. PublicAffairs, 2021.[7] K. Beck, White feminism: from the suffragettes to influencers and who they leave behind. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 2021.[8] K. W. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics.,” University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 139–167, 1989.[9] K. W. Crenshaw, “Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color,” Stanford Law Rev., pp. 93–118, Feb. 1991.[10] B. Moradi, M. C. Parent, A. S. Weis, S. Ouch, and K. L. Broad, “Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis,” Psychol. Women. Q., vol. 44
tool for recruiting, engaging, retaining and educating students,” in Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems, 2012, pp. 196–201.A. C. Passos, F. L. Junior, and H. H. de Arruda, “Project-based learning activity with robotics: A low-cost case study,” in 2022 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2022 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2022 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), 2022, pp. 360–365.J. McLurkin, J. Rykowski, M. John, Q. Kaseman, and A. J. Lynch, “Using multi-robot systems for engineering education: Teaching and outreach with large numbers of an advanced, low-cost robot,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2013.L
. Seaton, “Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX’s First MOOC.,” Res. Pract. Assess., vol. 8, pp. 13–25, 2013.[6] A. McAuley, B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier, “THE MOOC MODEL FOR DIGITAL PRACTICE:”.[7] T. R. Liyanagunawardena, A. A. Adams, and S. A. Williams, “MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 202, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455.[8] R. Legon, “MOOCs and the Quality Question,” 2013.[9] L. Wiest, “Effective Online Instruction in Higher Education,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 13, pp. 11–14, Jan. 2012.[10] J. R. Drake, M. T. O’Hara, and E. Seeman, “Five Principles for MOOC Design: With a Case Study
, particularly the InvertedClassroom format at the use of the Mastery Tests (but not the repeated opportunities). Table 2. Characteristics of Teaching Methods Phase > Regular Inverted Inverted + Mastery Inverted + StudioElement 1997-2008 F2009-present F2020-S2022 F2022-presentLecture Format/ Instructor presents Minimal notes presented; Q&A with entire Minimal notes presented; activity-Instructor Role notes on board class; example-driven; Instructor provides driven; Instructor and peer tutor and leads Q&A some individual consultation
, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women Engineering Students and Self- Efficacy: A Multi-Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self-Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2009.tb01003.x.[25] W.-C. Mau, “Factors That Influence Persistence in Science and Engineering Career Aspirations,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 51, no. 3, p. 234, Mar. 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161- 0045.2003.tb00604.x.[26] K. L. Tonso, “Engineering Gender-Gendering Engineering: A Cultural Model for Belonging,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 5, no. 4, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v5.i4.60.[27] K. Charmaz, Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed
Q&As and where to findmeeting links, how and where to reach the instructor inside and outside the class time and officehours, and the info on online tests in Canvas.Supporting teaching and learning activities and student-instructor interactions, both during andoutside the class time, is one major challenge in the online mode. To address this challenge, thenew approaches that the instructor developed specially for online teaching are 1) pre-recordinglecture videos for most of the class periods, uploading lecture videos to MS Stream, and postingthe video links in Canvas, 2) pre-recording demo videos on how to edit, debug, and test ARMassembly language programs in the µVision IDE and how to use GlobalProtect and CitrixWorkspace, 3) hosting
, and Attention: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and Eye Tracking,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 843–854, 2007, doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.843.[28] K. Wang and J. F. Dovidio, “Perceiving and Confronting Sexism: The Causal Role of Gender Identity Salience,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0361684316670628.[29] R. Pauley, M. Cunningham, and P. Toth, “Doctoral Student Attrition and Retention: A Study of a Non-Traditional Ph.D. Program,” J. Coll. Student Retent., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 225–238, 1999.[30] P. Mendoza, P. Villarreal, and A. Gunderson, “Within-Year Retention Among Ph.D. Students: The Effect of Debt, Assistantships, and Fellowships,” Res. High
. 09, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://scholar-google-com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&q=A+Voice+fr om+the+South%3A+By+a+Black+Woman+of+the+South.+Chapel+Hill%3A+University+of+N orth+Carolina+at+Chapel+Hill+Library.&btnG=#d=gs_cit&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3Ac 95dT08oyMcJ[18] P. H. Collins, Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge, 2002.[19] M. B. Zinn and B. T. Dill, Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Routledge, 2016.[20] C. L. Wijeyesinghe and S. R. Jones, “Intersectionality, identity, and systems of power and inequality,” Intersectionality and higher education: Theory, research, and
, no. 1, pp. 110–132, 1985, doi: 10.2307/256064.[6] P. J. Collier, Developing effective student peer mentoring programs: A practitioner’s guide to program design, delivery, evaluation and training. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tqypCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT13&d q=what+students+expect+from+peer+mentoring+programs&ots=8BL6yovNfZ&sig=wuK SJdmKZ8gQ_Ek1OjS3ZcI869Y#v=onepage&q=what students expect from peer mentoring programs&f=false[7] P. J. Collier, “Why peer mentoring is an effective approach for promoting college student success,” Metropolitan Universities, vol. 28, no. 3, 2017, doi
. Austin, “Managing for Creativity and Innovation in A/E/C Organizations,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 399–409, Oct. 1993, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1993)9:4(399).[6] L. Q. Pereira, “Divergent thinking and the design process,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development Conference Book, 1999, pp. 224–229. [Online]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.944.5938&rep=rep1&type=p df[7] E. P. Torrance, Creativity. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1963.[8] M. Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, 1st ed. New York
pathways and the options theyhave.Students indicated that speaking with engineering entrepreneurs provided them with moreknowledge of and confidence in the industry. Students from underrepresented groups and first-generation students in engineering may have had fewer opportunities to discuss compensationand negotiating strategies. However, students reflected on learning how to ask for their worthand discuss these important leadership and career strategies in their surveys. One student shared, This week's Q&A session with engineers who are also entrepreneurs. I was able to hear how our speakers have dealt with not knowing how to confidently name their prices. I feel that as people of color, it is a challenge for us to assign
beginning of each event. • Emphasize the participation of HUG students: We put a line in the registration form stating that “This program is designed for HUG students. If you don’t identify as HUG, we kindly ask you to quietly observe, refrain from asking questions, and not take up space during the event.” • Implementing an online anonymous comment tool: From the experiences of the first two panel events, we found that HUG students favored asking questions and providing feedback anonymously instead of raising their hands in front of audiences. Thus, we included the interactive Q&A online tool, allowing attendees to ask questions anonymously. • Discuss HUG students’ challenges in pursuing a research career
response. 𝑝𝑝: 𝑝𝑝 value of a Mann Whitney U-testcomparing pre- and post-survey distributions. Bias: Noting if the result was significant betweenpre- and post-survey responses and that the distribution does not appear to have acquiescencebias. 3.a. Responses from Hispanic/Latino(a) Population Pre-survey Response Post-survey Response Q. Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew 𝑝𝑝 Bias 1 4 4 1.14 0.48 -1.23 5 5 0.80 0.65 -2.06 0.004 Yes 2 1 2 1.19 0.13 0.45 1 1 1.41 0.54 1.32 0.314 3 5 5 0.67 0.83 -3.27 5 5 0.32 0.88 -2.48 0.526 4 4
drastically different, as I replaced in-person office visits with online Q&A. (#93) Content: often could not cover as much online Delivery: many videos created, used webcam/doc cams, Zoom Preparation time: about double the preparation Assessment methods: online exams had to be a completely different format to lower effect of cheating Supporting students: bookable virtual office hours and more 1-on-1 meetings. (#42)Of those instructors who completed the survey (n=81), 85% (i.e., 69 instructors) reported havingaccessed at least one of the eight options in the survey for instructional support during thepandemic. As shown in Table 2, the most widely accessed one was the online resources providedby the education
analytic memos; naming and operationalizing emergent codes; extractingdominant themes; and producing the final report in the form of the present research paper. Whilea full discussion of the methods outlined by Braun &Clarke (2006) is beyond the scope of thepresent work, see Ruiz et al. (2021) for more detail regarding the analysis approaches used here.In generating codes, we examined student responses for recurring or common themes. Wefocused on allowing themes to emerge from the development of initial, open codes that wouldeventually cluster around broader themes. For example, we noted in the following passagethemes related to both safety and structural engineering. [Q]uestions such as trusses that we have been working on recently
. 2, pp. 226–239, 2021, doi: 10.1080/09687599.2020.1730159.[6] Alison Hillman and Gerard Quinn, “Justice for all Q&A: A Different Approach toDisability,” Open Society Foundations Voices, 2021. Accessed: Aug. 9, 2021. [Online].Available: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/q-and-a-a-different-approach-to-disability?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_080621&utm_content[7] D. Marks, “Models of disability,” Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 85–91, 1997, doi:10.3109/09638289709166831.[8] Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L., No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328, 1990.[9] D. Goodley, Dis/Ability Studies: Theorizing disablism and ableism, 1st ed. New York,NY: Routledge, 2014.[10] M
each breakout group, students would work in small groups (<15 students each) to hold deeper conversations about different elements of environmental injustice. ● Friday’s class period (10/30/2020) would consist of a guest presentation by two members of UCCO, followed by a 15-minute Q&A portion, where students could appreciate the perspective of a group leading in environmental activism. Topics would include environmental racism in Connecticut and Puerto Rico as well as the climate movement taking place on the university’s campus.Figure 1. Comparison of EJ week to the rest of the course Monday Wednesday Friday Average Week in the
’ explanations of suffering,” in Morality and Health, A. Brandt and P. Rozin, Eds. London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 119– 169.[28] H. C. Luegenbiehl and R. F. Clancy, Global engineering ethics. New York: Elsevier, 2017.[29] R. F. Clancy, “The development of a case-based course on global engineering ethics in China,” Int. J. Ethics Educ., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40889-020-00103-1.[30] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[31] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[32] H. E. Canary, J. R