Technology Education," World Congress of Engineering Educators and Industry Leaders, UNESCO Conference Proceedings, Paris, France, July 2-5, Vol.3, pp.463-468, 1996.Author BiographyM. KOSTIC is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Northern Illinois University.He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois, and then worked in industry for some time. Professor Kostic'steaching and research interests are Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer and related energy sciences; Page 8.998.9with emphases on new technologies, experimental methods, creativity, design, and computer
focus was recreational equipment, such as rollerblades and skateboards, but anew market was waiting for AxleShoX in industrial casters.The problem posed to the CasterShoX Multi-College Design Team was to find a new applicationfor the ultra-compact shock absorbing technology used in CasterShoX wheels. CasterShoXrequested a team of engineers and advertising students to generate and validate the application.As a team, a long list of ideas was generated and, using a rigorous process, they were evaluatedagainst a set of attributes to arrive at the final application. The advertising students analyzed thenew application with regard to its potential in the marketplace. The engineering studentsgenerated a prototype and test procedures that were used to
. Task Analysis FormCurriculum Writer Subject Matter Expert DateDutyTaskSteps Performance Tools Related Knowledge Safety Attitudes Decisions Cues Errors Standards Equip. Mat’ls Verbal/ Math Technology WrittenFigure 2: Task Analysis ChartThese two charts do not tell educators how to teach, or exactly what to teach; it provides andorganizes documentation of industry’s expectations of engineering graduates. It can be useful isdeciding which CAD software to teach or which brand of PLC to use in the lab, as well asdefining which soft skills should be acquired by potential
engineers or others with a technologicalinterest working at the intersection of management and technology. They recognize that thesuccess or failure of technology can seldom be determined in isolation from issues ofmanagement. Their work exposure to supply chains and logistics varies widely.II. The Supply Chain Course The course that emerged at MSOE is an amalgam of the several approaches describedabove. Class sessions examine a number of topics, including global optimization, configuring thelogistics network, inventory management and risk pooling, information flows and the bullwhipeffect, supply chain integration, strategic alliances, procurement and outsourcing strategies,international issues, coordination, customer value, information
Electronics 300.00 8 Solar System Array 150.00 9 Total 11,000 Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 365The budget for the 2023 design changes was sponsored by Nissan and Lane Motor Museum, aswell as our Engineering Technology Department at MTSU. Without their support, the teamwould not be able to integrate new and innovative technologies.Capstone ProjectsEvery year students integrate the projects
Society for Engineering Education 450Biography:Dr. Ibraheem Kateeb is the section chair of Central NC section and a Senior Member of IEEE with over 25 yearsof experience in academia and industry. He received his Ph.D. from NCA&TSU. He is currently at NCA&TSU asAssistant Professor of Computer Systems Technology Department. His current research is on power and greenenergy, electronics and control/robotics. In the last two years, he published more than 27 journal and conferencepapers and has many projects and grants in power, renewable energy and smart grid related issues. Dr. Kateeb wasrecognized as the recipient of Academic Excellent
-31.[6] Poole, Clifton H. “Plagiarism and the Online Student: What Is Happening and What Can Be Done?” Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems 18.2 (Spring 2004): 11-14. “Proceeding of the 2007 Midwest Section of the American Society for Engineering Education” 7[7] Townley, Cynthia, and Mitch Parsell. "Technology and Academic Virtue: Student Plagiarism through the Looking Glass." Ethics and Information Technology 6.4 (Dec 2004): 271-7.[8] SuperiorPapers.com. Visited on 3 July 2007 at http://www.superiorpapers.com.[9] Scanlon, Patrick M. and David R. Neumann. “Internet Plagiarism among College Students
Strategic Responses to Cyclical Environments: An Entrepreneurial ImperativeEllyn A. Lester, Assoc. AIA Linda M. Thomas, JD, PhDConstruction Management Program Program Director, Construction ManagementCivil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering Civil, Environmental and Ocean EngineeringSchaefer School of Engineering and Science Schaefer School of Engineering and ScienceStevens Institute of Technology Stevens Institute of TechnologyEngineering education centers on accreditor-mandated core knowledge. The skills andknowledge required to tackle engineering problems are the focus. Only recently has engineeringeducation expanded to include the liberal arts and
World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia andTelecommunications, pp. 1236-1244, 2014.[3] A. Belasco, “College Advice for the Career-Minded: So, you want to be an engineer?,” (2015), CollegeTransitions. [Online]. Available https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/so-you-want-to-be-an-engineer/[4] A. Murata and Y. Ohta, “Metacognition in Solving Process of Basic Electric Circuit Problem-Comparison of Metacognitive Characteristics between Non-major and Major Students in ElectricEngineering,” Computer Technology and Application, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 415-424, Aug. 2013.[5] T. T. Moores, J. C.-J. Chang, and D. K. Smith, “Clarifying the role of self-efficacy and metacognitionas predictors of performance: construct development and test,” ACM
isoffered at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNC Charlotte) for several courses in avariety of programs, including the Electrical Engineering Technology (ELET) program. Sincethe ELET program also offers an IADE (Individual Access Distance Education) option fordegree completion, online sections for on-campus courses are required. It is therefore necessaryto have SI sessions available for the on-campus students as well as eSI (electronic SI) sessionsfor the IADE students.For most ELET courses, WebCT is utilized as an asynchronous means of interaction between theinstructor and students for both on-campus and IADE sections. The difference in interactionarises in the way supplemental instruction is designed and conducted, especially for
Disorders, State University of New York at New PaltzIntroductionEffective engineers are skilled at applying their expertise to complex problems that requirebalancing competing objectives and taking into consideration a wide range of technical, ethicaland societal concerns. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) hasaddressed the need for students to develop these skills in two different Student Outcomes (SO).The first addresses the need for students to consider factors that contribute to societal well-beingwhen designing engineering solutions (ABET Student Outcome 2). The second relates to theethical and professional judgement of the engineer in considering the impact of engineeringsolutions in their broader contexts (ABET
technology course from high school. While the experiences and content in these classes varies, more students do appear have some introduction to these topics. However, there are still students who have no experience with Figure 2: Comparison of agreement with two statements engineering design. In both 2014 about previous engineering knowledge for different years
advanced education, research and development, and other creative efforts in science and technology. 3. Participate as leaders in activities that support service to and economic development of the region, state, nation, and world. 4. Conduct themselves in a responsible, professional, and ethical manner. Figure 3: Example of Program Educational Objectives. Table 6: Mapping of Desired Traits and Institutional Core Values with ABET Program Educational Objectives. Desired Trait Institutional PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4 of Graduate Core Values Practice Opportunity and Engineering
; Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAcknowledgements:The authors would like to thank Mr. Brad Hummel, Electronics Technician, and Mr. WilliamKanzig, Machinist, for their support of the students in this project. Thanks to Dr. SrinivasaVemuru for his help in advising two of the student groups involved. Special thanks to Dr. DavidRouch and Dr. Arif Sirinterlikci, from the Department of Technological Studies at ONU for theirassistance in allowing our students to use their department facilities. Dr. Barry Farbrother, Deanof the T. J. Smull College of Engineering at ONU, Dr. John Estell, Chair of the ECCSdepartment, and Dr. Tarun Goswami, Chair of the ME department, were all helpful in allowingthe
, Process Modeling, and Engineering Statistics, to show the relationship problems. between basic science and engineering/ technology. 1D Encourage use of outside resources, 1. Students will know i, k 1. Compilation of an outside resource such as WWW, library, etc., in solving how to effectively portfolio by the faculty member open-ended problems in use the WWW and teaching technical writing containing undergraduate ChE classes. the library to find examples of the use of WWW and information. library, as well as documentation of
and an advanced technology degree?Ç Should the professional Master’s degree be the M. Engr., and should the Master’s degree be the M.S.?Ç Should institutions be allowed to accredit programs at both the basic (B.S.) and advanced (M. Engr.) levels?Professor Hoadley believes that the answer to all of the questions is yes and so does the author.He goes on to state that, in his experience, it is becoming more and more difficult to find one ofthe "movers and shakers" in the civil engineering profession (owners, presidents, partners,principals, division heads, project managers, etc.) without a Master’s degree. So, themarketplace probably has already answered the questions posed and it is now up to theprofessional
Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), requires students to beprepared for engineering practice “…trough the curriculum culminating in a major designexperience based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework…”. Thisculminating design experience has been labeled by many as the “Capstone Design.” ABET doesnot prescribe the mechanics of how this experience is to be administered. It instead allows theindividual institution the latitude to define what a culminating experience is and how thatexperience meshes with its curriculum. As a result a wide variety of culminating experiencesexist at various institutions. Welch, (2004) reports the use of one-semester design-build projectsas an excellent venue to satisfy criterion 4
, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from U-M, and a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Prior to re-joining U-M, he was an instructor in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Project Teams’ Structure Impacting Students’ Professional Skill DevelopmentAbstractThis work-in-progress paper
/orcapstone projects are the favored experiences of engineering students during their undergraduateeducation; however, writing reports is often expressed as one of their least favorite experiences.Indeed, engineering students enjoy working with machines, instruments, and numbers rather than Page 26.924.2words. The reality, though, is that effective written communication is a necessary competencyfor engineers because engineers actually spend 20 to 40 percent of their workday writing [1]. Forthis very reason, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology [2] has addressed incriterion 3g that “an ability to communicate effectively” in the
(OSU), with a joint appointment in thedepartments of Industrial, Welding, and Systems Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. Before joining OhioState, he worked as a tool and die maker at General Motors Corporation.JOHN A. MERRILL is the Director for the First-Year Engineering Program at The Ohio State University (OSU).His current responsibilities include operations, faculty recruiting, curriculum development, and program assessment.Dr. Merrill received his Ph.D. in Instructional Design and Technology from OSU in 1985, and has an extensivebackground in public education, corporate training, and contract research.OMER MASUD is a Graduate Teaching Associate for the First-Year Engineering Program at The Ohio StateUniversity College of Engineering
Paper ID #8854Poll Everywhere! Even in the Classroom: An investigation into the impact ofusing PollEverywhere in a large-lecture classroomDr. Wendi M. Kappers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Wendi M. Kappers has a Ph.D. in Instructional Technology from the University of Central Florida (UCF). Her thesis work explored how educational video game effects upon mathematics achievement and mo- tivation scores differed between the sexes. During her tenure at Seminole Community College working as a Tenured Professor and Program Manager of the Network Engineering Program, she was Co-PI for the CSEMS NSF grant that explored
Paper ID #37696Digital Image Correlation (DIC) Techniques in LearningClassical MechanicsAriful Bhuiyan (Assistant Professor) Dr. Bhuiyan received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech University in 2013. His thesis was titled “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Response Due to Forces Resulting from Quadriceps Muscle and Ground Reaction.” He received his M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the National University of Singapore in 2005 and earned B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 2002. He has more than 10 years of industrial experience, playing
. and B.S. in manufacturing engineering and electrical engineering, respectively, from the Missouri University of Science and Technology. Dr. Nagel’s long-term goal is to drive engineering innovation by applying her multidisciplinary engineering expertise to instrumentation and manufacturing challenges.Prof. Christopher Stewart Rose, James Madison University I do research on the anatomy, development and evolution of amphibians and I teach courses on the com- parative anatomy of vertebrate animals, animal development, human development and evolution, scientific writing, and biology in the movies.Dr. Ramana Pidaparti, University of Georgia Ramana Pidaparti, is currently a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at VCU. Dr
education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework.Dr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifi- cally, the cost modeling and analysis of
. Dickerson, D. Rover, C. Cruz-Neira, R. Weber, “CRCD: Low-Power Wireless Communications for Virtual Environments,” Invited Paper at the American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Conference, Toronto, Canada, June, 2002.[4] B. Graubard, F. Chen, Z. Min, R.J. Weber, D. Rover, and J.A. Dickerson, “Lessons Learned: Installing a Wireless System in the C6 Virtual Reality Environment,” IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 7th Annual Immersive Projection Technology (IPT) Symposium, Orlando, March 2002.[5] J. A. Dickerson, W. C. Black, C. Cruz-Neira, R. Weber, “CRCD: Wireless Multimedia Communications for Virtual Environments,” Invited Paper at the American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June
letting students take 3 1CR seminarsFocus on imparting success strategies to studentsResolve classroom shortages and keep small class sizeReferences[1] C. J. Maker, “Identifying Exceptional Talent in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Increasing Diversity and Assessing Creative Problem-Solving,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 161–210, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1932202X20918203.[2] G. Ragusa, E. L. Allen, and G. B. Menezes, “Impacts Resulting from a Large-Scale First- Year Engineering and Computer Science Program on Students’ Successful Persistence Toward Degree Completion,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Conference: American Society for Engineering
graduate with a BS inIT in April 2005.STEPHEN R. RENSHAWStephen Renshaw is an Instructor of Information Technology at Brigham Young University in Provo, UT. Hereceived a B.S. and an M.S. in Computer Science from Brigham Young University in 1985 and 1987. Prior toinstructing full time he experienced 14 years within industry in various Information Technology areas including: Page 10.819.6telephony, process control, system integration, networking, and health care computing. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American
Paper ID #6040REMOTE DEMONSTRATION OF PACKAGINGProf. Akram Hossain, Purdue University, Calumet (Tech) Akram Hossain is a professor in the department of Engineering Technology and director of the Center for Packaging Machinery Industry at Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN. He worked eight years in industry at various capacities. He is working with Purdue University Calumet for the past 24 years. He consults for industry on process control, packaging machinery system control and related disciplines. He is a senior member of IEEE. He served in IEEE/Industry Application Society for 15 years at vari- ous capacities
Paper ID #33805Reflections on Realizing the Promise of the NSF S-STEM ProgramDr. Mark F. Roll P.E., University of Idaho Dr. Mark F. Roll is an Associate Professor in Materials Science & Engineering focused on organic and hybrid functional materials in high-value and thin-film applications. He completed his Ph.D. in Macro- molecular Science & Engineering at the University of Michigan in 2010, where he gained extensive experience in hybrid organo-silicate chemistry. Prior to his current position at UI he served as National Research Council Post-Doctoral Fellow at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in
classroom environments. The National Research Council research found that“engineering students will better grasp the relationship between the laws of physics and theconstruction of effective supports for a bridge if they see some examples of well-designedbridges, accompanied by explanations for the choices of the critical design features” [11].Reference [8] shows that the “single most desirable attribute in new recruits” is the ability ofstudents to apply their theoretical knowledge to real-world problems.This philosophy was the motivation to restructure and improve undergraduate education in theFlight Dynamics and Control I and II classes. Unmanned aerial systems (UASs) and autonomousrobots are emerging technologies of the 21st Century. When