incorporating social parameters into thescientific process, and the third is Delve et al.’s service learning model. Page 25.70.3Schwartz’s model describes the cognitive development towards engaging in altruistic behaviorthrough five unique phases11, 12. The first phase is the Attention Phase and describes theindividual’s recognition of needs, perceptions about potential action and recognition of one’sown ability to engage in these actions. The Motivation Phase categorizes the activation of theindividual’s value system through feelings of moral obligation to act or not act. The activationof moral obligations could come from internal personal norms
(other than an independent voltage source, of course!), which we term branch voltages.Alternatively, they are sometimes voltages between nodes that are not directly connected by acircuit element, which we call non-branch voltages. The currents may be either currents througha specific branch that is not an independent current source (termed branch currents), or rarely,currents through specific wires that are internal to a node (and are therefore dependent on aspecific layout), which we term non-branch currents. The power(s) may be that either absorbed Page 25.242.12or supplied by an independent or dependent source or by a passive element. These
Sciences, 1(2), pp. 201-238.10. Vattam, S., and Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Design-Based Science Learning: Important Challenges and How Technology Can Make a Difference. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN.11. Wittrock, M. C. (1991). Generative Teaching of Comprehension. The Elementary School Journal, 92(2), 169- 184.12. Hotaling, L., McGrath, B., McKay, M., Shields, C., Lowes, S., and Cunningham, C. M., (2007). Engineering Our Future New Jersey. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Chicago, IL.13. McKay, M., and McGrath, B. (2007). Real-World Problem-Solving Using Real-Time Data
position. The interface with the ELVIS IIboard provides the ability to send control signals to the motor from a computer and record theon-board sensor data using the integrated data acquisition system. (a) (b) (c) (d)Fig. 2. NI ELVIS II platform (a) Prototype board, (b) QNET Mechatronics Sensor Trainer,(c) QNET DC Motor Trainer, (d) DC Motor position control results.M Series NI DAQ cards PCI-6010 and PCI-625153The NI PCI-6010 is low-cost 16-Bit, 200 kS/s, 16 analog input and 2 analog output multifunctionDAQ. The NI PCI-6251 DAQ is available for high speed data acquisition. This card provides 16analog inputs that can be
pedagogical modelsuggests that students do not flourish intellectually in classes that simply require them to remember andrepeat information. Instead, students benefit most from moving through a cycle that advances them froma stage of merely acquiring information to more advanced stages in which they learn to analyzeinformation and ultimately to synthesize information and apply what they’ve learned in differentsituations. Bloom’s revised taxonomy, as implemented through Bransford et al.’s model and others, maybe utilized as an integral foundation of advancements in innovation content throughout curriculumdevelopment.Five Factor Model (Big Five Personality Dimensions). “Personality is that pattern of characteristicthoughts, feelings, and behaviors
Page 25.926.121. Varde, K. S., “Energy and engine research through undergraduate research program,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005. 2. Schuster, P., and Birdsong, C., “Research in the undergraduate environment,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2006. 3. Revankar, S., and Mbuga, F., “Summer and academic year undergraduate research in nuclear engineering,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2008. 4. Feng, G., Nix, W. D., Yoon, Y., and Lee, C. J., “A study of the mechanical properties of nanowires using nanoindentation,” Journal of Applied Physics, 99, 2006, pp. 074304-1 – 074304-10. 5. Cao, G., Nanostructures and Nanomaterials: Synthesis
creating and sponsoring the KAIST Freshman Design Programand to Dean S. O. Park, Dean K. H. Lee, Dean G. M. Lee and Dean S. B. Park for theircontinued support for the program. Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge the ED100faculty project advisors and teaching assistants. It is their daily efforts that make the coursesuccessful. This work was supported by a KAIST High-Risk High-Return Research Grant.References1. Blackboard Inc. Website, http://www.blackboard.com, accessed Dec. 20, 2011.2. Moodle Website, http://moodle.org, accessed Dec. 20, 2011.3. SAGrader Website, https://www.sagrader.com/login, accessed Dec. 20, 2011.4. Andromatics Website, http://www.andromatics.nl, accessed Dec. 20, 2011.5. Criterion Online Writing
in any complex human system, such as education, there is muchvariation present, most of which cannot be controlled in any meaningful sense. Hence, we havetaken a design-based approach that can yield improvements that can be measured locally andaggregated over time, while at the same time giving us insight into how to be effective inimplementing change.References[1] Gattis, C., Hill, B., & Lachowsky, A. (2007). A successful engineering peer mentoring program. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[2] Jones, S., Rusch, K., Waggenspack, W., Seals, R., & Henderson, V. (2010). S-STEM: Eng^2 scholars for success engineering engagement. In American Society for
coursework and time on SAT scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 866-875.6. Capraro, R. M. & Slough, S. W. (2008). Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics approach. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.7. College Board (2011). Program summary report 2011. Retrieved from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/AP-Program-Summary-Report.pdf8. Dick, T. P. & Rallis, S. F. (1991). Factors and influences on high school students' career choices, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(4), 281-292.9. Ferry, N. M. (2006). Factors influencing career choices of adolescents and young adults in rural Pennsylvania, Journal of Extension, 44(3
as students enter their junior and senior years. A drawback ofwritten assignments is the potential for plagiarism of outside materials by students. Plagiarism isproblematic from an academic perspective for two commonly-cited reasons: (1) the student(s)who plagiarize neither develop associated writing skills nor learn the intended lesson content1,and (2) students within a class where other students are plagiarizing without knowledge of theinstructor may receive comparatively poor grades even though they are learning and developingthe intended skills.Prior to word processing and the Internet, plagiarism required considerable effort: students mustfirst locate a book, article or old report, then write or type the outside text. However, in
presenter are TBPsmooth and effectiveUse of Presentation Media - Effectiveness of use of media (e.g., graphics, MEDCAD models, handouts, video clips, prototype, physical mockups) andtheir formats (e.g., font, color, units)Questions and Answers - Questions are answered accurately and concisely QAif the presenter(s) knows the answer, or handled appropriately if thepresenter(s) doesn’t know the answer, or taken as opportunity to delvedeeper into the topicAdherence to Time Limit - Presentation delivered within the allowed time TLlimitProblem Definition - A clearly stated design problem definition is PDEFpresented (e.g. what need(s) does this design meet, what are
COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION (1: Strongly Disagree; 5: Strongly Agree) 1 Visual (Manometer) 4 5 3 4 3 3 2 3 5 4 2 2 3 5 2 5 2 5 3 2 Aural (Fundamentals) 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 5 3 Reading (Bernoulli) 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 4 Kinesthetic (Viscosity) 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5
the actual deployment of the short course(s).Upon completion of the short course(s) all participants are emailed an evaluation request. Theassessment instrument is available electronically for approximately two weeks after each session.At the end of the first week a response rate is provided by the Office of Institutional Research,Planning and Assessment (IRPA) and a secondary email is sent if the response rate is lower than60%. To date our average response rate is approximately 73%.MarketingTo assist in developing a new communicating strategy we returned to our alumni to discuss newservices offered by Continuing and Professional Studies. As previously mentioned, members ofthe Alumni Advisory Board had previously voiced a desire for Rose
second-grade class taught by Ms. Smith, students justified the criteria theychose for a good design by referring to the context set by the story. The students were workingon choosing a site for a model Tarpul, a kind of gondola used to cross rivers in Nepal. In thestory and context for the Evaluating a Landscape EiE unit, Suman is a boy who is concernedabout the siting of a Tarpul near his home, because his grandmother is sometimes ill and needs tobe transported across the river to the nearest clinic. Ms. S: Who has tested site H? Go back to that page for a second. Look on your test page where you wrote how many weights you tested. All of you tested site H. Can you tell me how many weights you got [into the model Tarpul]? When you tested H
] Papert, S., Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1993. [2] Appel, K., Gastineau, J., Bakken, C., and Vernier, D., Physics with Computers, Vernier Software and Technology, Beaverton, OR, 2003. [3] Church, W., Ford, T., Perova, N., and Rogers, C., “Physics with Robotics Using LEGO MINDSTORMS in High School Education,” Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium, Palo Alto, CA, 2010. [4] Erwin, B., Cyr, M., and Rogers, C., “Lego Engineer and RoboLab: Teaching Engineering with LabView from Kindergarten to Graduate School,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 16(3): 181-192, 2000. [5] Mataric, M.J., Koenig, N., and
first phases of the study (conducted during 2011),which addresses research questions one, two and four.1.1 Background of the Premier AwardThe Premier Award competition was instituted with two primary goals: to recognize and rewardthe efforts of faculty (and students) developing courseware and to provide an external measure ofthe quality of the courseware.14 The Premier Award was created as a program within theSynthesis Coalition, one of the NSF engineering education coalitions funded in the 1990’s,which focused on improving engineering education by designing, implementing and assessingapproaches to undergraduate engineering education that emphasized multidisciplinary synthesis,teamwork and communication, hands-on and laboratory experiences
Page 25.878.4exhibits.The lecture sections of the leadership module provided the framework for development of thecore competencies28. A central focus of the leadership module was the three “C”s of leadership:competence, compassion, and chronos (time management). The module offered methods fordeveloping personal and team leadership styles; addressed differences in learning and personalitystyles; presented pathways for implementing mission statements and plans of action; offeredopportunities for strategic thinking, problem solving and brainstorming; utilized teamwork indiverse settings; and implemented K-12 service learning through outreach teaching activities.Table 1 provides a summary of the lecture topics provided within the leadership
(2008).4 PC Magazine. Definition of microblog, (n.d.).5 Grosseck, G. To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education. World Conference on Educational Science 1, 478-482 (2009).6 Grosseck, G. & Holotescu, C. Microblogging multimedia-based teaching methods best practices with Cirip. eu. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 2151-2155 (2010).7 Badge, J., Johnson, S., Moseley, A. & Cann, A. Observing emerging student networks on a microblogging service. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7, online (2011). Page 25.933.118 Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J. & Shen
AC 2012-3445: CHANGING ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATION: UN-DERSTANDING ILL-STRUCTURED PROBLEMS THROUGH ARGUMENTVISUALIZATION IN COLLABORATIVE LEARNINGProf. Michael H.G. Hoffmann, Georgia Institute as Technology Michael H.G. Hoffmann’s research focuses on the question of how creativity, cognitive change, and learn- ing can be stimulated by constructing diagrammatic representations, and by experimenting with those representations. This idea has first been developed by Charles S. Peirce in his concept of ”diagrammatic reasoning.” Since 2004, he developed ”Logical Argument Mapping (LAM),” a method and diagrammatic system of representation that is supposed to stimulate critical thinking. LAM has been implemented in the
engineering programs areuniquely positioned to incorporate these recommendations. This material is based upon work primarily supported by the Engineering ResearchCenter Program of the National Science Foundation and the Office of Energy Efficiency andRenewable Energy of the Department of Energy under NSF Cooperative Agreement No.EEC‐1041895. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the National ScienceFoundation or Department of Energy. Page 25.303.2 Changing the Face of Engineering: How Photovoltaic
Progress. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Page 25.442.14 Exhibition & Conference held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 1-4 November 2010.4. Ng, J.M.K., Gitlin, I., Stroock, A.D. & Whitesides, G.M. Components for integrated poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic systems. Electrophoresis 23, 3461-3473 (2002).5. Xia, Y.N. & Whitesides, G.M. Soft lithography. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 37, 551-575 (1998).6. Whitesides, G.M., Ostuni, E., Takayama, S., Jiang, X.Y. & Ingber, D.E. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 3
on curriculum design," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, pp. 203-211, 1993.[9] J. T. Klein, "Interdisciplinary Teamwork: The Dynamics of Collaboration and Integration," in Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Scienc, S. J. Derry, M. A. Gernsbacher, and C. D. Schunn, Eds., ed: Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2005, pp. 23-50.[10] W. C. Morse, M. Nielsen-Pincus, J. E. Force, and J. D. Wulfhorst, "Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research," Ecology and Society, vol. 12, 2007.[11] D. Richter and M. C. Paretti, "Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom
semi-log function using the logarithm of earnings as the dependentvariable. Mincer used two forms of the earning function, parabolic and Gompertz. The grossannual earnings Es,t for a worker with s years of schooling and t years of experience is expressedwith parabolic dependence as: (1)where rs and rp are the rates of return on schooling and post-school investments, k0 is the ratio ofinvestment to gross earnings at the start of work experience, and T is the positive net investmentperiod (career work span). The Gompertz earning function incorporates a sigmoidal transferfunction to express the decline in value of up-front investment in education
professionalsocialization into the sciences22. Russell et al found that participation in undergraduate researchresulted in increases in understanding, confidence, and awareness23. Eighty-eight percent of the3300 respondents to a survey “reported that their understanding of how to conduct a researchproject increased a fair amount or a great deal, 83% said their confidence in their research skillsincreased, and 73% said their awareness of what graduate school is like increased” 23. Also, 68%of the respondents “said their interest in a STEM career increased at least somewhat as a result oftheir UR experience”23.2.3 The Impact of Non-traditional Teaching on the Learning Experience of 21st CenturyEngineering StudentsNow more than ever, the U. S. faces a number of
. C2010BR-02. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau. 10 U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Postsecondary Awards in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, by State: 2001 and 2009. NCES 2011-226. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. 11 Baum, S., J. Ma, and K. Payea. (2010). Education Pays 2010: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. New York: The College Board Advocacy and Policy Center. 12 National Research Council. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 13 National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. (2008). Confronting the “New” American
solving,” in The Nature of Intelligence, L. B. Resnick, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 231-236, 1976.[11] Flavell, J. H., “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry,” American Psychology, vol. 34, pp. 907-911, 1979.[12] Paris, S. G. and Winograd, P., “Metacognition in academic learning and instruction,” in Dimension of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, B. F. Jones, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 15-44, 1990.[13] Lawanto, O. and Johnson, S. D. (in print), “Metacognition in an engineering design project,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2011.[14] Butler, D. L. and Cartier, S. C., “Learning in varying activities: An explanatory framework and a new
prototype along withlessons learned may be passed on to follow on teams in the development of refined prototypes.We highly encourage faculty members to employ this approach in developing new labware andcourseware. All material discussed in this paper is available from the corresponding author.AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the Hewlett Foundation for their sponsorship of the EWSI-UW Curriculum Improvement Grants that sponsored this project. References (student co-authors listed in bold)1. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Evaluations During the 2011-2012 Accreditation Cycle.” ABET, Inc. October 30, 2010.2. S. F. Barrett and C.H.G. Wright, “For Students By Students
faculty exchange student exchange or established short term faculty –led study abroadprograms. Most schools offer scholarships for their students and provide services to aidinternship opportunities. Such support garners interest in the field of engineering, as well asprovides a means to an end for those students who aspire to experience cultural variety in theircareer(s).New Challenges for Construction EducationThe education of construction engineering is traditionally designed to train students for technicalinformation in construction and building, structural management. Admittedly, there is nohesitation about the importance of teaching core engineering and analytical skills to our students.On the contrary, it is pertinent to educate them as
only difference between the two groups will be around the method ofinstruction (i.e. animation or, alternatively, static diagrams).We recommend that our colleagues include animations, developed with an eye toward thestudents' background, when teaching the operation principles of electronic devices such as theBJT.Bibliography1. Karmalkar, S. (1999). Simple unified elucidations of some semiconductor device phenomena. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42, 323 – 327.2. Benesen, L. & Robinson, B. (1983). A study of the mathematics requirements for Israeli technicians and Page 25.700.7 practical engineers. International