lesson plan for the school semester. By doing so, thestudent mentors involved with BEAM take on the role of teachers and leaders instead of justvolunteers working with k-12 students.Another unique aspect of the program is the coupling of engineering outreach with a mentoringtraining course, which is described below. Students concurrently work in the field and also havean engineering and conceptual basis in a course. Our program is method-driven in that studentsare given training, relevant scientific knowledge, and reflective discussion opportunities toimprove the quality of mentoring.The program is also unique in that it offers different levels of involvement for the mentors. Onone hand, students can enroll in the BEAM mentor training course and
result can bedeemed to be scientific. In case study research, action research, and ethnography the chosen method ofresearch is the investigation of a single case. Its presentation, plus theoretical reflections, took the form ofa novel-a detailed and well-documented narrative description of the course of a case. This researchtradition is categorized by modern empirical research methodology mostly as "single-case research" or"aggregating single-case research", respectively, meaning that a small number of similar cases aresuperimposed in order to work out the common pattern [9, 11, 12]. The demand for systematic empiricalresearch is at the core of the debate, which the social science communities world-wide have been trying tomeet. In general, the
53 (engineers) and 54 (scientists) percent of the studentsexpressed uncertainty regarding the potential salaries of engineers and scientists. Approximately42 percent of the students believe engineers and scientist “make a lot of money.”Four questions on the survey addressed student attitudes towards engineering and science. Thefrequency distributions of responses to these questions are shown in Figure 2. The first two ofthese questions asked students to select the statement that best reflected their feelings or“affection” for the engineering or science disciplines. Approximately 63 percent of the studentindicated they either “love” or “like” engineering on the pre-survey. This percentage increased to72 percent on the post-study survey. When
course design for IT. The problem thus posed is to attempt to explore on anabstract level what is happening as IT curricula evolve. What happens to the instructional designas curricula are updated? What are instructors and designers doing and how are they doing it?This deeper understanding of what is happening will create a foundation upon which amethodology for evolving curricula in rapidly changing environments may be developed. Thisstudy is an exploration of the change process. The result is a theoretically based description ofthe change domains and structure.Research methodologyThe research was done as a collective case study, where the ‘case’ was a selection of coursechanges that reflected the process of change in IT. Seven faculty members
shake table experience on student understandingof concepts and the development of skills in the classroom. There was a good deal of variation across institutions in students’ responses to theselearning outcomes. These may reflect the variation in course composition of the students, Page 22.883.10characteristics of the instructors, variation in implementation of the shake tables, developmentsover time in the technology, etc. While a larger sample and a more thorough data collectioneffort necessary to estimate associations between all possible variables were beyond the scope ofthis study, we are able to partition the variance into within
‐waypairedstudent'st‐testwasusedtocomparepre‐andpost‐responsesforeachof 26 items for both the treatment and control groups. We also performed a two-wayunpaired student's t-test analysis comparing the change in the treatment group (with changedefined as post-score minus pre-score) to the change in the control group.Students also completed free response reflections at the conclusion of each STEM classroomvisit.Student Research FindingsThe analysis of the surveys shows no significant (p<0.05) differences between students’ prevs. post responses, or between the treatment and control groups, in these four areas: their understanding of the nature of engineering and science their knowledge about STEMs’ work their perception of STEMs
of engineering ethics have reflected atone time or another on the barriers that the use of the “E-word” poses for capturing the attentionof engineering students and their academic advisers. A close reading of the overview essay(“Introduction to the Grand Challenges for Engineering”), however, reveals an underlyingphilosophy that Leo Marx has referred to as the “technocratic” view of progress that is either, atbest, indifferent to ethical considerations or, at worst, undermines engineering ethics.In his well known essay “Does Improved Technology Mean Progress?,”3 Marx contrasted theEnlightenment concept of progress that saw improved technology as a means to achieving socialprogress with the technocratic view that sees improved technology as
made for this study: IIT students would show relatively strong evidence of forward inferencing Successful forward inferencing would be associated with high ability, as reflected in cumulative grade-point averages (CGPA) Forward inferencing is a sufficient, but not necessary, marker of problem solving ability.The reasoning for these predictions is as follows. The first prediction was made because of theintense engineering training programs at IITs, the second prediction was made because of thedeep conceptual knowledge required for successfully applying forward inferencing, and the thirdprediction was made because of the possibility of successfully solving problems without usingforward inferencing.ParticipantsA U.S. sample
,deposited, or canceled), and unmet need. SEECS PIs, as mentioned in the recruitment section,send a handwritten note to those students who have not applied. This mailing takes places inearly march since the deadline for applications is March 30th. The selection of the cohort takesplace during the first two weeks of April. Awarded students are notified via email. Thesestudents are instructed to make a deposit as well as enroll in the seminar.5 DemographicsThrough these recruitment efforts, the cohorts have been filled with mostly regionally-basedstudents reflecting the demographics of the School of Engineering and Computer Science atGannon University. For the basic demographics of selected major, distance from the school,high school GPA, gender, and
website features as theyexist at the time of the ASEE meeting.Figure 1: Sample Log-In Page. Page 22.1107.4Figure 2: Sample Video Scenario Page (top and bottom).AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation via grant DUE-1036255. Opinions Page 22.1107.5expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policies of the NationalScience Foundation. Appendix PI Interview Questions for Project Management and Change
sometimes from disparate sources, inthe service of creativity. This process, with subsequent feedback from public display andpersonal reflection about the creative process itself, broadens one’s experiences, providingfurther material to stockpile and archive.Creativity may be our most important human skill. In one sense of the word, to be creativemeans that one can make something, a fundamental human impulse. When we make a cake, drawa diagram, or a write a proposal, we create. We all create, making things that did not exist before.Creativity is also one of our most valued characteristics. In another sense of the word, to becreative means to be imaginative or original. We celebrate exemplary creativity at art galleries,concert halls, sports arenas
Length of time working with communities on service learning projects of engineered works for directly influences usage and diversity of sustainability concepts 39; sustainable performance evident in reflective essays from students in senior design who worked on LTS projects7 Leadership [ASCE BOK3] Students’ have stronger understanding of leadership and skills to motivate others to achieve a common vision 19,21,35 Creativity; Open ended nature of many LTS projects with vast array of non- Creative Design technical and technical constraints forces students to be creative to
for education, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Page 22.1238.14 Appendix A Renewable Energy Internship Assessment (Year 1)1. List two renewable and two nonrenewable energy resources. Renewable: a) b) Nonrenewable: a) b)2. What are two factors that enable us to use water as a source of power? a) b)3. In one or more sentences describe what solar energy is?4. List two materials that absorb heat and two materials that reflect heat. Absorb: a) b) Reflect: a) b)5
electrical switch • Measurements using a dial caliper and micrometer • Basic stamp microprocessor (writing music by translating notes to frequencies) • Electrical circuitry using breadboards • US Coast Guard AROW program – water robotics • Hydrogen powered fuel cell cars Page 22.1233.5Program EvaluationThe Engineering Challenge for the 21st Century Program has a very comprehensive evaluationwhich is to be completed by each participamt on the following three (3) criteria: 1) Course Evaluation 2) Instructor Evaluation 3) Student’s/Teacher’s ResponseThe following illustrations reflect the evaluation compilation of the student
forteaching science. Participants rate their beliefs on a five point Likert scale ranging from “1”representing “Strongly Disagree” to “5” representing “Strongly Agree” as they respond to itemssuch as, “I am continually finding better ways to teach science” or reversed phrased items suchas, “I am not very effective in monitoring science experiments.” We made modifications tosome of the STEBI items to reflect a more general focus on STEM, rewriting items such as,“Increased teacher effort in teaching science produces little change in some student's scienceachievement” to read “Increased teacher effort in teaching STEM content produces little changein some student's STEM learning achievement.” The modified version of the instrument waspreviously used to
definition of quantitative and precise metricsthat reflect changes in the program. A second is the data collection and the action definitions thatshould minimize or, at least, allow the resolution of interdependencies and correlations amongthem. While these form an intellectually interesting modeling and feedback problem, one mustalso be prepared to accommodate some faculty resistance, indifference, or simply lack of time toperform such tasks. Viewing automation and consistency as a key for the success of continuousimprovement, we have implemented this feedback process for the last four years and here wepresent some of our experiences.1. IntroductionObjective and meaningful evaluation of student performance and career success is a complicatedproblem
Wednesdays will allow for a lab meeting the first week of classes,which is typically a partial week. The current practice is to start lab sessions the second week ofthe quarter. This combination would increase total course lab time from eighteen hours to thirtyhours, which represents a 67% increase, without changing the current four-credit courseallowance. Table 2 reflects a proposed revision to course content, as well as restructured lab sessionswhich will be attempted for the course offering in the spring of 2011. The requirement for Page 22.1530.9casting projects in addition to the welding / fabrication projects has been replaced by a
business side ofthe equation is marginalized. In reality the majority of the graduates will become both practicingengineers, and eventually businessmen and women. Why diminish the importance of businessacumen other than it is not the educators area of expertise?PostscriptThis paper was never intended to be a rigorous, data mining experiment. The contents are moreof a reflection on the comments received over an eight year period from industry personnelobserving deficiencies in engineering graduates as a whole. Having arrived in academia afterpracticing for many years, the author encountered the same issues prior to academia in hiring forhis own department. Once one gains entrance into the hiring and tenure process for academia, itis obvious there
onthe Internet. Others have attempted to provide security education at the university level in theform of a three-hour training session8. While arguably better than a Website, a single session isnot a sufficient amount of time for students to comprehend, reflect and attempt to applyknowledge. From our experiences, students need repetition, time to reflect on course material,and the opportunity to write about and discuss presented material in order to assess and improvetheir own understanding. This type of learning simply cannot be achieved in a single three-hourtraining session. From the authors’ collective experiences, a broad demographic of students donot have access to practical information about computer security that would improve
never really achieved inpublic education, was to teach students in the early elementary through high school grades aboutthe industrial culture that dominated the American landscape in the 20th century. In contrast tothe commonly held belief that IA was only about vocational tool skills, the ideology on which IAwas established in the l870s was a general education ideology in support of the notion that allboys and girls in the U.S. would benefit from the study of our industrial culture. Much the sameideology that now leads many to believe “K-12 engineering education” today would benefit allstudents, not just those seeking the postsecondary vocational engineering track.The presentation of a paper titled “A Curriculum to Reflect Technology”10 at
productivity.Professional Development: 5. Growth Planning (F) Individuals document professionalIndividual demonstration of 6. Growth Progress (F) development in technical,improved knowledge, skills, 7. Professional Practices (F) interpersonal, and individualand behaviors essential to 8. Growth Achieved (S) attributes important to their personalengineering practice and project needs, professional behaviors, and ways of a reflective practitioner.Design Processes
, seeks to enhancethe effectiveness of the instructional process through application of experiential educationtechniques.According to Kolb [2], experiential learning exists across four modes, including (i) concreteexperience, (ii) reflective observation, (iii) abstract conceptualization, and (iv) activeexperimentation (p. 30). The primary components of learning processes exist along twocontinuums relating concrete experience to abstract conceptualization and reflective observationto active experimentation. The COSMOS program incorporates activities with elements frombroad ranges of these spectra, e.g., some activities were heavily observation-based while othersinvolved active, trial-and-error problems; some relate concretely to lecture material
policy for this class and theholiday mood, can we discount extrinsic motivation (e.g. motivation from grade) as the soledriver for academic success in this study? To answer these questions, we start by articulating thetheoretical underpinnings of this study and attempt to operationalize the constructs to reflect thecontext of the work.2.0 Theoretical Conside rationsA lot of research in engineering education have been largely exploratory (as contrasted withcause-effect and mechanistic type research) and bereft of theoretical considerations [12]. Nomatter the type of research questions, the community of engineering educators continues toemphasize the need for grounding research in theoretical frameworks as a vital ingredient forenhancing quality
an effective solution. Effective teamsshould also be organized enough to produce this design solution in sufficient time to test anddocument the results of their design. Page 22.242.3Assessing the effectiveness of capstone design projects is a complex undertaking. Many schoolshave turned to the use of design journals or notebooks to require students to document theprogress of their design and to reflect on the design process10,11. Other schools, includingNortheastern, have used a combination of faculty, industrial sponsors, and professional peerevaluations to provide a number of views of the quality of the projects12. Student self
teammembers are likely to divulge it as part of this exercise. In order for the instructor to intervene in a timelymanner, a mid-term or mid-project evaluation is critical. This approach requires self-reflection on thepart of the student and also provides peer evaluation. This information can be invaluable to the instructorwho may likely not have had the opportunity to observe the finer workings of the team. As anotherexample, to assess whether or not students have utilized a process in decision making, as opposed to, forexample, a majority vote, students can be asked to write a short memo outlining a decision they made,options considered, and the means by which they determined the outcome. A well-defined rubric canthen be used to analyze the
under theumbrella of sustainable engineering. Page 22.418.2In this paper, we present two sets of data: (1) a comparative analysis of fifteen published sets ofsustainability principles (some of which are drawn from the context of engineering, some fromother contexts, but none in the context of engineering education), and (2) a summary of arepresentative set of engineering courses at US Universities that include sustainability terms intheir titles or course descriptions. While other methods of data collection may reflect a morenuanced understanding of the idea of sustainable engineering (and, in fact, seeking this nuance ispart of the motivation
project outputsmoving forward is in part a reflection of those difficulties.UltrasoundThe Ultrasound project was the result of one of the instructor’s conversations with a professor inRadiology who was training midwives in Uganda to use ultrasound technology. They werehaving some issues with the commercial portable ultrasounds (cost, difficulty of user interface,etc.), and so the problem posed to the students was: how can you make ultrasound more usableby midwives with limited training? And can you make it cheaper, too? In winter quarter therewere two CSE students and three HCI students on the team. In winter quarter, students surveyedSeattle-area midwives, created surveys to send to Ugandan midwives, investigated otherdeveloping world based
engineeringdesign process22 also shown in figure 1. Figure 1. Legacy Cycle and Engineering Design ProcessThe Legacy Cycle consists of the process followed to solve challenges that are designed tomotivate and engage faculty/students in learning activities. In the Legacy Cycle, the followingsteps are performed and repeated: Page 22.113.4 Look Ahead (Not shown in the Figure): The learning task and desired knowledge outcomes are described here. This step also allows for pre-assessment and serves as a benchmark for self-assessment in the Reflect Back step. The Challenge: The challenge is a question or task carefully
resultcounterproductive since the students will be overloaded with information. Another extreme willbe to teach them only one or few methods; although this avoids an overload, the authors haveobserved that most instructors do this, teaching just a couple of preferred methods. The premiseof this research work is that there is a lack of guidance when it comes to design methodselection. This situation is also reflected in the professional world where it is well known thatdesigners will stick to just a couple of methods in each category for the most of their professionallife. This is understandable because (1) the designer is familiar with the method, and (2) there isnot a clear guide to help decide which other methods to use. A test-bed for an expert system toguide
course which included: atomic bonding,crystal structures, dislocations and defects, and phase diagrams. During each class period aReformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) observation was completed to assess theinstructor’s classroom pedagogical practice in order to determine how it might have changedover the course of the semester. Students in the course completed daily reflections and an exitcourse survey to assess their perception of how supportive various components of the coursewere to their learning. Data suggested there were minor changes in teaching behaviors over thesemester, and that time spent on activities and number of slides in the instructor’s presentationinfluenced these changes. Additionally, students perceived that many of