. Examples of these are courses such as machine vision,fluid mechanics, etc. Another noteworthy feature of this project has been the instant appeal tofaculty in other departments. The wind tunnel has already been used by a faculty member in thePhysics department and there have been requests for other equipment as well from a variety ofother departments all over the University.The table given below shows the equipment usage in the twelve different courses that have beentargeted for vertical integration. The sequence of “X”s in any column show the prerequisitestructure developed for that particular equipment within any curriculum. Inverted Mobile Ball & Wind Vibrations Train
-ReferencedCognitions in Relation to Mathematics”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.Thornton, S. (1995), Children Solving Problems, Harvard University Press.Woods, D., A. Hrymak, R. Marshall, P. Wood, C. Crowe, T. Hoffman, J. Wright, P. Taylor, andC.G. Bochard (1997), “Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster Problem SolvingProgram”, Journal of Engineering Education.Biographical InformationDEBRA LARSON joined the College of Engineering and Technology as an Associate Professorafter completing a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Arizona State University and working inindustry for ten years. Dr. Larson is a registered Professional Civil Engineer and teaches, inaddition to EGR 286 and EGR 386, senior structural design classes in Concrete, Steel
weekly labs for a semester-long project. In doing so, they willbecome accustomed to taking responsibility for their own education. Student commentssuggested that treating students as professionals, and expecting them to behave so, cultivatesprofessionalism.REFERENCES1. Dutson, A. J., R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 1, 1997, pp. 17-28.2. Mourtos, N. J., “The Nuts and Bolts of Cooperative Learning in Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 1, 1997, pp. 35-37.3. Howell, K. C., “Introducing Cooperative Learning into a Dynamics Lecture Class,” Journal of
. • Covey, S. R., The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic, New York, NY, Simon and Schuster, 1989 • Douglass, D. N., Choice and Compromise: a woman’s guide to balancing family and career, New York, NY, AMACOM, 1983. • Levinson, H., Career Mastery: keys to taking charge of your career throughout your worklife, San Francisco, CA, Berrett-Hoehler Publ., 1992. • Mackenzie, A., The Time Trap, New York, NY, AMACOM, 1990. Page 3.445.5 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings • Messenger, J., Personal Excellence: a system for making
improvement process. Each faculty memberfound to be performing unsatisfactorily is required to develop and implement a plan designed toimprove his or her performance. The plan, created at the unit level, with the unit head mustinclude specific goals, timelines and benchmarks associated with the area(s) or weakness thatwill be used to measure and follow improvement progress. Failure to achieve the goalsprescribed in the performance improvement plan in a timely manner shall result in arecommendation for dismissal. A faculty member who is recommended for dismissal because ofthe post–tenure review process has an opportunity to challenge the recommendation asprescribed by ABOR policy, under hearing procedures for faculty.Elements of ImplementationProgram
-4- 1 = None 2 = Slight 3 = Moderate 4 = A Great DealProgress made, because of this course, in your ability to: n) Identify the tasks needed to solve an unstructured problem. 1 2 3 4 o) Visualize what the product of a project would look like. 1 2 3 4 p) Weight the pro’s and con’s of possible solutions to a problem. 1 2 3 4 q) Figure out what changes are needed in prototypes so that the final 1 2 3 4 engineering project meets design specifications. r) Develop ways to resolve conflict and reach agreement in a group. 1 2 3 4 s) Pay attention to the feelings of all group members
themselves a letter grade based on their performance forthe project. The mean GPA of the students in the twenty member group was 3.3/4.0, and themean GPA of the students in the ten member group was 3.0/4.0. This occurred even though theten member group’s project was of significantly more detailed and of higher quality than thetwenty member group’s project. The instructor believes that this result is due to the students’method of self-assessment. Most students graded themselves based on completing the workassigned to them. If the student completed the work, s/he usually assigned an A. Because thelarger group had the same amount of work as the smaller group, members had less responsibility,and completed their tasks in much less time. One student
Curricula at University of California-Davis," IEEE Transactions on Education, May 1994, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 136-146.5. R. G. Quinn, "Drexel's E 4 Program: A Different Professional Experience for Engineering Students and Faculty," Journal of Engineering Education, October 1993, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 196-202.6. S. W. Director, P. K. Khosla, R. A. Rohrer, and R. A. Rutenbar, "Reengineering the Curriculum: Design and Analysis of a New Undergraduate Electrical and Computer Engineering Degree at Carnegie Mellon University," Proceedings of the IEEE, September 1995, Vol. 83, No. 9, pp. 1246-1269.7. "Reinventing the Classroom," WPI Journal, Winter 1994, pp. 6-12
);surf(x,y,z,abs(z)); %Plot the initial waveform in 3Daxis([-a a -a a -2*max(max(z)) 2*max(max(z))])lim=axis;view(-10,30)pcolor(z); %Scale color using field amplitudecolormap(hot) %Define the colormapLP22m=moviein(20); %Allocate memory for movie frames%Store successive framesfor j=1:20 surf(x,y,sin(2*pi*j/20)*z,abs(z)); axis(lim); view(-10,30); LP22m(:,j) = getframe;end%Run the movie one time%movie(LP22m,1)APPENDIX B%Matlab m-file used to simulate group velocity in an optical fiber.%The program gives a choice of using a dispersive or a non-dispersive%material. Time is updated in the upper right corner as the%simulation progresses.%Written by B. Jenkins; 8/97clearclfmedium=input('Is this a dispersive(d) or non-dispersive(n) media?','s
the initial waveform in 3Daxis([-a a -a a -2*max(max(z)) 2*max(max(z))])lim=axis;view(-10,30)pcolor(z); %Scale color using field amplitudecolormap(hot) %Define the colormapLP22m=moviein(20); %Allocate memory for movie frames%Store successive framesfor j=1:20 surf(x,y,sin(2*pi*j/20)*z,abs(z)); axis(lim); view(-10,30); LP22m(:,j) = getframe;end%Run the movie one time%movie(LP22m,1)APPENDIX B%Matlab m-file used to simulate group velocity in an optical fiber.%The program gives a choice of using a dispersive or a non-dispersive%material. Time is updated in the upper right corner as the%simulation progresses.%Written by B. Jenkins; 8/97clearclfmedium=input('Is this a dispersive(d) or non-dispersive(n) media?','s')kb=12; %Define
. Arrandale, Waste-To-Energy. Promises and Problems, Governing, February 1993. [8] D. Riggle, Utilization Options: Finding markets for scrap tires, BioCycle, March 1994. [9] R. Steuteville, The State of Garbage in America (Part 1), BioCycle, April 1995.[10] M. Blumenthal, Scrap Tire Market Analysis, BioCycle, February 1997.[11] S. Bejurstrom, Nuclear waste can be managed - An informed public is the best partner, IW, November 4, 1996.BIOGRAPHY Dr. Bahador Ghahramani is an Associate Professor of Engineering Management in the School ofEngineering at University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR). Prior to joining UMR he was a Distinguished Member ofTechnical Staff (DMTS) in AT&T-Bell Laboratories. His work experience covers several
Work (I) * Ambient Temperalure (R) x Summation of Delta S I= 34.913 BTU/sec Page 3.50.4 54. Evaluation The previous section, figures and tables define the INTERCOOLING HEAT EXCHANGERSpreparations that must be performed prior to evaluating Intercoolers reduce power requirements byopportunities for supplying the requited flow of air at reducing the specific volume of the air to bethe specified temperature and pressure while reducing
career student professional upon completeion of the organizations, mentoring undergraduate program..NOTE: Some sources may not be applicable and students are not limited to the sources listed above. Table 1. Portfolio Guidelines3.2.1 Departmental Guidelines• Undergraduate Portfolio Orientation: Each semester all freshman and transfer students were required to attend a mandatory undergraduate portfolio orientation. Orientation was conducted by a selected faculty member(s) of the Industrial Engineering Department. This orientation provided students with the opportunity to get an understanding of what is to be contained in
structure of courses, has beenbasically inherited since 1950’s college and department adjustment. The founders of manycourses were passed away, however, people only inherited the one course by the syllabusand the teaching materials. With the change of age, several parts of the teaching system havebeen changed more or less, even greatly, however, not fundamentally. In particular, the entityof the structure of courses is not structurally revolutionized. It is necessary to analyze history,sum up the experience and look forward the future. According to the requirement of the modeof the capable people’s training in the new stage, the current tasks of teaching reform are tore-examine the inherited system of teaching, extract the essentials and remove
more effort and dedicate more time."The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army,DoD, or U.S. Government."References[1] 2020, C. on the E. of, & Engineering, N. A. of. (1900). Educating the engineer of 2020:Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press.[2] ABET General Criterion 7 – Facilities. https://www.abet.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/01/2022-23-EAC-Criteria.pdf[3] Chandrupatla, T. R., & Dusseau, R. A., & Schmalzel, J. L., & Slater, C. S. (1996, June),Development Of Multifunctional Laboratories In A New Engineering School Paper presented at1996 Annual
deviations indicate that international students’ experiences in their graduate programs arediverse. These variations imply that while certain aspects of their experiences meet withsatisfaction, others present challenges that may require targeted attention for support systems forinternational students.Significant results include a very strong positive correlation between Q1 degree completeconfidence and several items (Q3 Advisor relationships, Q4 Support Network, Q5 Belongingness,Q10 Goals, and Q11 Cost) with r > 0.7 and p <0.01. Additionally, Q3 Advisor relationships andQ4 Support Network are highly correlated (r = .886, p Could you describe the event(s)? (Text box) Intention to dropout Q9 In the past month, how often did
,” Organization Science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 876–890, 2008. [13] S. Carless and C. dePaola, “The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams,” Small Group Res, pp. 71–88, 2000. Day One Activities and Reflection ExercisesActivity 1: Spaghetti TowerTask: Build a free-standing structure to support three marshmallowsMaterials – Every team receives the following material: • 20 sticks of spaghetti • 1 yard of tape • 1 yard of string • 3 marshmallowsInstructions: 1. Form teams of four 2. Collect materials 3. Build a structure in 15 minutesGrading Criteria: • Tower height (taller is better)Activity 2: Paper Airplane LauncherTask: Build a paper airplane launcher using a three-step Rube Goldberg
proposes a focus on the process of problem-solving and does not want to limitthe process to particular kinds of problems but to those that "influences one's adaptivefunctioning in the real-life social environment" (and engineering problems are some of those.)D'Zurilla et al.'s model uses the term social Problem-Solving for such problems. The modeldevelops the concepts of "problem-solving," "problem," and "solution," specifying that problem-solving "refers to the process of finding a solution." In contrast, "solution" refers to "carrying outthose solutions in the actual problematic situations." The model comprises "problem orientation"and "problem-solving skills." Through these components, they developed the Social Problem-Solving Inventory, which
Education Institutions," in Active Learning -- Beyond the Future, Intech Open, 2019.[3] S. Hartikainen, H. Rintala, L. Pylvas and P. Nokelainen, "Susanna Hartikainen, Heta Rintala, LauraThe Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Education," Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, 2019.[4] H. Leary, A. Walker, M. Lefler and Y.-c. Kuo, Self-directed Learning in Problem-based Learning, Wiley, 2019.[5] D. B. Markant, A. Ruggeri, T. M. Gureckis and F. Xu, "Enhanced Memory as a Common Effect of Active Learning," Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 10, no. 3, 2016.[6] M. J. Myers and A. B. Burgess, "Marcella JInquiry-based Laboratory Course Improves Students Ability to Design
and example of sections that were repeated for each class period. Figure 2. Examples of open-ended sections of workbook.The Impact Portfolio included four distinct sections, three of which explicitly connected to theKEEN 3Cs. The curiosity section asked students to find a video and article that connected withtheir professional interests and provide a summary of main takeaways and connection to theiroverall interests and goals. A section emphasizing connections required students to identify onesustaining and one disruptive innovation in their field of interest, the innovation process thecreator(s) took to implement, and the impact the innovation has had on the specific field andsociety. The creating value section asked students
knowledge and use of different institutionalsupport services [28]. A Cronbach's Alpha of 0.878 was attained during the validationprocess. At the same time, a factorial analysis yielded an adjustment of factors to 4dimensions with a cumulative explanation percentage of 65 % (with a KMO equal to 0.812and a Barlett's test of sphericity equal to 0.000). The Exploratory Factor Analysis performedin this study was Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation. Table 1 showssample items of each dimension and the corresponding Cronbach´s Alpha.The survey response scale is of the Likert type that starts at 1. Strongly disagree, up to 5.Strongly agree. We included a dimension called "Perceived Institutional Support" with fiveitems. The initial statement
] S. E. Chang, “Computer anxiety and perception of task complexity in learning programming-related skills,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 713–728, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.021.[6] T. James and A. Magana, “Evaluating Self-paced Computational Notebooks vs. Instructor-Led Online Lectures for Introductory Computer Programming,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2023. doi: 10.18260/1-2--43422.[7] J. Goopio and C. Cheung, “The MOOC dropout phenomenon and retention strategies,” Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 177–197, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15313220.2020.1809050.AppendixAll content for the long lesson course
. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference (pp. 19-25). IEEE.Lönngren, J., Adawi, T., Berge, M., Huff, J., Murzi, H., Direito, I., & Tormey, R. (2020). Emotions in engineering education: Towards a research agenda. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden, 2020, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273951.Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. Springer.Maddux, J. E., & Gosselin, J. T. (2003). Self-efficacy. The Wiley Handbook of Positive Clinical Psychology, 89-101.Willis, D. A., Krueger, P. S., & Kendrick, A. (2013). The influence of a research experiences for undergraduates program on student perceptions and
Engineering is Elementary” In Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 13-479) June 2008.[5] J. Singer, J. Ross, & Y. Jackson-Lee, “Professional Development for the Integration of Engineering in High School STEM Classrooms”, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 6(1), Article 3.( 2016).[6] R. Hammack & T. Ivey “Elementary teachers’ perceptions of engineering and engineering design”, Journal of Research in STEM Education, 3(1/2), 48-68, (2017).[7] D. Shernoff, S Sinha, D. Bressler & D. Schultz, “Teacher perceptions of their curricular and pedagogical shifts: Outcomes of a project-based model of teacher professional development in the next
] M. H. M. Sidek, N. Azis, W. Z. W. Hasan, M. Z. A. Ab Kadir, S. Shafie, and M. A. M.Radzi, “Automated positioning dual-axis solar tracking system with precision elevation andazimuth angle control”, Energy, Vol. 124, pp. 160-170, 2017.[4] A. Al-Othman, Y. Tariq, I. Al-Adwan, M. Al Khawaldah, H. Alauthman, M. Alkhedher, andM. Ramadan, “An experimental study on hybrid control of a solar tracking system to maximizeenergy harvesting in Jordan”, Solar Energy, Vol. 263, p. 111931, 2023.[5] I. Abadi, A. Musyafa, and A. Soeprijanto, “Design and implementation of active two axessolar tracking system using particle swarm optimization based fuzzy logic controller”,International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 640-652, 2015.[6
. Shiel and D. Murchan, “Understanding and Applying Assessment in Education,” Apr. 2017. Accessed: Jan. 07, 2024. [Online].[12] D. Wiliam and P. Black, “Meanings and Consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment?,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 537–548, Dec. 1996, doi: 10.1080/0141192960220502.[13] R. L. Linn, E. L. Baker, and S. B. Dunbar, “Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria,” Educ. Res., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 15–21, Nov. 1991, doi: 10.3102/0013189X020008015.[14] A.- Umam, F. P. Mauludi, and M. K. Wardana, “STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF PERFOMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION,” J. Engl. Lang. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2
High School Students: A Case Study,” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2015, 38(4), 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607325 5. Christenson, S., “Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for All Students,” Psychology of the Schools, Vol. 45(5), 2008, Wiley Periodicals, DOI: 10.1002/pits.20302 6. Kumar, P., Khalid, A., ‘Blended Wing Body Propulsion System Design,’ International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, Vol. 4 (2017), issue 4, October 8, 2017 7. Kumar, P., Khalid, A., ‘Box Wing Design Optimization using Aspect Ratio and Winglet Height,’ International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, Vol. 1, Issue 4, Article 6, 2014 8
. 2022, pp. 1557–1566. doi: 10.21125/iceri.2022.0408.[11] J. Labrie, C. Russell, and A. Kaur, “Board 226: Building data center career pathwaysthrough K-12 industry externships,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Baltimore, Maryland, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/42661[12] Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-Year and 4-Year STEMDegrees, Board on Science Education, Policy and Global Affairs, National Academy ofEngineering, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Barriers andOpportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students’Diverse Pathways. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2016, p. 21739. doi:10.17226/21739.[13] A. Lucietto, S
learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities.”, Comp. in Hum. Behavior, vol 55, pp 1185 – 1193, 2016.[11] S. Zappe, R. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger, H.W. Lee, “’Flipping’ The Classroom To Explore Active Learning In A Large Undergraduate Course”, 2009 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Classroom Engagement in Educational Research and Methods. Austin, TX. June 2009. pp 14.1385.1 – 14.1385.21.[12] E. Alfonseca, R.M. Carro, E. Martin, A, Ortigosa, P. Paredes, “The impact of learning styles on grouping for collaborative learning: a case study”, User-Model-User-Adap. Inter., vol 16, pp 377 – 401, 2006.[13] H. Pachler, M
Engineering Cornerstone Robotics Design Project. In2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028610[5] Wengrowicz, N., Dori, Y. J., & Dori, D. (2017). Meta-assessment in a project-based systemsengineering course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 607-624.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1173648[6] Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J.C. et al. (2019)Activelearning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices, and experiences. IntJ Interact Des Manuf 13, 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8[7] Reis, A. C. B., Barbalho, S. C. M., & Zanette, A. C. D. (2017). A bibliometric andclassification