: Instructors are directed to the ABET Compliance Tracking System (ACTS) site to find: The list of performance criteria that are assigned to their course(s) The assessment form and directions on how to complete the assessment This is typically done at the pre-semester faculty retreat and continues into the first department meeting of the semester if necessary. This ensures that every instructor is aware of what and how he/she needs to assess. B. During Semester: All instructors are reminded that they need to document their course’s assigned performance criteria and to enter this information into ACTS. These reminders are made periodically at bi-weekly faculty meetings. C. End of Semester: Instructors complete assessment
. 58, 858-867.21. Thornton, 1996 forthcoming22. Thornton, R., & Sokoloff, D. (1998). Assessing Student Learning of Newton's Laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66, Issue 4, 338-352.23. S. Ramlo, 2002 forthcoming24. Steif, P. (2004). Initial Data from a Statics Concept Inventory. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.25. Steif, P.S., and Dantzler, J.A. (2008). A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education.26. Morris and Kraige 198527. Hestenes and Wells 1992 -- Hestenes, David, Wells, & Malcolm (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher
of part time has been unequal as part time are having biggerdistribution either in STEM related field or in Non-STEM related field. Table 2 Estimated Number of Faculty (1,000’s) of instructional faculty and staff by employment status in public 2-year colleges Fall 20031 All Disciplines STEM Full-Time Part-Time Full-Time Part-Time Male 63.6 124.5 18.4 31.4 Female 61.9 120.7 9.2 15.9 Page
Style Index: A Replication and Extension”. British Journal of Management.13 Entwistle, N.J. and Tait, H. (1996). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.14 Amabile, T., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A., and Tighe, E.M. (1994). “The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychological Association, 66 (5).15 Khatena, J. and Torrance, E.P. (1998) Khatena Torrance Creative Perception Inventory: Instruction Manual, Scholastic Testing Service, Inc. Bensenville, IL.16 Dasgupta, S. (1994). Creativity in invention and
in the early2000’s Kansas was the epicenter for renewed evolution debates related to K-12 curriculumchanges. Science standards were changed to reflect “Intelligent Design” for 2 years before beingrescinded in 2005).The 2009 Transportation Conference survey results showed that contact with local (county andcity) officials (30%) was double that with state officials. However, consistent with statepercentages, fewer than 10% of the respondents had contact with local school board officials.In June 2010, the authors co-presented to the KSPE Annual Meeting using similar content to the2006 ASEE Midwest Section presentation. However, the entire morning of the conference wasfocused on legislative issues and the final presentation of the morning was
, plus the emphatic support by the Page 22.175.3government, was sufficient for all parties to make the decision to go ahead with the initiative.Why Jalisco, Mexico?The Jalisco State Council of Science and Technology (COECYTJAL)’s vision is to succeedin making Jalisco an innovation and knowledge-generating hub through articulated,organized and complementary collaboration initiatives between the various public and privateinstitutions and players in the state4. To achieve this vision, they promote scientific andtechnology initiatives that are aligned with the social needs of Jalisco, aiming for continuousand sustainable development. The state
, which also differs from many other engineering andscience disciplines. These characteristics together paint optics as a much more interdisciplinaryfield, which also relies heavily on and provides technology to a wide variety of fields such aschemistry, materials science and engineering, nano-science, physics, electrical engineering, andmedical areas.[1] Bunch, R. M., C. Joenathan, A. Siahmakoun (2003). From Optics to Optical Engineering: 20 Years of OpticsEducation at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Proceedings from Education[2] Joenathan, C. R. B., S. Granieri (2005). Optical Engineering Education with Curriculum Mapping for ABETAccreditation. Proceedings from Education and Tranining in Optics and Photonics. in Optics and Photonics.[3
become a reality it is necessary to identify: 1) how students are thinking about Page 22.204.2engineering and 2) how their beliefs change over time. Since much of the previous research hasfocused on secondary levels, it is time that we take what has been learned and begin to determineat which stage(s) in the students’ development conceptions and beliefs are being generated. Forexample, if we know that female and minority students are shying away from engineering whenthey come out of high school because of lack of understanding about the profession, then it isvital to determine at what point they formulate these beliefs and implement
, goal setting and potency, to measure a student’s individual perception on theirteammates’ effectiveness. The detailed description of the 9-item questionnaire is listed in table 1.The first letter item ID column represents the corresponding construct: I= Interdependency; G=Goal Setting and P= Potency. Table 1 9-item Peer evaluation questionnaire Item ID Item Description I1 Collaborates well with my team on all in-class and out of the class assignments. I2 Contributes to my team's effectiveness by having a clearly defined role(s). I3 Is a reliable team member. G1 Often helps my team think of what we were/were not achieving. G2 Articulates individual goals that can
: Increasing theRepresentation of Women in STEM via a New Interdisciplinary Engineering Program at aLiberal Arts Women’s College, 2005-2009Bibliography 1. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, National Academy of Engineering, National Academies Press, 2005 2. Unger, S. H., “Controlling Technology: Ethics and the Responsible Engineer,” 2nd ed., Wiley-Interscience, 1994. 3. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Evaluations During the 2009-2010 Accreditation Cycle,” ABET, Inc., www.abet.org. 4. Vanderburg, W.H. and Khan, N., “How Well is Engineering Education Incorporating Societal Issues?,” Journal of Engineering
outcome of the commercialization plan development being a Page 15.1386.8primary driver. Of critical importance is the ability to engage students in businessactivities beyond the traditional professional service role (i.e. entrepreneurialactivities).AcknowledgementsThe work presented herein is funded in part through a grant from the KentuckyScience and Engineering Foundation, project number KSTC-144-401-07-016,COMMFUND-713-RFP-006.Bibliography 1. Ernest, A. N. S., N-B. Chang, R. Fowler, J. R. Fattic, K. Andrew, and J. Ballweber, "Water Resource Management Capacity Development: A Small Systems Technology Transfer Model", 2009 ASEE Annual
knowledge learned in the classroom. Students can then be guided totransfer the specific insights from one assignment into the potential of benefits of compositematerials in other engineering applications. Page 15.655.12References[1] Y. Dong and J. El-Sayed, Mechanics, Process, and Design Simulation of Fiber- Reinforced Composite Materials – a New Course Development, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper # AC 2007-1005, Honolulu, Hawaii (2007).[2] Boss, S., Krauss, J., Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in
. Page 15.920.127. V. Elango and L. Karunamoorthy, “Effect of lighting conditions in the study of surface roughness by machine vision - an experimental design approach”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, v 37, p. 92-103, 2008.8. X. Li, L. Wang, and N. Cai, “Machine-vision-based surface finish inspection for cutting tool replacement in production,” Int. J. Prod. Res., v 42, n 11, p. 2279-2287, 2004.9. E. Alegre, J. Barreiro, M. Castejón, and S. Suarez, “Computer Vision and Classification Techniques on the Surface Finish Control in Machining Processes,” ICIAR 2008, LNCS 5112, pp. 1101-1110, 2008.10. F. Luk, V. Huynh, and W North, “Measurement of surface roughness by a machine vision system,” J. Phys. E: Sci
specialization.References 1. The Earth Charter, http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/pages/Read-the-Charter.html 2. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163 3. Agenda 21, http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/ 4. Arrow, K.J. and Fischer, A.C. (1974), "Environmental preservation, uncertainty and irreversibility", Quarterly Journal of Economics 88(2):312-319. 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_cycle_assessment 6. Nair, I., Life Cycle Analysis and Green Design: A Context for Teaching Design, Environment, and Ethics, JEE, October 1998, 489-494. 7. Nair, I., S. Jones and J. White, A curriculum to enhance environmental
the Internet-controllable vortex tube consists of:̇ Source of compressed air (5HP electric compressor and air dryer unit)̇ Pressure transducers (Omega Dyne Inc; Model: PX209-200A5V)̇ Temperature transducers (Omega Engineering Inc; Model: TX91A-K2) Page 15.550.6 ̇ Vortex Tubė National Instrument-DAQ card (16 inputs, 16 bits, 200KS/s, Multifunction I/O for USB)̇ LabVIEW software and server (Host Computer, IP Address: 144.118.xx.xxx)̇ Client (PC downloaded with LabView Runtime Engine)̇ Network IP Camera (Toshiba, Model: IK-WB21A with 22 x optical zoom, pan, tilt features)̇ Flow Transducer
tourists.Things were certainly much different than they were in the 1950’s when he first arrived.He spoke eloquently of how the native culture was no longer strong nor as vibrant as itonce was. Now he felt an outsider in the land he once called home. The juxtaposition ofthat homeless man with his garbage bag filled with his entire earthly holdings alongsidethe opulence of lavish meals served at ocean-side restaurants is an image that has hauntedus. The present work is our effort to respond.References1. Davis, Michael, Thinking Like an Engineer, Oxford University Press, 19982. Bruntland Commission (1987) Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Published as Annex to General Assembly document A/42/427, Development and
the underlying electrical concepts in addition to demonstrating the measurement techniques. In the future, student feedback will be collected and analyzed statistically to study the effectiveness of these demonstrations. Bibliography 1. Xu, et. al., (2009). BEEM: A project to enhance lab and design skills for BME students. 2009 BMES Annual Meeting 2. Rosser, S. V. (1997). Reengineering female friendly science. Athene series. New York: Teachers College Press. Page 15.1266.113. http://ece2.rosehulman.edu/beem/
::). The cell that’s value must bechanged during the iteration process is identified (A9). By clicking on the Solve button, thevalues of the cells are automatically changed for the desired solution. A new dialog box opensconfirming that the Solver found a solution, as shown in Fig. 4-c. The Solver returns a value of26.063 oC for the dew point temperature, as shown in Fig. 4-d.Exercise 5:Moist air enters a duct at 10 oC, 0.101 MPa, relative humidity of 75%, and a mass flow rate of3.0 kg/s. Air is heated at a rate of 60 kW as it flows through the duct. No moisture is added orremoved during this process. Evaluate the temperature and relative humidity of the exit.Solution:Identifying the duct inlet as state 1 and the exit as state 2, the following
No.NNG05GF80H. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those Page 15.820.2of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NASA or the NASA WV Space Grant Consortium.While improved student performance in calculus was the primary objective of this effort, theexperience of developing and implementing the math-engineering joint projects has resulted inimproved communication between both departments and has helped the math faculty see howstudents work in groups to discuss and solve problems and to create reports and presentations oftheir work. The interactive nature of these problems
. Page 15.853.95. Fowler, F.J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Applied Social Research Methods Series,38.6. Hesketh, R., Slater, C., Savelski, M., Hollar, K., & Farrell, S. (2004). A program to help designing courses tointegrate green engineering subjects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20 (1), 113 – 122.7. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1990). Learning together and alone: Co-operation, competitionand individualisation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.8. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.9. Mott, R., Neff, G., Stratton, M., & Summers, D. (2002). Future directions for mechanical, manufacturing, andindustrial engineering
, Oregon, June 12-15, 2005, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=89639. M. Whitt, R. Handy and M. Ratcliff. "Technology students: Their role in the global economy". American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2006 Annual Conference, American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Chicago, Illinois, June 18-21, 2006, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=11023&pdf=2006Full2642.pdf10. Khan, S. and Kissick, B. "Beating the competition down with the stick of education: A winning strategy for a global world". ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2008, ASEE, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22-25, 2008, http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=934311. Committee on the Offshoring of
engagement, b) includeactive and cooperative learning and c) implement peer instruction. In addition, the fill-insheets have enabled differentiated instruction in the class room, by adding symbolicsolutions to challenge the advanced student, while helping the average and below averagestudent solve the basic problem using numbers. Aside from these an equal number ofproblems are given as homework which have varying degrees of fill-in to inculcate andtrain students in problem solving. Additionally, detailed solutions are made available toimprove problem solving skills, while teaching methodologies. Student surveys indicatethat these fill-in sheets have increased their learning.Bibliography1. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. and, Johnson
disseminated onthe project’s website soon after its implementation. This template consists of the followingblocks: 1) Summary – goal to be achieved by students; 2) Objectives – skills to be acquired bystudents; 3) Standards to be addressed; and 4) Lesson Information – Grade Level, Subject Area,Duration, Setting, Materials Needed, Background Knowledge, Lesson Plan(s) details, andAdditional Resources (learning objects, timelines, assessment rubrics, surveys, etc.). Item 4includes detailed information provided via hotlinks. The Fellow submits the final lesson to theGrant Coordinator for checking and approval before implementation. On the average it takesabout six weeks to develop a lesson before implementation.Most of the lessons that have been created
Phys., 66 (1), 64-74.3. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). “Cooperative Learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works?” Change, July/August, 27 - 35.4. MacGregor, Jean, Cooper, J., Smith, K., and Robinson, P. (2000). Strategies for Energizing Large Classes: From Small Groups to Learning Communities, Jossey Bass Publisher, San Francisco, CA.5. Mazur, Eric (1997). Peer Instruction. Prentice Hall, NJ.6. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. and, Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 87 – 1017. Mechanics Readiness test. (http://comp.uark.edu/~jjrencis/aseemechanics/education/Mechanics
the effort to develop the post-test for the lesson. Awell-defined template is used by the Fellow to create the lesson, which can be disseminated onthe project’s website soon after its implementation. This template consists of the followingblocks: 1) Summary – goal to be achieved by students; 2) Objectives – skills to be acquired bystudents; 3) Standards to be addressed; and 4) Lesson Information – Grade Level, Subject Area,Duration, Setting, Materials Needed, Background Knowledge, Lesson Plan(s) details, andAdditional Resources (learning objects, timelines, assessment rubrics, surveys, etc.). Item 4includes detailed information provided via hotlinks. The Fellow submits the final lesson to theGrant Coordinator for checking and approval before
GillichBibliography1. Bourne, J., D. Harris, and F. Mayadas, Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 131-146.2. ABET, Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. 2005, ABET: Baltimore, MD.3. Trapp, S., Blended Learning Concepts – a Short Overview, in Innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing, E. Tomadaki and P. Scott, Editors. 2006, Sun SITE Central Europe: Aachen, Germany. p. 28-35.4. Schramm, D., Global challenges for engineering educators: lessons from an online masters degree for practicing engineers, in 2002 ASEE/SEFI/TUB Colloquium. 2002, American Society for Engineering Education: Berlin, Germany.5. Allen, I.E., J
STEP Fellows from 2006 to 2009 elucidates the role of the university graduatestudent in the STEP program. Each Fellow stands in a unique position as a kind of pivot pointamong high school and university educators, high school students, and the university researchenvironment. Effects of the experience, voiced through the mouths of the participants, rangefrom purposeful enthusiasm to the need for resolution. For most of the Fellows, STEP is an “eye-opener” into teaching, and most (67%) Fellows state that they want to teach at some level in thefuture. One Fellow states that STEP “help[s] me see and understand realities of teaching.” STEPhas an overall positive effect on the majority (70%) of Fellows based on the online survey asshown in Figure 4
/Thermodynamics_Software/Suppliers/pid5061.htm2 Bhattacharjee, S., http://thermo.sdsu.edu/testcenter/3 Patrick Tebbe, Patrick, et.al, “Development of Software Applications forthermodynamics Related Courses: The THERMOVIEW Project”, ASEE AnnualCongress and Exposition, 20014 Friedman, Ella, “Interactive Learning Tools For Undergraduate Thermodynamics”,ASEE Annual Conference, 20045 Kumpaty, Subha, “Learning Enhancement in Thermodynamics Classroom via use ofTEST™ Software in Design Projects and Laboratory”, ASEE Annual Conference, 20026 Gramoll, Kurt, et. al., “Online Interactive Multimedia For EngineeringThermodynamics”, ASEE Annual Conference, 20047 Stanley, Richard, “Interactive Web Based Animation Software: An Efficient Way toIncrease the Engineering
., Ward, J., Havens, N., & Ricca, J. (2002). Development of a Web-based Learning System for Teaching Web Design and Development: A Problem-Based Progressive-Scaffolding Approach. Proceedings of the AACE E-Learning Conference, Montreal, CA, 1562-1565, http://dl.aace.org/96186. Hall, R.H., Stark, S., Hilgers, M., & Chang, P. (2004). A Comparison of Scaffolding Media in a Learning System for Teaching Web Development, Proceedings of the AACE E-Learn Conference, pp. 1906-1913, http://dl.aace.org/167077. Hall, R.H., Luna, R., Hilgers, M.G., Sullivan, J.M., Lawrence, W.T., & Buechler, M.R. (2005). Evaluation of a Prototype GIS Learning System to Teach Civil Engineering Concepts. Proceedings of the World
computer scientists and recognizing student receiving the certificate as KEEN Undergraduate TE Fellows.The purpose of the KEEN Innovators Program Initiative is to encourage the integration ofentrepreneurship concepts and skills into the engineering and computer science curricula byawarding a stipend to an Engineering & Computer Science (ECS) faculty member who developsan innovative plan for fostering the entrepreneurial mindset within the course(s) they teach. Inaddition to the stipend, the assistance of the KEEN grant team will be offered to enable use ofbest practices developed by others in the network who are building entrepreneurial skills andinsights into engineering and computer science courses. This is intended to be a