with the STEP 1B Engineering Grant hadspecific objectives supporting these goals. They were: (1) develop and maintain an effectiveliaison between BRCC and LSU; (2) utilize scholars in a peer ambassador program facilitatingtransfer success; (3) establish a pre-transfer academic counseling program; (4) expand existingseminars to orient and integrate BRCC and other transfer students into LSU and (5) invite BRCCmath, science and engineering faculty to participate in ongoing Faculty Development.Activities of the program included outreach, professional development, advising, and developingan overall assessment tool. All scholars participated in outreach activities that consisted of Peer-to-Peer talks at BRCC each semester and Shadow Days at LSU for
are degreeprograms commonly offered at other institutions. Mathematics, physics, and chemistry were alsoincluded in the study to gain an understanding of curricular choice opportunity in non-engineering Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) disciplines.The “Choice Value” term was developed as a quantified representation of the aggregatecurricular choice opportunity within a given degree program, and is a function of total coursechoice opportunities, the proportion of degree credit hours that provide curricular choice, and thenumber of courses from which students may choose. Choice Values were determined using thepublished curriculum in the 2013-2014 university catalogs, as well as counts for the number ofindividual course options
established researcher in the social sciences. It ishoped that this work will provide a holistic summary of their pathway, and to also caution andguide faculty who are contemplating either a partial or complete shift in their research paradigmto EER.KeywordsFaculty development; mentoring; research initiation; engineering formation; RIEF1. IntroductionEngineering education research (EER) is an interdisciplinary field that addresses the uniquechallenges associated with the teaching and learning of engineering, and the pathways leading toengineers' professional formation and growth [1-3]. EER integrates a wide range of qualitativeand quantitative elements from the physical sciences, social sciences, mathematics, andengineering. The scope of EER was
Paper ID #33466Development of the Fit of Personal Interests and Perceptions ofEngineering Survey (F-PIPES) Instrument (Fundamental)Dr. Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 classrooms. Specific research interests include design metacognition among learners of all ages; the knowledge base for teaching K-12 STEM through engi- neering; the relationships
mechanics of materials. Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2009.535058611. Dyer-Barr, R. (2013). What Works in STEM Intervention Programs (SIPs) for Underrepresented Minority Undergraduates: Perspectives from SIP Administrators, ASQ Advancing the STEM Agenda Conference, Grand Rapids, MI.12. Pelleg, B., Imhoff, K., Ayers, K., & Boettcher, P. A., (2016). Utilization of an Engineering Peer Tutoring Center for Undergraduate Students. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA.13. Truschel, J. (2006). 6 habits of a highly effective tutor, Synergy, 1, 1-4. https://www.myatp.org/synergy-volume-114. Webster, T. J. & Dee, K. C. (1998). Supplemental instruction integrated into an
CUPP initiative, but also satisfied theirrequirements for a 3-credit Senior Capstone course, which is a mandatory requirement of theprogram. Their involvement with this collaborative project allowed the students to gainexperience with a practical, real-world engineering project and enabled them to use the skillsintroduced throughout their curriculum, as well as provide them with an opportunity to begin torefine their communication and project management skills. According to ABET (2017):“Baccalaureate degree programs must provide a capstone or integrating experience that developsstudent competencies in applying both technical and non-technical skills in solving problems”[4]. Furthermore, Dulaski (2013), has stated that similar senior capstone
Engineering Outreach: Project-Based Learning for Elementary and Middle School StudentsAbstract: Parents have sought out engineering preparatory programming for their children whohave expressed an interest in the field as a college major and as a career. The supplementaleducational industry which has arose to train the hard and soft skills required to prepare studentscontinues to grow and transform the way elementary and middle school engineering education isshared. The cost of these supplemental programs is a future investment in that they provide anentry to engineering concepts, exploration of first principles, and project based learning. Newadditions to this market such as Ad Astra/Astra Nova and Synthesis have sought to
threads are cross-departmental pathways of classes and projects inareas that address the “new machines and systems” of the future and that are likely to play a major partin impacting the world when the students graduate. By participating in the pilot, students will earn an SBdegree from the department they are majoring in and a NEET Certificate naming the thread, within theusual four-year duration. NEET has launched two additional pilot threads in Fall 2018: AdvancedMaterials Machines (covering materials science and engineering and mechanical engineering) and CleanEnergy Systems (covering nuclear science and engineering, civil and environmental engineering andmechanical engineering).The NEET approach and curriculum developed over more than nine
utilizecompetencies developed in the first three years of the curriculum in the solution of a complexdesign problem.Educational excellence requires exposing students to the current edge of research. To ensure thatstudent projects are along the same trajectory that the industry is moving, educators mustcontinually introduce emerging techniques, practices, and applications into the curriculum. Thefields of Internet of Things (IoT) and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are growing rapidly, andthere is increasing interest in providing undergraduate students with a foundation in these areas.This paper presents IoT and WSN projects that our undergraduate computer and electricalengineering students have done in their senior capstone course in wildfire
, students participate in a two-week tripwhere students interact with the community and implement the project, participate in culturalexperiences, and identify projects for the following year. Following the trip, additionaldocumentation similar to items noted above is required, as well as an executive summary, shortvideo, reflections paper, and survey.Previous publications related to the course have discussed training internationally responsibleengineers3, sustainability and impact4, integration of sociology and engineering using keyprinciples of human-centered design5, GEO course insights6, social connectivity betweenstudents and communities7, the documentation strategy2, and water filter implementation inSouthern Peru8. Some of these publications
and challenges of implementingthe first year in an experimental pilot program. As part of a set of initiatives to transform highereducation at Purdue University, the Polytechnic Institute (PI) was designed to be a multi-disciplinary, hands-on, competency-based experience for undergraduate students in technologyprograms. In Spring 2014, the PI began recruiting students, and in Fall 2014, the programopened its doors to its first cohort. The faculty who had taken a year to design and develop thefirst year curriculum eagerly awaited their new mentees. However, students came in with theirown hopes and concerns, which impacted their desire to join and remain in the program.Students were not alone in their decision-making. They were guided and
. Half of the initial 14 interviews were conducted inperson and half by phone to see what were the effects the different formats. The phoneinterviews were more candid, so the rest of the interviews were conducted by phone or Skype.In a previous paper, students were assigned an ‘SR Type’ that described how they envisionedengineering integrating with their own SR-related endeavors41. These types are shown in Table1. The majority of these students also repeated the EPRA survey, which included a new open-ended question that asked the students to identify any courses that had impacted their views ofSR.Table 1: SR Types Identified from Year 1 Interviews SR Type 1 - These students indicated that their reasons for choosing engineering as a major were or
… Contributions to WPI may demonstrate an external impact if they are disseminated and recognized externally.” • It endorses an inclusive definition of scholarship and identifies characteristics common to all scholarship: public, amenable to critical appraisal, exchanged and used by other members of a scholarly community. The scholarships of discovery, integration, application and practice, teaching and learning, and engagement are defined. The policy states that contributions may be in one area or across multiple areas, and that all areas are valued equally. Scholarly contributions may combine or cut across traditional categories of teaching, research/creativity, and service. • A teaching portfolio is now a required element
elements withinthe system, connected by lines that represent a variety of relationships. Given its usefulness inunderstanding intricate systems, it should be helpful in mapping the engineering educationprocess. A huge number of factors affect the education of new engineers. From elementaryschool to graduate school, students are exposed to STEM curriculum, experiential learning,career development, and other external factors that contribute to them becoming an engineer.Having a systemogram that compiles this information could be used by students, teachers,professors, and administrators to refine the system for everyone’s benefit. The systemogram ofthe engineering education system is shown below in Figure 6.Figure 6: Systemogram of student flow
connect withone another and reflect on the information they have been exposed to throughout the day.As shown in fig. 6, the majority of teachers have already used, or are intending to use the activitykit provided. Some have even mentioned using activities from the website that were not part of thetrack they attended at the workshop but fit their classroom curriculum. There was a wide breadthin the ways teachers implemented their classroom kits. Some teachers mentioned they use theactivity as an introduction to a new concept, while others used them as hands on reinforcement ofa concept they had already taught in a traditional fashion. Teachers who used the kits mentionedthat they encouraged them to try new teaching strategies in their classrooms
[4]. Therefore, these engaging, accessible, and affordable courses and challenge problemshave been and will continue to be developed to reach more students throughout the state, and inthe future, the country.SLI’s goal is to increase the number of students and enhance the education of students pursuingcareers in space. The objective is to create an integrated set of educational resources, implementthem strategically in undergraduate classrooms, K-12 classrooms, outreach events, andworkshops, and assess their efficacy in achieving our goal. The public benefit of the project isexpanded opportunities, materials, and resources for enhancing K-12, undergraduate,teacher/professor, and public knowledge and understanding of space science and
Your Hand, a multidisciplinary collaboration between engineering and the artsAbstract: Raise Your Hand is an immersive, interactive sensor-driven dynamic art exhibit.Vision tracking software changes the video projections, mechatronics, and music composition inresponse to the height of a visitor’s raised arm. The 1 ½-year project brought together studentsand faculty from computer engineering, computer science, electrical engineering, industrialdesign, mechanical engineering, literature, media and communication, computational media, andmusic technology. Further, students were integrated into the project in different forms, includingcapstone design teams, Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) students, undergraduate research
. Randall Davies, Brigham Young University Dr. Davies is currently an assistant professor of Instructional Psychology and Technology at Brigham Young University. His research involves program evaluation in educational settings with the general objective of understanding and improving the teaching and learning process. His research has a specific focus of evaluating technology integration, assessment policy, and educational practices. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Understanding Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions: Barriers to Study Abroad ParticipationIntroductionWe live and work in a global environment that presents many opportunities and
and coding. c. Develop engaging coding challenge activities for students to explore.7. A Moment in Time, an intro to Statics. a. Start from the beginning with particle physics and forces. b. Teach moment analysis through to application. c. Introduce the basics of truss analysis with a focus on procedural thinking.8. Explore digital supports. a. PhET is a solid source of physics concept simulations. b. Physicsclassroom.com provides lessons, often from alternate views. c. Hyperphysics.com is a visual sources of concept and equation applications.9. Dig into some math application with derivatives and integrals. a. Connect calculus actions with engineering applications. b. Deep dive
students in experiencingrational discourse [19]. Experiencing disorienting dilemma in classrooms through ill-structuredquestions and reflective learning strategies is essential for students to enter the transformativelearning process, but creating an environment of trust and support in the classroom is crucial forstudents for completing their transformative learning process.VIII. ConclusionFirst year engineering curriculum aims to ease the academic transition of first year students fromhigh-school to college by making them aware of the limitations of their study habits and learningtechniques. Through transformative learning experiences, students not only become cognizant oftheir limiting habits of mind, but they also become independent thinkers
portion of the program is to prepare Scholars for the pace,rigor, and depth of the STEM curriculum at Rice. All Scholars take first-year Chemistry,Physics, and Calculus as courses, five days a week; homework, quizzes and exams areadministered like in the academic year. As stated above, RESP is not a remedial program.Instead, the summer portion of RESP exposes students to the most challenging sections ofChemistry, Physics, and Calculus. Scholars simultaneously receive coaching from instructors,staff, and upperclassmen Fellows in study and learning techniques. This coursework issupplemented by individual Pre-Calculus remediation through ALEKS, an adaptive onlinelearning system. Additionally, students complete modules in engineering design and
created to offer an alternative totraditional coursework, as often there is not room in a curriculum to require automationtechnicians to complete separate cybersecurity courses. If an educator wishes to incorporate theCyber4RAM content into their course offering, the project team can share a SCORM packagethat can be utilized via their institution’s LMS. NICE Competencies for Badge 1. Asset and Inventory Mgmt. 2. Computer Languages 3. Data Privacy 4. Data Security 5. Digital Forensics 6. Identity Management 7. Incident Management 8. Infrastructure Design 9. Physical Device Security 10. Systems Integration 11. Vulnerabilities Assessment Figure 1: Badge Competencies Figure 2: Badge Development
everyone, even though everything in the society pressures you into sameness – it is a handicap in the end. A handicap to live without knowing the struggle of difference – in all of its pain, its fear, its celebration, its compassion [2].”AbstractThis is an archival record of a proposed panel discussion for the 2021 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition. It reflects a year-long conversation between the six co-authors. Panel attendeeswill be invited to join and expand upon that conversation. Further analyses and integration areplanned after the conference when we will have the benefit of other panel attendees’ commentsand their own narratives.Under ideal circumstances, engineering cultures in academia and industry bring out the best
(education; engineering; public affairs; arts andsciences; food, agriculture, and environmental sciences; business; law). The OhioState EmPOWERment Program in convergent graduate training for a sustainableenergy future enrolls Ph.D. students studying any aspect of energy from degreeprograms any college in Ohio State and engages them in several curricular andco-curricular elements that are designed to dovetail with their Ph.D. degreeprogram requirements in ways that do not extend their time to graduate. TheOhio State EmPOWERment Program established at Ohio State an energy StudentCommunity of Practice and Engagement (SCOPE), a Graduate InterdisciplinarySpecialization (GIS), and an undergraduate Research in Sustainable Energy(RISE) summer research
Paper ID #11218PROGRAMMING A SIX AXIS MOTOMAN HP3C ROBOT FOR INDUS-TRIAL SORTING APPLICATIONMr. Hamza Kadir, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Alumni Hamza Kadir, M.Sc., currently works as a Controls Engineer in the Packaging Machinery OEM indus- try. He completed his Masters from Purdue University Calumet, majoring in Mechatronics Engineering Technology. He conducted his M.Sc. Directed Project at the Nick and Nancy Wilson Mechatronics En- gineering Technology Laboratory. This project involves integration of modern automation tools for an intelligent part sorting system. He has previously worked with use of
Paper ID #25288Experimental Evidence Regarding Gendered Task Allocation on TeamsMs. Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan Elizabeth is an undergraduate student at the University of Michigan studying Biomedical Engineering and Applied Mathematics. She has worked as a research assistant for Dr. Robin Fowler in the Technical Communication Department of the College of Engineering for several years focusing on team dynamics for first-year students and also works as a research assistant in the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group working on design science based research in senior-level engineering design
Paper ID #32203What’s Next? From Analysis to ActionDr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Agnieszka Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washing- ton, and MSEE and BSEE from Florida Atlantic University in 1996 and 1994. Dr. Miguel’s professional interests involve image processing, machine learning, and engineering education especially active learn- ing, diversity, equity, and inclusion, retention, and recruitment. Her teaching interests include MATLAB, circuits, linear systems, and digital image processing. She is an ASEE Fellow and a member of the IEEE, SWE, and Tau
3.09 3.77 1.00We also visualized all the students’ networks. (See Figure 1 for three examples.) The networksdepicted who the alters were, the content of the relational ties, and the overall structure of thenetwork. Visualizations allowed for an examination of network structure and components,particularly whether students’ networks on campus overlapped structurally and to what degreethey were integrated. Individual student networks are also useful to institutional personnel inworking with specific students on their support networks and strategies. Findings indicated thatfirst-year students exhibited a range of network structures, generally spanning those from“home” and newly created networks in the college environment, which
in academia. He is currently Assistant Dean for Research, Batten College of Engineering and Technology (BCET) at ODU. His previous appointments include As- sociate Professor of Engineering Technology and as Associate Director of the Institute for Ship Repair, Maintenance, and Operations at Old Dominion University (ODU).His research has focused mostly on control systems (integration and testing) and the reliability and maintainability of complex systems. He has been selected as both a NASA and an ONR Faculty Fellow. He regularly teaches courses in Ma- rine Engineering and in Maintained Systems. Most recently Dr. Dean was on the Headquarters Staff the American Society of Naval Engineers. He received his Ph.D. from
Paper ID #11535A Series of Singular Testimonies: A New Way to Explore Unearned Advan-tages and Unearned DisadvantagesDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the