SESSION 2259 An Undergraduate Intern’s Experience With Industrial Instrumentation and The Effect on Teaching Dr. Harris Rawicz Assistant Professor/Engineering/ Trenton State College Senior Scientist/ ITT Aerospace/Communications Division Ms. Carol Cummiskey Student/Engineering/ Trenton State College Summer Intern/ITT Aerospace/Communication DivisionAbstract A simulation of the Time Keeping System(TKS) on the Global Positioning System
innumerous calls for reform in engineering education[1-3]. Regardless of the chosen response tosuch calls, it is clear that quality education requires the presence of instructors who have learnedto teach effectively. Unfortunately, because we often rely on “on-the-job” training, facultybecome skilled at teaching after receiving their doctoral degrees and “practicing” on students.For this reason, institutions commonly establish teaching effectiveness centers dedicated tofaculty development. Moreover, and of greater concern to us, much undergraduate teaching,especially during laboratories which may constitute 50% or more of the time that students are inthe classroom, is performed by Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) who may receive notraining in
Paper ID #12960Microcontrollers for Non-Electrical Engineering Students - Do We Need toTeach Assembly Language?Dr. Shouling He, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology Dr. Shouling He is an associate professor of Engineering and Technology at Vaughn College of Aero- nautics and Technology, where she is teaching the courses in Mechatronics Engineering and Electrical Engineering Technology. Her research interests include modeling and simulation, microprocessors and PLCs, control system designs and Robotics. She has published more than 45 journal and conference papers in these research areas.Dr. Yuhong Zhang, Texas
and promote innovative thinking from students. The lecture-based format of teaching which predominates in engineering education may not be the most effective manner to achieve these goals [1,2]. Constructivist learning theory asserts that knowledge is not simply transmitted from teacher to student, but is actively constructed by the mind of the learner through experiences. [3,4]. Students learn best with hands-on projects with practical purpose [5]. Laboratory based projects are the best vehicle for demonstrating many aspects of engineering problem solving situations. However, in most cases, laboratory environments are set up as “exercises” which have very clear, predetermined outcomes. This is done to reinforce lecture material that is
our teaching methods, which include real-time signalprocessing laboratories using low-cost DSP processors, and hands-on projects. We will alsopresent a course assessment and outcome, which will include how the students apply their gainedDSP knowledge to their capstone senior projects. Finally, we will address the possibleimprovement of the course content and associated laboratories.I. IntroductionDigital signal processing (DSP) technology and its advancements have continuously impactedthe disciplines of electrical, computer, and biomedical engineering technology programs. This isdue to the fact that DSP technology plays a key role in many current applications of electronics,which include digital telephones, cellular phones, digital satellites
diagrams: interpretation skills • Mechanical properties: laboratory experiments on tension test, impact test, hardness, heat treatment • Materials selection: study of common objects and designs – cups and saucers, cutlery, door knobs, skate boards, bicycles, cars, etc. • Failures: fracture generated from different tests Some topics such as phase diagrams and atomic bonding are very important, but theyare complex to teach and not easy for students to understand. Theses, of course, requiremore time, effort and homework problem sets to get the message across. As a result, it isnot always possible to appropriate equal amounts of teaching time and assessment tasksto meet all of the ABET outcomes listed for the course
understanding ofphenomenon. The most appropriateplace for students to gain this insightinto the physical world is in thelaboratory. In the laboratory studentscan play with the phenomenon they Figure 1: Vertical force table used in teaching Engineering Page 8.1028.4are studying. They can explore the Mechanics.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @ 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationbounds of the theory and gain a deeper understanding of its significance. Students are repeatedlywarned that physical intuition
Teaching Engineering Design – The Evolution of a Senior Design Course in Electrical Engineering Carl E. Fossa, Jr. and Glen P. Dudevoir Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996 Carl.Fossa@usma.edu Glen.Dudevoir@usma.eduAbstract Engineering students typically take a core set of courses that include both laboratoryexercises and semester design projects. These courses provide the students with practicallaboratory and experimental skills, as well as teaching them to apply these skills to a well-defined design project. However, the core engineering courses do
the steady-state andtransient response of protective relays and verify relay settings.The Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP) is a large time-domain simulation programthat is a power industry-accepted method for studying the transient response of systemcomponents. EMTP simulations can be performed on personal computers, which are available tostudents and are an integral part of practicing engineer's equipment.Several large utilities have built relay testing laboratories that subject commercial relays totransient waveforms [1,2,3]. Laboratory testing is accurate and complete, but the costs of theselaboratories are high. Relay test laboratories are beyond the means of most universities, so a morecost effective method to teach relay
) of the final geometry that they are supposed to produce and offered assistance on anas needed basis. The exercises detailed in this paper were developed for use as guided exercises(first part of the laboratory session). These exercises usually required between thirty and forty-five minutes to complete.While the exercises were developed for use with Pro/Engineer, the authors have ensured thatthey are compatible with Solid Works. The authors are also confident that these exercises can beeasily adapted to any higher-end CAD program without losing their content or educational value.The exercises presented below attempt to teach students some fundamental lessons aboutparametric design which will transcend both course and CAD
™ is taught as the programming language andinterfaced with two different systems, sensors and controls. One system uses Vernier®instrumentation and data acquisition and the other uses National Instruments® PCI interfaceboards and a variety of discrete sensors and controls. These systems will be compared andcontrasted to expose the reader to two approaches to teaching data acquisition systems. Anoutline of suggested laboratory experiments and related objectives is included.Introduction:While the Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) and Mechanical Engineering Technology(MET) curriculums are very different, we have found a common ground in our treatment of dataacquisition and control. We both use LabVIEW™ to teach sensors, data acquisition and
AC 2011-1130: TEACHING CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONCEPTS TONONCHEMICAL ENGINEERS: INDIGO: A WORLD OF BLUESPolly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engi- neering at Lafayette College. She teaches the introductory engineering and chemical engineering courses, as well as process control. Her research interests include process control, biochemical engineering and the dyeing process. Page 22.1375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Chemical Engineering Concepts to Nonchemical
Paper ID #21239Developing a Summer Engineering Teaching Institute for Community Col-lege Engineering FacultyDr. Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of Engineering and Mathematics at Ca˜nada College in Redwood City, CA. He received a BS in Geodetic Engineering from the University of the Philippines, his MS in Geode- tic Science from the Ohio State University, and his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other underrepresented groups in
Session 3668 Feeling is Believing: Using a Force-Feedback Joystick to Teach Dynamic Systems Christopher Richard, Allison M. Okamura, Mark. R. Cutkosky Center for Design Research, Stanford UniversityAbstractAs an innovative approach to teaching the laboratory component of an undergraduate course ondynamic systems, we present the haptic paddle: a low-cost, single-axis, force-feedback joystick.Using the paddle, students not only learned to model and analyze dynamic systems, but by usingtheir sense of touch, they were able to feel the effects of phenomena such as viscous damping
Session 2793 An Interactive Workshop for High School Teachers to Develop and Teach Pre-Engineering Curricula S. K. Ramesh*, Michael J. Fujita, Preetham Kumar*, Andrew Lindsay, Steven de Haas*, Elizabeth-Gillis Raley *California State University Sacramento / Defense Microelectronics Activity/ Parallax Inc., / Sacramento Engineering and Technology Regional ConsortiumAbstractThe College of Engineering and Computer Science at California State University, Sacramentohas organized and conducted free interactive workshops for high school
Session 3268 The Spinning Rocket Simulator: An Experimental Design Project for Teaching and Research D.M. Halsmer, W.E. Bair, P. Ng Oral Roberts University Abstract An experimental apparatus is being developed to simulate the dynamics and control of spinning, thrustingbodies with internal mass motion. An interdisciplinary team of undergraduate engineering students is executingthe first phase of development as a senior design project at Oral
background, the subject does become very hard for the students to grasp and for thelecturer to teach. Before the integrated approach was developed, a great deal of the time of alecture had to be used to recap or even re-teach what had been taught in previous lectures. Whatfollows is a discussion of the evolution of teaching power electronics in an integrated approachwith much higher success rate.2. Problems and solutions in the first 2 years of teaching the subjectDuring the year (1994-95) when the subject was taught for the first time, it was found out that,almost right from the beginning, the subject was difficult for most of the students judging fromtheir performance in laboratory, tutorial and lecture classes. In order to help the students
possible that with proper, routine, maintenance, suchequipment may be adequate in a laboratory setting to teach machining processes. Therefore, anydecision to adopt bench-top lathes will need to be carefully weighed against the additionalmaintenance that might be required when using these lathes.Modifications to the CurriculumIndustry and faculty were asked whether they would be open to changing the curriculum taughtin traditional programs to accommodate the smaller sizes of bench-top metal lathes. The majorityof individuals surveyed (90.6% of those from industry and 73% of faculty) believe coursecontent can be adjusted to accommodate the smaller material sizes that are necessary when usingbench-top lathes without presenting adversely affecting
Session 1566 USING A GENERIC CHECKLIST FOR TEACHING AND GRADING THE FORMAT, COMPOSITION, AND PRODUCTION QUALITIES IN LABORATORY REPORT WRITING Sheldon M. Jeter Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstract An itemized checklist on the format, composition, and production qualities expected inexperimental engineering reports is presented and described. The checklist can be used as aninstructional tool, a working reference, and a grading instrument. Methods to implement its useare also described, and a quantitative
AC 2008-843: A PROJECT-DRIVEN APPROACH TO TEACHING CONTROLS INA GENERAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMJason Yao, East Carolina University Dr. Jianchu (Jason) Yao joined the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University as an Assistant Professor in August, 2005. He received a B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Shaanxi university of Science and Technology, China, in 1992 and 1995, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Kansas State University in 2005. His research interests include wearable medical devices, telehealthcare, bioinstrumentation, control systems, and biosignal processing. His educational research interests are laboratory/project-driven
Session 1532 Teaching the Theory of Signals and Systems A Proposal for a Curriculum Francisco Vaz, Ana Maria Tomé, Paulo J. S. G. Ferreira Departamento de Electrónica e Telecomunicações/ INESC Universidade Aveiro, 3800 Aveiro, Portugal email:fvaz@inesca.pt Introduction In the University of Aveiro, a new Portuguese University (only twenty years old), theteaching of the Theory of Signals and Systems is done within the Department of Electronics andTelecommunications
Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring an inquiry-based learning with peer-teaching pedagogy in a physiological signals lab courseIntroduction and BackgroundActive learning can support meaningful engagement with science concepts and practices, whichhas been known to improve students’ affect toward science [1]. Professors recognize theopportunity for students to engage in such active learning during laboratory courses and haveemployed successful methods of doing so that foster meaningful engagement [2,3,4]. Onemethod of active learning and enhancing student engagement is using inquiry-based learning in alaboratory environment. This method also helps to develop creativity and critical thinking skills[8,9] which are
Connect2U, topics on water resources applications, and the social, economic, administrativeand legal issues related to WRM were included within the curriculum. Since no singleappropriate textbook was found, additional teaching materials were developed by the instructorand his colleagues. Simple laboratory demonstrations and field trips were added. Current waterissues and emerging water problems were learned in the class ‘icebreaker minutes’ and throughdocumentary review assignments. Important assignments and teaching materials were posted onBlackboard. Students were guided to research and gather water related information relevant totheir neighborhoods. They were encouraged to work on a term paper topic that could eitherconnect water resources to
. His research interests include: engineering education, geotechnical earthquake engi- neering, and hazard mitigation. Address: Department of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engi- neering, 130 Butler Carlton Hall, Missouri S&T, Rolla, MO, 65409; telephone: (+1) 573.341.4484 be- gin of the skype highlighting(+1) 573.341.4484end of the skype highlighting; e-mail: rluna@mst.edu Page 22.123.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Web-Based Learning Module for Teaching GIS within the Context of Environmental EngineeringAbstractThere is a growing need for
facilitate understanding of moment of inertia, stress-strainrelationships, flexural behavior, electronic sensors, and coding. Teaching methodologiesimplemented in the course include inquiry-based learning, flipped classroom, hands-on activities,laboratory experiments, and brainstorming in group design sessions. The course supports thefollowing seven ABET program Outcomes with italicized objectives assessed with an end ofsemester survey. 1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. 2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as
successful teaching strategy.It can be used in a virtual environment or regular college classroom settings. Active learningteaching approaches have been found to improve student learning, raise retention rates, and closethe achievement gap between various student populations in college science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses [4]. Beyond the subject of electrical engineering,active learning pedagogies have been applied extensively in industrial engineering [5-7].For STEM students, in particular, who learn best in courses with hands-on laboratories, aneffective online instructional practice uses a variety of active learning pedagogies as shown inFigure 1. There is a considerable level of discontent with online engineering
Paper ID #36388Lessons Learned from COVID That Have Been Transferred to Post-COVIDTeaching and LearningDr. Michael Cross, Norwich University Michael Cross is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering teaching classes in the areas of circuits, electronics, energy systems, and engineering design. Cross received degrees from the Rochester Institute of Technology and the University of Vermont and began his academic career at UVM where he taught courses in the areas of analog and digital circuits, electronics, semiconductor physics, power electronics, and engineering design.Dr. David M. Feinauer P.E
Development and Assessment of Interactive Spreadsheet Software for the Teaching of Semiconductor Device TheoryAbstractPreviously, we reported on the initial development of specialized interactive spreadsheets andsupporting exercises to aid in the teaching of semiconductor device concepts. Here, we discussthe continued development, implementation, and optimization of these tools using feedbackbased on instructor observation, course surveys, student focus groups, and various measures ofstudent performance. The software is designed to serve as a “virtual laboratory” in whichstudents can gain experience and use visualization to observe the inner workings ofsemiconductor devices, which are not normally directly observable. Quantities such as
Session 3159 Mini-design projects; a Hands-on Approach to Teaching Instrumentation Courses in ET Programs. Guido W. Lopez, Eric W. Hansberry School of Engineering Technology Northeastern University Boston, MA ABSTRACTDesign is the central activity of engineering and the focus of undergraduate engineering education.Effective teaching and learning of underlying engineering science and the
software engineering.OverviewThe Teaching Artificial Intelligence as a Laboratory Science †1 (TAILS) project is designed todevelop a new paradigm for teaching introductory artificial intelligence (AI) concepts byimplementing an experiment-based approach modeled after the lab sciences. It explores whetherstructured labs with exercises that are completed in teams before students leave the classroomcan build a sense of accomplishment, confidence, community, and collaboration among students,characteristics which have been shown to be critical to retain women and non-traditionalcomputer science students in the field.TAILS presents to students an array of fundamental AI algorithms as a set of hands-on activitiesmade available through a database of lab