignment, students find the amount of timeengineers spend writing may vary from writing just one memo a week to almost full time forproject engineers and managers. But, on the average
relating the energy topic of the week with howit is related to sustainable energy and sustainability generally. The last segment of the recitationis devoted to the homework assignment.The homework each week consists of writing an essay, about two pages in length, on theassigned topic. Three of the essay assignments use the Calibrated Peer Review (CPR4) process.Approximately 10 essays are written over the course of the semester.Table 1: Course Lecture Topics in the first course section on Energy Basics Week Topic 1 Energy Overview Energy Overview Energy Conversions 2 MLK Day Energy for Heating Energy Storage 3 Steam Engine Internal Combustion Engine (Professor, Mech. Eng.) Turbines and Jet Engines
. Although the conventionalapproach is still important, lifelong and project-oriented learning for engineers is considered afundamental education in recent times5-7. Providing engineer training to meet this goal is quitechallenging. The degree to which the students develop skills depends on how they solveproblems, write reports, function in teams, self-assess and do peer-review, learn new knowledgeand adapt to changing professional expectations8-11. Recent research shows that engineer trainingand development of critical design skills can be facilitated by providing practice through severalmechanisms that would allow for critical thinking. Instructors should not only simplydemonstrate the problem solving, but also coach students to develop similar
with the TTU EnglishDepartment and incorporates prevailing composition theory and pedagogy by engagingthe students in such collaborative exercises as peer review and group invention strategies.The overarching aim of both of these courses is to incorporate methods and pedagogiesfrom disciplines in the Humanities to help engineering students learn to read, write, andthink critically about their own discipline.Introduction Page 6.655.1“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright Ó 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”Students in the Introduction to Electrical and Computer
technical writing students whenever possible. The chemistry faculty identifiedstudents enrolled in technical writing who had previously taken the chemistry course, soone of these students were assigned to lead a group as a “knowledgeable peer,” becauseof their experience with both courses. Because enrollment numbers fluctuate, flexibilityin composing groups is required.The assignmentThe assignment was given as a pre-lab to the chemistry students; it was given as asecondary research (library digital database compendium) assignment to technical writingstudents. Ideally, students were to meet for a full 50-minute session to share the resultsof their research into chromatography. Two subsequent 50-minute sessions providedtime for teams to synthesize
also focus on specific issues related to SoTLprofessional development that more general CoPs cannot [11]. SoTL CoPs can also supportmembers in ways that result in measurable outputs such as peer-reviewed publications [12].II. Writing GroupsMany faculty, both new or experienced, frequently voice challenges of consistently writing forpeer-reviewed publication as the pressure to produce is coupled with the typically solitary natureof writing [13]. To combat this, writing groups are small collections of people that gatherfrequently to support one another in their writing, either through accountability, peer-feedback,or even collaborative writing sessions [14]. The group’s main purpose is to help each other meettheir individual writing goals. Thus