claims, such adocument must be updated on a regular basis [4], [5], [6]. ASCE published the second version ofthe body of knowledge in 2008 (CE-BOK2) and now is in the final stages of preparing the thirdversion (CE-BOK3), which is scheduled to be published in the spring of 2019. Current plans callfor the CE-BOK to be revisited every eight years.Civil engineering work has evolved to encompass the distinctive and complementary roles of notonly engineering professionals, but also technologists and technicians. Such segmentation is notunlike that encountered in other learned professions, such as medicine or law, and it is critical tothe efficiency and success of the civil engineering workforce. ASCE, through Policy Statement535 [7], views the core of
Paper ID #22042Development of Students’ Intercultural Knowledge and CompetenceDr. James Warnock, University of Georgia James Warnock is a Professor and founding Chair for the School of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Georgia. He has been a big proponent of self-directed learning and active learning in his classes. James is also the Adjunct Director for training and instruction in the professional services department at ABET. In this role, he oversees the development, planning, production and imple- mentation of the ABET Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar
. Scholarships were awarded to four cohorts with five students selected in 2011-2012 (Cohort1), seven students selected in 2012-2013 (Cohort 2), twelve students selected in 2013-2014 (Cohort3), and twelve students selected in 2014-2015 (Cohort 4). The scholarship was limited to foursemesters of financial support at an average $3,750 per semester with the exception of Cohort 1.Initially, the plan was have all scholars in each cohort begin the program in the fall semester. Asthe associates degree program was implemented at BRCC, approximately the same number ofBRCC students were on track to transfer to LSU fall and spring semester. Thus, the scholarshipswere awarded each semester.Cohort 1 (2011-2012)The first cohort of five students received the Pathway
class continues toperform better, space in courses at the upper-level of the curriculum are more likely to befilled with students who started a freshman and who are progressing in the curriculum.The freshman class at the school of engineering has significantly increased in numberswithin the past couple of years; the infrastructure and focus on essential services that canbetter serve the current undergraduate population at the school of engineering is of primeimportance.Students with Academic DifficultiesIt is important that students who are having academic difficulties with their coursework atpartner institutions have a plan of action towards their future in these programs both atthe community college (short term) and at school of engineering
an assistant professor of Student Affairs and Higher Education at Iowa State University. Michael’s program of research centers on the role of technology in the experiences of undergraduate stu- dents. His current projects focus on large undergraduate science and engineering lecture courses exploring how students use digital study resources, how faculty and instructors design and plan for the use of digital technologies in the classroom , and, how data from digital study resources (e.g., learning analytics) can be used with other forms of data to understand student learning and performance and ultimately, to improve instructional practices.Dr. Stephanie D. Teasley, University of Michigan Dr. Teasley is a Research
of Regional and Com- munity Planning in 2001 from Kansas State University. She has taught design studios at the college level since 1998: at Kansas State University in the Department of Interior Architecture and Product Design for over fifteen years, at Chongqing Jinazhu University in the People’s Republic of China for one year, in Afghanistan at Kabul University for two summers, and in Bangladesh at the Asian University for Women for one year. Lewis’ scholarly interests include: teaching methodology, especially with beginning design students; in- ternational educational experiences, cultural exchanges, and study abroad; and the intersection between design and social justice. She received the honor of being
digital natives (students), and incorporates: mind mapping (discoverybased learning), experts on call, gamification, all integrated through teacher views thatproduce dynamic project-based lesson plans. The system encourages an interdisciplinaryapproach that requires students to draw on multiple subject areas simultaneously to solvereal world problems. Previous research conducted by the authors has indicated that in thecontext of learning style models, the PLMS provides a balanced approach to learning andtherefore should be a very useful learning tool in the physics curriculum. This study willfirst present the results of attitudinal and learning style surveys that were conducted inlocal junior high schools that correlate learning style profiles
test, I also took a biology test that was absolutely horrible. I'm not used to information heavy examination. It seemed like he wanted us to know everything in both the book and the powerpoints. The blame falls on me for underestimating biology and putting a lot of time to graphics. I plan to solve this by seeing the biology teacher for help. I wish to actually understand how to work through his purely conceptual tests.First entries by Author Y Entry 1: My old school, [name of prior university], had a campus that you could walk from any building to another within 10 minutes. At a campus the size of [current institution], it is very easy to get caught up in the “human traffic.” Students at this
researchexperiences in England, Sweden, Poland, Scotland, Spain, Italy, Germany, Austria, France, theNetherlands, Japan, China, Singapore, Australia, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Honduras, Colombia,Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, St. Kitts, Ethiopia, Togo,Ghana, South Africa and Morocco [6].IR SITE PROGRAMS A summary of research sites with universities can be seen in Table 1, below. Previouspublications on IR for underrepresented minority students in Sweden, the Netherlands, andAustria provide a detail description of the university sites research facilities and activities [5,6].In the last six years, 25 students were hosted at TU Graz/U Graz and 12 were the recipients ofthe Marshall Plan scholarship. From 2008 to present, 32
Develop your own original hypothesis and a perform that skill research plan to test it or ability now Grasp the concept and limits of a technology well enough to see the best ways to use it Design and build something new that performs very close to your design specifications Innovation Rate the extent to 1-5 Search out new technologies, processes, Orientation which you techniques, and/or product ideas partake in the Generate creative ideas following Promote and champion
] and others have suggested that heteronormativity and heterosexismmay be promoted through particular ideologies in engineering culture, especially“technical/social dualism” (devaluation of social, communicative and personnel-related aspects)[38-40] and “depoliticization” (relegation of questions of social justice and inclusion as“political,” and thus irrelevant to “real” engineering) [41, 42].This project used a mixed-methods research plan with surveys of engineering deans [43], facultyand students as well as ethnographic participant observations of a Virtual Community of Practicefor LGBTQ inclusion in STEM. The surveys and ethnographic research generated newknowledge and understanding of engineering cultures, which provided empirically
the camp was well received by the participating girls and their parents. The idea of having agirl only camp was also well received. As an example, one girl said she had originally planned toattend a co-ed STEM Camp, but changed her mind when she heard about this camp for girls. “Inengineering and science fields you’re always going to be outnumbered by guys, so I liked how itfocused more on the impact that women can have and the job opportunities women have,” shecommented. In the post workshop survey we asked the participants the following question “I think whatwe are studying about science and math in STEM Girls camp is useful for me to know” withfollowing seven answer options (a) Strongly Disagree, (b) Disagree, (c) Somewhat Disagree, (d
innovation, study control engineering and technology in national development strategies.Topic3: Science and Technology Focus on the learning about the development trendDevelopment Strategies in and application of the engineering leadership of theengineering leadership world, the development history, policies and strategic planning of China’s science and technology, understand the focus of innovation and research in engineering leadership fields.Subject Three: Courses on ManagementTopic1: Practice and Thinking on Learn and communicate about the cross
beviewed as somewhat prescriptive. The ABET evaluation process is a peer-review process fromthe disciplinary viewpoint. Thus in an ABET evaluation, an evaluator from a relevant technicalsociety will be sent to assess the program.In comparison, AUN-QA seeks to create viable internal quality assurance (IQA) systems withinASEAN universities. The primary focus of AUN-QA assessment at the program level (there areinitial efforts underway towards doing institutional level evaluations) is for the purpose ofimproving the effectiveness of the quality assurance system. AUN-QA has adopted the Plan -Do – Check - Act (PDCA) approach for improving QA practices, as shown in figure 2.8 Thus,AUN-QA accreditation is more system and process–oriented. Student
dirty water. Again, supplies were given andtime for brainstorming was given; teams were formed and a competition was constructed to seewhose filter could clean the water the best. The following Table 3 outlines each engineeringchallenge along with its supplies and objective defined in our lesson plan for that day.Table 3: Supplies and Engineering Challenge Objective Defined in Lesson Plans Engineering Challenge Supplies Given Objective Paper To relay the scientific concept of air Tissue Paper Parachute Design Challenge
. National Findings on Science Education from Speak Up 2007 Author Kim Farris-Berg.19. Steif, P.S. and Dollar, A. (2012). Relating usage of web-based learning materials to learning progress. In: Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX.20. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(26).21. Talbert, R. (2012). Learning MATLAB in the inverted classroom. In: Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX.22. Thomas, J. S. and Philpot, T. A. (2012). An inverted teaching model for a mechanics of materials course. In: Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, San Antonio
out group-specific activities on each level.The remote office is to analyze the progress of a university and make decisions on theinitiation of respective internationalization activities according to the networking level.The more detailed description of levels is provided below.Level 1: intentions (application of the “declarative” approach). A university declares itsintentions to internationalize with its potential partners abroad. Meetings and negotiations arecarried out and networking counterparts send their delegations. Plans and roadmaps areagreed as the outcomes of the stage one. The remote office is opened with an “easy partner”motivated to cooperate.Fig. 2. Proposed networking model for of engineering university
activities from the pilot program to be leveraged across multiple K-12 age ranges as part of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) outreach activities. To date, this program has been in place for three academic sessions of each course. Thework presented here will cover results and observations to-date, preliminary evaluations ofeffectiveness relative to standard (non-pilot) program instances, and plans for future work. Gradedistribution, pass/fail percentage, and anonymous student feedback surveys are utilized asmetrics to evaluate the impact of the pilot program’s changes for each of these courses.Description of Program The pilot program utilizes experiential learning tools in the form of hands-on projects,classroom
Education, Research and Faculty CollaborationABSTRACTIt has been long recognized that one of the most important aspect of delivering high qualitySTEM education is to provide the students with an educational experience that includes a widerange of knowledge including not only engineering, science, and mathematics but also liberalarts education such as ergonomics (operation, safety, usability), business (economics, marketing,management, planning, corporate identity), aesthetics (form, visualization, style), and social,environmental, and cultural issues. In response to this need, the School of Engineering,Mathematics and Science (SEMS) at Robert Morris University (RMU) formed a Research andOutreach Center (ROC) in the year 2010. The center activities
engage in academic work using a variety of self-regulating strategies: planning, monitoring, evaluating, and adjusting approaches to learning. Seventh, students’ use of cognitive strategies is situated in the context of cycles of dynamic, iterative, self-regulating activities. Eighth, as part of the monitoring effort and in an ongoing way, students compare outcomes that emerge through their activity with internal or external standards.Overview of the REU Site ProgramThis REU Site program aims to motivate and retain talented undergraduates in STEM careers,particularly careers in teaching and STEM education research. Each year over a three-yearproject period, eight undergraduate students from across the nation are recruited to
each week. Feedback was provided each week onthe journal assignments. At the end of the semester, the students were asked to write a 7-8 pagefinal reflection titled “Design Your Process For Becoming a World Class Engineering Student.”The Design Your Process project is a nationally implemented project that asks students toprovide a plan for how they will be successful in the rest of their academic engineering career.Students are asked to synthesize all they have learned in their academic success course, choosethe skills that they believe are most relevant to their success, and make a specific plan they willfollow to reach their goal of graduating with an engineering degree. In order to recruit students to participate in FYS 101-eng, the
wrote the standards for), the SONET (Synchronous Optical Network) architecture, which served as the base for today’s North American telephone network. Rodney was Chairman of the T1X1 Technical Sub- Committee (the organization responsible for SONET standardization) from 1990 through 1994. He has been active in SONET’s National and International Standardization since 1985. In addition, Rodney has published numerous papers and presentations on SONET. Rodney began his career with Fujitsu Network Communications in 1989 as the Director of Strategic Plan- ning. He also held the positions of Director of Transport Product Planning, Vice President of Business Management, Senior Vice President of Sales Management, Senior Vice
outset,students were introduced to key library professionals and digital search tools which they employedto review literature relevant to their research foci, forming a basis for research proposals. By weekfour, students presented their research plans before a panel of faculty and student judges. To enrichindividual research experiences, weekly seminars with guest lectures and discussions on moderndrivers of STEM research were integrated in this summer research program. In order to completethe program, each student produced three final deliverables - an oral presentation, a technicalposter and a final paper. In addition, students were exposed to an industrial R&D setting througha visit to a multinational corporation known for its innovation
requirementsand design development and the required skills for planning, analysis, and design of softwaresystem. Similarly, Requirements Engineering course focuses especially on requirementdevelopment tasks and technique along with requirement inspection technique. Both the coursesrequired the students to learn about software inspections and their impact on the software qualityimprovement. Students in both the courses had an average of two years of software developmentexperience in past (i.e. classroom projects, assignments, and industry).Artifact: Two externally developed industrial strength requirement documents (Table I), LoanArranger System (LAS) and Parking Garage Control System (PGCS), were inspected by eachparticipant during two inspection cycles
, the value of establishing amathematical model became apparent; this proposed model is planned to account for andmeasure such phenomena. Toward this objective, introducing an expansion of the binary systemto include “depth of coverage” or emphasis of a topic is an integral component of the model.Application 2: Testing the SchemeAnother study of applying the classification scheme occurred during a National ScienceFoundation sponsored workshop at the First Year Engineering Experience Conference in 2013.During the workshop, samples from 28 different classified courses were collected and analyzed.4The study used two different methodologies, namely by course and by outcome analysis. Bycourse analysis involves the examination of the whole course
also test common household materials for their ability tocontain, absorb, or remove oil. In the fourth lesson, they design and test a plan to clean up an oilspill in a tub of water, using what they’ve already learned.For the matching E4C unit, we combined multiple lessons so as to match time spent on thelessons across treatment conditions. We revised lessons selected for inclusion in E4C to be age-appropriate and share a similar format across E4C lessons and units. We also designed a fewlessons to address learning objectives for which we could not find engineering lessons availableon the web. In lesson 1, students learn about pollution and how pollution moves through theenvironment by observing a model. In lesson 2, students read about
identify factors necessary to be considered as an engineer. The study showsthat sophomores, juniors and seniors were more likely to identify themselves as engineers thanfreshmen. Male students were also more likely to identify themselves as engineers than femalestudents. Furthermore, students with future career plans to continue in an engineering related fieldafter graduation were more likely to self-identify as an engineer. The most commonly identifiedfactors as being necessary to be considered an engineer were intangible factors such as being ableto make competent design decisions, being able to work with others by sharing ideas, acceptingresponsibility for the consequences of actions, and speaking/communicating using accuratetechnical
first week and 23 for the second. Camps were jointly taught by UC Davis students fromthe Mechanical Engineering and Education Department. Daily lesson plans were developed inconjunction with the C-STEM Center staff to ensure teaching effectiveness. During the camps,campers were engaged in different activities aiming at introducing the basic concepts ofengineering design such as brainstorming, prototyping and testing. Computer aided designactivities were held for three hours every day and the 3D modeling curriculum was used duringthat time.During the computer design activities, particular attention was given to how the mechanicaldesign software SolidWorks and 3D printing are introduced to students who have no priorexperience using these tools
be aligned with these national objectives.The planning team consisted of the authors as this small team possessed the expertise, resourcesand authority to perform the needs assessment and to implement the recommendations thatresulted. Dr. Stanton worked for Delphi Automotive after earning his B.S degree in ElectricalEngineering at Clarkson University. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at VirginiaTech, and was employed at Colorado State University as a Research Scientist under the HEVEprogram. Dr. Thomas Bradley was Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at CSU withindustrial and academic experience in HEV engineering and analysis. Bradley was PI for CSU’sportion of the HEVE program and had authority to implement necessary
overcome their often inadequateprior educational experiences and succeed in their university programmes and laterprofessional lives. For South Africa, this is the only hope of supplying the country’s need forenough competent engineers within a reasonable time frame. In this paper we describe thedesign features of a planned five-year engineering degree program and show how it hascontributed to an increase in the one-year retention rates both in engineering as a whole andfor black students, thus addressing the dual challenges of increasing retention and equity.ContextThe University of Pretoria is a large urban university of nearly 50 000 students,approximately 5000 of whom are enrolled in nine undergraduate engineering programs,which, according to