progress toward a degree more quickly.Low Academic Preparedness. Many students enrolled in ME/CIVE majors are underprepared inSTEM subjects, particularly mathematics. ME and CIVE largely share the same curricular planfor the first two years, which assumes that first-year students enter the program “calculus ready.”Students who are unprepared to take calculus often take one or more semesters of preparatorymath which can delay their progress in their engineering curriculum or lead them to give up theirpursuit of an engineering degree. Also, in the first two years, students take the requiredmechanics core courses which include Statics, Dynamics, and Mechanics of Materials. Thesecourses are the students’ first experience with engineering analysis
for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP), Director of the Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education, a 3M national Teaching Fellow, and a mOliver Pan, University of Toronto Oliver Pan is an undergraduate student at the University of Toronto, studying finance with a double minor in statistics and economics. He exhibits a deep enthusiasm for data analytics, driven by a curiosity to unveil analytical insights spanning multiple sectors such as financial technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering Students’ Engagement and Learning Outcomes: A Typological Approach Qin Liu, Greg Evans, and Oliver
Professional Standards Commission/Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. Her teaching experience spans across secondary, adult, technical and higher education. She has presented at state, regional, national and international conferences and has several publications. She has served on ac- creditation committees, K-12 school committees and local community boards and received and managed over two million dollars in federal grants. In addition, Dr. Mosley serves on state and national committees for teacher education.Dr. Mir M. Hayder, Savannah State University Dr. Hayder is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Savannah State Uni- versity, GA. He received PhD in Mechanical
—rather than investigating systemic or “watershed”-type hazards [13]-[15]. Someapproaches that aim toward broadening faculty teaching strategies rather than protecting studentsfrom them include integrating relevant applications of STEM content; emphasizing the societalcontext and social justice implications of engineering work [16]; and using project-basedlearning to engage students in real-world applications and collaborative work [17].Moreover, engineering’s tendency to cling to an idea of itself as “apolitical” and “neutral,” ratherthan acknowledging its social construction and baked-in centering of white masculinity, has beenshown to be correlated with the marginalization of under-represented participants in engineeringculture [18],[19]. The
universities have a set of affiliated colleges in designated regions and areresponsible for overseeing functioning of the colleges including accreditation, andmanagement of diverse academic activities such as initiation of education programs,enforcement of present curriculum, and supervision of examinations. AICTE (All IndiaCouncil of Technical Education) governs the technical education system in India, which in2016-17 had 3,291 institutes with an intake of 15,56,360 students, but enrolment of 7,78,813students [10]. The employability of these students upon graduation, though, was abysmallylow at 18% [11].Figure 1: Box plot of scoring pattern, at the entrance examinations, from 2012 to 2015, at our collegeMethod
Paper ID #26684Does Student Satisfaction Equal Learning? A Differentiated Design Strategyfor Course Improvement: Lessons Learned from Learning Outcomes andGrade DistributionDr. J. Martin Chernosky, Texas A&M University J.Martin Chernosky is the Learning Architect for the Studio of Advanced Instruction and Learning for the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He earned a B.A. in Education, an M.Ed. in Adult Learning and Technology from Western Governors University, and an Ed.D. in Educational Leadership from the American College of Education. With over 25 years in dynamic adult education settings ranging
actually presenting enough distinct processing options as well as providing enoughopportunity to actual practice making decisions. Current options for ethics training arenoticeably limited in these areas.Approaches to Ethics InstructionThere are multiple methods of ethics training currently in use. When determining what should beincluded in ethics training, there are aspects of both the delivery and the content to consider.Delivery methods are often separated based on whether instruction is disseminated as part ofstand-alone ethics course focused on either general or more field specific ethics or if it isdelivered in an ethics-across-the-curriculum method which is essentially an integration of ethicscontent in otherwise technical skills courses. 4
H Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology After 14 years in the middle and high school math and engineering classroom where Mr. Rosen was working on the integration of engineering and robotics into the teaching of the core curricula classrooms. He has now been at Georgia Tech’s CEISMC for the past 8 years working on curriculum development and research on authentic STEM instruction and directing the state’s FIRST LEGO League competi- tion program. Mr. Rosen has authored or co-authored papers and book chapters that address issues of underrepresented populations participation in engineering programs and the integration of robotics and engineering into classroom instruction.Dr. Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of
of Engineering in Electrical Engineering from Morgan State University. Mrs. Partlow currently serves as the Program Director of the Verizon Innovative Learning Program, which focuses on provid- ing minority middle school boys with hands-on learning experiences using advanced technology, app development software, 3-D design techniques, and entrepreneurship skills. She has also served as an on- line course development specialist responsible for the creation, organization, and delivery of several web based Electrical Engineering courses offered at Morgan State University. Her technical expertise includes, web-based learning, online course development, information management, systems integration, and 3-D simulation
and basic tools. Further, resources such as labspace, materials, and the time investment in working with these materials can present achallenge. Meyer shows the implementation of this strategy in a steel course by fabricating steelconnections from 1/8” thick plate and loading them to failure. [4] Stahl and DeVries discuss theadvantage to building a large frame and its many uses for full-scale structural testing at theMilwaukee School of Engineering. [5] Stahl’s paper also transparently outlined the numerousresources in both time and money that are required for such an instructional strategy. Estesshows this strategy implemented in a concrete structures course at the United States MilitaryAcademy. [6] This course heavily integrates fabrication
Image Processing, Commu- nication Systems, and Robotics. He is an author of numerous research papers and presentations in these areas. Dr. Aliyazicioglu is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). He is a member of Eta Kappa Nu, Tau Beta Pi and ASEE.Dr. Amar Raheja, California State Polytechnic University Dr. Amar Raheja is currently a professor of Computer Science at California State Polytechnic University- Pomona. He received his PhD in Biomedical Engineering from University of Toledo, OH in 1999. and MS and BS from Indian Institute of Technology, India in 1992 and 1994 respectively. His research interests and publications are in the area of image processing, computer vision and
Consortium for Student Data Exchange at the University of Oklahoma(https://csrde.ou.edu/). Other engineering programs with similar student demographics as WMUmay find the strategies and methods described in this paper useful.Scaling Up STEP CohortsAlthough CEAS does not have a common first-year engineering curriculum for its 14engineering and applied sciences programs, we are successful in placing 90% of all first-yearsummer orientation participants in STEP cohorts. We have seen an increase from 75% to 90%over the past eight years. The STEP IB project involves, on average, 343 first-time first-yearstudents annually who are placed into 18-19 cohorts. Figure 1 below shows the total number ofstudents who participated in summer orientation from 2010 to
Scholars Program” Award # 1153281AbstractThe National Science Foundation awarded the University of Southern Maine with a grant forSTEM Opportunities for Academically Capable and Financially Needy Students entitled the“University of Southern Maine STEM Scholars Program,” Award # 1153281. At the completionof our fifth year, this poster presentation provides an opportunity to present data on the successof our S-STEM program, as well as share some of the best practices learned and applied. TheUSM STEM Scholars Bridge Program has been a model for blending the elements ofrecruitment, retention, and placement into an integrated, comprehensive but non-intrusiveprogram that promotes student success in transitioning from high schools and communitycolleges
of thislecture is part of Learning Objective 1 in that the proper selection of measurement systems, thecombination of probes and sensors is a critical part of planning and experimental program. a. b. Figure 2. An example of a probe and a sensor. A pitot static tube (a.) is a probe and a pressure transduce (b.) is a sensor.Numerical Methods (L.O. 2, 3) –While this is not a numerical analysiscourse there are a series of lecturescovering the use of numerical methodsfor experimental data reduction. Theselectures cover topics such as numericalerror, numerical integration, finding rootsof equations, Fourier series andfrequency analysis, and curve
contributing to narrow perceptions of ethicsamong students.22 For example, educational reforms aiming to introduce more social and ethicalrequirements into curricula can be perceived by students as “constraints” and “discreterequirements” rather than integral to both their education and future professional practice.Related research has additionally questioned whether engineering education has measurableimpacts on the ethical capabilities and moral development of engineering students. For instance,Shuman et al. coded student responses to an open-ended ethical dilemma, and found littleevidence of growth in ethical reasoning from the freshman year to senior year, althoughrelatively few of these students had taken formal ethics courses.23 Similarly, Wu et
Tierra Madre, an environmentally soundlow-income housing community in the region, and was president of the Association of Women in theCommunity College. She is a member of the Early College High School Leadership Council and theadministrative liaison for the Integrated Technologies Committee at EPCC. Page 26.1369.3 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Sharing Best Practices Toward Seamless Transfer of Engineering StudentsIf the United States is to maintain its economic leadership and be able to sustain its share of high-technology jobs, it must prepare the next
Paper ID #41314Creation of Open-Source Course Materials for Engineering Economics Coursewith Help from a Team of Students—Lessons LearnedDr. Tamara R. Etmannski, University of British Columbia Tamara Etmannski is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Canada. Her position is focused on teaching content and various curricula and teaching and learning initiatives connected to ’impacts in engineering’ (sustainability, leadership, economics, entrepreneurship). Her pedagogical interests include high-impact practices like active and experiential
multidisciplinary curriculum involving two or moresubject areas not only increases students’ competence in complex problem solving and thuscompetitiveness in the workforce, but also increases interest in future coursework for women [5,6, 7, 8]. The inclusion of engineering majors that support multidisciplinary pathways could helprecruit and retain more engineers into the workforce, as well as help balance the ratio of men towomen engineers practicing the profession.Recently at several universities (such as University of Colorado Boulder, Boise State, OregonState, Texas A&M, Purdue, and University of Southern California), there has been an emergenceof new engineering majors which incorporate outside disciplines into engineering studies,allowing for more
on the control system may make itnecessary to take over manual control.The automatic control system consists of a frequency sensor that feeds back through aproportional, integral, differential (PID) set of gains. Students can experiment with how differentgain values change the response of the grid to changes in load and generation. An objective is tooptimize the scoring metric by changes to the PID gains. The system of generation, loads, batterysystem and closed loop control is summarized in .With the automatic control engaged, the player takes on the strategic role, while maintaining asupervision of the operations of the microgrid, of deciding how to grow their operations byinvesting their points. Decisions include how much storage to buy
Paper ID #28979Impact of a Summer Research Program for High School Students on theirIntent to Pursue a STEM career: Overview, Goals, and OutcomesMrs. marialice mastronardi, The University of Texas, Austin PhD student, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education at University of Texas, Austin M.S. in Electronic Engineering, Polytechnic of Milan (Italy), 2006Dr. Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin Audrey Boklage is research assistant and director of the curriculum lab at Texas Inventionworks in the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She is particularly interested in
(age, gender, citizenship, academic discipline, and stage of persistence) and theirpreferences for three styles of mentoring as assessed by the Ideal Mentor Scale (IMS): Integrity,Guidance, and Relationship. The study concluded that “graduate students’ perceptions of theideal mentor are influenced somewhat by major socio-cultural factors, but also suggest thatindividual differences may play a larger role” [25]. Mutual respect fosters an environment ofstrong relationship for effective engagement and attracts students who commit and want tofollow the mentor because, relationally, the students are motivated by the sense that the mentorcares for them more than his or her positional rights, and so are willing to follow in theirmentor’s directives
that lasts a full semester and is followed by a second semester- 3long component in the fall. In addition, the model includes continued opportunities for students toincorporate their skills into their programs of study and dissertation research. By moving awayfrom the ‘sole’ bootcamp-style program, spacing the learning opportunities over time [19]-[20]and integrating learning opportunities into their programs of study we hope to achieve moreeffective outcomes. FIGURE 2. GS LEAD Training ModelImplementation of the training model began in summer 2016 with the first cohort of GS LEADparticipants entering the GS LEAD Summer Academy. The Summer Academy was an immersiveeight
meaning and purpose.McAdams writes, “the I becomes an autobiographical author; the Me becomes the story it tells”[17].As such, in modern society, storytelling can be leveraged in a variety of ways to support socialcohesion, identity discovery, and sensemaking to positively impact even the engineeringclassroom. For example, the Academic Pathways Study found that for some engineeringstudents, an engineering career was not necessarily the expected end goal (14% definitely not,12% probably not, and 8% unsure) [18]. This data highlights that learning, even in anengineering curriculum, should be broad enough to support students headed to a variety ofcareers that may be related or adjacent to STEM fields.In fact, students’ expectations for the value of
principles.Keywords: Backward Design Process, Course Design, Outcome Based Learning, Statics.I. INTRODUCTIONA. Setting for the Curriculum ProjectThe specific setting for this curriculum project is outlined as follow:1. Salient characteristics of the institution or sponsoring organizationAs described by Anand (2005), " Engineering Mechanics - Statics is a core course in most of theengineering disciplines, and is generally taught by a civil and/or a mechanical engineeringfaculty at the nations' ABET accredited colleges and universities" (p.1). The institutional settingfor this course is also considered an ABET accredited engineering college that offersundergraduate degree programs for civil engineering and/or mechanical engineering students.This course is not
University Dr. Gallagher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with joint appointments to Mathematical Sciences and Education & Human Development. Her research inter- ests include student cognition in mathematics, development of teacher identity among graduate teaching assistants, curricular reform to foster diversity and inclusion in STEM fields, and development of mathe- matical knowledge for teaching. She is co-PI on an NSF INCLUDES Design and Development Launch Pilot, ”Statewide Coalition: Supporting Underrepresented Populations in Precalculus through Organiza- tional Redesign Toward Engineering Diversity (SC:SUPPORTED),” Award #EEC-1744497.Abigail E Hines, Clemson
Outstanding Scholar Award from Cal Poly with a cash prize of $1500, along with three other teaching and research cash awards plus student council recognition for outstanding service. He has been chair of the aerospace engineering department at Cal Poly (2001-2004), the associate dean of AFIT (1988-1989), and chair of the electrical engineering dept. at AFIT (1986-1987). He is an associate fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) and a senior member of the IEEE. Dr. Biezad has authored a book published in 1999 in the AIAA Education Series titled Integrated Navigation and Guidance Systems, along with 70 technical articles, book chapters on systems identification, three magazine articles, and
Paper ID #38102Board 331: Latinx Engineering Students Surviving the Odds to AccomplishTheir College DegreeDr. Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre, New Mexico State University Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre received an Ed.D. degree in Higher Education Leadership from Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC), and an M.Sc. from the University of Technology of Compi`egne, France. She is now a researcher at New Mexico State University (NMSU). She focuses her research on qualitative studies addressing minority and underrepresented student college persistence, such as Latinas’ performance in STEM, mentoring, and Latinx
and Engineering Ethics journal were found using a keyword search on“human rights” AND privacy. Privacy is also a key issue in computing education, being requiredunder the ABET Computing Accreditation Commission’s criteria (5. Curriculum, (a)2.d. Humansecurity) [37] and recommended for computer engineering education (e.g. in the ACM/IEEE’sCurricular Guidelines [38], privacy is found among the Preparation for Professional Practiceoutcome 9, contemporary issues). A general discussion of scenarios and issues related to ethicsand privacy is provided by Britz [39] from the perspective of an information professional.Human rights are discussed as one of three ethical norms applicable to privacy (also includingtruth and freedom). The paper is written
with Renewable Energy TechnologiesAbstract The DESSERT (Designing Equitable and Sustainable STEM Education with RenewableTechnologies) project focuses on designing equitable STEM education modules centered onrenewable energy technologies to engage middle and high school students from underrepresentedgroups in STEM fields. Led by an interdisciplinary team of faculty and undergraduate studentsfrom two universities, the project aims to inspire interest in sustainable energy-related careersamong students from diverse backgrounds. The activities emphasize hands-on learning, empathy,and STEM literacy integration. Two sets of lab activities were developed. The first set of labactivities focuses on energy storage with a classroom set of pumped
, “Progress with the professional spine: A four-year engineering design and practice sequence,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–74, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.7158/22054952.2013.11464079.[3] Z. S. Roth, H. Zhuang, and A. Zilouchian, “Integrating design into the entire electrical engineering four-year experience,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/integrating-design-into-the-entire-electrical-engineering-four-year- experience[4] R. Khan and L. Romkey, “Scaffolding reflection across the design curriculum: Triangulating Student, Alumni, and Faculty Perspectives of the Role of Design within an Engineering Science