Session 1526 Structural Engineering Workshop: A Curriculum of Real and Virtual Experiments Douglas C. Stahl Richard A. DeVries Milwaukee School of EngineeringAbstractMost design procedures for structural components and systems are based on specific behaviorsprior to or including an ultimate failure mechanism. One of the critical steps in structuralengineering education is to help students understand these behaviors. While some of thebehaviors are rather obvious and can easily be described, many are not. To help
writes that a holistic curriculum shouldconnect the coursework to one another and emphasize all areas of development and growth –spiritual, emotional, physical, and environmental. He advocates that the teachings of BlessingWay and Protection Way should be a mainstay in the pedagogy in order to practice characterdevelopment (e.g. integrity with social transactions) and learn new skills and knowledge (e.g.viewing coursework through a lens of ecological awareness). By providing Western links to aNavajo framework for learning, Benally attempted to represent a connection between Navajo andWestern knowledge while explicating a framework from Navajo sacred knowledge. The intent ofthis was to prepare Navajo children to be able to function in the modern
Technical Workers. The adaptation involvesconsideration of local industry needs. The NSF grant is also helping to equip four state-of-the-artlaboratories for integrated use in Chemical Process Operator Technology, MechanicalEngineering Technology, Industrial Plant Maintenance Technology, and Process InstrumentationTechnology. Laboratory equipment that is planned for the new computer simulation, mechanicalsystems, process instrument, and unit operations laboratories will be highlighted. Overallprogram goals are to implement an A.A.S. Degree in Chemical Process Operator Technology, toenhance related A.A.S. Degree courses, and to work with an Industry Advisory Committee oflocal chemical industry representatives to ensure that the associate degree
Paper ID #34558Transforming Curriculum to Improve STEM Learning and Advance CareerReadinessDr. Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University Dr. Ekaterina Koromyslova is an Assistant Professor in Operations Management. She teaches several courses, including Operations and Supply Chain Management, Engineering Economic Analysis, and De- cision Making in Management. She has several years of industry experience as an analyst-consultant for manufacturing companies and as a leading manager in supply chain and logistics. Her research inter- ests are in engineering education, including learner-centered teaching strategies
educators are aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards and provide suggestions for integrating neuroscience content, neuroethics, andengineering design challenges. The teachers implemented the lessons in their own classroomsand then revised them based on piloting feedback before the units were published.Currently, nine teacher-authored curriculum units for secondary STEM courses are available,with more added each year. Many units utilize engaging technologies—such aselectromyographically-controlled robotic gripper hands, circuit boards, SnapCircuits, ArduinoUno rigs, and SpikerBoxes—that illustrate basic concepts of the sensorimotor feedback loop.The study of bioethics is
solar monitoring and motor control applications Program a PLC to collect data for a SCADA system using both Analog and Discrete sensors Identify various software packages needed to communicate in a SCADA system Configure and test communications in a SCADA system Page 26.943.5 Create a Human Machine Interface (HMI) that reflects the operation of equipment Troubleshoot problems that occur while integrating a SCADA systemStudent activities and modules developedIntroducing the SCADA curriculum for the first semester was an extreme challenge since the labmodules were untested and it wasn’t clear how much of
Paper ID #25627Developing a Studio Model Computer Curriculum for First-Year Undergrad-uate StudentsProf. Thomas E. Mertz, Kansas State University - Polytechnic Campus Thomas Mertz is an associate professor at Kansas State University, Polytechnic Campus, in the School of Integrated Studies. He received his M.S. in Computer Science from the University of Kansas in 1981 and subsequently attended the Ph.D. program at Temple University. He has taught computer science since 1977 as well as working as an independent software developer for a variety of companies. He is currently the program option coordinator for the computer
Title: Consensus Building Method for Expert Crowdsourcing of Curriculum TopicsAbstractState of the art curriculum development efforts are done with a committee often consisting oftwo to four faculty members but are commonly undertaken by the assigned course instructor.However, the small number of faculty participants in the curriculum development effort canyield an out-of-date and insufficient curriculum for students entering the industry workforce [1],[2], [3], [4]. Crowdsourcing has been used to gather more input from domain experts consistingof faculty and industry professionals [2], [3], [5]. However, these efforts can yield large amountsof inputs from various crowd workers resulting in additional time required for the
Technical Information Center (DTIC), Information Assurance Technology Analysis Center (IATAC), and other DoD clients. Dr. Green earned a Doctor of Management and an MS in Technology Management from the Uni- versity of Maryland University College, an MBA from the University of Michigan, and a BS in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Page 22.296.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Bringing a technology entrepreneurship curriculum online at the University of MarylandAbstractThe demand for online teaching and learning
communications content, the map with coursecontent sheets makes it possible to clearly view the prerequisite structure and breadth and depthin the curriculum. This in turn makes it easier to evaluate curriculum development andenhancements as part of the overall continuous improvement process.The curriculum map has been added to the set of instruments used to measure outcomes in themulti-loop assessment process control system6, which is vitally integral to our continuousimprovement process. Guided by ABET EAC criteria, as are universities7, 8 from across thecountry, the University of Tennessee at Martin and the School of Engineering faculty and staffare working with dedication to implement and refine an assessment process which will assure thehighest
. Aspart of a European Union funded SOCRATES project, different universities have developed aJoint European Master Program in Remote Engineering (MARE) which includes a course of“Rapid Prototyping of Digital Systems” in its curriculum, designed by the TechnicalUniversity Ilmenau, Germany. Implementing the laboratory part of this course as an OnlineLab turned out to be a good solution to obtain better learning outcomes. The overalldevelopment and evaluation of the online solution was realized at Carinthia University ofApplied Sciences, Villach Austria.IntroductionActive learning or working by means of online laboratories is especially valuable for distanceworking or education. Users in the workplace can access remote laboratories without havingto
,networks for cloud computing is also disrupting conventional manual commands.telecommunication companies and managed service providers(MSPs), who are rapidly trying to redesign their networks in This is quite different from the approach used by traditionalorder to remain competitive [2]. Applications such as social network switches and routers, which employ a distributedmedia, mobile access, video streaming, and big data analytics architecture (each switch only understands how to route dataare driving this transformation at an accelerating pace. It has packets to the next hop in the network). Since there is nobecome challenging for traditional college curriculums
of requirements that slightly differ in category definitions and number of credit hours. Thearchitecture, engineering, and construction degrees include the core curriculum courses as a partof the degree requirements defined by the state, regional accreditation, and professionalaccreditation procedures. The core curriculum courses also offer an opportunity for earlypreparation and recruitment for professional degree programs. This paper reviews the corecurriculum participation of Texas architecture, engineering, and construction programs. As partof this study, the Texas General Education Core Curriculum database is queried for approvedcore curriculum courses taught by architecture, engineering, and construction programs at highereducation
Curriculum: “Living with the Lab”All engineering students at Louisiana Tech enroll in an integrated curriculum designed to Page 14.619.3incorporate many of the educational practices of the National Science Foundation EducationalCoalitions9. Students complete three engineering courses (ENGR 120, 121 and 122) which areimplemented as combined lecture / laboratory classes and which meet twice each week for tenweeks for 110 minutes per meeting, as shown in Table 1.Our freshman integrated curriculumincludes differential and integral calculus courses, basic chemistry lecture and laboratorycourses, and a calculus-based physics course; students also
perceived group roles in the context of first-year engineering courses, weexplored female students’ learning experience in a group project setting in this work-in-progress using Benne and Sheats’ functional roles model. Based on our qualitativedata, we found that female students performed a range of roles in the group project. Inthe dimension of task roles, female students usually took the roles of assistants, opiniongiver, coordinators and initiator-managers. In the dimension of social roles, femalesserved as harmonizers, followers or gatekeepers. As to the dimension of individual roles,some female students self-reported the feeling of being an outsider in working with aproject group. Suggestions were proposed to promote engineering curriculum
13.714.7HR ethics and professional standards 6Technology and HRIS systemsQualitative and quantitative methods and tools foranalysis, interpretation, and decision-making purposesChange managementLiability and risk managementJob analysis and job description methodsEmployee records managementInterrelationships among HR activities and programsacross functional areasOne recommendation coming from our advisory committees as well as from other programs9 isthe need for graduates to have written communication and presentation skills. This has beenincorporated into the curriculum with increased written assignments and presentations in existingcourses. The skill of written communication is an integral part of not
Session 2793 The Creation of a Partnership to Guide the CIS Curriculum Michael Doran, Jerrolyn Hebert, Haukur Ragnarsson, Gene Simmons, Joshua Harrison, Neil Henderson, Douglas Phillips, Mike Trippi University of South Alabama / Accelerated Technologies Division of Mentor GraphicsAbstractThe computing industry is in a constant state of evolution. Technological changes are slow to bemerged into the college curriculum. In many cases, faculty members at universities suffer from alack of industry contact, which hinders this integration of new technology. In addition, to
be found in bringing in a new course into analready packed curriculum. A new course, IME540 Environmentally Conscious Designand Manufacturing, will be offered for both undergraduates and graduate students as anengineering elective across all disciplines in the university and will reside within theIndustrial & Manufacturing Engineering Department. In an attempt to reach as manystudents as possible, the course is being offered with minimal prerequisites and will beteam-taught by faculty from various disciplines including Business, Liberal Studies,Mechanical Engineering and Chemistry.The multidisciplinary faculty group will have completed two offerings of IME540 as asenior engineering elective course by the time this paper is presented at
wholeeducational experience is the fostering of independent entrepreneurship through Technogenesis, acornerstone of the institute’s strategic plan. Technogenesis is the educational frontier at SITwherein faculty, students, and colleagues from industry jointly nurture the process of conception,design, and marketplace realization of technology.The scope and complexity of the planned curriculum developments to address the above requirecareful planning of assessment procedures to ensure the educational integrity of the resultingprogram. Therefore, the School of Engineering (SoE) formed an assessment committee andcharged it with the implementation of outcomes-based assessment by quantitative measurements ofperformance and attitudes throughout a hierarchical
resultedfrom efforts of the Industry-University-Government Roundtable for Enhancing EngineeringEducation (IUGREEE) to initiate a continuing and evolving process to provide curriculumdesigners with important information from industry.IntroductionThe ABET Criteria 2000 approach used to accredit engineering education curricula createsopportunities for universities to redesign their curriculum but it requires a focus on achievingspecific goals, objectives and outcomes. Among them is a list of eleven outcomes thatengineering programs must demonstrate their graduates possess upon graduation. The studenteducation outcomes described in the Criterion 3 section of the ABET Criteria 2000 are: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and
coursework, seminars and workshops that accommodate their educational, researchtraining, and career placement needs. The fellows have to attend an introductory panel discussionwith several faculty members, researchers at national lab, industry professionals, and currentgraduate students to help new fellows identify their interest.With successful completion of background knowledge and core research skill training, studentsstart working in their home institution’s research laboratories for the first year. Faculty andexternal mentors help trainees in developing his/her applied research project (i.e., thesis,dissertation or undergraduate project depending on the student’s level) that addresses asustainability priority track.3.1 Integration of
, though they follow somewhat different mechanical constructionprocedure, electronic packaging and software for programming. Currently we are in the processof acquiring electronic components so that students can start fabricating the new sensor boardwhich will be integrated with the BalloonSat for further testing of the circuit and software. Weexpect to launch our payload along with next balloon launch by the Columbus group which hasbeen tentatively fixed at the first or second weekend of April 2010. Because of the timeconstraint, it was decided to postpone the launch of the second payload with Arduino, GPSmodule and solar cells for a future mission. Since the launch will take place within an hour’sdrive from the university, it will allow us to
our course. Weinclude results and analysis from a student focus group, an anonymous exit survey, and includeour own observations.IntroductionIn the Fall 2011 semester when CPLDs were adopted for our introductory logic circuit course we Page 26.1252.2used an integrated approach, including the use of CAD tools and a hands-on experience with abreadboard. Our students first used discrete logic devices in two laboratory experiments and thena used CPLD module. Based on our research4 we found that in using this module, students caneasily identify the CPLD and with modest wiring they can construct circuits that they feel areboth satisfying and
Student Chapter at UTEP.Mrs. Helen Elizabeth Geller, University of Texas, El Paso Helen Geller is the Program Manager for the STEMGROW grant, funded by the Department of Education at the University of Texas at El Paso.Luis Carlos Jimenez, University of Texas, El Paso Luis C. Jimenez is an undergraduate student majoring in Computer Science at The University of Texas at El Paso with interest in Cyber Security. He is currently working with the Center for Research in Engineer- ing and Technology Education as a Research and Development Specialist with an emphasis in technology implementation in the STEAM curriculum. Luis has been an active volunteer with organizations that try to help the community through engineering
-Southwest Annual Conference, Houston, TX. 367-370.[11] Hsu, T. (1999). Development of an undergraduate curriculum in mechatronics systems engineering. Journal Page 13.1024.10 of Engineering Education, 173-179.[12] Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M. (1994). A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 1-6.[13] Porter, R. L., Fuller, H. (1998). A new “contact-based” first year engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 399-404.[14] Yokomoto, C. F., Rizkalla, M. E., O’Loughlin, C. L., El-Sharkawy, M. A., Lamm, N. P. (1999
asystemic analysis and provide an integrated solution for the increasingly complex technologicalneeds of society.”5Other benefits of incorporating systems engineering into the computer science curriculum are: (1)increasing the diversity of the Department, thereby expanding the research and fundingopportunities; (2) increasing the opportunities for meaningful interactions between twocompatible disciplines in which methodologies, tools, and techniques of each discipline havehigh potential for adaptation by the other; (3) for computer science programs within engineeringschools, and increasing sense of compatibility with the engineering departments; and (4)expanding the traditional computer scientist’s perspective of solving real world, human problems
monitor and control a physical system based on customerrequirements collected. At the component level, learning modules and related hands-on experiments were developedfrom a system design perspective to provide an opportunity for students to learn how to select theappropriate sensors to monitor the physical phenomenon and how to design necessary analog anddigital signal conditioning circuits to connect them to micro-controller/computers. The systemlevel learning modules were designed to help students familiarize themselves with currenttechnology used in monitoring and control such as integrated sensor boards, commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) general purpose DAQ hardware and software development environment. At the network level, six hands-on
furthering theoutreach of the curriculum to more courses. The team expands their scope in an effort to extendthe outreach of e-Portfolios to other departments within the College of Engineering to achievethe same goals for a wider variety of engineering students, and considers other applications suchas recruiting, grading, and other documentation use cases. The team also discusses the mosteffective means of implementing curriculum such as this in order to protect the integrity ofacademic programs and property, while ensuring the ease and accessibility of an electronicportfolio for all students.KeywordsProfessional Development, Engineering Education, High Impact Practice, Electronic Portfolios,Curriculum ImplementationBackgroundThe Biggadike e
ManufacturingAbstractAdditive Manufacturing (AM) has become a game changer for the manufacturing industry. Withgrowing implementation of AM in various industries, it is the responsibility of different levels ofeducation to expose students to AM technologies and to integrate AM into their curriculum. It iswell known that students who gain the skillsets of today’s industry have a better chance in gettinga competitive job. In response to this need, a new senior level elective course on AM, has beendeveloped for the first time in Old Dominion University (ODU) region in the South. The coursewas developed and taught by the Mechanical Engineering Technology faculty with the expertisein manufacturing processes, welding, and material science. The course was available to a
Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013). Women, Minorities,and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013.http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_digest.pdf6. Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., & Murphy, L. (2012). Reading for Understanding. How Reading ApprenticeshipImproves Disciplinary Learning in Secondary and College Classrooms. (Jossey-Bass) 22 – 29.7. Chen, X., Solder N. (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields StatisticalAnalysis Report. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf8. Karp, M., Hughes, K., & O’Gara, L. (2008). An Exploration of Tinto’s Integration Framework for CommunityCollege Students. Community College Research