including more voices fromAfrican American students in engineering at PWIs as we expand beyond this pilot study. Also,these findings are not necessarily limited to Black and African American students at PWIs;future studies could expand on our findings to explore other minoritized populations atinstitutions that were not designed with them in mind. A second limitation of this study is the fact that the results are preliminary and call forfurther study that aims to explore the cultures cultivated in different engineering programs atPWIs and how African American students navigate them. We plan to collect and analyze furtherdata to identify how students use their navigational capital to achieve this aim. Finally, this study looks at the
. According to the U.S. Bureau Labor Statistics (2017), that nationalaverage of STEM related occupations was $87,500 which is nearly double the average nationalwage of non-STEM occupations. The national commitment to promoting STEM excellence isevidenced by the State-Federal STEM Education Summit that was hosted last summer. The STEMEducation Summit convened a wide range of STEM leaders from all 50 states, five territories, andseveral tribes. The goal of the summit was to outline and develop a national STEM education planthat “will to help inform the development of the upcoming Federal 5-Year STEM EducationStrategic Plan” (p.3). To help support the initiative to enhance STEM education, the prioritizationof improving STEM education U.S. Department of
Hammarby Sjöstadsverk 2015 wastewater treatment Royal Institute of Technology Ocean farming research 2015, 2017 (KTH) research presentations Fossil-free bus fleets Automation in manufacturing Forest products engineering Biofuels and bioplastics Sustainable urban planning Urban Food Production Rosendal’s Garden 2017, 2019 Integrated forestry and wood and Iggesund paperboard/Holmen Group 2017, 2019 paper production Large scale extractive processes Kiruna Iron Ore Mine 2019 Climate change impacts on
’ Interest in Transportation EngineeringAbstractThe National Summer Transportation Institute (NSTI) was a week-long summer residentialprogram supported by the Federal Highway Administration, the state’s Department ofTransportation, and a college of engineering in a large university. The program engagedparticipants in transportation engineering topics with opportunities to interact with engineerswho plan and maintain transportation systems. 125 students entering grades 10-12 spent oneweek living at the university campus. Students participated in tours of transportation-related sitesnot normally accessible to the public including traffic management centers, airports, and activeconstruction sites. Students also engaged with faculty and toured campus
summer camp time can be in the middle of summer and may disruptthe summer schedule for the whole family. In addition, in the summer, faculty and high-school teachers have their own summer agenda. All of this needs to be discussed andprepared to find the best time for summer camp.ScheduleThe schedule of the summer camp should be planned carefully, especially in the case ofvirtual education. The aim is to keep the student focused on his activities, to make thepresentation clear and complete enough to make it clear and adaptable for all students.Type of studentsOur goal in this summer camp is to focus on minorities and women, as well as low-incomefamilies. At the moment, we are focusing on high school. The involvement of middle schoolstudents was
and the extent to which they view themselves as a “STEM person”. Slightly modified version of the Chemistry Motivation Questionnaire (Glynn & Koballa, 2005), which includes 30 items that measure the following six student factors: Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Self-Determination, Goal-Orientation, Anxiety-Related Motivation. The Sense of Belongingness scale [8], which is part of the National Survey of Student Engagement, used by Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA and the Center for Post-Secondary Research and Planning at Indiana University. This instrument operationalizes "belongingness" in a number of different contexts, including
6 learningoutcomes and good gains in 8 learning outcomes (see Table 1).Unsurprisingly, student learning during the pandemic was measurably lower than pre-pandemic.Five learning outcomes were significantly lower for the students enrolled in 2020 than for thoseenrolled in 2019: how ideas from this class relate to other classes; drawing appropriate FBDs forgiven systems; interest in taking or planning to take additional engineering classes; confidencethat you can do statics work; and comfort level in working with complex ideas (see Table 2).To further assess the extent to which these significant differences can be attributed to differencesbetween the two courses, we modeled each learning outcome. The timing of when students wereenrolled in the
than a personalpassion for social justice. Although that is a commendable starting point, we also need to gainsolid grounding in literature related to critical race theory, developing White racial literacy, socialjustice in engineering education, liberative pedagogy, and culturally-responsive teaching andmentoring. While we have developed a basic foundation in these theories and frameworks, we willcomplete a more extensive literature review starting in summer 2021, which will guide our futurework. In parallel to a literature review, we will run four focus groups with students who completedthe social justice modules in both design classes to gain an understanding of their identities andinterests. We plan to refine our modules and implement them
College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Stanley Shie Ng, Biola University Stanley Ng received his BS in Biomedical Engineering from University of California Irvine and MS in Biomedical Diagnostics from Arizona State University. He serves as faculty and director of engineering programs at Biola University. Currently, he is pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering and STEM Education at North Dakota State University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Innovation-Based Learning: A New Way to Educate InnovationAbstract – As seen in recent
01 SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT MM/DD/YY REMARKS 1 _ _ /_ _ /_ _ ... PROJECT PLANS AND DETAILS 2 _ _ /_ _ /_ _ ... 3
-binary options). Based on the initialscreening survey, 81 participants identified as White or Caucasian; 21 participants reportedidentities from countries located in Asia; 10 participants chose not to answer. The remainingparticipants identified racial or ethnic affiliations typically considered underrepresented inengineering, including Latinx, Hispanic, African-American, and Black, as well as regional (e.g.Middle Eastern) or nation-specific identities.Data CollectionAll participants completed an initial screening survey that captured demographic data (name,gender, self-described race/ethnicity), background (previous internships, current capstoneproject), and employment plans (industry sector, company size). Subsequent data collectionincluded
learningoutcomes (milestones accomplished such as publications, proposals, defenses); career plans(academic, entrepreneurial); additional educational constructs as determined by the pedagogicalexpert. Overall program learning is assessed via a rubric developed to assess the 5 DimensionsScale, Figure 5 [10] from the project leadership team, Scalability Committee, External AdvisoryBoard, and the Student Advisory Board. The evaluation logic model, presented below in Table 1,outlines the project goals, actions, key measures, and leading and lagging outcomes.While the ultimate goal of the project is to increase the number of innovations andentrepreneurialism of doctoral graduates, along with the proportion of degrees earned fromtargeted student groups, it is
during homework applications. This 7-minute time constraintwas decided upon originally to align with the desires of GenZ students for short bursts ofviewing, but also fit well into the 12-minute restriction which is required under softwarelicensing terms. It was discovered early in our pilot that a strict adherence to the 7-minutelimitation was too restrictive for many of the planned videos and would require the instructor toeither reduce the included material or to artificially separate the footage into two videos. Neitherof these points were considered sufficient to maintain the original, relatively arbitrary 7-minuteframework and we modified the concept to allow for single-topic review videos which weresimply as short as possible to cover the
leadership positions, wantingfunding to develop a new initiative, and/or simply seeking to earn recognition at graduation withuniversity approved honor cords. Peer mentors are also required to participate in two full-dayleadership workshops offered each spring. After being an active mentor for two years or more,most move up to “leader” status within the organization hierarchy. Leaders are given much moreresponsibility, such as assisting with the planning of the leadership workshops and presenting atconferences. These leaders play an integral role in developing the new mentors who join theorganization, mentoring the mentors themselves. A few methods to analyze the effectiveness of the peer mentor program at LSU havebeen undertaken recently [12
activity.” (Kerri, Ethnographic Eyes Chapter 2 reflection) “Knowing a students’ community can help you plan and deliver instruction because you will know more about a students’ background knowledge and what experiences they may or may not have had. It is also important to teach from the students' culture/view so they are able to apply what they learn in school, to what they learn at home (like how a student can connect the water sensor activity with farming/ranching at home).” (Jennifer, Ethnographic Eyes Chapter 2 reflection) “It is so important for me to understand different learning needs and to be able to provide instruction that will allow students to show me what they know in a way paper pencil
including gentrification and food deserts; the impact of policies and regulations on the built environment; understanding the impact of institutional elements on projects; and modeling of public perceptions. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #34350Liam Verses, University of Texas at Austin Liam Verses is pursuing a BS in Environmental Engineering and a BA in Plan II Honors at The Uni- versity of Texas at Austin. His current research focuses on macroethics in undergraduate engineering programs. His other academic interests include water and
difficultto navigate through the app and complained about designs and other minor issues. Ultimately, theproject was temporarily halted and a new application is currently being designed and developedwith the same objectives. It will only have a different framework and personnel on theproject.The new path for the project includes switching to React Native for cross-platform mobiledevelopment and a goal to create a functional product for evaluation for final exam review.Thischange also follows best practices in app development as described by Wardynski1 and wouldserve all students with a mobile phone 1 . Future plans would include creating a Professorfunctionality that helps the professor see the efforts made by the students and assign grades basedon
need to provide support, yet allow forfrustration, contrasts with what is often experienced during school when a teacher helps studentsfind and then rewards a correct answer. In WGG, making multiple attempts and engaging in aredesign was rewarded. The figure in Appendix A presents an example of the design challengeand assessment criteria used by youth to evaluate their design. Youth are encouraged to use theassessment criteria as they planned for their redesign.Learning Facilitators stressed that they found a connection between youth engagement and easeof use. Youth did not mind and often enjoyed complex design challenges. However, they wantedtheir learning about the challenge, using the technology and answering any questions, to beeasily done
other person who even if you are born in the US. I have met studentshere who have come here for summer programs, who have gotten their passports just becausethey were coming for the summer program. They experience afterwards is just unbelievable. It’slike someone has opened up a new world for them. So for me, the first thing everybody needs todo, and I plan to do it even for my children, is to internationalize their education.Table 1: Summary of the topics and questions discussed in each round table. Questions asked of the Panelists Sample of questions generated/discussed Roundtable One – The Uneasy Relationship Between Politics and Science Is there an uneasy relationship between When was the last time in history
bridge forMariabella to connect to engineering. In contrast, Mariabella discussed the value of working inthe more open design context, where the group took up her idea as a meaningful experience. Mariabella’s experiences offer insight into what it might take to engage more youth frommarginalized backgrounds in engineering. Designing and developing ways for youths’knowledge and experiences to not only be elicited, but also have an impact is one direction thatmay support more youth connecting with engineering. Borrowing from science education: …lesson planning for agency requires teachers not only to allow space for students to exercise control over their own commitments to knowledge, but also to imagine students as
top heavy and would ruin the integrity when the motors and blocks would move. Therefore, re- engineering these blocks to what would have been a great help in the process. Overall this project was helpful in learning new processes, thinking outside of the box, and problem solving. I had a great experience completing this project and have future plans to make the modular pieces self-configuring with sensors and other new technology. • Team Member #2: This project was very helpful for learning how industrial robots work. At the beginning, I spent time doing research about industrial robots which were SCARA, articulated, spherical, cylindrical, Cartesian, and parallel robot type. Each robot
. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Appendix B Classroom Schedule for the Intervention Topic Day Class ScheduleIntroduction/ Setup 1 • Introduce project, overview/ purpose, show clubhouse • Consent/assent forms 2 • Pre-Questionnaires • Smart Homes (architecture, trends, needs) • Brainstorming Ideas- what could my clubhouse look like? Architecture / 3 • What’s the process of creating a building from start to finish? Construction • What are blueprints? • Scaling activity • Floor Plans
(i.e., whether or not still at Penn State). Students were matched ongender, race, campus assignment, and SAT Math score (within 1 standard deviation).Results: Compared to a matched comparison sample, the Engineering Ahead students earnedstatistically higher grades in their first college math course by half a letter grade, were less likelyto drop their first math course, and earned a higher grade point average at the end of their firstyear of college.Conclusions: The significantly higher math course grades for the bridge students compared to thematched comparison students suggest that the bridge programming and cohort buildingbenefitted the students. We will continue to track Cohorts 1 to 3 as well as Cohort 4 (2019).Plans are underway to
means to be a professional (n=12), 3) developing a career plan byreflecting on experience (n=11), and 4) learning from a role model (n=8). Students withdiverging style gathered information by working with other people and talking about variousfield experiences. They used these perspectives to build a better idea of the work environmentand the type of work they are going to be doing. For example, Kaitlyn shared a story about oneof her internship experiences and how she learned about work environment through interactionwith professionals stating, “there are things and opportunities for me to kind of get out in thefield and look at something to actually see it, to measure it, those kinds of stuff. But I guessknowing that comes from talking with
experience included surveying thestudents about their feelings on diversity and engineering both before and after the activity, anin-class activity focused on design and diversity of teams, and a reflection and discussion periodabout the students’ experiences. A discussion of the successes and opportunities forimprovement within the activities is included, along with changes planned for the second trialduring the current academic year.MethodsFor the pilot run of the activities, the professors each developed an in-class project that tookplace during one class period. Each activity contained a technical aspect, a design aspect, and areflection period. Both projects chose a product to design that had an aspect which wasinfluenced by the background of
students relate to each course's learning outcomes. Theinstructors must dedicate time to planning the logistics, aligning the syllabi, and homeworkprojects. Any overlap between courses reflects real life, so faculty must embrace how thoseoverlaps can be utilized to correlate Social Media homework for the benefit of the students. Amajor concern was that one student was registered for two of the courses at the same time, yetthe faculty decided to ask the student to conduct each course's deliverable separately.Integrating such innovative technological tools that are engaging to learners not only creates asense of appreciation and belonging but also provide real connections to the world. Minoritystudents who are less aware of issues in the U.S
topredict career plans in engineering [4]. Thus, the objective of this paper is to explore howstudents describe the usefulness of a newly implemented introductory engineering design class asthey navigate their subsequent years in college.This paper seeks to answer the following research question:How useful do students perceive what they learned in an introductory engineering design coursefor their successive years in college or for what they want to do after graduation?We aim to answer this question by analyzing survey responses from students who have taken theclass since the first course implementation in the Summer 2018 semester.BackgroundIntroductory engineering courses are a common element in several engineering programs. Thereis growing
; such as when students feel comfortable raising new perspectives andchallenging tradition. Prior research recommends “strategic planning and intentionalimplementation” to increase diversity of engineering teams and the integration of such teams [7].For example, the authors of [1] strongly advise the instructors to form the teams and base theirdecisions on the characteristics of the individual students. Characteristics may include gender,experience level, students’ schedules [1], race/ethnicity, major, and ability. It may also bebeneficial for the instructors to assign and rotate team roles to prevent gender biases fromperpetuating students’ roles in teams and to facilitate inclusive teamwork [1]. Others suggestavoiding isolating minority
Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29467 Thomas Becnel is working towards his Ph.D. in the Laboratory for NanoIntegrated Systems, led by Pierre- Emmanuel Gaillardon, in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. He received the electrical engineering degree from the University of Utah, and the M.Sc. degree in computer engineering from the University of Utah in 2018. His areas of research involve the design of large-scale sensor networks, low-noise capacitive CMOS sensors, and advanced low-power communication techniques. He plans to graduate with a Doctorate of
-Processing PipelineCultivate ACCESS participants interact with each other in a continuous and dynamic system wecall the ACCESS Community. The main circle of the ACCESS Community includes scholars,mentors, and ambassadors. These participants interact on a weekly basis to discuss topicsprovided to them by the Cultivate ACCESS leadership team and dive deep into their explorationof agSTEM careers and personal development. Outside of the main circle are parents andteachers. These participants do not engage as frequently with ambassadors and mentors butinteract frequently with scholars at home and during school hours. Cultivate ACCESS providessupport to these participants through resources focused on career and college planning. Parentsand teachers are