networks made up of multiple capacitors exclusively in series,parallel or hybrid series/parallel combinations. However, they were not asked in this course todetermine how the voltages split up across capacitors in a network (e.g. series) connected to avoltage source, as they were required to do with a series resistance (e.g. voltage divider) Page 26.362.10network. While they were expected to understand that the same amount of electric currentpasses through each and every one of the resistors in a purely series resistor circuit, they did notrecall or apply here the relationship between charge and voltage across a capacitor (Q = CV),that they
ofthe case study, students delved into the “central limit theorem”, which is a key concept in thecourse. The students are expected to visualize the central limit theorem for the given data. Thisalso motivates them to explore graphical tools in Python in order to produce various plots fromthe data, such as Q-Q plots. In addition, students got to practice with cumulative distributionfunctions and understand the concept more in depth. The case study was designed such thatstudents were required to revisit the majority of the probabilistic concepts (e.g. conditionalprobability, integration technique) and apply them at the same time in a different, realisticcontext. This case study also went one step further, and the students were introduced with
Chinese students is that they seldom ask anyquestions during the class, but they tend to gather around the instructor after the class and askquestions about the lecture. We believe this is related to the way students are expected to behaveduring lecture, which is to listen and not interrupt. As for NAU taught courses in China, theclassroom follows the more student-centered approach. Every NAU faculty would combine oneor several interactive class activities with traditional lectures to keep the students engaged inclass. Some typical activities include: a) Short Q & A sections: the roles are interchangeable as either the instructor or students can be the one to give questions. b) Asking students to answer short questions with a
scheduling and associated modifications asneeded. The acceptance letter also included anticipated benefits and commitments, such as: Participating in STRIDE sessions held once a week Reflecting once a month through an electronic journal guided by instructors Attending meetings for a professional group of your choice recommended by instructors Receiving training on peer mentoring for future STRIDE cohorts Demonstrating the use of recommended study methods weekly, for example, through display of out-of-class notes and Q&A with instructor on notes and weekly schedule.It was also explicitly highlighted that there was no cost to students to participate in the program,and contact
engineering ethics: Assessment of its influence on moral reasoning skills,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 1998.[6] J. Henrich, S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan, “The Weirdest People in the World?,” Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 33, no. 2–3, pp. 61–83, 2010.[7] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. Oakes, and A. Mead, “The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-based design teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[8] R. I. Murrugarra and W. A. Wallace, “A Cross Cultural Comparison of Engineering Ethics Education
, demonstrates technol- ogy and tools, identifies common pitfalls, and articulates deliverables. As illustrated in Figure 8b, 76.5% of the students from both institutions positively confirm the effectiveness of presentations and videos. Finally, to address students’ concerns about timely feedback, we use the chat feature of Slack chatbot 36 and Zoom 37 to facilitate Q&A sessions. Because of these efforts, we kept students’ satisfaction consistent during and after the Pandemic. 7 Reflections and Future work After conducting a 5-year pedagogic project, we have gained valuable insights from both students and faculty in cybersecurity. In the following, we have compiled a list of lessons learned and recommendations for researchers and educators.• Does
note on higher education," Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23-36, 2011.[5] A. Sen, Equality of what? In: McMurrin S Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.[6] A. Sen, Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.[7] D. Crocker and I. Robeyns, Capability and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.[8] M. Walker, "Imagining STEM higher education futures: advancing human well-being," Higher education, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 417-425, 2015.[9] Q. Liu, D. Turner, and X. Jing, "The “Double First-Class Initiative” in China: Background, Implementation, and Potential Problems," Beijing International Review of Education, vol. 1, pp
50-min lectures had to be freed. In the past, three reviewsessions were done before the midterms, and two project description sessions were needed forthe smaller assigned projects. The review sessions were moved to out-of-class Q&A sessions,with the opportunity to watch previously recorded review sessions asynchronously. The projectdescription lectures were not needed anymore. The final (6th) lab session was used to test thetruss and was added to the class time by moving the third midterm to the final exam slot afterclasses ended. Figure 3: Student welding components of their prototype. Figure 4: Student welding the prototype truss connections behind a protective screen. Figure
career"?: In thisdiversity, Q&A session, mentees were encouraged to ask questions about computing careerequity, and pathways, including the available career opportunities, skillsets required, internshipinclusion in tips, and other related topics. Mentors shared their experience and their opinions oncomputing these topics. (Focus: objective v)iii) develop Mentoring Session 3 - Develop strategies to overcome barriers to reach goals: This wasstrategies to a Q&A session as well where mentees were able to ask questions related to theirbe successful perceived obstacles in computing careers, such as low sense of belonging & self-in computing efficacy, preparedness, academic struggle including
Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2017, 2017.[47] Nite, S.; Allen, G.; Bicer, A.; Morgan, J.; Warren, V.; Barroso, L. College freshman beliefs about studying and learning mathematics: Results from a summer engineering calculus bridge program. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2017, 2017.[48] Lee, W.; Brozina, C.; Amelink, C.; Jones, B. Motivating incoming engineering students with diverse backgrounds: Assessing a summer bridge program’s impact on academic motivation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 2017, 23, 121–145.[49] Whalin, R.; Pang, Q.; Lowe, L.; Latham, J. Assessment of a summer bridge program: Seven years and counting. ASEE Annual Conference and
”, International Journal of Engineering Education, 38(5A), 2022, 1377-1388.28. Y.-C. Liu, “Renovation of a mechanical engineering senior design class to an industry-tied and team-oriented course”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 2017, 800-811.29. Y.-C. Liu and Y.-Q. Dou, “Design of an industry-tied and team-oriented course for mechanical engineering seniors”, Proceedings of ASEE SE Section Annual Conference, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, April 12-14, 2015.30. Y.-C. Liu, A. Artigue, J. Sommers, and T. Chambers, “Theo Jansen project in engineering design course and a design example”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 2011, 187-198.31. Y.-C. Liu and Y.-Q. Dou, “Design of an industry-tied and
. K. Bharti, “Real-time sign language converter for mute and deaf people,” in 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision (AIMV), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6.[33] Q. Fu, J. Fu, S. Zhang, X. Li, J. Guo, and S. Guo, “Design of intelligent human-computer interaction system for hard of hearing and non-disabled people,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 23 471–23 479, 2021.[34] T. H. Soe, F. Guribye, and M. Slavkovik, “Evaluating ai assisted subtitling,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, 2021, pp. 96–107.[35] F. Hamid Yousuf, A. Bushnaf Alwarfalli, and I. Ighneiwa, “Arabic sign language recognition system by using surface
learning communities- Understanding the role of collaborative work in an undergraduate engineering program.Learning Sciences 1. Goleman, D., McKee, A., & Waytz, A. (2017). Empathy (HBR emotional intelligence series) 2. Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic Accuracy. 3. Kvalsund, R., Baardsen, B., & Allgood, E. (2016). Mindfulness Subjectivity through Q Methodology: Training and Practising Mindfulness in an Educational Program as Influential and Transformative. 4. Lebuda, I., Zabelina, D. L., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Mind full of ideas: A meta- analysis of the mindfulness–creativity link. 5. Oxley, J. (2011). The Moral Dimensions of Empathy Limits and Applications in Ethical Theory and Practice
–13, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2102202.[2] J. Evert, “Teaching Corner: Child Family Health International: The Ethics of Asset-Based Global Health Education Programs,” J Bioeth Inq, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11673- 014-9600-x.[3] Q. G. Eichbaum, L. v. Adams, J. Evert, M. J. Ho, I. A. Semali, and S. C. van Schalkwyk, “Decolonizing Global Health Education: Rethinking Institutional Partnerships and Approaches,” Academic Medicine, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 329–335, 2021, doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003473.[4] L. Hammersley, “Community-based service-learning: Partnerships of reciprocal exchange?,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 171–s4
’ journeys navigating public-inspired science work,”2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Jul. 2021.[15] K. Anderson, S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. Nathans-Kelly, and C. Nicometo,“Understanding the current work and values of professional engineers: Implications forengineering education,” 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, pp. 14.1297.1–14.1297.17, Jun. 2009.[16] S. D. Streiner, Q. Zhu, and R. Clancy, “Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North CentralSection Conference,” in Examining the Relations between Moral Intuitions and Values amongFirst-Year Engineering Students: Implications for Culturally Responsive Ethics Education.[17] D. Kahneman and A. Deaton, “High income improves evaluation of life but not emotionalwell-being,” Proceedings of the
. Bowen, “Critical factors in the undergraduate research experience,” in Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science, New York, NY, US: Teachers College Press, 2008, pp. 172–188.[7] A. Q. Gates, P. J. Teller, A. Bernat, N. Delgado, and C. K. Della-Piana, “Expanding Participation in Undergraduate Research Using the Affinity Group Model,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 409–414, 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00467.x.[8] P. Schuster and C. Birdsong, “Research In The Undergraduate Environment,” presented at the 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2006, pp. 1-13. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/research-in-the-undergraduate-environment[9] S. Hsieh
] United States Census Bureau, "Race," 2016. [Online]. Available: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=B02001&tid=ACSDT1Y2016.B02001& hidePreview=true&tp=true. [Accessed May 21, 2020].[9] N. Grant, "Tech companies still aren’t hiring Black workers", 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-08/tech-companies-still-aren-t- hiring-black-workers. [Accessed April 16, 2020].[10] N. A. Buzzetto-More, O. Ukoha, and N. Rustagi, "Unlocking the barriers to women and minorities in computer science and information systems studies: Results from a multi- methodolical study conducted at two minority serving institutions," Journal of Information Technology Education
Dec. 2022.[7] Engine Power and Torque Curves. images.cdn.circlesix.co/image/still/uploads/posts/2016/08/58863cb65bd5ff6ed7edb03f4 1 9b51c6.gif.[8] Typical Electric Motor Torque & Power Curves. images.theconversation.com/files/269180/original/file-20190414-76843- 99pwbb.png?ixli b=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip.[9] yashastronomy. "Arduino based RPM counter with a new and faster algorithm." Arduino Project Hub, 30 Apr. 2020, create.arduino.cc/projecthub/yashastronomy/arduino-based-rpm-counter-with-a-new- and- faster-algorithm-3af9f3.Appendix 1: Data Collection and Analysis [4]
hand,refers more to how an individual self-identifies along a continuum between male and female thatincludes, but is not exclusive to, traditionally (socially constructed) feminine or masculinecharacteristics between male and female. In contrast to sex, the definition of gender is fluid andevolves over time. Some of the most common genders in modern terminology are cisgender(gender identity aligns with sex), transgender (gender identity is opposite of sex, “T”), non-binary (gender identity does not clearly align with either male or female sex, sometimes “Q”),and gender non-conforming (exhibiting behaviors that do not conform to traditional norms fortheir sex). Genders that are not binary male or female are collectively referred to as
, no. 4, pp. 583-610, 2018.[19] A. Haverkamp, A. Butler, N.S. Pelzl, M.K. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and Q. Driskill, “Exploring Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Engineering Undergraduate Experiences through Autoethnography,” In Proc. CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31764[20] K.F. Trenshaw, A. Hetrick, R.F. Oswald, S.L. Vostral, and M.C. Loui, “Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students in engineering: Climate and perceptions,” In Proc. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1238-1240, 2013. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6685028[21] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021-2022
Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, 2006. [2] J. Hattie, “Visible learning,” 2008. [3] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. A. Lundeberg, and C. F. Bunting, “Problem-based learning: Influence on students learning in an electrical engineering course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, p. 253–280, 2011. [4] R. Mayer, “How engineers learn: a study of problem-based learning in the engineering classroom and implications for course design,” [5] H. Siy, B. Dorn, C. Engelmann, N. Grandgenett, T. Reding, J.-H. Youn, and Q. Zhu, “Sparcs: A personalized problem-based learning approach for developing successful computer science learning experiences in middle school,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), 2017
.[Accessed: March 29, 2022].[9] Future Engineers. Future Engineers, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.futureengineers.org. [Accessed: March 28, 2022].[10] Invention Convention. Invention Convention Worldwide, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://inhub.thehenryford.org/icw/home. [Accessed: March 28, 2022].[11] Rube Goldberg. Rube Goldberg, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://rubegoldberg.com.[Accessed: March 28, 2022].[12] Du, X., Lundberg, A., Ayari, M. A., Naji, K. K., & Hawari, A. (2022). Examiningengineering students' perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem- and project-basedlearning using Q methodology. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 111–136. Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20430. p. 132 [Accessed: March 28, 2022
. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644- 659.Sapsford, R. (2007). Survey research (2nd ed.). Sage.Smith, N. M., Zhu, Q., Smith, J. M., & Mitcham, C. (2021). Enhancing engineering ethics: Role ethics and corporate social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00289-7Sottile, B. J., Cruz, L. E., Burleson, Y.-A. L., & McLain, K. (2021, July). It’s about time: An analysis of student activities under remote learning. Paper presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37412Sottile, B. J., Cruz, L. E., &
their major. Nazempour et al. [4] provide more details regarding the SBP structure,execution, and assessment.Summer Bridge Program for cohort III was held virtually via Zoom in the Spring of 2021 due tothe COVID-19 pandemic. During this 2-hour online workshop, cohort III of scholars becameacquainted with the program, faculty mentors, and some cohorts I and II scholars. There was alsoa Q/A session in that cohort III scholars asked questions from scholars of other cohorts andfaculties.Mentorship Program. To ensure that all scholars have access to resources and feel supported,each scholar was assigned to a faculty mentor from the academic department corresponding tothe scholar's major. Cohort I and II scholars were assigned to their faculty
theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macro-kinds, and ideologies of knowing," Linguistics and Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 291-310, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2009.08.001.[28] N. Li, Q. Wang, J. Liu, and V. J. Marsick, "Improving interdisciplinary online course design through action learning: a chinese case study," Action Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 49-64, 2022.[29] T. Wartenweiler, "Teachers’ experiences of spirituality in Swiss secular high schools – an interpretative phenomenological analysis," Journal of Beliefs & Values, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 414-429, 2022/10/02 2022, doi: 10.1080/13617672.2021.1985901.[30] C. Wood, M. D
actively contribute regardless of their academic disciplines or institution, andencouraged new ideas from diverse voices and perspectives outside of previous opportunityspaces9. Participants had significant opportunities to engage with staff members for advice duringthe ideation phase.Throughout the event, interns participated in technical talks from various staff, many of whomwere junior staff that presented their areas of work/research and facilitated a Q&A immediatelyfollowing their presentations. Students were able to then use these topics to inspire their topics,provide students exposure to new technologies, and provide networking opportunities with staff.Technical talks listed below with asterisks were topics that directly helped to
. Once participant mentioned: “The program provided the resources and the structure for me to complete my applicationpackage. The program also connected me with applicants on the same timeline as myself. Wemet several times after the program to practice our chalk talks and to perform mock interviews.We used the information from the program (written resources and the Q&A panel info) togenerate interview questions. I was very prepared for my Zoom interviews and for my in-personinterviews. This provided me with the confidence (Underrepresented groups in STEM lackconfidence during interviews).”Most and Least Useful Aspect of the SPARK ProgramAfter the program, participants were asked to report on the most and least useful aspect of theSPARK
Continuing-Generation College Students,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 62, Aug. 2019.[9] M. E. Thompson, “Grade Expectations: The Role of First-Year Grades in Predicting the Pursuit of STEM Majors for First- and Continuing-Generation Students,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 961-985[10] Q. H. Mazumder, S. Sultana, and F. Mazumder, “Correlation between Classroom Engagement and Academic Performance of Engineering Students,” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 240-247, Apr. 2020.[11] M. Polmear, A. D. Chau, and D. R. Simmons, “Intersection of Diversity, Out-of-Class Engagement, and Engineer of 2020 Outcomes for Civil Engineering Students,” Journal of
about mentoring their students,and perhaps see some techniques or skills that they would like to explore for themselves.References[1] R. D. Augustine, “Persistent and attrition of engineering students, a study of freshman and sophomore engineering students at three Midwestern universities,” 1966.[2] L. A. McDade, “Knowing the ‘right stuff’: Attrition, gender, and scientific literacy,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 93–114, 1988.[3] C. Adelman, “Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers,” 1998.[4] M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering,” J
Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, 2021.[23] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.[24] A. Loignon, “RIEF Project Advisory Board Meeting,” Aug. 17, 2022.[25] P. P. Shah, R. S. Peterson, S. L. Jones, and A. J. Ferguson, “Things Are Not Always What They Seem: The Origins and Evolution of Intragroup Conflict,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 426–474, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0001839220965186.[26] A. Loignon and S. Wormington, “Psychologically Safe for Some, but Not All? The Downsides of Assuming Shared Psychological Safety among Senior Leadership Teams,” Center for Creative