, and Research Bases." Journal of Engineering Education 25.123(2006)Prince, Michael J., Vigeant, M., and Nottis, K., “A Preliminary Study on the Effectiveness ofInquiry-Based Activities for Addressing Misconceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students”,Education for Chemical Engineers, 4:29 (2009)Schuck, S., Kearney, M., and Aubusson, P., “Education Opportunities and Challenges forGeneration OurSpace: Taming the beast?”, Proceedings of World Conference on EducationalMultimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, 5804, 2008Vigeant, M., Prince, M., and Nottis, K., “Creating of Reliable Instruments for Assessment ofConceptual Understanding in Heat Transfer and Thermodynamics”, AIChE Annual Meeting, 2009Vigeant, M., Prince, M., and Nottis, K
Administered Family STEM Nights. Paper presented atthe 118th Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE 2011),Vancouver, British Columbia. K-12 and Pre- College Engineering DivisionAlbers, L., Clark, S., Parry, E., & Smith, R. (2010). The Impact of Active Learning through Cooperation onScience Fair Projects on Elementary School Students. Paper presented at the 117th Annual Conference andExposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE 2010), Louisville, Kentucky. MinorityDivisionCunningham, Christine M. Engineering Is Elementary. The Museum Of Science Boston, 2013. Web. 2013
, WA.6. Brawner, C.E., M.W. Ohland, M.K. Orr, and X. Chen. Factors Influencing Engineering Student Major Selection. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference. 2013. Oklahoma City, OK.7. Cleveland, W.S., The Elements of Graphing Data, 1985, Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software.8. Ohland, M.W. and B.L. Sill. Communicating the impact of an introduction to engineering course to engineering departments. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference. 2002. Piscataway, NJ.9. Argrow, B.M., B. Louie, D.W. Knight, N.E. Canney, S. Brown, A.J. BLanford, C.L. Gibson, and E.D. Kenney. Introduction to Engineering: Preparing First-Year Students for an Informed Major Choice. In Proceedings of the American
Technology Teacher, 64(5), 23-268. Gattie, D.K. & Wicklein, R.C. (2007). Curricular value and instructional needs for infusing engineering designinto K-12 technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 6-18. Page 23.1196.139. Dym, C.L, Agogino, A.M, Eris, O., Frey, D.D., and Leifer, L.J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching,and learning. Journal of Engineering Education 94(I), 103-120.10. Dorst, K. (2007). Creating design expertise. [Keynote] Proc. ConnectED Int. Conf. Design Education11. Tate, D., Chandler, J., Fontenot, A.D., and Talkmitt, S. (2009). Matching pedagogical intent with engineeringdesign
ofcontemporary leadership theory, The Leadership Quarterly, Volume 12, Issue 4, Winter 2001, Pages 419-450, ISSN1048-9843, 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00090-X.3. Colleen Chesterman, Anne Ross-Smith, Margaret Peters, “Not doable jobs!” Exploring senior women's attitudesto academic leadership roles, Women's Studies International Forum, Volume 28, Issues 2–3, May–June 2005, Pages163-180, ISSN 0277-5395, 10.1016/j.wsif.2005.04.005.4. O’Bannon, D., Garavalia, L., Renz, D., and McCarther, S. (2010). Successful Leadership Development forWomen STEM Faculty, Leadership Manage. Eng. 10, SPECIAL ISSUE: Women in Civil Engineering, 167–173.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.00000805. Naomi Chesler, Peg Single, Borjana Mikic, On Belay: Peer-Mentoring and Adventure Education
. As the people who will fill theranks of engineering workers (and managers) in the future, our best hope for underminingexisting cultural structures of inequality such as depoliticization is to not socialize our studentsinto them in the first place.References1. Cech, Erin A. and Tom J. Waidzunas. 2011. “Navigating the Heteronormativity of Engineering: The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Students.” Engineering Studies 3(1): 1-24.2. Faulkner, Wendy. 2000. "Dualism, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering." Social Studies of Science 30:759-92.3. McIlwee, Judith S., and J. Gregg Robinson. 1992. Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.4
Incoming Working Professional Students. In Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. San Antonio, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education.6 Triola, M. (2010). Elementary Statistics. 11th Ed. San Francisco, CA.: Addison-Wesley.7 College of Technology (2012). 2012 MS Student Handbook. West Lafayette, IN.: Graduate Office, College of Technology.8 Dyrenfurth, M., Newton, K., Schuver, M. & Elliott, S. (2009). ROI: Return on Investment as a Factor in Designing Graduate Research Projects for Mutual Benefit. In Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Austin, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education. Page 23.1276.9
sophisticated type of thinking. In 1997, Kinsner considered the value of usingcomputer programs for undergraduate teaching to help solve field problems5. It was concludedthat the use of such computer packages in class settings improves students' comprehension andskills in solving field problems. There is a need to conduct a parallel study to investigate thepotential benefits of using engineering software(s) in pavement engineering courses at theundergraduate level.Description of DARWin Software In simple terms, Design, Analysis, and Rehabilitation for Windows (DARWin) is acomputerized pavement design tool based on the AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavement
andReactions, Industrial Heating, BNP Media, Pittsburgh, PA: August 1982.10. Fogler, H. S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. 4th Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleRiver, NJ, 2009. Page 23.1314.11
modelparameter calculations were achieved.A method to accurately determine the transistor intrinsic capacitances was developed anddemonstrated. The accurate correspondence of simulation, analysis and experimental enhancesstudent confidence in the learning process.AcknowledgementUSD Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the Fall 2012 semester.IV. Bibliography 1. D. Costa, W. U. Liu, and J. S. Harris Jr., “Direct extraction of the AIGaAs/GaAs heterojunction bipolar transistor small-signal equivalent circuit,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 38, pp. 201 8-2024, Sept. 1991. 2. I. E. Getreu, Modeling the Bipolar Transistor. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978 3. Thomas F. Schubert,, Jr. and Ernest M. Kim, A Short Study
). Page 23.1330.102. MyMathLab by Pearson Publishing. http://www.mymathlab.com/ (accessed January 4, 2013).3. Budny, D.; LeBold, W.; Bjedov, G. Assessment of the Impact of the Freshman Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education 1998, No. October, 405-411.4. Moore, R.; Jensen, M.; Hatch, J.; Duranczyk, I.; Staats, S.; Koch, L. Showing Up: The Importance of Class Attendance for Academic Success in Introductory Science Courses. The American Biology Teacher 2003, 65 (5), 325-329.5. Hatfield, J.; Hieb, J. Using Retrieved Panels from DyKnow in Large Classes. In The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-Based Technology on Education; Reed, R., Berque, D., Prey, J., Eds.; Purdue University Press: West Lafayette, Indiana, 2009.6. Hatfield, J
tunnel for either atour or for actual usage. With the exception of 2012’s program, the wind tunnel’s testsection was large enough to place a cycle with an athlete into the tunnel. The girls wereallowed to stand inside the tunnel as well as observe a variety of flow visualization andaudio (they could hear when the drag was reduced) techniques used to determineaerodynamic drag.The athlete stationed in the wind tunnel on a cycle tested a baseline (unmodified helmet)and each student team’s modified helmet. In 2012, a wind tunnel with a smaller testsection was used. Each helmet was tested on a Styrofoam wig head holder. Figure 2 a) Tuft Test and b) Modified HelmetsBiomechanics - Motion Capture and Analysis (Lecture, Hands-on
. Adams, R.S., and Felder, R.M. (2008). Reframing Professional Development: A systems approach to preparingengineering educators to educate tomorrow’s engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 239–240.2. Boice, R. (2000). Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.3. Felder, R.M., Brent, R.,and Prince, M. J. (2011) Engineering instructional Development: Programs, BestPractices, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89-122.4. Fink, D.L., Ambrose, S. and Wheeler, D. (2005). Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a Page 23.1356.9new era. Journal of
questions. While this activity may not be able to reach millions of people a year, itcan reach to reach 1000s. To reach many different audiences we need activities of different scaleand scope. This activity has proven meaningful in a medium-scale festival event.Referencesi “NSF’s Goals...Setting a True Course”, n.d., http://www.nsf.gov/nsf/nsfpubs/straplan/goals.htm.ii Y. Chae, S. Purzer, and M. Cardella, “Core Concepts for Engineering Literacy: The Interrelationships AmongSTEM Disciplines,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Louisville,KY, 2010.iii J.H. Falk, M. Storksdieck, and L.D. Dierking, “Investigating Public Science Interest and Understanding: Evidencefor the Importance of Free-choice
cm Green di 0.19 cm 160 Settling Velocity [cm/s] 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
-.&4$,!%*'-&!12!,#&!<==!-1/.%&:! e:! =S"J?!'34!,#&!;3%,$,/,$13'0!a&7$&B!N1'.4!>;aN?!,1!-134/-,!)1.&!.18/%,!4','!-100&-,$13! 21.!2/.,#&.!%-#10'.0(!&E*01.',$13:!!!C5&2@18;5&'!"#&!-1/.%&!#'%!.&-&$7&4!*1%$,$7&!2&&48'-C!2.1)!%,/4&3,%!'2,&.!$,%!2$.%,!(&'.!12!$)*0&)&3,',$13:!g1,'80(6!,B1!%,/4&3,%!'.&!,'C$35!,#&$.!S7/@'*!*.1G&-,!$3,1!N$1)&4$-'0!<35$3&&.$35!=&3$1.!K&%$536!B#$0&!'31,#&.!%,/4&3,!-1)*0&,&4!'3!$3,&.3%#$*!',!/X'8!17&.!,#&!%/))&.:!Y44$,$13'00(6!%,/4&3,!&7'0/',$13%!4$4!31,!$34$-',&!'3(!3&5',$7&!2&&48'-C6!'34!&35$3&
orientation. Traditional gyroscopes typicallyconsist of a spinning wheel that resists alterations in its angular momentum vector relative toinertial space as it is demonstrated in a simple sketch in Figure 3. In modern times, gyroscopesmeasure angular velocity vector (rad/s). The angular rotation rate, obtained from all threegyroscopes, represents the body frame's angular velocity relative to an inertial frame, expressed inthe body frame. As shown by Fuchs [9], gyroscope data is crucial as it supplements theaccelerometer data, which has a delayed signal due to averaging. Despite their significance,gyroscopes do have some drawbacks. The existence of moving parts causes friction leading todrift, which is a primary disadvantage. Additionally, noise is
temperature inside and outside the tank is 8.77oC. Ambient Relative humidity is62%, annual maximum frequency wind speed is 2.4 m/s with SE direction. The tank is inunsheltered single storied condition and open country ground roughness. Cloud cover is 50%with stability class of E. There is no inversion height. The fractured/punctured hole is located at1.5 m above the ground with 0.05 m circular hole diameter. The total release/issue time is 28min. 3Methodology: Once baseline study [2] is conducted, similar techniques are used to find temperatureeffects on propylene leak. Table-1 shows the site, tank, and environmental parameters used forPropylene chemical spill simulations. It is also horizontal
Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2020.[12] L. Sax, J. Blaney, K. Lehman, S. K. Rodriguez and C. Zavala, "Sense of Belonging in Computing:The Role of Introductory Courses for Women and Underrepresented Minority Students," Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 122, 2018.[13] M. Holanda, A. Aruajo and D. Dilva, "Sense of Belonging of Female Undergradate Students in Introductory Computer Science Courses at Univerfsity of Barasilia in Brazil," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Lincoln, NE, 2021.[14] "Girls Who Code," Girls Who Code, [Online]. Available: https://girlswhocode.com/about- us.[15] J. Torres, "Girls Who Code extends program to Quinnipiac
, “On Change III: Taking Charge of Change: APrimer for Colleges and Universities,” An Occasional Paper Series of the ACE Project onLeadership and Institutional Transformation, American Council on Education Publications,1999, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED450621[4] M. Borrego, J.E. Froyd, and T.S. Hall, “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: asurvey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments,” Journal ofEngineering Education, 99(3), 185-207, 2010.[5] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, “Facilitating change in undergraduate STEMinstructional practices: An analytic review of the literature,” Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 48(8), 952-984, 2011.[6] J.M. Williams, E. Andrijcic, S. Mohan, C. Margherio, E
://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for- states-by-states[11] Partnership for 21st Century Skills, “P21 framework definitions.” Accessed: Mar. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.battelleforkids.org/insights/p21-resources/[12] A. Srivastava and S. B. Thomson, “Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Applied Policy Research.” Rochester, NY, Jan. 02, 2009. Accessed: Mar. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2760705[13] R. E. Mayer, “Cognitive theory of multimedia learning,” The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, vol. 41, pp. 31–48, 2005.Table 1Evidence of Generative Learning Strategies in EDII and SL GP Strategy Definition
studies. Then, wewill delve into the discussion section, where we will interpret the results within the context ofexisting literature and theory. This section will also explore the practical implications of ourfindings for educational institutions. Finally, we will conclude by offering a reflective summaryof the significance of the study and its contributions to entrepreneurial education research.MethodologySurveyA Cronbach's Alpha of 0.890 was attained during the survey validation process for theEntrepreneurial Competencies dimension and 0.876 for the Entrepreneurial Intention dimension.Table 1 shows the corresponding Cronbach´s Alpha reliability analysis by dimensions.Descriptive statistics were used in sample characterization for data analysis
, andphysiological. Two underlying factors were used to measure emotions: enjoyment (4 items; α=.86; ω= .87) and hopelessness (4 items; α=.80 ; ω=.84). All reported alpha and omega values areaveraged values from each time the items were used during year 1. The items were adapted fromthe AEQ-S scale [23]. All emotion questions were listed in one block with the following prompt“Please consider how you felt today in the camp”. Enjoyment was defined as having feelings ofjoy while learning content during the summer camp. An example of enjoyment is “I enjoyed thechallenge of camp activities”. Hopelessness was defined as the opposite emotional counterpart ofenjoyment: feeling discouraged while learning new content. An example of hopelessness is “I felthelpless
programmingsoftware. Faculty perspectives vary regarding the appropriate implementation of AI supportwithout raising academic dishonesty concerns. Clear communication of expectations andrestrictions regarding AI usage is recommended. It is proposed that faculty require anacknowledgments section in reports and require students to disclose any AI tools used anddescribe how the tool(s) was used to help complete the assignment.References[1] McMurtrie, B., ChatGPT is Already Upending Campus Practices. Colleges are Rushing toRespond, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol 69, Issue 15. March 31, 2023.[2] Terry, O.K., I’m a Student. You Have No Idea How Much We’re Using ChatGPT, TheChronicle of Higher Education, Vol 69, Issue 19, May 26, 2023.[3] Calabro, K., C.M
“Entrepreneurship – New Insights”, Eds. M. Mohiuddin et. al., Intech Open, September 2023[5] Dziobczenski, P. R. N., Kähkönen, E., & Mits, H. (2023). “Shaping A Sustainable Future Through Integra�ng Sustainability, Crea�vity and Entrepreneurship In Engineering Educa�on At Aalto University”, European Society for Engineering Educa�on (SEFI). DOI: 10.21427/BW39-Y819[6] A.A. de Bronstein, S. Lampe, and J. Halberstadt, “Fostering future engineers as transformational agents: integrating sustainability and entrepreneurship in engineering education”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 219 pp. 957-962 (2023)[7] Braga, M. [et al.]. “How do students transform good solu�ons from an educa�onal challenge in a startup? A case study to entrepreneurship
line . 10.18260/1-2- -34915[11] Parker, M.A., Ashe, D., Boersma, J., Hicks, R. and Bennett, V., 2015. Good teaching starts here: Applied learning at the Graduate Teaching Assistant Institute. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(3), pp.84-110.[12] Miller, K., Brickman, P. and Oliver, J.S., 2014. Enhancing teaching assistants'(ta s') inquiry teaching by means of teaching observations and reflective discourse. School Science and Mathematics, 114(4), pp.178-190.[13] Chadha, D. and Shah, U.V., 2023, June. Work-in-Progress: Unpacking Graduate Teaching Assistants’(GTAs) Taught Practice—Exploring Training through Decisional Capital. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[14] Chadha, D
: Jacobs Publishing Co., 1973.[9] D. Rohini, A. AmarKarthik, R. Abinaya, A. Mathan, S. Midhun, and D. Dhushyanth, "Buckling analysis of a commercial aircraft wing box and its structural components using Nastran patran," Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 66, pp. 895-901, 2022/01/01/ 2022.
in computer aided design." 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, Jun 20th-23rd, 1999. [3] Chester, Ivan. "Teaching for CAD expertise." International journal of technology and design education 17: 23-35, 2007. [4] Bloom, Benjamin S. "Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1." Evaluation comment 1.2 (1968): n2. [5] “Entrepreneurial Mindset” engineeringunleashed.com. https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset (accessed January 2nd 2024).
engineering troubleshooting process.Through continuous adaptation of these problem-solving methodologies, engineers caneffectively address troubleshooting problems and propel innovation. We hope that this workoffers insights and guidance for engineers approaching troubleshooting, while also providingeducators with valuable tools and frameworks to prepare the next generation of engineeringprofessionals.References[1] A. Schaafstal, J.M. Schraagen. “Training of troubleshooting: A structured, task analytical approach” Cognitive task analysis: Psychology Press; 2000. p. 71-84.[2] K. Duncker, L. S. Lees. On problem-solving. Psychological monographs. 1945;58(5):i.[3] Schaafstal A, Schraagen JM, Van Berl M. Cognitive task analysis and innovation
Statics course course course course s course Before Before After Before After Before After Before After change After change change change change change change change change (n=122 change (n=197 (n=107 (n=178 (n=103 (n=227 (n=147 (n=252 (n=183 ) (n=44) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )% Summer Yr 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 2% Fall Yr 1 69 86 40 53 3 34 56 81 43 77% Winter Yr 1 25 12 43 34 87 55